|
HEY GAIL posted:what is her opinion on absurd hats Tragically, the diocese of Copenhagen, even the bishop, is completely hatless at all services  I could see her having a hidden hat boner, though!
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2017 07:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 02:24 |
|
|
Tias posted:Tragically, the diocese of Copenhagen, even the bishop, is completely hatless at all services
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2017 07:14
|
|
|
HEY GAIL posted:poo poo. Show her some pictures. Spread it around. She's a priest, I ain't exactly going to see her again  But I'd support a campaign to be-hat her!
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2017 07:19
|
|
|
Far be it from me to make any unkind judgment about the beauty and humor of silly hats, it's just that I respond very well to the understated stylishness of the Roman hat and its lookalike cousins. Yes, it is so.  Ex Quisite  No. That's too stylish. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2017 07:27
|
|
|
Sometimes there are posts here on sex and gender, although I never use the word "trans" when talking about early modern Europe because that comes from a society that has different views of these things than they did. Anyway, a woman named Marie Garnier in the 16th century was female until the age of 22, when he suddenly turned into a man. The reason this is relevant to this thread is that he had to be rebaptized, of course. https://nursingclio.org/2017/09/19/imagining-sex-change-in-early-modern-europe/
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2017 10:05
|
|
|
we just finished recording our first podcast episode (just needs to be edited and uploaded, will post a link here when that's done) and so i'm looking up some more catholic answers forum questions for the next episode and boy if you want a quick anger sesh nothin beats reading five billion people wondering if associating with friends or family who are lgbt is sinful or not. a priest advised that a man keep his daughter from going to the house of her friend because her friend's parents were lesbians. what the gently caress is wrong with these people. gay people exist! trans people exist! loving deal with it and stop making thanksgiving some kind of power struggle between your faith and your family!
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2017 07:57
|
|
|
Back when I used to go to CAF the only thing I saw were questions about whether or not it's okay to attend a same-sex wedding since you might give off the appearance of supporting same-sex marriage (because as we all know, the LGBT community literally does not know a single thing about the Catholic Church's stance on this issue, it remains a mystery to all.) Which, I guess, is more understandable rather than "don't let your daughter talk to her friend with two mommies"
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2017 23:03
|
|
|
I figure if anyone can explain this, it's y'all. https://twitter.com/MalkyDungeon/status/911282192504049665
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2017 23:30
|
|
|
The first US-born martyr, a priest assassinated during the Guatemalan civil war, was beatified today http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/fr-stanley-rother-first-us-born-martyr-to-be-beatified-in-september-43252/ Ora pro nobis
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2017 23:55
|
|
|
Cythereal posted:I figure if anyone can explain this, it's y'all. the Blessed Ranieri frees the poors from a jail in Florence, from the san sepolcro altarpiece
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2017 07:19
|
|
|
Everyone got excited about the possibility Cardinal Burke & co. would make a filial correction to the pope but SSPX beat them to it.quote:Entitled Correctio filialis de haeresibus propagatis, meaning ‘A Filial Correction Concerning the Propagation of Heresies,’ the 25 page letter was delivered to the Holy Father at his Santa Marta residence on Aug. 11. I assume His Holiness used it as toilet paper.
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2017 14:43
|
|
|
There is something about statements like the above that just sets my teeth on edge.
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2017 16:50
|
|
|
Worthleast posted:And he recognized it. Aquinas is the great accumulator and synthesizer, but he never intended to be the last word. his handwriting loving sucks
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2017 18:05
|
|
|
The Phlegmatist posted:Everyone got excited about the possibility Cardinal Burke & co. would make a filial correction to the pope but SSPX beat them to it. Reading through it, will comment later. Here are the seven heresies the letter accuses the pope of holding or allowing to be taught. just lol if you don't latin posted:His verbis, actis, et omissionibus, et in iis sententiis libri Amoris laetitia quas supra diximus, Sanctitas vestra sustentavit recte aut oblique, et in Ecclesia (quali quantaque intelligentia nescimus nec iudicare audemus) propositiones has sequentes, cum munere publico tum actu privato, propagavit, falsas profecto et haereticas:
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2017 19:38
|
|
|
what a bunch of nerds, releasing a statement in latin and english without a translation
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2017 20:10
|
|
|
quote:By these words, deeds, and omissions, and by the above-mentioned passages of the document Amoris laetitia, Your Holiness has upheld, directly or indirectly, and, with what degree of awareness we do not seek to judge, both by public office and by private act propagated in the Church the following false and heretical propositions: I think that nothing will come of this, and the conservative bishops will continue to interpret things their way, and the liberal bishops will continue to interpret things their way. It is for the pope to act and clarify the situation, and he has not shown himself one to be pushed around in this manner. As a side note, this is all Joseph Shaw and Chris Ferrara. Bp Fellay only heard about it and signed after it had already been presented to the pope.
