|
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 02:02 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 08:00 |
|
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 23:59 |
|
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 09:11 |
|
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 22:19 |
|
Hell yes.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 22:49 |
|
Chopsticks Express by Isaac Sachs, on Flickr
|
# ? Sep 8, 2017 15:58 |
|
psticks
|
# ? Sep 8, 2017 18:11 |
|
I saw this building and I thought of you all.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2017 03:26 |
|
|
# ? Sep 9, 2017 17:14 |
|
DSC_0771-2 by Esa Foto, on Flickr DSC_0745-2 by Esa Foto, on Flickr DSC_0585-2 by Esa Foto, on Flickr
|
# ? Sep 10, 2017 22:16 |
|
|
# ? Sep 10, 2017 23:52 |
|
Horses
Medieval Medic fucked around with this message at 12:28 on Sep 12, 2017 |
# ? Sep 11, 2017 10:42 |
|
|
# ? Sep 12, 2017 00:59 |
|
|
# ? Sep 12, 2017 01:30 |
|
v magenta highlights e: nvm, i had f.lux on
|
# ? Sep 12, 2017 01:37 |
|
|
# ? Sep 12, 2017 06:11 |
|
|
# ? Sep 12, 2017 06:22 |
|
|
# ? Sep 12, 2017 07:16 |
|
a cyberpunk goose fucked around with this message at 08:12 on Sep 12, 2017 |
# ? Sep 12, 2017 07:58 |
|
I'm sensing a theme here
|
# ? Sep 12, 2017 12:09 |
|
Gonna hijack this for a question that's been bugging me: what's the technique for a shot like this? I was set up for a sunrise last month in a spot where I thought had potential and it turned into a tire fire. Basically the foreground was pitch black and no amount of bracketing or messing with sliders could fix it (and this ignores the fact that the composition wasn't as good as I had envisioned). Is it a timing thing? Sun has to be a certain distance over the horizon to work? Or do you need a spot tilted downhill so it picks up light better? A sample if you want to see what I'm talking about : http://i.imgur.com/ihMQMUW.jpg
|
# ? Sep 12, 2017 16:10 |
|
Also, this hike owns. Did you soak your feet in upper grinnell lake? How long could you do it before your toes begged for mercy?
|
# ? Sep 12, 2017 16:12 |
|
xzzy posted:Gonna hijack this for a question that's been bugging me: what's the technique for a shot like this? I was set up for a sunrise last month in a spot where I thought had potential and it turned into a tire fire. Basically the foreground was pitch black and no amount of bracketing or messing with sliders could fix it (and this ignores the fact that the composition wasn't as good as I had envisioned). Essentially it's an HDR shot with the saturation pushed a bit. You can bracket (or use a camera with a massive DR) and get this kind of result by merging the properly exposed areas of the different shots in PS, or you can use other software that stacks it automatically but generally doesn't do as good a job. It's possible that's a single shot unbracketed if the sun had just, just came up over the horizon as well.
|
# ? Sep 12, 2017 16:14 |
|
Sludge Tank posted:I'm sensing a theme here Beautiful cars?
|
# ? Sep 12, 2017 17:16 |
|
xzzy posted:Also, this hike owns. Did you soak your feet in upper grinnell lake? How long could you do it before your toes begged for mercy? Haha nah, but I did stick my hand in, it was still pretty chilly. Stood knee-deep at Virginia Falls last year in early summer and everything below water was starting to go numb by the time I was done with the pictures.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2017 01:06 |
|
xzzy posted:Gonna hijack this for a question that's been bugging me: what's the technique for a shot like this? I was set up for a sunrise last month in a spot where I thought had potential and it turned into a tire fire. Basically the foreground was pitch black and no amount of bracketing or messing with sliders could fix it (and this ignores the fact that the composition wasn't as good as I had envisioned). VelociBacon did a decent job of explaining it, I would usually do multiple exposures but in this case it was a single exposure as I did not have a tripod with me. I think it depends on the scene really, I think your example works as is. Here is a before from lightroom to give you an idea.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2017 07:24 |
|
|
# ? Sep 13, 2017 23:53 |
|
Haven't picked up my camera in a year, I think. I just haven't been motivated to do anything, but I took a last minute trip to Reno for the hot air balloon races. Didn't get anything nearly as good as before, but here you go. 2017 Great Reno Balloon Race Moonbump Early Sunrise Launch
|
# ? Sep 14, 2017 02:32 |
|
|
# ? Sep 14, 2017 03:39 |
|
|
# ? Sep 16, 2017 19:15 |
|
Went to Colorado this weekend, decided I should move back ASAP. Untitled by Ryan Sees What, on Flickr Untitled by Ryan Sees What, on Flickr Untitled by Ryan Sees What, on Flickr
|
# ? Sep 18, 2017 04:26 |
|
copen fucked around with this message at 13:35 on Sep 18, 2017 |
# ? Sep 18, 2017 13:31 |
|
tau posted:Went to Colorado this weekend, decided I should move back ASAP. This one is cool, but you got a nasty halo along the mountain ridge. Probably from sharpening.
|
# ? Sep 18, 2017 14:52 |
|
Untitled by Tom Olson, on Flickr
|
# ? Sep 18, 2017 22:10 |
|
tau posted:
Sweet
|
# ? Sep 19, 2017 13:55 |
|
xzzy posted:This one is cool, but you got a nasty halo along the mountain ridge. Probably from sharpening. I get this a lot too, partially due to sharpening, but only really visible when you knock down the luminescence on the blue channel. If you want to take down those blue skies like you would have in back and white film with a colored filter, without filtering the camera, you've really got to watch those edges. I've done a lot of fiddly work to get rid of them. I do wonder what causes the thing. Is it oversharpening itself? Or is it an artifact of a large flat field of color that is only really firing on one of the sensor's three channels that gets strange at its edges?
|
# ? Sep 19, 2017 16:42 |
|
thetzar posted:I do wonder what causes the thing. Is it oversharpening itself? Or is it an artifact of a large flat field of color that is only really firing on one of the sensor's three channels that gets strange at its edges? Based on googling around, if it's a white band a few pixels wide that shows up along a high contrast line, it's oversharpening that does it. If you pixel peep there should be a matching dark band on the other side of the edge though it's harder to see. The sharpen feature is fundamentally using an edge detection convolution matrix to find areas of contrast and boost that contrast at a local scale. Think of what happens to an image when you use the emboss filter in Photoshop, it's sort of like that. In practice, reducing the radius or amount sliders is what fixes it.
|
# ? Sep 19, 2017 16:58 |
|
RangerScum posted:Untitled by Tom Olson, on Flickr Boom chicka bow wow. Portrait Backlit by B. B., on Flickr torgeaux fucked around with this message at 17:13 on Sep 19, 2017 |
# ? Sep 19, 2017 17:03 |
|
|
# ? Sep 20, 2017 00:27 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 08:00 |
|
xzzy posted:Based on googling around, if it's a white band a few pixels wide that shows up along a high contrast line, it's oversharpening that does it. If you pixel peep there should be a matching dark band on the other side of the edge though it's harder to see. The sharpen feature is fundamentally using an edge detection convolution matrix to find areas of contrast and boost that contrast at a local scale. Think of what happens to an image when you use the emboss filter in Photoshop, it's sort of like that. This is super helpful. Thanks. I was going nuts trying to get that halo out.
|
# ? Sep 20, 2017 02:03 |