|
the best dnc email was the one that included a 50-page attachment that was just grafs from her paid speeches that the campaign considered problematic, broken out by oligarch she was praising. Clinton: “The Simpson-Bowles Framework And The Big Elements Of It Were Right… You Have To Restrain Spending, You Have To Have Adequate Revenues, And You Have To Have Growth.” CLINTON: So, you know, the Simpson-Bowles framework and the big elements of it were right. The specifics can be negotiated and argued over. But you got to do all three. You have to restrain spending, you have to have adequate revenues, and you have to have growth. And I think we are smart enough to figure out how to do that. [Clinton Speech For Morgan Stanley, 4/18/13]
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 20:03 |
|
|
Willa Rogers posted:the best dnc email was the one that included a 50-page attachment that was just grafs from her paid speeches that the campaign considered problematic, broken out by oligarch she was praising. that is the worst formatted transcript in the history of transcripts
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:18
|
|
|
Karl Barks posted:a pod cast where it's zegermans and cc talking about how each other is technically correct  Special Guest: Fishmech
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:24
|
|
|
zegermans posted:what yes it is, it's called "asking for comment" you're wrong; if there's a particular accusation against someone then it's pro forma to ask for comment on the accusation, but it's not pro forma (and it's against journalism codes of ethics) to send an entire piece to have it vetted by a campaign. eta: from the society of professional journalists' code of ethics: 
Willa Rogers has issued a correction as of 21:29 on Sep 26, 2017 |
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:26
|
|
|
concerned citizen argues furiously with his smalt as it refuses to dispense any more. even with its robotic voice, you can sense increasing discomfort and concern
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:34
|
|
|
safely sodomized posted:tfw the world is already great 
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:35
|
|
|
Willa Rogers posted:next up in congress: "bipartisan fixes" that give more money to insurance companies; tin plans with $20k/year deductibles; and monopolies into perpetuity for pharma. Considering family deductibles on most of the plans I looked at were $13.5k i fully expect tin plans to be over 25k/year. So a big surgery on new year's eve could result in a $50k bill without including the cost of premiums.
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:36
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:39
|
|
|
etalian posted:Crooked help for a very crooked dishonest canidate, basically the Lance Armstrong of politics. Lance Armstrong isn't really a good comparison since he won a whole bunch (but got caught cheating), whereas Hillary has never won anything, despite cheating.
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:42
|
|
|
Willa Rogers posted:someone on dailykos writes positively about bernie's performance last night and is accused of "erasure" for not mentioning amy k. Amy's boring "THERE'S A MIDDLE PATH" horseshit isn't worth writing about
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:42
|
|
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:Lance Armstrong isn't really a good comparison since he won a whole bunch (but got caught cheating), whereas Hillary has never won anything, despite cheating. Also lance armstrong never owned slaves
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:42
|
|
|
desperate for another dose, concerned citizen holds the smalt over his open mouth and shakes it vigorously. it screams like a wounded animal and its halo light flashes red
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:42
|
|
|
Willa Rogers posted:"let our campaign review your story before you publish it" isn't bog standard stuff between the media and the people talking to the media. it's not really unusual at all. i'd say it's pretty fair to let the subject of a story see and comment on a story before it goes out, especially if they're a source on the story and have an interest in making sure the story portrays what they said accurately. say for example you had DWS talk to a journalist - it's fair to ask if you can check the article before it goes out since the journalist might misquote her, or at least as a polite heads up that they are going to get a poo poo storm thrown their way because she said something bad. or if i spent like an hour with a journalist providing info on background that they then used in the story, they might want to check with me to make sure they got all the facts right before it goes out. i also don't see a problem with a campaign getting a chance to either comment or ask for corrections in the story. i think when you see stuff like what reines did - something he's infamous for, of course - that is obviously over the line and journalists should never agree to those terms, although i doubt any campaign on earth would ever miss the opportunity to use a journalist that flexible if they could. the key thing is whether it's transactional.
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:43
|
|
|
docbeard posted:My position is: Did the DNC have it's hands directly in each result manipulating the final tally? No Did the DNC use it's influence to apparently have bias of one candidate, essentially harming the exposure of other candidates, and do it purposefully with intent? That's what is being argued. One could say the DNC Emails were a sign of their bias, and such bias would lead to many many actions that would acculmulate over time. One could say the rejection of Nina Turner with donuts is one such bias, continuing beyond the primaries and is just status quo reaction to the things the establishment democrats don't like. Is it legal for them to be biased? It's not allowed to be openly biased according to their own rules for people who hold positions. Tulsi (2nd in command at the time), biased, endorsed sanders, and quit her position to do so. DWS (1st in command at the time) biased, did not specifically state "I endorse hillary" thus  ""unbiased"", did not quit and immediately after getting done due to appearing biased re-enforces assumption of bias by getting a super comfy position on Hillary's campaign for prestige.
