Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
thrawn527
Mar 27, 2004

Thrawn/Pellaeon
Studying the art of terrorists
To keep you safe

Waffles Inc. posted:

what leads me to believe otherwise? we don't see anything of the republic in tfa except for the people before they get blown away

evidence that the republic isn't destroyed
- the assumption that it contains more than five planets or that the destruction of those five planets is inconsequential to its survival

evidence that the republic is destroyed
- the visual language of the film
- a character's dialogue
- the other characters' reactions

Then yeah, we're going to have to disagree. To me, the film series showing us a Republic of thousands of planets/systems being replaced by an Empire of roughly the same size, being replaced by another organization also known as the Republic implies to me that they would also have thousands of planets/systems. Or if the First Order had been splitting the galaxy, I could at least see hundreds or something. Only 5 planets would mean they were a comically small organization in the Star Wars universe.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

jivjov
Sep 13, 2007

But how does it taste? Yummy!
Dinosaur Gum

Waffles Inc. posted:

my dude i can't stress enough how little of a drat i give about books or extended materials or whatever the hell

based on what we see in the film, this is what happens

hux has his nuremberg rally speech:

"today is the end of the republic. the end of a regime that acquieces to disorder. at this moment in a system far from here the new republic lies to the galaxy while secretely supporting the treachery of the loathsome resistance. this fierce regime which you have built will bring an end to the senate, their cherished fleet. all remaining systems will bow to this new order and will remember this as the last of the republic"

what we then see is a big beam shoot off and split into five beams and we see those beams destroy planets, one of which gets a close-up panic shot of people in fancy clothes, who we presume to be like, politicians

if we follow the visual and verbal language of the film, the first order destroyed the republic. it happened in this movie.

You seriously think that that one system was the entirety of Republic space? And that every single Republic citizen lived there?

Even compared to just the other films, that's dumb. Coruscant was not the entire Republic back in the prequels. What do you think all those senators and whatnot were representing?

The Republic has hundreds, if not thousands, of worlds.

Waffles Inc.
Jan 20, 2005

Mechafunkzilla posted:

Don't the characters mention several times that the entire Republic fleet was blown up?

so when finn gets to the not-yavin 4 base he meets up with poe and they talk to leia

poe: finn's familiar with the weapon that destroyed the hosnian system; he worked on the base
leia: we're desperate for anything you can tell us

then some gal patronizes chewie

then 3p0 talks about the luke map

then bb8 rolls up to r2 and it's legit sad because bb8 and r2 rule :(

then han and leia have a nice scene about kylo

it cuts away to rey being captive

when we cut back to the base we get some info about the death star

snap: they've somehow built a hyper-lightspeed weapon within the planet itself

they talk some more then they get a message that tells them that the fo is charging the death star again

3p0: oh my, without the republic fleet, we're doomed

then they talk about the weakness (the ~thermal oscillator~)

so no, not multiple times

jivjov posted:

You seriously think that that one system was the entirety of Republic space? And that every single Republic citizen lived there?

Even compared to just the other films, that's dumb. Coruscant was not the entire Republic back in the prequels. What do you think all those senators and whatnot were representing?

The Republic has hundreds, if not thousands, of worlds.

you're not understanding what i'm saying i don't think

ok so hux literally says "today is the end of the republic" and "...will bring an end to the senate and their cherished fleet"

and then shoots the thing. they don't shoot again. presumably hux and the FO think that the shot they just did is going to accomplish what was in his speech.

is he wrong? surely hux knows more about the republic than we do because he's thinking that "today is the end of the republic"

Waffles Inc. fucked around with this message at 19:56 on Sep 14, 2017

jivjov
Sep 13, 2007

But how does it taste? Yummy!
Dinosaur Gum
You can literally see the fleet getting destroyed along with the planets. That's on screen.

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

Hux: Today is the end of the Republic. The end of a regime that acquiesces to disorder. At this very moment in a system far from here, the New Republic lies to the galaxy while secretly supporting the treachery of the rogues of the Resistance. This fierce machine which you have built, upon which we stand will bring an end to the Senate, to their cherished fleet. All remaining systems will bow to the First Order and will remember this as the last day of the Republic!


Interpret that as not many more systems. It's vague tho.

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

Waffles you replied to me in nested quotes which I can't cope with on a phone .

No I don't think it is bad storytelling because the story was adequately told. I dont think it was bad movie making either especially since information is being communicated visually .

Waffles Inc.
Jan 20, 2005

euphronius posted:

Waffles you replied to me in nested quotes which I can't cope with on a phone .

