Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
awesmoe
Nov 30, 2005

Pillbug

Neurolimal posted:

Genuine, not loaded question here: why are there more gun deaths in america than any other gun-legal country?

I think that it's not legal to/not possible to get funding for research that would answer that question

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

1337JiveTurkey
Feb 17, 2005

Strict liability for anything involving guns, their manufacture or sale. Execution of any potential "good guy with a gun" who doesn't charge into any nearby mass shooting heedless of their own safety for cowardice before the enemy.

Unoriginal Name
Aug 1, 2006

by sebmojo

Dead Reckoning posted:

That's at least an honest argument. I don't agree with banning guns, but I understand it and I understand why people are in favor of it. I don't get people who look at a mass shooting and think, "well, the most important thing we can do here is to make sure that the guns have to be loud so that people have fair warning, and try to make it so that the shooter gives them a decent interval in which to attempt escape."

Odd that you can understand a tone deaf argument when it's someone else making it. Can you possibly make the stretch to understanding why you gun advocate fucks popping out of the woodwork to suddenly defend your little metal toy and exactly the meaning of a 18th century phrase about militia less than a day after nearly a hundred people got shot by one man makes you a giant loving rear end in a top hat regardless

Peachfart
Jan 21, 2017

LeJackal posted:

Take away your ability to probate people that disagree with you and playground taunts is all that's left?


"Murder rates are higher then ever recorded across all categories!"
Squallid: "Firearm prevalence is much lower though! What a successful and efficient use of resources!"

If you want to see the result of public policy that ignores social equality and justice while doubling down on gun control, turn your eye to Brazil.

They should Hellban you from any threads where the word 'gun control' appears. It would be a very effective way to prevent you getting banned constantly, some sort of 'LeJackal control'.

Squalid
Nov 4, 2008

twodot posted:

I think this is likely just poorly stated, but this is a very bad end goal.

Would you prefer an end goal of reduced firearm related injury and mortality? I see it as a public health issue like smoking or drinking. I believe reducing prevalence even of legal and registered guns would contribute to this goal firstly by reducing suicide and accidental injury, and secondly by reducing weapon transfers into the illegal economy which principally occurs through theft of legally owned weapons if I recall correctly.

Jackel correctly in my opinion points out ending the drug war way make a larger impact, though that doesn't mean decreasing weapon availability would not make a difference itself.

Are there any reasonable estimates of true gun prevalence in Brazil, including those owned illegally? Strong Antigun laws don't necessarily mean low prevalence, as gun rights activists like to point out.

eviltastic
Feb 8, 2004

Fan of Britches

Neurolimal posted:

Genuine, not loaded question here: why are there more gun deaths in america than any other gun-legal country?

I'm all for gun control and safety checks, but it seems like finding the answer to that might do more to save people than silencer bans or hypothetical gun confiscation or magazine capacity limits (that would just be skirted around using speed-loader type magazines).

May have to narrow the question. The causes of spree shootings, a more typical murder or assault, and suicides can be pretty disparate.

evilweasel
Aug 24, 2002

Neurolimal posted:

Genuine, not loaded question here: why are there more gun deaths in america than any other gun-legal country?

I'm all for gun control and safety checks, but it seems like finding the answer to that might do more to save people than silencer bans or hypothetical gun confiscation or magazine capacity limits (that would just be skirted around using speed-loader type magazines).

any answer to this would be very long and complicated, and would have to start with asking which specific country you were looking at. in particular, you would need to know in what sense guns were "legal" in that country: in the US there is effectively no regulation because while states can pass whatever laws they want, other states can basically legally inject all the illegal guns into circulation they want while looking the other way.

Party Plane Jones
Jul 1, 2007

by Reene
Fun Shoe

1337JiveTurkey posted:

Strict liability for anything involving guns, their manufacture or sale.

Never going to happen, that case law has been settled for going on 20 years. The cases in the early 90s did drive a number of manufacturers out of business or force them to change their markets.

evilweasel
Aug 24, 2002

Party Plane Jones posted:

Never going to happen, that case law has been settled for going on 20 years. The cases in the early 90s did drive a number of manufacturers out of business or force them to change their markets.

pretty sure the case law was settled via legislation, so it would be easy to repeal that legislation

twodot
Aug 7, 2005

You are objectively correct that this person is dumb and has said dumb things

Squalid posted:

Would you prefer an end goal of reduced firearm related injury and mortality?
End goals should be things like "reduced injuries and deaths" reducing firearm related injury, but increasing bomb related injury isn't helpful. Thankfully there's no reason to think that reducing firearm prevalence increases bomb prevalence, so reducing firearm prevalence is a fine goal, but it's not an end goal (or rather it's a nonsense end goal).

evilweasel
Aug 24, 2002

Squalid posted:

Would you prefer an end goal of reduced firearm related injury and mortality? I see it as a public health issue like smoking or drinking. I believe reducing prevalence even of legal and registered guns would contribute to this goal firstly by reducing suicide and accidental injury, and secondly by reducing weapon transfers into the illegal economy which principally occurs through theft of legally owned weapons if I recall correctly.

yeah you have specific end goals that you're trying to accomplish by reducing guns, reducing guns isn't the end in itself. it so obviously achieves those end goals that you can shortcut into thinking it's an end in itself though.

