Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Yes, that's why people were willingly doing it.

I was just saying that 90% of the blame lies with the lenders and financial institutions, but most people who bought into it with the expectation that they would flip their house or that housing can only ever go up were not blameless.

People saw a bubble and thought they could get in and make a ton of money without ever putting down any of their own money.

actually, the people making $30k a year were. if you were at that income level, and some banker dangled the impossible dream of homeownership in front of you, it'd be hard to avoid not jumping at that "opportunity"

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Spun Dog
Sep 21, 2004


Smellrose

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Yes, that's why people were willingly doing it.

I was just saying that 90% of the blame lies with the lenders and financial institutions, but most people who bought into it with the expectation that they would flip their house or that housing can only ever go up were not blameless.

People saw a bubble and thought they could get in and make a ton of money without ever putting down any of their own money.

Nah, I'm leaning more towards %100.

Taerkar
Dec 7, 2002

kind of into it, really

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Yes, that's why people were willingly doing it.

I was just saying that 90% of the blame lies with the lenders and financial institutions, but most people who bought into it with the expectation that they would flip their house or that housing can only ever go up were not blameless.

People saw a bubble and thought they could get in and make a ton of money without ever putting down any of their own money.


'Most' of those people were not anything close to the majority, or even a large minority, of homebuyers.

Paracaidas
Sep 24, 2016
Consistently Tedious!

Majorian posted:

No, it really was pretty inaccurate and misleading. No one on the left is calling for lower safety standards - they are only pointing out that Booker's excuse for capsizing a non-binding amendment is nonsense, which it is. These medications already meet our safety standards, because they were manufactured in the U.S. originally before being imported by Canada. That is why this process is calling reimportation - because we would simply be buying back the drugs that we already sold to Canada.

Again, as it was a non-binding amendment to a budget appropriations bill that he voted down, and [url=http://maplight.org/data/passthrough/#legacyurl=http://classic.maplight.org/us-congress/interest/H4300given how much money he gets from Big Pharma,[/url] it's not exactly a stretch to deduce why Booker voted the way he did. He's a massive whore for Big Pharma.


It did not need safety provisions, because the drugs were manufactured in the U.S. and already met the safety standards. It wasn't even a bill; it was a non-binding amendment. Get your facts straight.

The text of the amendment posted:

EC. 3___. DEFICIT-NEUTRAL RESERVE FUND RELATING TO LOWERING PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICES FOR AMERICANS BY IMPORTING DRUGS FROM CANADA.

The Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the Senate may revise the allocations of a committee or committees, aggregates, and other appropriate levels in this resolution for one or more bills, joint resolutions, amendments,amendments between the Houses, motions, or conference reports relating to lowering prescription drug prices, including through the importation of safe and affordable prescription drugs from Canada by American pharmacists, wholesalers, and individuals with a valid prescription from a provider licensed to practice in the United States, by the amounts provided in such legislation for those purposes, provided that such legislation would not increase the deficit over either the period of the total of fiscal years 2017 through 2021 or the period of the total of fiscal years 2017 through 2026.

At no point in the text is country of origin mentioned (it's not reimportation) Safety is only mentioned as "safe and affordable", which is especially vacuous, even for a non-binding amendment. One of us is certainly being "inaccurate and misleading" here.


Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

What is the logic of Booker voting against one reimportation amendment and for another one in the same day if he was voting against the first one to send a message?
It flows if you start from "Booker is corrupted by corporate contributions". Less so if you start from any other perspective.

I want to double back to your points later, fetish and hellblazer, but now my battery is dying. Generally, there was enough shitflinging in the primaries that we needn't invent new slurs against each other(refer to Condiv's initial point and defense of it). Similarly, Maj, when someone specifies a group, there's no need to rush in and apply the statement to other groups that it specifically is not targeted at. These two behaviors are why these conversations turn so acrimonious.

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

Xae posted:

Why have more people vote against the bill than are necessary to kill it?

Well, for starters, I'm sure the fact that Booker, Murray, and Casey are among the top ten recipients of money from the pharmaceutical industry, and their vote on this bill, is purely coincidental.

botany
Apr 27, 2013

by Lowtax

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Even the most financially-illiterate person should probably have known that something was up when they were denied by every bank for any traditional mortgage, but offered a $425,000 mortgage with 3% down on a $30,000 a year salary.