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:45
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:it's not really unusual at all. i'd say it's pretty fair to let the subject of a story see and comment on a story before it goes out, especially if they're a source on the story and have an interest in making sure the story portrays what they said accurately. are you saying this because you've worked in journalism and this is your experience or is this more of a personal feeling thing
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:45
|
|
|
Majorian posted:I maintain this remains his best dance video, even better than "Thriller," come at me bro. Actually it's "Bad"
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:46
|
|
|
Karl Barks posted:are you saying this because you've worked in journalism and this is your experience or is this more of a personal feeling thing because i've worked on the other side
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:46
|
|
|
zegermans posted:its a shame what ESS has become. It was amazing during the height of "every Breitbart article on the front page" reddit meltdown around May It did a lot of work in helping Trump get elected, and for that it deserves fair credit.
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:46
|
|
|
Wow cannot believe this brosocialist is using a gendered slur against a woman (offscreen).
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:48
|
|
|
Man does that Perez tweet have some finely aged, triple distilled Succ in the replies. https://twitter.com/JohnSmithChgo/status/911338906628616193
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:49
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:It did a lot of work in helping Trump get elected, and for that it deserves fair credit. oh do tell 
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:50
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:because i've worked on the other side I've seen things you.... people wouldn't believe. Focus groups on fire off the shoulder of Interstate 76. I watched spreadsheets glitter in the dark near the Des Moines HQ. All those... moments... will be lost in time... like tears, in rain. Time... to die.
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:53
|
|
|
taibbi had the best coverage of the clear bias the dnc leaks revealed: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/dnc-leak-shows-mechanics-of-a-slanted-campaign-w430814
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:53
|
|
|
zegermans posted:oh do tell Stoking the great salt wars
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:54
|
|
|
btw did burnie stop the lies?
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:57
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:Stoking the great salt wars sorry but the political sections of reddit were an embarrassment of breitbart, worldnetdaily, and daily mail for like 2 months straight right up until the convention and deserved to be made fun of. Besides it was a silly insular circlejerk that I can't imagine had any real impact either way.
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 21:58
|
|
|
Uncle Wemus posted:Amy's boring "THERE'S A MIDDLE PATH" horseshit isn't worth writing about yah. I was gonna write something snarky about the brave stands she took on behalf of business tax credits and state-based decisionmaking but it wasn't worth it since dk these days is lanyard-town.
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 22:00
|
|
|
zegermans posted:sorry but the political sections of reddit were an embarrassment of breitbart, worldnetdaily, and daily mail for like 2 months straight right up until the convention and deserved to be made fun of. Besides it was a silly insular circlejerk that I can't imagine had any real impact either way. Yeah realistically it's more of a symptom than a cause but Im not about to celebrate a cadre of the bitterest salt war veterans pissing on anything related to one of the few staunch progressives this garbage nation has produced.
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 22:03
|
|
|
Frijolero posted:Thanks Obama! our Neville Chamberlain
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 22:08
|
|
|
Wasn't there an email with a spreadsheet showing how much big donors paid and what they got in return in terms of access?
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 22:26
|
|
|
Terror Sweat posted:Wasn't there an email with a spreadsheet showing how much big donors paid and what they got in return in terms of access? I believe that was a transparent fabrication.
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 22:27
|
|
|
Cornflakes posted:our Neville Chamberlain It's never been wealthier and more enjoyable for the 1% !
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 22:27
|
|
|
Terror Sweat posted:Wasn't there an email with a spreadsheet showing how much big donors paid and what they got in return in terms of access? Didn't hear about anything like that. There were various emails about getting posts/access for specific individual donors but no one is stupid enough to say "u know, for the cool $50 grand they gave us"
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 22:37
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/fawfulfan/status/868083171358855169
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 22:44
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/yaaaaskween/status/868923184308920320 https://twitter.com/yaaaaskween/status/868923675352772608
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 22:44
|
|
|
Squizzle posted:https://twitter.com/yaaaaskween/status/868923184308920320 jesus christ lol
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 22:47
|
|
|
thats gotta be a parody account....... right?
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 22:48
|
|
|
anime was right posted:thats gotta be a parody account....... right? obviously
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 22:48
|
|
|
I love to unironically believe in trickle down race economics
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 22:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 20:03 |
|
|
anime was right posted:thats gotta be a parody account....... right? https://twitter.com/yaaaaskween/status/911077371482009603
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2017 22:50
|
|