No I don't think it is bad storytelling because the story was adequately told. I dont think it was bad movie making either especially since information is being communicated visually .

sorry 'bout that, i don't like nesting quotes all that much myself

but yeah, i can dig, we just disagree about the efficacy of what's being communicated i guess

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

How the gently caress can a worm live in a asteroid field

What is it eating ???

thrawn527
Mar 27, 2004

Thrawn/Pellaeon
Studying the art of terrorists
To keep you safe

euphronius posted:

How the gently caress can a worm live in a asteroid field

What is it eating ???

Well it tried to eat the Falcon. So maybe spaceships? It can't get much though, so, like the Sarlacc, it doesn't really make any drat sense.

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

Spaceships would be stupid to go into an asteroid field !!

Bongo Bill
Jan 17, 2012

In the preceding film, there was a shot of something that represents an entity also called The Republic, which consisted of thousands of glowing objects representing the worlds that constitute it. This establishes the scale of the setting: the galaxy is large.

Unlike A New Hope, the conflict in The Force Awakens is trilateral. The relative powers of the belligerents aren't really established. The lack of clarity of the actions happening exacerbates it but is orthogonal to the bigger problem.

Here is what summarizes it for me:

If the Rebels had failed and the Death Star blew up their base, what would have happened next in the Star War?

If the Resistance had failed and Starkiller blew up their base, what would have happened next in the Star War?

Would the war be over? Would it just be the beginning? Would it escalate? De-escalate?

Which of these answers has stronger textual support?

General Dog
Apr 26, 2008

Everybody's working for the weekend
I guess what I've been getting at is that if the point of Starkiller was to "even the playing field", and we're supposed to believe that- even with a large portion of the Republic fleet gone- the First Order can project enough strength to threaten a large portion of the galaxy before the Republic systems can retool for war, then that's loving stupid; it's too much of a leap.

Waffles Inc.
Jan 20, 2005

not that it matters all that much, but is there any interview or insight from JJ or one of the tfa writers or anything why Leia's group had to be the resistance and not just like, straight up the republic? I just don't understand that

it seems to slavishly devoted to having the same power dichotomy of the OT

i mean yes, i can charitably see what they might have been going for: leia being a sort of cassandra-esque figure who loses her credibility and career because of her constant warning about the empire, but i only know all of that through reading the new novels and poo poo

Waffles Inc. fucked around with this message at 20:23 on Sep 14, 2017

thrawn527
Mar 27, 2004

Thrawn/Pellaeon
Studying the art of terrorists
To keep you safe

Waffles Inc. posted:

not that it matters all that much, but is there any interview or insight from JJ or one of the tfa writers or anything why Leia's group had to be the resistance and not just like, straight up the republic? I just don't understand that

it seems to slavishly devoted to having the same power dichotomy of the OT

thrawn527 posted:

Oh right, the novelization probably talked about Starkiller Base in more detail.

The EU does go into the state of the Republic, and Leia's situation a bit, and I wish some of it had ended up in the movie. The Republic is now largely demilitarized, lead by a bunch of people in the new government being tired of all these Star Wars. Also First Order sympathizers putting their finger on the scales a bit. They have (had, after Starkiller) a fleet, but not a large one. Leia has been trying to do just what you say and use the resources of the Republic, but during a large political battle, someone leaked that she was the daughter of Darth Vader (this is how Ben found out about this as well, she hadn't told him yet), and it destroyed her credibility and image in the Republic. So she gathered what support she could from friends like Ackbar and formed the Resistance to be a splinter group doing what it could to stop the First Order. This is all from the novel Bloodline.

I know the novelization goes into a bit more, but all I know is that when you see the Republic home world destroyed, it focuses on one woman specifically looking up in horror. This woman works for Leia (and was a character in Bloodline), and she was there arguing Leia's cause in her absence (it's believed that if she showed up herself, someone would try to assassinate her). But any scenes with her beyond this were unfortunately cut.

The Force Awakens has some problems, no doubt. Like this stuff should have been in the movie. But it's not, so if you actually do want to know what's happening, it's this. If you just want to criticize the movie for not having it, go ahead.

It should also be noted that Rian Johnson worked with the author of Bloodlines to make sure some stuff was in that book to help set up The Last Jedi, so that movie might go more into it.

