|
If Bradford ends up not playing I am going to be so mad. One week of good play, then knee issues again.
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 15:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 04:41 |
|
|
Oh look a tweet that said he is already going to locker room after warmups. Never even dropped back at all.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 15:38
|
|
|
yeah I'm not happy between having him being my backup to Luck in another league and having Diggs in this one
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 16:35
|
|
|
Someone respond to me and trade me a damm qb. First Down Syndrome.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 16:57
|
|
|
sorry, it's only 9 am here and I was up puking last night I'm on chat now
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 17:15
|
|
|
I am going to score much less than one hundred points today because my team is not goodBloody posted:I am going to score much less than one hundred points today because my team is not good Furthermore i am got to lose to a team with five quarterbacks none of whom are starting caliber Bloody fucked around with this message at 20:42 on Sep 17, 2017 |
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 17:22
|
|
|
Can we allow people to leave slots blank in the lineup? Forcing me to start bradford so I am 100% unable to make a trade isnt helpful.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 18:39
|
|
|
Bloody posted:I am going to score much less than one hundred points today because my team is not good How the heck did I quote this post into an edit of itself my god
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 20:43
|
|
|
poo poo. why'd i cut JJ Nelson this is jamison crowder all over again
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 21:09
|
|
|
crabtree 
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 22:10
|
|
|
Spermy Smurf posted:Can we allow people to leave slots blank in the lineup? yeah if we don't have a rule about it I think you should be allowed
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 22:11
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 23:06
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:crabtree ...and I'm still gonna lose, because apparently jaquizz and jalen are better than bell and miller Leperflesh fucked around with this message at 23:41 on Sep 17, 2017 |
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 23:34
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:...and I'm still gonna lose, because apparently jaquizz and jalen are better than bell and miller At least they outperformed starting RB Jordan Howard. Who didn't quite manage 1 yard per carry.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2017 02:06
|
|
|
jfc this is so close adams gets a catch, then burnett gets half a tackle, we're like one or two points apart and just not seperating
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2017 03:56
|
|
|
noooooo gently caress well that's that
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2017 04:09
|
|
|
Sorry guy who emailed me about trading for Siemian, I didn't check that email account from Saturday night until today. If you had posted in the thread or PMed me here I might have responded in time. Though I'm no longer sure if he's my worst QB since Carson Palmer loving sucks and the Cardinals are loving stupid for not having a young guy waiting in the wings.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2017 15:55
|
|
|
I'm looking to upgrade my defense. I have some combination of picks/rookies/starters available. Given current roster depths/etc, it is harder for defense to be as much value above replacement as top tier offensive players with like 5 exceptions, though. Send me your thoughts!
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2017 18:10
|
|
|
Well, I'm playing your Titoons this week, so I probably don't want to help you out, but definitely hit me up next week if you don't find what you need.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2017 18:27
|
|
|
Can we fix this QB lock thing immediately? If I was able to trade for a qb who put up 20 I would have won.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2017 10:54
|
|
|
rebuild my rear end Flacco is available if anyone wants him
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2017 18:21
|
|
|
Yeah if Teemu and you agree, I'm turning off the "can't submit an incomplete lineup" thing. There's nothing in our rules about it. e. The system is already set with "partial lineups allowed" set to Yes, so I'm confused now, I thought that'd be the thing? e2: can anyone make sense of this? http://www64.myfantasyleague.com/2017/support?L=79286&FAQ=1062 These are the current settings 
Leperflesh fucked around with this message at 18:42 on Sep 19, 2017 |
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2017 18:37
|
|
|
Has it been 7 days Leper? If so, I am going to steal your last qb from the taxi and start him. Keeping the first qb taken from the board on your taxi is daring.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2017 18:54
|
|
|
Also going to steal Perine from Team McLean and start him this week.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2017 18:55
|
|
|
Spermy Smurf posted:Has it been 7 days Leper? Trubisky? But he's not even playing, lol
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2017 19:07
|
|
|
True story though I just moved Olsen onto IR, they hadn't designated him as Out yet when I looked yesterday, and I was fiddling around with waiver options and forgot to promote Trub. I mean you outright told me last week you'd be trying to steal him. My mistake, though, he's there and therefore he's stealable. But I feel also like you're basically intentionally tanking your season at this point, because you could have picked up a waiver wire QB last week and didn't, even after I indicated I was gonna start Deshaun you had saturday waivers to grab glennon or hoyer or somebody. You just want my guys and you're mad at me for hording QBs and you're gonna make me lose another week to keep my rookies. That's fine. I'll start loving trubisky. I wasn't planning on tanking this season, but I won't be bullied either. I spent my entire draft capital on these rookie QBs, I'm not gonna let them get stolen in the first three weeks.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2017 19:14
|
|
|
I don't remember when the first Bradford q sign went up, but I thought he was starting until he didn't personally. I would maybe say FCFS (haven't played only, $2 minbid) might be reasonable between Sat and Mon kickoff for last minute " not playing" news. So, if you're starting trubisky, those d up for sale?