Potato Salad
Oct 23, 2014

nobody cares


I'm glad open carry saved so many lives in Las Vegas. Good to see only a few people died because God Fearing Real Americans were able to take out the shooter instead of fleeing like the sheltered cockroaches they are.

Potato Salad
Oct 23, 2014

nobody cares


wait, wrong universe

Democrazy
Oct 16, 2008

If you're not willing to lick the boot, then really why are you in politics lol? Everything is a cycle of just getting stomped on so why do you want to lose to it over and over, just submit like me, I'm very intelligent.

LeJackal posted:

The gun control endgame is confiscation of all weapons except by agents of the state, and a total legal and practical monopoly of force without consequence.

It's effectively impossible to resist the police, let alone the military, with conventional arms, even if you wanted to (which you shouldn't, because we live in a democratic society).

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

eviltastic posted:

May have to narrow the question. The causes of spree shootings, a more typical murder or assault, and suicides can be pretty disparate.

There is a strong and oft neglected argument that the causes of spree shootings and suicides are linked and overlapping. Spree shootings are usually a subtype of gun suicides.

Harold Fjord
Jan 3, 2004

LeJackal posted:

The gun control endgame is confiscation of all weapons except by agents of the state, and a total legal and practical monopoly of force without consequence.

I mean, yeah.

Squalid
Nov 4, 2008

Neurolimal posted:

Genuine, not loaded question here: why are there more gun deaths in america than any other gun-legal country?

I'm all for gun control and safety checks, but it seems like finding the answer to that might do more to save people than silencer bans or hypothetical gun confiscation or magazine capacity limits (that would just be skirted around using speed-loader type magazines).

It's very complicated. One interesting point is that even when you control for education, income, and population density, African American communities have much higher rates of violent crime than similar white communities. There are probably several reasons for this, including the phenomenon of under/over policing which reduces trust in police to resolve conflicts and contribute to people looking to solve a personal problem themselves. When asked why violence is so bad in their communities, many people involved in Chicago gangs will say the old drug bosses who used to keep order were all put in jail, reducing capacity for peaceful conflict resolution. Clearly there are a lot of issues with mass incarceration weapons prevalence (I believe), race, and community trust at play.

Wakko
Jun 9, 2002
Faboo!
The gun control 'debate' is a really great snapshot of USA politics in tyool 2017.

Daily civic life in America is so profoundly alienating and unjust that Americans constantly snap and try to kill as many of their fellow citizens as possible before killing themselves.

The democrat solution: disarm the entire population so they just quietly suicide or worst case drive a truck into a crowd!

The republican solution: do nothing! humans are at best second class citizens to the real people, corporations!

eviltastic
Feb 8, 2004

Fan of Britches

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

There is a strong and oft neglected argument that the causes of spree shootings and suicides are linked and overlapping. Spree shootings are usually a subtype of gun suicides.

Yeah I agree, maybe "disparate" was the wrong word to use. Multifaceted would've been better.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Wakko posted:

The democrat solution: disarm the entire population

You will literally never find a Dem with enough courage in their convictions to call for something this drastic.

Instead we're going to get a "ban the scary looking guns" bill that will die in committee and would have done nothing but piss off people if it had passed.

Squalid
Nov 4, 2008

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

There is a strong and oft neglected argument that the causes of spree shootings and suicides are linked and overlapping. Spree shootings are usually a subtype of gun suicides.

Anthropologists noticed this connection in Malaysia in the 19th century custom of "running amok," when a man, typically after being publicly shamed by adultery or something, would take a sword and go wild attacking some public place like a market until they are finally killed. If they were somehow subdued the perpetrators would claim temporary insanity. Suicide is of course prohibited for Muslims so some commentators have suggested it was basically one semi-rationalized Medieval suicide by cop

Democrazy
Oct 16, 2008

If you're not willing to lick the boot, then really why are you in politics lol? Everything is a cycle of just getting stomped on so why do you want to lose to it over and over, just submit like me, I'm very intelligent.

Wakko posted:

The gun control 'debate' is a really great snapshot of USA politics in tyool 2017.

Daily civic life in America is so profoundly alienating and unjust that Americans constantly snap and try to kill as many of their fellow citizens as possible before killing themselves.

The democrat solution: disarm the entire population so they just quietly suicide or worst case drive a truck into a crowd!

The republican solution: do nothing! humans are at best second class citizens to the real people, corporations!

I honestly think that spree shootings of today have much more to do with men reclaiming masculine power in a society where masculine patriarchal power is increasingly threatened. This is mostly speculation, but would explain why the shooters are almost always men.