No interview, but the story group is deeply entrenched in Lucasfilm now, and as I say here, Rian Johnson was involved in at least some of the plot of this book.

thrawn527 fucked around with this message at 20:25 on Sep 14, 2017

General Dog
Apr 26, 2008

Everybody's working for the weekend

Waffles Inc. posted:

not that it matters all that much, but is there any interview or insight from JJ or one of the tfa writers or anything why Leia's group had to be the resistance and not just like, straight up the republic? I just don't understand that

it seems to slavishly devoted to having the same power dichotomy of the OT

From posts itt about the books, I think it's something to the effect that the member systems of the Republic are largely tired of fighting the remnants of the Empire and don't take them seriously enough to want to expend the effort to finish the job. Thus the Republic votes to make peace, but some of the higher ups (not very subtly) commission this CIA Black OPs bullshit to break Imperial control of their remaining systems.

Waffles Inc.
Jan 20, 2005

so based on all of that i'm wondering where that leaves us with tlj

it's gotta be essentially the ESB status quo right? with the republic destroyed the resistance is all that's left, and based on the casino stuff i guess they're going after the fo's purse?

Waffles Inc. fucked around with this message at 20:37 on Sep 14, 2017

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

It's status quo ante .

And we will all find out together !!

thrawn527
Mar 27, 2004

Thrawn/Pellaeon
Studying the art of terrorists
To keep you safe

Waffles Inc. posted:

so based on all of that i'm wondering where that leaves us with tlj

it's gotta be essentially the ESB status queue right? with the republic destroyed the resistance is all that's left, and based on the casino stuff i guess they're going after the fo's purse?

Honestly I don't know. I think you're going to see a severely weakened Republic, with it's head cut off and no military, absorb the Resistance into the Republic as it's new military. Leading to friction on who is really in charge now. I'm guessing that's where Laura Dern's character will come in, as an internal antagonist to Leia. Though I guess the Vanity Fair article says she's someone high up in the Resistance, so maybe not.

But no one really knows yet.

jivjov
Sep 13, 2007

But how does it taste? Yummy!
Dinosaur Gum
https://twitter.com/hamillhimself/status/908421456874283008

Bigger Luke is Canon

Taintrunner
Apr 10, 2017

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Milky Moor posted:

Star Wars Explained is some kind of Disney guerilla marketing thing, right?

They have a Patreon, so no. Lego sent them a Snowspeeder kit to giveaway once, though.

Craptacular!
Jul 9, 2001

Fuck the DH

just another posted:

It'd be neat to see Luke become a de facto Sith Lord opposite Rey as a consequence of a murderous belief that the Jedi must be destroyed in order to end the cycle and bring balance to the Force.

Not all Dark Jedi are Sith lords. I can't be Luke being a Sith, but I can see him going to dark side to try to keep the Jedi as an old relic that dies with him. Aside from which, the Sith are known for the "rule of two", Dark Jedi aren't, and I think the whole point, especially if you have him kill of Kylo Ren, is "no apprentices". Wishing his own family to rule at his side was Vader's mistake (this is actually what Snoke is teaching Ren and why Ren is killing off relatives), and training a psychopath was Luke's. Luke killing Ren would address the failures of two generations.

UmOk
Aug 3, 2003

Waffles Inc. posted:


"you're safe. when we heard about alderaan we feared the worst"
"we've got no time for our sorrows, commander. you must use the information in this R2 unit to plan the attack. it's our only hope."
?

Dude: I heard about Alderan and your family dead.
Leelu: lol ain't nobody got time for that

The MSJ
May 17, 2010

https://twitter.com/cavanscott/status/908368681721266176

https://twitter.com/ChuckWendig/status/908352488847364098

https://twitter.com/garywhitta/status/908366485222858752

https://twitter.com/DelReyStarWars/status/908376126690660353

https://twitter.com/ek_johnston/status/908358778504073221

https://twitter.com/ChristieGolden/status/908353693048647680

https://twitter.com/CharlesSoule/status/908386131170996225

just another
Oct 16, 2009

these dead towns that make the maps wrong now

Craptacular! posted:

Not all Dark Jedi are Sith lords. I can't be Luke being a Sith, but I can see him going to dark side to try to keep the Jedi as an old relic that dies with him. Aside from which, the Sith are known for the "rule of two", Dark Jedi aren't, and I think the whole point, especially if you have him kill of Kylo Ren, is "no apprentices". Wishing his own family to rule at his side was Vader's mistake (this is actually what Snoke is teaching Ren and why Ren is killing off relatives), and training a psychopath was Luke's. Luke killing Ren would address the failures of two generations.

Yep, sorry. Was being lazy using the term Sith. I just meant it would be (potentially) interesting to see Luke's desire to break the cycle become pathological in its own right.

ungulateman
Apr 18, 2012

pretentious fuckwit who isn't half as literate or insightful or clever as he thinks he is

:getin:

thrawn527
Mar 27, 2004

Thrawn/Pellaeon
Studying the art of terrorists
To keep you safe


Aaaand my excitement for this collection just died. These are bad. And they're what they chose to reveal as good examples. Oh my.

