Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Boywhiz88
Sep 11, 2005

floating 26" off da ground. BURR!
Holy poo poo. Everyone look up Jeremy Piven’s new show “Wisdom of the Crowd” and tell me that isn’t one of the dumbest/most hosed up concepts for a show.

Hey, remember all those horrible incidents where internet detectives tried to solve poo poo on their own and got it horribly wrong. Let’s make a show about if they didn’t get it horribly wrong and brush-over that whole “getting it horribly wrong” thing.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

420 Gank Mid
Dec 26, 2008

WARNING: This poster is a huge bitch!


achillesforever6
Apr 23, 2012

psst you wanna do a communism?
Its weird seeing one of our most active members in the Pittsburgh DSA get really mad about Chapo because Felix said some nice things about Liz Bruenig nearly a year ago. Then again the recent Abortion Bill news probably was the reason for it.

Henchman of Santa
Aug 21, 2010
I mean is Liz Bruenig out there pushing for anti-abortion legislature? Always seemed to me like her pro-life stance is strictly personal and that she just supports alternatives to abortion.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth
yea I'm gonna be incredibly unhappy if I find out Bruenig is actively supporting that poo poo instead of her usual 'look this is what I think, I support alternatives, but the option should exist for others' takes on that stuff.

Speaking of left twitter meltdowns, PixelatedBoat's was really funny yesterday because it involved the rare 'log off, log back on, instantly start bullshit again' move.

UltimoDragonQuest
Oct 5, 2011



I remember a tweet from Spring 2016 along the lines of "A bunch of people should apologize to Elizabeth Bruenig after Hillary picks Tim Kaine." Writers can believe whatever dumb things they like but there is an obvious ceiling on positions of power in a real left movement.

Boywhiz88
Sep 11, 2005

floating 26" off da ground. BURR!
Not really seeing a meltdown. Just a dood who’s understandably frustrated with this bullshit. Also, new episode popped and I’m guessing it’s about the shooting based on its title. Gonna make dinner and listen to it

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth
yea I like Bruenig, I follow her on Twitter and she seems like a very nice person, but no I'm never gonna vote for her for office or anything. A private citizen personally having issues with abortion but not opposing it? A-Ok, freedom and all that jazz. Tim Kaine's dumb rear end 'well I personally don't like it but don't oppose it (except those times I did oppose it woops)' poo poo shoulda been our first red flag.

Phobophilia
Apr 26, 2008

by Hand Knit
woody kaine 4 senate

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Boywhiz88 posted:

Not really seeing a meltdown. Just a dood who’s understandably frustrated with this bullshit. Also, new episode popped and I’m guessing it’s about the shooting based on its title. Gonna make dinner and listen to it

I just mainly found it funny because it boiled down to a dude being told by a bunch of minority leftists that a disarming movement always targets minorities over all others and with the over-militarized police that's basically exactly how genocides happened before and him going 'nah but this time the cops can be trusted to enforce the laws fairly' and getting very mad online when people went 'what, no'.

Like, I'm really anti-gun but we should probably make step one 'disarm the police' to avoid the whole 'state has all the power' thing getting worse.

achillesforever6
Apr 23, 2012

psst you wanna do a communism?

Henchman of Santa posted:

I mean is Liz Bruenig out there pushing for anti-abortion legislature? Always seemed to me like her pro-life stance is strictly personal and that she just supports alternatives to abortion.
She is admittedly not the most subtle person and not nice when it comes to attacking someone (the DSA member), I think what pissed her off is a bunch of leftist men coming to Liz's aid when she went off on her. She does great work for Pitt's grad program and trying to fight for a union there.