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

Squalid posted:

Anthropologists noticed this connection in Malaysia in the 19th century custom of "running amok," when a man, typically after being publicly shamed by adultery or something, would take a sword and go wild attacking some public place like a market until they are finally killed. If they were somehow subdued the perpetrators would claim temporary insanity. Suicide is of course prohibited for Muslims so some commentators have suggested it was basically one semi-rationalized Medieval suicide by cop

Yup.

With this guy, my guess is that it was a combination of

1) (Mail-order?) wife left him, and

2) blew all his money on the slots, so

3) gently caress those happy people having fun BLAZE O GLORY

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

Democrazy posted:

I honestly think that spree shootings of today have much more to do with men reclaiming masculine power in a society where masculine patriarchal power is increasingly threatened. This is mostly speculation, but would explain why the shooters are almost always men.

Read Mark Ames' book Going Postal.

evilweasel
Aug 24, 2002

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

Yup.

With this guy, my guess is that it was a combination of

1) (Mail-order?) wife left him, and

2) blew all his money on the slots, so

3) gently caress those happy people having fun BLAZE O GLORY

well if he wasn't a big gun nut before this (and he doesn't seem to have been), clearly he didn't blow all his money on slots. even in america getting 10-20 guns like he apparently had isn't free.

Vincent Van Goatse
Nov 8, 2006

Enjoy every sandwich.

Smellrose

evilweasel posted:

well if he wasn't a big gun nut before this (and he doesn't seem to have been), clearly he didn't blow all his money on slots. even in america getting 10-20 guns like he apparently had isn't free.

Dude apparently owned a plane and took hunting trips to Alaska. He probably had lots of money to burn.

1337JiveTurkey
Feb 17, 2005

He accomplished everything he wanted to in life and decided to end it all trolling the gun nuts by shooting up a bunch of them with an honest-to-god type 2 receiver AK-47.

mdemone
Mar 14, 2001

I've not been able to find this anywhere because of all the chaff being thrown about — did the shooter survive into custody?

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

evilweasel posted:

well if he wasn't a big gun nut before this (and he doesn't seem to have been), clearly he didn't blow all his money on slots. even in america getting 10-20 guns like he apparently had isn't free.

For loss-of-status suicides it's not the absolute but the relative wealth loss that seems to hit people. Like, maybe he just had to sell his 350k house. Or maybe it was just the wife leaving him and Vegas as such didn't have a role at all. I believe Vegas has the highest overall suicide rate of anywhere in the country though so I'm guessing that gambling played some kind of role.

A Concrete Divider
Jan 20, 2012

The Unbearable Whiteness of Eating

mdemone posted:

I've not been able to find this anywhere because of all the chaff being thrown about — did the shooter survive into custody?

found dead in room; self-inflicted gunshot

The Kingfish
Oct 21, 2015


Candlelight Virgil posted:

found dead in room; self-inflicted gunshot

The only thing that can stop a bad guy with a gun.

A Concrete Divider
Jan 20, 2012

The Unbearable Whiteness of Eating
It's really morbid thinking about these bullets raining down from the 32nd floor and just impaling the victims through the tops of their skulls while they were unwittingly doing the "boot scoot and boogie."

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


jesus christ lejackal

is there any situation you would ever support gun control?

as for the shooter, apparently he was wealthy as gently caress, happy, retired, had a girlfriend, etc

he was p much living the dream, and decided to murder a poo poo ton of people cause who the hell knows why

The Kingfish
Oct 21, 2015


I would never support gun control. THese atrocities are the price other people pay for my freedoms.

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

The inevitable lejackal posting response.

A Concrete Divider
Jan 20, 2012

The Unbearable Whiteness of Eating

The Kingfish posted:

I would never support gun control. THese atrocities are the price other people pay for my freedoms.

https://twitter.com/nycjim/status/914948897465946112

Wakko
Jun 9, 2002
Faboo!

Democrazy posted:

I honestly think that spree shootings of today have much more to do with men reclaiming masculine power in a society where masculine patriarchal power is increasingly threatened. This is mostly speculation, but would explain why the shooters are almost always men.

Certainly toxic masculinity is the proximate motivator for a number of these omnicidal angry white men. A functioning society would have community structures to channel these people back into some kind of productive role. Left to their own devices long enough, a growing population of these types gives you a Sturmabteilung.

Dead Reckoning
Sep 13, 2011

The Kingfish posted:

I would never support gun control. THese atrocities are the price other people pay for my freedoms.

Do you spend a moment in silent reflection on all the lives lost to DUIs every time you open a beer?

Enigma89
Jan 2, 2007

by CVG
In my ideal world the 2nd amendment gets changed to allow for some restrictions so the people who want things to be literally interpreted can't whine.

Do we even know what weapons he was using?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

The Kingfish
Oct 21, 2015


The Kingfish posted:

I would never support gun control. THese atrocities are the price other people pay for my freedoms.

I do actually believe this. I just said it in a funny way.

  • Locked thread