How some of those loans were ever approved is beyond belief.

why would you assume they ever got denied? a whole lot of people were first targeted for homeownership during the bubble, they didn't get denied earlier. then there's the scores of people who were straight-up scammed, like people thinking they were getting a fixed rate mortgage only to find later that they were sitting on an adjustable-rate one. and the reason NINJA mortgages were approved is because they made everyone a shitload of money. the people who got them were expecting to flip the house in the short term, the banks who signed them passed them off to the financial industry, the financial industry figured out that AIG was offering CDS protection on them at a price that literally made them money just for sitting on the instruments, AIG figured out that they could make millions betting on MBS. the whole thing was a clusterfuck on all levels, and just about the only people who are genuinely not to blame are low-income people who got got with offers of mortgages at great rates without ever being told what was actually going on.

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.
That's why I go 100% on the financial industry too.

Plenty of people were outright lied to and scammed on these loans, and would have understood if they got declined.

It's not on the borrower to perform due diligence on the loan. It's on the lender, which is why they can charge interest, as they assume the risk.

Saying "well borrowers should have known better" is pure victim blaming poo poo.

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

Paracaidas posted:

At no point in the text is country of origin mentioned (it's not reimportation) Safety is only mentioned as "safe and affordable", which is especially vacuous, even for a non-binding amendment. One of us is certainly being "inaccurate and misleading" here.

Yes, it's still you. The notion that Booker was protecting anyone but his major donors from a lack of safety provisions in a non-binding amendment is pretty absurd. The guy's bought-and-sold for.

Taerkar
Dec 7, 2002

kind of into it, really

There's more than a tinge of 'The victim consumers should have educated themselves beforehand' libertarianism involved too.

LITERALLY MY FETISH
Nov 11, 2010


Raise Chris Coons' taxes so that we can have Medicare for All.

Hellblazer187 posted:

There's a strain of leftism that wants to believe "no war but the class war," and in so doing they do not give proper attention to issues of racial equality. That is a far, far cry from "calling minimum wage increases racist."

Your statement being true does not preclude my statement from being true.

Another way of putting it: There's a strain of center leftism that wants to believe "no war but the race war" and in doing so they do not give proper attention to issues of economic equality.

This does not mean you're one of them.

socialsecurity
Aug 30, 2003

LITERALLY MY FETISH posted:

Your statement being true does not preclude my statement from being true.

Another way of putting it: There's a strain of center leftism that wants to believe "no war but the race war" and in doing so they do not give proper attention to issues of economic equality.

This does not mean you're one of them.

I'm not sure I've ever met anyone who focuses on race issues but not class especially since they are very intertwined.

Ralepozozaxe
Sep 6, 2010

A Veritable Smorgasbord!

7c Nickel posted:

Even up in Georgia, Irma is no joke.



Taken on my walk to buy noodles.

It seems like the person taking this picture was more fixated on the missing mailbox than the huge tree that was ripped in half in front of an elementary school.

Push El Burrito
May 9, 2006

Soiled Meat

Ralepozozaxe posted:

It seems like the person taking this picture was more fixated on the missing mailbox than the huge tree that was ripped in half in front of an elementary school.

A tree falling over is nature.

Mailbox theft is a federal crime.

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

socialsecurity posted:

I'm not sure I've ever met anyone who focuses on race issues but not class especially since they are very intertwined.

Really? That was a defining characteristic of the Clinton '16 campaign. (which was ironically a 180 from her "white working class" focus in 2008)

The Ol Spicy Keychain
Jan 17, 2013

I MEPHISTO MY OWN ASSHOLE
e - nvm

The Ol Spicy Keychain fucked around with this message at 21:42 on Sep 11, 2017

Khisanth Magus
Mar 31, 2011

Vae Victus

socialsecurity posted:

I'm not sure I've ever met anyone who focuses on race issues but not class especially since they are very intertwined.

There was a gently caress ton of "we should never bother with all these things to help poor people until we have solved racism", even on SA, during the primary. Strangely none of those people could actually come up with ways to magically fix racism, only that it had to somehow be done before we could do anything at all about "class issues".

socialsecurity
Aug 30, 2003

Majorian posted:

Really? That was a defining characteristic of the Clinton '16 campaign. (which was ironically a 180 from her "white working class" focus in 2008)

Are you seriously saying that the Clinton campaign had 0 plans for the economy or class issues?