Btw its going to be cool seeing Tim Faust in our tiny Letter Carrier's Union hall for his lecture

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

achillesforever6 posted:

Its weird seeing one of our most active members in the Pittsburgh DSA get really mad about Chapo because Felix said some nice things about Liz Bruenig nearly a year ago. Then again the recent Abortion Bill news probably was the reason for it.

yeah, that was really weird. i really dont understand why people are obsessed with at a catholic lady whose stance is "i disagree with abortion, but i don't think the government should make it illegal". if a man held this position, he would get shredded, but since this is a woman then the fallback is "she believes in demons!!! and men defend her!!!".

i'm honestly baffled

Henchman of Santa
Aug 21, 2010

sexpig by night posted:

I just mainly found it funny because it boiled down to a dude being told by a bunch of minority leftists that a disarming movement always targets minorities over all others and with the over-militarized police that's basically exactly how genocides happened before and him going 'nah but this time the cops can be trusted to enforce the laws fairly' and getting very mad online when people went 'what, no'.

Like, I'm really anti-gun but we should probably make step one 'disarm the police' to avoid the whole 'state has all the power' thing getting worse.

PB is also an Australian and that definitely informs his take on the issue. And he did deal with some lunatics in there as well, like someone calling him transphobic based on literally nothing.

The gun debate is so exhausting and nobody looks good during it.

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

sexpig by night posted:

I just mainly found it funny because it boiled down to a dude being told by a bunch of minority leftists that a disarming movement always targets minorities over all others and with the over-militarized police that's basically exactly how genocides happened before and him going 'nah but this time the cops can be trusted to enforce the laws fairly' and getting very mad online when people went 'what, no'.

Like, I'm really anti-gun but we should probably make step one 'disarm the police' to avoid the whole 'state has all the power' thing getting worse.

i found it funny that people came out of the woodwork to get mad at a guy who posts jokes for holding the default liberal position on gun control, and not the position of revolutionary marxist-leninists. he wasn't even tweeting about confiscating guns, just nonspecific gun control, yet extremely-online dorks unlocked their accounts for long enough to rant at him for wanting to steal the guns of the revolutionary vanguard.

and more pragmatically:

https://twitter.com/BillHumphreyMA/status/914966870603784192

Wrestlepig
Feb 25, 2011

my mum says im cool

Toilet Rascal
Pixelated Boat comes from a country where they did the thing he was advocating and it empirically worked, and the main arguments against his view were that minorities need guns to defend themselves (which I don't think is really happening since cops aren't shot, and in the few cases I have heard of they get put in jail anyway, legality not mattering), that guns are necessary for leftists to do an armed revolution (which is insane on a lot of levels) and that enforcement would target black people more than white people, which is a little more reasonable but the response to that was incredibly bad faith about how he obviously meant it'd be done in way and enforce the state monopoly on violence. All he said was some poo poo like "I don't want anyone to have guns, period" and everyone acts like he's some loving cryptofascist because he didn't support some weird libertarian streak that popped up for a day.

Kunster
Dec 24, 2006

To be frank, after the election there was a period of time where you had major nominally twitter left folk (including Felix, MurderBryan and ArmyStrang) outright championing a pro-gun stance to the point they were hinting at DSA Gun and Self-Defense training programs.

Seeing that stance go from "Yes, the left must become less scared of guns so we can prevent things like the Heather Meyer incident and let's also consider the black panthers, also it's elitist and the working class would respect us more" to "Oh look, the cosplay left and the extremely online suddenly think AR-15 are WOKE now" on one hand relieves me since at least NOW people are actually talking about harm reduction/giving an actual poo poo about mental health, but on the other it feels like they're throwing a bunch of folk under the bus over this.

UltimoDragonQuest
Oct 5, 2011



Arguing over the merits of gun ownership is a dumb waste of time but that's the fight we get when people are more willing to say they like guns than say they don't care about gun control.