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2017 21:33
|
|
|
Yeah, after digging into the signatories a little bit it's not exclusively an SSPX document. I wonder what's going to happen to the diocesan priests who signed onto it though. Hope they enjoy being transferred to the hell parishes, I guess. I don't think anything realistically will come of it either, I just wonder if this will hurt SSPX's chances of regularization which they need to actually do under a liberal pontificate like that of Pope Francis. If someone like Cardinal Sarah becomes pope, SSPX will be celebrating the return of a liturgical traditionalist to the Holy See for about all of one day before they all get excommunicated. Conservatives in the curia are fans of the EF but not exactly fans of SSPX.
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2017 21:52
|
|
|
My childhood parish in America was St. Pius X with no affiliation to the Society of St. Pius X. That was very confusing growing up.
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2017 23:22
|
|
|
Caufman posted:My childhood parish in America was St. Pius X with no affiliation to the Society of St. Pius X. That was very confusing growing up. Both my childhood parish and the parish to which my older son's school is attached are under the patronage of Pope Pius X, in two different states, no less! He's pretty popular for lowering the age of first communion to 7 and encouraging regular reception of communion in general. Apparently he was also the Pope who decided that the US was no longer a missionary territory, permitted Italian Catholics to vote, and let refugees into the Apostolic Palace after a 7.1 magnitude earthquake in 1908. (oh and also he was really, really, really opposed to Modernism, which I am guessing is why the SSPX chose him as a patron)
|
|
#
?
Sep 25, 2017 00:13
|
|
|
I have searched online and tried several different email addresses but I cannot find one that works for the Vatican. I am trying to contact any public relations area. Does anyone here know of an address?
|
|
#
?
Sep 25, 2017 05:30
|
|
|
Bizarro Kanyon posted:I have searched online and tried several different email addresses but I cannot find one that works for the Vatican. The e-mail of the Holy See's Press Room is info@salastampa.va The Secretariat of Communications email is spc@spc.va and, specifically, the General Affairs email for the Secretariat is direzione.affarigenerali@spc.va Maybe one of those might help?
|
|
#
?
Sep 25, 2017 06:09
|
|
|
Epicurius posted:The e-mail of the Holy See's Press Room is info@salastampa.va Thank you so much.
|
|
#
?
Sep 25, 2017 12:26
|
|
|
Sorry to all Presbyterians, Independants, Quakers &c., but I simply couldn't not post this  https://twitter.com/manymanyplies/status/911939945966784512
|
|
#
?
Sep 25, 2017 18:20
|
|
|
System Metternich posted:Sorry to all Presbyterians, Independants, Quakers &c., but I simply couldn't not post this According to my girlfriend, I'm an ammonite, so, checks out.
|
|
#
?
Sep 25, 2017 18:28
|
|
|
I think a new Antipope could be just the kind of revitalizing shakeup we need
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2017 05:01
|
|
|
I felt similarly about The Young Pope, but that had the benefit of being shocking but fictional. A real antipope is simply too spicy for me.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2017 11:25
|
|
|
I'm sitting at the fall festival of a local OCA parish. They have a pastry department. The pastry department has a logo.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 01:00
|
|
|
docbeard posted:According to my girlfriend, I'm an ammonite, so, checks out. An ammonite sounds like some kind of 40K gun-monk, please confirm this is the case
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 11:27
|
|
|
Tias posted:An ammonite sounds like some kind of 40K gun-monk, please confirm this is the case More a warp monster than a gun-monk, and also they actually existed 
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 11:58
|
|
|
It's a pokemon, I'm pretty sure.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 13:03
|
|
|
Paladinus posted:It's a pokemon, I'm pretty sure.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 13:04
|
|
|
 LET'S GET EARLY MODERN 
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 16:14
|
|
|
And that's why we Catholics apparently have rules for baptizing flesh vats.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 17:36
|
|
|
JcDent posted:And that's why we Catholics apparently have rules for baptizing flesh vats. All must go back into the vats to help the populace!
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 17:52
|
|
|
HEY GAIL posted:
what kind of paperwork does a priest have to fill out in the case that a person "probably" has a soul?
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 18:36
|
|
|
HEY GAIL posted:
yesssssss source pls
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 19:55
|
|
|
System Metternich posted:yesssssss source pls
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 20:21
|
|
|
Lutha Mahtin posted:what kind of paperwork does a priest have to fill out in the case that a person "probably" has a soul? I'd imagine it's similar to when the pries isn't sure the person has been baptized previously and so has to say: "In case you have not been baptized I baptize you in the name..."
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 21:19
|
|
|
Lutha Mahtin posted:what kind of paperwork does a priest have to fill out in the case that a person "probably" has a soul? I think if they wrote a new gospel, it'd cover all the bases.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 23:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 02:24 |
|
|
i didnt go to mass today and i feel bad about it edit: nevermind, went to mass chernobyl kinsman fucked around with this message at 04:48 on Oct 8, 2017 |
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2017 19:57
|
|