Taerkar
Dec 7, 2002

kind of into it, really

Hoo boy.

Y'all are trying to get USPOL killed quickly with your leakage.

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


Push El Burrito posted:

A tree falling over is nature.

Mailbox theft is a federal crime.

if the hurricane is shot enough do you think it could be arrested?

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

socialsecurity posted:

Are you seriously saying that the Clinton campaign had 0 plans for the economy or class issues?

No, but she and her campaign didn't run on these issues, either. Her default answer to questions about economic justice was, "Check my webpage." And it's one thing to back a strategy that ultimately fails; I can pretty readily forgive someone who admits that they backed the wrong horse. But the fact that so many of her big-time fans, like Joy Ann Reid, still insist that the Democrats need to jettison the working class in favor of city-dwellers in order to win elections, is pretty galling.

Tatsuta Age
Apr 21, 2005

so good at being in trouble


7c Nickel posted:

Even up in Georgia, Irma is no joke.



Taken on my walk to buy noodles.

How'd the noodles turn out

cargo cult
Aug 28, 2008

by Reene

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

This past week and today have had a wave of potential congressional retirements.

Many of them are in safe seats, but the less incumbency there is in 2018 the more uncertain the results could be.

There's a bunch of news out today about potential Senate retirements:

:siren: Senator Mitt Romney and Senator Kid Rock will be a thing in 2018. :siren:

Senate


Orin Hatch (R-UT)

Reports say that Hatch plans to retire and Mitt Romney will run for his Senate seat in Utah.

https://twitter.com/HotlineJosh/status/907233581763907590

Bob Corker (R-TN)

Says he is considering retirement and will make an announcement. Politico says it is "likely" that he retires.

Tom Carper (D-DE)

Usually one of the strongest fundraisers in the Senate, but only has $30,000 in his account.

Won't commit to running again and will "speak to the boss (my wife) and let you know at the start of next year about where the future takes me."

Diane Feinstein (D-CA)

Husband is ill, she is in her 80's, won't commit to running again and will make an announcement "after determining the needs" of her family.

Robert Menendez (D-NJ)

Going to be a forced retirement if he is convicted in his criminal trial.

Bernie Sanders (I-VT)

Old. Won't commit to re-election, but says he is leaning towards running again.
I cant tell if it's a good or bad thing that so many Rs across bot h houses are indicating they want to retire. Will they be replaced by literal Nazis?

PhazonLink
Jul 17, 2010
"Will they be replaced by literal Nazis? "

Yes.


Evil abhors a vacuum.(though MRAs love vacuum cleaners)

Quorum
Sep 24, 2014

REMIND ME AGAIN HOW THE LITTLE HORSE-SHAPED ONES MOVE?
It's not surprising that so many old-school Republicans are seeking to get out of Dodge. Anyone not firmly aligned with the Trump wing faces a Morton's Fork come the next general election, either angry primary voters cast them out of the party, or they face an uphill battle in the general.

skeleton warrior
Nov 12, 2016


oh, hey, another thread full of Majoran and Condiv telling us why Bernie Was Right And Would Have Won

Hooray

Pembroke Fuse
Dec 29, 2008

skeleton warrior posted:

oh, hey, another thread full of Majoran and Condiv telling us why Bernie Was Right And Would Have Won

Hooray

I wish we could lock Hillary and Bernie in a sound-proof room. Forever. And then get on with the very hard task of trying to elect Dems while shifting the overton window to the left.

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


skeleton warrior posted:

oh, hey, another thread full of Majoran and Condiv telling us why Bernie Was Right And Would Have Won

Hooray

actually i haven't mentioned bernie at all

till this post at least

skeleton warrior
Nov 12, 2016


Condiv posted:

actually i haven't mentioned bernie at all

till this post at least

Good point, all of your posts have been "Hillary was wrong and you should have voted for someone else but not Donald Trump or Gary Johnson or Jill Stein but I don't know who that other person would be I guess you should figure it out yourself"

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


skeleton warrior posted:

Good point, all of your posts have been "Hillary was wrong and you should have voted for someone else but not Donald Trump or Gary Johnson or Jill Stein but I don't know who that other person would be I guess you should figure it out yourself"

sorry, none of that either

you're actually the one bringing that poo poo in here

congratulations?