The premium episode points out the uncharacteristic ambition and solidarity of Democrats on this one issue.

achillesforever6
Apr 23, 2012

psst you wanna do a communism?
Deleted because I realized it was poo poo to link someone's twitter page here

achillesforever6 fucked around with this message at 17:52 on Oct 5, 2017

Kunster
Dec 24, 2006

To be frank, a bunch of her detractors literally had to handle left government policies that had to severely compromise with a """""Catholic Left"""""" which meant super restrictive abortion policies *cough Brazil* so it gets extra painful when the response of "Hey don't repeat the same mistake Dilma Rouseff did and end up juggling literal children being considered demons for not wanting to get a baby... as someone who literally had to go thru that." is "Ah, you're just like that because you're extremely online and don't go outside". By the "super nice lady" herself.

Aaaand it doesn't help that after Tim Kaine and mainstream Democrats starting to compromise with Red states regarding that particular issue with much anger, stuff like this floats up. You can't quite juggle at the same time "How dare the Dems compromise on this matter" and then get upset when you end up well. also compromising on this matter.

Moon Atari
Dec 26, 2010

rumble in the bunghole posted:

Pixelated Boat comes from a country where they did the thing he was advocating and it empirically worked, and the main arguments against his view were that minorities need guns to defend themselves (which I don't think is really happening since cops aren't shot, and in the few cases I have heard of they get put in jail anyway, legality not mattering), that guns are necessary for leftists to do an armed revolution (which is insane on a lot of levels) and that enforcement would target black people more than white people, which is a little more reasonable but the response to that was incredibly bad faith about how he obviously meant it'd be done in way and enforce the state monopoly on violence. All he said was some poo poo like "I don't want anyone to have guns, period" and everyone acts like he's some loving cryptofascist because he didn't support some weird libertarian streak that popped up for a day.

Drama like this plays out anytime an Australian (or any non-American) tries to argue guns with Americans. The US might have exported its culture worldwide but when it comes to guns there is a massive cultural divide between them and the rest of the world that makes mutual understanding impossible. A couple of decades of NRA propaganda has really hosed them up all across the political spectrum. Even on the left the gun worship is so strong that they will resort to the slimiest arguments to justify their outrage. Like accusing PB of being transphobic for supporting gun control and getting super mad about it requires a level of unconscious devotion to guns that virtually no one outside of America can understand.

Fans
Jun 27, 2013

A reptile dysfunction
As a UK goon the devotion is surprising when even mass shootings will have people defending unrestricted gun access.

The idea you can just buy a gun without any checks is so loving it there it's like you're on a different planet

A Gnarlacious Bro
Apr 25, 2007

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
I think it's funny a nerd got ran off of twitter

Henchman of Santa
Aug 21, 2010

A Gnarlacious Bro posted:

I think it's funny a nerd got ran off of twitter

He wasn't though. Unless you're talking about someone else.

Neon Belly
Feb 12, 2008

I need something stronger.

Boywhiz88 posted:

Holy poo poo. Everyone look up Jeremy Piven’s new show “Wisdom of the Crowd” and tell me that isn’t one of the dumbest/most hosed up concepts for a show.

Hey, remember all those horrible incidents where internet detectives tried to solve poo poo on their own and got it horribly wrong. Let’s make a show about if they didn’t get it horribly wrong and brush-over that whole “getting it horribly wrong” thing.

Remember all those horrible incidents where professional detectives tried to solve poo poo on their own and got it horribly wrong?

It's a fictional TV show.

Serf
May 5, 2011


Boywhiz88 posted:

Holy poo poo. Everyone look up Jeremy Piven’s new show “Wisdom of the Crowd” and tell me that isn’t one of the dumbest/most hosed up concepts for a show.

Hey, remember all those horrible incidents where internet detectives tried to solve poo poo on their own and got it horribly wrong. Let’s make a show about if they didn’t get it horribly wrong and brush-over that whole “getting it horribly wrong” thing.

between that and the show about the tech billionaire buying high-tech weapons and poo poo for a police station there is some scary poo poo out there that straight up sucks off tech whizkids and endorsing mass surveillance and police power

prefect
Sep 11, 2001

No one, Woodhouse.
No one.