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2017 19:18
|
|
|
I am not tanking poo poo. Sure, that one week was bad because bradford was Q and went to out 3hrs before the game. I have Wednesday and Saturday waivers to grab a qb. Forcing you to start him costs me zero, and might cost you a loss. It's basically zero risk for me, he was the first qb taken, and Glennon likely gets benched at halftime with how he is playing. There is no way you don't start him. Your strategy is taking qbs. My strategy is making you start them.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2017 19:24
|
|
|
This goes back to that whole "how much of a chance on an injured Q player are you taking". He's benefitting from only having a single QB on his roster by having more flexibility at all other positions, but that comes at the cost of maybe not having a QB to play. If you play that particular game of chicken, well, sometimes that Q is gonna be out. I don't think we need to add another waiver period just to let owners play chicken with their questionables. e. Spermy Smurf posted:Your strategy is taking qbs. My strategy is making you start them. I'm not in your division and I'm not winning my division at this point, so: your strategy isn't helping you at all. It's entirely punitive. It's your right to do it, I won't dispute that, but it's not helping you win your division or get to the playoffs. There's 10 other teams, mr. Smurf. Leperflesh fucked around with this message at 19:29 on Sep 19, 2017 |
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2017 19:27
|
|
|
Find me another team with a #1 QB draft Pick on their taxi squad. If I lose this week who cares, I would have Tribs for a few years most likely. It is a good choice, I don't care if you are mad at it. It may be considered petty, that's fine. It's a strategy. I need a qb. The only way for me to get one (without trading an insane amount) is to steal one.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2017 19:35
|
|
|
Spermy Smurf posted:Find me another team with a #1 QB draft Pick on their taxi squad. Or pick one up off the waiver wire. I assume Ketchum stuck Mahomes on his regular roster specifically to protect him from you, so yeah, I guess I'm the dumb dumb for leaving Trub on mine.  I'm starting Trub. You've hurt my playoff chances this year, and gained nothing otherwise. What will you do now?
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2017 19:37
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:True story though I just moved Olsen onto IR, they hadn't designated him as Out yet when I looked yesterday, and I was fiddling around with waiver options and forgot to promote Trub. I mean you outright told me last week you'd be trying to steal him. Now imagine having 5 injured players and no drat room to do poo poo. I'd like to propose an increase in IR slots for next season. two is the amount for a normal league, we should have 4 or 5 for a dynasty league.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2017 19:40
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:
Correct. I gained nothing. Lost nothing too. I will pick one up on Wednesday like I had planned. The bid is already in, been in for 48hrs.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2017 19:43
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:Yeah if Teemu and you agree, I'm turning off the "can't submit an incomplete lineup" thing. There's nothing in our rules about it. I'm fine with this but I think in the off-season we should revisit the rules just to cover any deliberate tanking if there isn't a rule already (Not that I think anyone would actually do it, but there should probably be something about it anyway? Or maybe I'm just being stupid and creating more work)
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2017 21:48
|
|
|
So my question about the settings above still stands, I thought we had something turned on but we don't, and I don't understand why Spermy couldn't submit an incomplete lineup with nobody in at QB.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2017 22:19
|
|
|
I just want to make sure people realize I am not tanking. I really really really thought Bradford would start. If I ran out and grabbed backups for every single questionable player I wouldn't be able to do anything else. It was one week of a questionable guy that was worse than I realized. This week I will have a quarterback. No one seriously believes I am tanking right? Going for Tribs was calculated that Leper would rather play him than actually let him go. There was a near-zero chance leper lets the #1 QB drafted go to a steal.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2017 22:21
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:So my question about the settings above still stands, I thought we had something turned on but we don't, and I don't understand why Spermy couldn't submit an incomplete lineup with nobody in at QB. I will get on a pc and look tonight. It wouldn't let me uncheck him. Wait what the gently caress, it lets me have no qb now.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2017 22:21
|
|
|
Trubisky was the #1 drafted QB, but also, that was by the bears, and more importantly, rookie QBs are a total crapshoot. First round QBs bust all the time. I intended to move him off taxi but got caught up in having my empty bench slot from Olsen going to IR available to grab a TE without having to make a conditional drop, because MFL won't allow you to input a nonconditional add if your roster is currently full. I've got a TE now, thanks to a trade, and so there's that promotion I intended to do yesterday but didn't. Anyway Spermy I don't know if you're tanking or not. But it doesn't matter, because tanking for one game is not against the rules. I've quoted it before, but here it is again: quote:To follow the spirit of a Dynasty format, Owners should manage their teams with the intent of balancing long-term multi-year success of the team, against the short-term attempt to win in the current year. It's entirely within both the explicit rules and the spirit of the rules to, if you want, do something that will likely lose you this week's match, if you think it's in the long-term interests of your team. Grabbing a rookie QB who likely won't play is in my opinion a good example of that tradeoff. You felt it was worth the risk, and that's your choice. I'm just salty because you've been focused on my QBs since the draft, and it's not comfortable for me. I thought I had a shot this year but I'm 0-2, and starting Trub against the Titoons this week means probably going 0-3. It's not an unrecoverable problem but if I was gonna have a rebuild year, I would have made different decisions about who I kept and what I bid on in the free agent auction. Whatever. I'll be fine, and there's no hard feelings. Well. Maybe a little hard feelings but I'll get over it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2017 22:30
|
|
|
I updated the league standings page to show FAAB dollars spent/remaining, because it was annoying me trying to find it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2017 23:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 04:41 |
|
|
It's on the transaction page clear as day right? Or is that a different league. But yeah, that doesn't look bad on mobile anyway.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2017 23:44
|
|