Taerkar
Dec 7, 2002

kind of into it, really

Pembroke Fuse posted:

I wish we could lock Hillary and Bernie in a sound-proof room. Forever. And then get on with the very hard task of trying to elect Dems while shifting the overton window to the left.

Locking Bernie up wouldn't solve anything. It's mostly those using him as a club to attack That Witch Hillary, Destroyer of Leftist Hope.

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


Taerkar posted:

Locking Bernie up wouldn't solve anything. It's mostly those using him as a club to attack That Witch Hillary, Destroyer of Leftist Hope.

she's done enough to attack herself recently imo

Pembroke Fuse
Dec 29, 2008

Taerkar posted:

Locking Bernie up wouldn't solve anything. It's mostly those using him as a club to attack That Witch Hillary, Destroyer of Leftist Hope.

Hillary and Bernie are at this point both seriously divisive well-poisoners who need to bow out of the lime-light and put their energy into behind-the-scenes work. I've seen enough arguments on Twitter and dKos that amount to cult of personality poo poo (Hillary/Bernie fanfiction, each side accusing the other of being corporate/Russian shills, etc, etc).

Khisanth Magus
Mar 31, 2011

Vae Victus

Pembroke Fuse posted:

Hillary and Bernie are at this point both seriously divisive well-poisoners who need to bow out of the lime-light and put their energy into behind-the-scenes work. I've seen enough arguments on Twitter and dKos that amount to cult of personality poo poo (Hillary/Bernie fanfiction, each side accusing the other of being corporate/Russian shills, etc, etc).

According to the very reputable supermarket checkout tabloids, Hillary has admitted to being the mastermind behind the whole Russia thing!

1-800-DOCTORB
Nov 6, 2009

7c Nickel posted:

Even up in Georgia, Irma is no joke.



Taken on my walk to buy noodles.

I can't unsee it.

Killer-of-Lawyers
Apr 22, 2008

THUNDERDOME LOSER 2020
At this point I hope whoever runs to the left of center in the next election makes a clean break from clinton and sanders. Theres plenty of less controversal and tribalism inducing names to signal what power bloc you are courting with out drawing the infighting out. More importantly there are a lot more younger politicians to signal with.

Like Keith Ellison, who signals left and can nip some poc concerns too.

Young dems, socialists, and in general not evil nazis are the future. Lets build them up.

Teddybear
May 16, 2009

Look! A teddybear doll!
It's soooo cute!


Killer-of-Lawyers posted:

At this point I hope whoever runs to the left of center in the next election makes a clean break from clinton and sanders. Theres plenty of less controversal and tribalism inducing names to signal what power bloc you are courting with out drawing the infighting out. More importantly there are a lot more younger politicians to signal with.

Like Keith Ellison, who signals left and can nip some poc concerns too.

Young dems, socialists, and in general not evil nazis are the future. Lets build them up.

You really think this country is ready to elect a Muslim president in Ellison? I mean, I think we can do a lot, but I don't think that we're there yet.

The Muppets On PCP
Nov 13, 2016

by Fluffdaddy

Pembroke Fuse posted:

Hillary and Bernie are at this point both seriously divisive well-poisoners who need to bow out of the lime-light and put their energy into behind-the-scenes work.

"both sides! both sides!" i continue to insist as i slowly shrink and transform into an msnbc anchor

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

skeleton warrior posted:

oh, hey, another thread full of Majoran and Condiv telling us why Bernie Was Right And Would Have Won

Hooray

I too remember when Bernie Sanders wrote a memoir after the election that blamed his loss on everyone but himself and his campaign advisors. Clearly it's the left-Dems that are the problem.

shrike82
Jun 11, 2005

Good job on the usual suspects killing the first USPOL in a while because they can't keep themselves to the bad dem thread.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

Teddybear posted:

You really think this country is ready to elect a Muslim president in Ellison? I mean, I think we can do a lot, but I don't think that we're there yet.

For the people that'd care about a Muslim president there already has been one.

  • Locked thread