Dead Man’s Band

Neon Belly posted:

Remember all those horrible incidents where professional detectives tried to solve poo poo on their own and got it horribly wrong?

It's a fictional TV show.

On one hand, sure. On the other hand, remember that time Scalia acted like "24" was a documentary and not fiction?

A Gnarlacious Bro
Apr 25, 2007

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Henchman of Santa posted:

He wasn't though. Unless you're talking about someone else.

I dunno, I have no idea who any the cutesy name poster squad is on twitter

Halloween Jack
Sep 12, 2003
I WILL CUT OFF BOTH OF MY ARMS BEFORE I VOTE FOR ANYONE THAT IS MORE POPULAR THAN BERNIE!!!!!

Boywhiz88 posted:

Sounds like someone who never listened to Frost/Christman....

But what do you mean by that?
Well, okay, but you called down the thunder. Here's his review of online's favourite movie, Batman v Superman:

Matt Christman of Earthling Cinema fame posted:

There actually is, [garbled] Superman is a tankie, so it kinda makes sense.

Yeah and he actually points out that Batman mostly just beats up poor people...and then, later on...they put a little cherry on that when Perry White is yelling at him for being too idealistic and saying "The WPA isn't hiring!" But what's so frustrating about that is that's actually an interesting thing to do with Superman. But because it's an interesting thing to do with Superman you can't do it for more than two seconds, because Zack Snyder needs to basically make Superman as unpleasant as possible due to his long-term plan of degrading him 'cause of his deep deep hatred of the character.

That's another thing I thought was amazing, because that's like the fourth scene in the movie, when Batman rescues these women from this sex trafficking ring. And he chains the guy shirtless to a radiator in this dark empty house and brands his skin. It's like a scene from Se7en. And I just imagine some kid going to his dad like "Daddy, why are those women in cages?" And he's like "Well, son, when a man wants to make money sometimes he brings women across the ocean and charges men to have sex with them."

That's the thing that I kind of realize watching this movie. So Zack Snyder keeps making these superhero movies but he clearly thinks that he is sort of above them. That he, that this type of material is below his aesthetic level and that the reason he keeps making them seems to me is that he is fascinated by the tropes of superheroes, but not the hero part, the super part. Like he is fascinated by anyone having that kind of power. And I think that power fantasy of superheroes is incredibly intriguing to him and he just gets off on it on like a libidinal level. Movies like this, the whole superhero canon, what's compelling about it is that you kind of put yourself in the place of some of these guys, right, and in a Batman vs. Superman movie, what's compelling to a degree is, which one are you rooting for, right? Which one do you identify more with. And I realize watching it that Zack Snyder identifies with Lex Luthor more than Batman or Superman. Because Lex Luthor wants these guys to fight, for no reason at all other than that he doesn't like them. And the thing he specifically doesn't like about Superman, because it's mostly about Superman, is that Batman is just sort of a handy person for him to fight, is his pretensions of being good.

Because for Snyder, that kind of power is to be exercised without restraint. Like when he thinks of Superman he's thinking of "Superman" in the Nietzchean Randian sense. And anyone who has that kind of power and would submit to earthly morality is a fraud, and a weakling, and needs to be brought down. And all of these movies are Snyder making GBS threads on Superman because he's disgusted by the fact that he will not assert the power that he has.

While Superman is right there and doesn't do a goddamn thing. He stand in the wreckage looking mildly annoyed. That's a perfect example of his contempt for the character because that scene ended up not impacting the plot in any way. It didn't matter at all. So he could absolutely could've saved them. He could've used X-ray vision, seen the bomb, thrown the bomb up in the air, saved everybody and it wouldn't have changed the movie at all. And it would've been a neat little moment, and would've been one of the few moments where you actually get to see Superman actually do anything, but no. He hates him too much for that. He has to stand there in this giant death explosion that he couldn't do anything to stop because he was too busy preparing his address to Congress that he didn't even get to give.