Shrimp or Shrimps
Feb 14, 2012


Had no idea that Star Wars blasters could be set to kill or not-kill.

jivjov
Sep 13, 2007

But how does it taste? Yummy!
Dinosaur Gum

Shrimp or Shrimps posted:

Had no idea that Star Wars blasters could be set to kill or not-kill.

Did you not watch the original film?

Ingmar terdman
Jul 24, 2006

I want a story about the guy who drives the space truck dragging the big yellow words at the beginning of Star Wars.

Just a reminder that unless I'm grossly misremembering, the "look sir droids" stormtrooper got an EU novel where he got demoted to Combing The Desert & Not Finding poo poo duty because he told his supervisor that AT-ATs might get tripped by a wire.

Bongo Bill
Jan 17, 2012

Shrimp or Shrimps posted:

Had no idea that Star Wars blasters could be set to kill or not-kill.

Sounds like you need to watch the first ten minutes of A New Hope again.

thrawn527
Mar 27, 2004

Thrawn/Pellaeon
Studying the art of terrorists
To keep you safe

Shrimp or Shrimps posted:

Had no idea that Star Wars blasters could be set to kill or not-kill.

Yeah, this is a weird thing to not know.

Shrimp or Shrimps
Feb 14, 2012


And the crazy thing is, I just re-watched A New Hope (and the rest of the 6) prior to TFA!

The MSJ
May 17, 2010

I hope the Stormtrooper story is about his life-and-death struggle being surrounded by Rebel soldiers after his teammates died. Then in the end he triumphantly walks out and gets choked to death by Vader for disobeying orders.

El Burbo
Oct 10, 2012

Finally, I can hear the droid racist's side of the story

Mr President
Nov 13, 2016

by Lowtax

thrawn527 posted:

At the beginning of ESB, when Luke is captured by the Wampa, he sees his lightsaber just out of reach. He then closes his eyes, reaches out, and uses telekinetic powers to pull the lightsaber towards him. This broke the suspension of disbelief, because that was an entirely new power never mentioned before in a Star Wars movie. Theater goers left the theater furious, and The Empire Strikes Back went on to be known as the movie that killed Star Wars. One angry viewer was quoted as saying, "That's not how the Force works!"

Not really Vader used force choke in the first one so it was already clearly established that the force gives Jedis special powers. It was described as an energy field. TFA was just lazy story telling. Like if the Hosnian system was so close to Maz's remote outpost where people who don't want to be found hang out why didn't Han just fly to Hosnia Prime and drop Finn and Rey with the Republic?

Mr President fucked around with this message at 03:07 on Sep 15, 2017

thrawn527
Mar 27, 2004

Thrawn/Pellaeon
Studying the art of terrorists
To keep you safe

Mr President posted:

Not really Vader used force choke in the first one so it was already clearly established that the force gives Jedis special powers. It was described as an energy field. TFA was just lazy story telling. Like if the Hosnian system was so close to Maz's remote outpost where people who don't want to be found hang out why didn't Han just fly to Hosnia Prime and drop Finn and Rey with the Republic?

Being able to use the dark side of the force to literally choke the life out of someone is wildly different than using telekinesis to pull an object towards you. It was a new thing the Force could do, introduced in a sequel.

The whole, "How could they see the Starkiller Base blast from where they were," is a real big "Who the hell cares?" moment for me. It's like when Neil Degrasse Tyson puts out an article about the scientific inaccuracies of The Force Awakens. Pencils down, NGT, who the hell cares?

Winifred Madgers
Feb 12, 2002

I care.

Sio
Jan 20, 2007

better red than dead

thrawn527 posted:

Being able to use the dark side of the force to literally choke the life out of someone is wildly different than using telekinesis to pull an object towards you.

What do you think he's choking them with if not telekinesis?

Neo Rasa
Mar 8, 2007
Everyone should play DUKE games.

:dukedog:

thrawn527 posted:

The whole, "How could they see the Starkiller Base blast from where they were," is a real big "Who the hell cares?" moment for me. It's like when Neil Degrasse Tyson puts out an article about the scientific inaccuracies of The Force Awakens. Pencils down, NGT, who the hell cares?

Agreed on this. I have my nitpicks about Force Awakens but I when that happened in my mind I was just like "drat these energy blast things are loving gigantic" without trying to calculate the exact distance of everything and how that would work in real life or whatever.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

SuperMechagodzilla
Jun 9, 2007

NEWT REBORN

Varam posted:

What do you think he's choking them with if not telekinesis?

Fear.

  • Locked thread