|
|
# ? Sep 22, 2017 22:07 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 04:15 |
|
lol
|
# ? Sep 22, 2017 22:18 |
|
you might find yourself living in a shotgun sh**BLAM**
|
# ? Sep 22, 2017 22:19 |
|
lol
|
# ? Sep 22, 2017 23:20 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdZ6q8lrHpo
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 00:47 |
|
I thought that might be one of those videos that just loop for 10 hours but nope that's the actual commercial.
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 01:53 |
|
The brand is known for its designer jeans that were popular in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Since the 2000s, Jordache has also diversified into real estate in the United States and other ventures in Israel.
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 02:06 |
|
as a Canadian who grew up in the mid 80s early 90si never heard of jordache until a joke on the Simpsons. well that's my story thanks for listening. friday night motherfuckers
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 03:42 |
|
gonna instagram my sweet onions wins
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 04:08 |
|
Kenny Logins posted:as a Canadian who grew up in the mid 80s early 90si never heard of jordache until a joke on the Simpsons. well that's my story thanks for listening. friday night motherfuckers also as a Canadian who grew up in the mid 80s early 90s i never knew how to pronounce that word until literally right now when i watched the video. in my head i'd been saying "jord ache", like something a goon gets from wearing his pants too tight
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 04:33 |
|
oh god my aching jord
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 05:51 |
|
has anyone sampled the beeps from this for some vaporwave yet cuz i'd listen to that
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 06:07 |
|
also a canadian who grew up in the mid 80s/early 90s but i was from a normal family that had a fuckin television so i've always known what jordache jeans were?
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 06:33 |
|
https://i.imgur.com/APa6eJF.mp4
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 06:45 |
|
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 07:07 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-7E1pnEQMQ&hd=1
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 07:08 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvrZJ5C_Nwg
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 14:06 |
|
Kenny Logins posted:as a Canadian who grew up in the mid 80s early 90si never heard of jordache until a joke on the Simpsons. well that's my story thanks for listening. friday night motherfuckers same except comrade detective
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 14:07 |
|
Cazlab posted:
something something tony abbott
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 14:07 |
|
Cazlab posted:
Your onion score is a piece of poo poo
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 14:49 |
|
Dillbag posted:also a canadian who grew up in the early 80s but i was from a normal family that had a fuckin television so i've always known what jordache jeans were?
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 15:12 |
|
Cazlab posted:
I don't think this is real. It looks a LOT like an onion article.
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 15:32 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4K97MpVZ3k
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 18:47 |
|
quote:"Every Seagate HDD at my local Walmart had these in them"
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 19:05 |
|
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 20:08 |
|
is that cycles? p impressive material work
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 20:13 |
|
nah cycles can't do dispersion, you can fake it, I think its because it doesn't have a bi-directional solver. but that is luxrender from a while ago. what makes it work is having a scattering volume everywhere, ya can't generally see light travelling through air lol
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 20:22 |
|
Hmmm, I should look into luxrender because cycles is a real poo poo to deal with.
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 20:38 |
|
Light Gun Man posted:has anyone sampled the beeps from this for some vaporwave yet cuz i'd listen to that same except futurefunk
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 20:43 |
|
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 21:54 |
|
precursor to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1qWcReF3N4
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 22:20 |
|
https://twitter.com/kidd_kong78/status/911589213816152064
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 22:32 |
|
Moist von Lipwig posted:Hmmm, I should look into luxrender because cycles is a real poo poo to deal with. hmm lol cycles rules. luxrender is pretty much dead, cant remember last time they did anything with it. they put all their effort into this minilux which is kinda cool because its so small and efficient, but there are about 8 different path tracers to choose but only the CPU driven bidirectional one is fully featured and its so slow compared to cycles and the GPU path tracers just produce worse results despite apparently using same algorithims geneuinly curious why you dont like cycles? there was a reason I moved from luxrender to cycles for sure
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 22:55 |
|
https://twitter.com/Der_Kevin/status/911663724213268480
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 22:59 |
|
they're making a new skate game?
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 22:59 |
|
echinopsis posted:hmm lol cycles rules. luxrender is pretty much dead, cant remember last time they did anything with it. they put all their effort into this minilux which is kinda cool because its so small and efficient, but there are about 8 different path tracers to choose but only the CPU driven bidirectional one is fully featured and its so slow compared to cycles and the GPU path tracers just produce worse results despite apparently using same algorithims Ehhh I'm finding it super slow, even with GPU acceleration. I'm probably just not used to optimizing it.
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 23:00 |
|
killing in the name of rules my opinion is that the first ratm album is one of the most solid albums there is. every track rules and zack actually sings in some kind of rhythm plus somehow the sound quality on the album is absolutely top notch evil empire has some great tracks too. cool riffs
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 23:03 |
|
blender / cycles poo poo https://s1.webmshare.com/MJROO.webm e: hmm Idunno why that won't embed
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 23:06 |
|
oh there we go https://s1.webmshare.com/R3vO6.webm
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 23:13 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 04:15 |
|
Moist von Lipwig posted:Ehhh I'm finding it super slow, even with GPU acceleration. I'm probably just not used to optimizing it. non-biased renderers are always going to be slow though, compared to ray tracers or scanline renderers tip for gpu rendering is to make the tile size as big as possible. my 2gb card could deal with 128x128 but the bigger the better. whereas with cpu rendering smaller is better. this is under the performance tab ya cant really optimise cycles too much. under the sampling tab, i use squared samples and the highest I ever go for high quality stills is 50 which is 2500 samples per pixel, and usually use no more than 20 which is 400 samples for doing animations. tbh cycles produces some pretty clean results compared to other path tracers ive used
|
# ? Sep 23, 2017 23:17 |