"You can tell that Superman is dangerous because his skull has ridges that indicate a proclivity for violence."... That was his part of the greater, just, depressing reality watch all of these quote unquote journalists just kill themselves to go out there and be like "Well, Superman's doin' somethin', we're on the scene." How do you have any self-respect?

Like, Anderson Cooper was on there, I mean, whatever, but you cannot now be in some warzone wearing khakis and reporting seriously. Motherfucker, you were talking about Superman. You volunteered to talk about Superman in a terrible movie because they asked you to because you're a loving starfucker and Ben Affleck signed a napkin for you.
1. Matt identifies how the film establishes Superman as an old-fashioned socialist and Batman as an anarcho-lib billionaire with all the hypocrisy and dark pathology that implies.

2. He then asserts that the director's creative agenda is being mad at a fictional character. In other words, he disclaims his own reading of the film in favour of bizarre paranoid fantasies about the filmmakers' motivations.

(Goons like to whine that CineD is a nest of Marxist-psychoanalytic film theory. You know what's actually esoteric, reading stuff into films that's not there, and completely loving insane? Imagining Zack Snyder is a hardcore Objectivist and composing novel-length interpretations of his films through the lens of Objectivism because he wants to adapt The Fountainhead. That's, like, a rite of passage for lovely YouTube movie reviewers at this point.)

3. Nerd reviewers love to project their own childishness onto this imaginary figure of a child. They imagine, it seems, some Dickensian moppet being traumatized by the new grimdark adaptation of Power Rangers or whatever. Remember when Tim Burton made a Batman flick where the villain mutilates his girlfriend and kills hundreds of people in a chemical weapons attack? I saw it when I was six, like a million other kids. We're fine.

4. Matt Christman, cohost of Chapo Trap House, thinks it's terrible and depressing to feature a bunch of self-important media figures just to make them look like buffoons. I'll just let that self-own stand by itself.

Also he thinks Blade Runner sucks, LOL. Does he ever explain his weird distaste for Ridley Scott? If he thought The Duellists was middling and that the painterly shots were a gimmick, I wonder what he thinks of Barry Lyndon.

Serf
May 5, 2011


drat, matt continues to be the best and most correct dry boy

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES
Here's my take: super hero poo poo sucks.

A Gnarlacious Bro
Apr 25, 2007

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
Explain yourself, about the super hero crap

Skyscraper
Oct 1, 2004

Hurry Up, We're Dreaming



Serf posted:

drat, matt continues to be the best and most correct dry boy

prefect
Sep 11, 2001

No one, Woodhouse.
No one.




Dead Man’s Band

Serf posted:

drat, matt continues to be the best and most correct dry boy

(Agreed, except that I still like Blade Runner.)

Serf
May 5, 2011


prefect posted:

(Agreed, except that I still like Blade Runner.)

oh yeah blade runner rules. i'll forgive matt on that one

long-ass nips Diane
Dec 13, 2010

Breathe.

Superman v Batman is one of the worst movies I have ever seen

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES
Harry Potter is a super hero

Serf
May 5, 2011


long-rear end nips Diane posted:

Superman v Batman is one of the worst movies I have ever seen

noteworthy only for somehow making the two most popular superhero characters in the world incredibly boring

QuickbreathFinisher
Sep 28, 2008

by reading this post you have agreed to form a gay socialist micronation.
`
Thelma and Louise and Alien are the only good Ridley Scott movies

MonsieurChoc
Oct 12, 2013

Every species can smell its own extinction.
Most Ridley Scott movies are good, but he deserves all the hate CHapo gives him because he did Black Hawk Down.

gently caress that movie is garbage.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Skyscraper
Oct 1, 2004

Hurry Up, We're Dreaming



I like Blade Runner, but I am aware that whenever the new movie comes out, I am about to stop liking Blade Runner :(

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply