|
I signed the contract today. No need to  I'm happy here so i'm glad the paperwork is done now, and I don't need to worry anymore
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 15:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 12:47 |
|
|
Vulture Culture posted:You might be worth top of market. A number of people in this thread are, without question.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 15:59
|
|
|
Sepist posted:Problem with payscale is that they vary by locality. All this tells me is that either the people in AZ/Phoenix are under paid compared to me, or I'm way higher up the chain tech wise to everyone that posted theirs. When I was at my last job, Glassdoor helped me get a raise to what I am worth based on job title and skillset, but really the largest jumps I've made in salary have come from going to other jobs and setting a minimum or 10k more than I made at the last place.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 16:03
|
|
|
What’s the rule of thumb for 1099 pay vs W2 pay? Not for me, for my wife. She will hopefully be getting a call today about an art job and I don’t know whether it’s going to be 1099 or W2.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 16:58
|
|
|
22 Eargesplitten posted:What’s the rule of thumb for 1099 pay vs W2 pay? Not for me, for my wife. She will hopefully be getting a call today about an art job and I don’t know whether it’s going to be 1099 or W2. Isn't it, if you want to make $100k/year, you need to charge $100/hr? So basically double W2
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 17:21
|
|
|
TheFace posted:All this tells me is that either the people in AZ/Phoenix are under paid compared to me, or I'm way higher up the chain tech wise to everyone that posted theirs. I always shoot for 15% or more than current as my initial counter-offer. (or higher if their initial offer is more than that) I always make them tell me what they're willing to pay first so I don't inadvertently leave money on the table.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 17:25
|
|
|
Always speak as if you're simultaneously considering another offer. Something like "I really don't want to be the guy who goes back and forth between two companies saying 'oh, they offered x, can you beat that?' and then running back and saying 'the other guy is offering x+5%, can you beat that?' Could you help save everybody's time and just give me your best offer, including benefits or any other perks that you think will help influence my decision? I'll be doing the same with other prospects and just compare all the offers and pick what's right."
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 17:34
|
|
|
Avenging_Mikon posted:Outlook question: This is not how it works. The standard test for Exchange permissions is to log into OWA (or O365) - if delegation works from the webapp, the rights should be applied properly. My first guess would be to confirm and re-apply the delegations with PS.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 17:35
|
|
|
Avenging_Mikon posted:Outlook question: Missed this. There are no system binding permissions here. My best guess is maybe a corrupt profile not pulling the correct permissions from the calendars. Have you tried more than 2 workstations (regular one + random one) to try and exclude that?
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 17:52
|
|
|
Dr. Arbitrary posted:Always speak as if you're simultaneously considering another offer. That's really clever. I'm a terrible negotiator but I think I could feign that.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 18:38
|
|
|
Happiness Commando posted:This is not how it works. The standard test for Exchange permissions is to log into OWA (or O365) - if delegation works from the webapp, the rights should be applied properly. My first guess would be to confirm and re-apply the delegations with PS. We've worked really hard to get users to delegate their own calendars to their admins. I'm not going to do poo poo on my end involving actually changing/confirming permissions because it will undo *all* of that. As far as the users are concerned, we have one level of permission that we offer. Full mailbox AND calendar access, no separation between them. ChubbyThePhat posted:Missed this. There are no system binding permissions here. My best guess is maybe a corrupt profile not pulling the correct permissions from the calendars. Have you tried more than 2 workstations (regular one + random one) to try and exclude that? Haven't had them try a 3rd machine. With our terminal session set up that'll be super easy to have them try, as well. Thanks. Bunni-kat fucked around with this message at 20:24 on Nov 3, 2017 |
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 20:21
|
|
|
Does anyone else have an extremely dry boss? This guy has almost no humor, kind of bums me out.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 20:28
|
|
|
I’d like mine to master being competent before we get started on humour.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 20:32
|
|
|
At this point I'm just happy that my boss replies to my emails, even if it is very delayed. Almost all my bosses throughout my career didn't respond to email.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 20:34
|
|
|
Internet Explorer posted:At this point I'm just happy that my boss replies to my emails, even if it is very delayed. Almost all my bosses throughout my career didn't respond to email. Your boss reads entire emails?
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 20:45
|
|
|
Oh no, don't be silly.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:22
|
|
|
finally got around to wrapping up our MS audit to realize we have 16 server licenses and 2 sql server cores short. c o o l 
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:42
|
|
|
Our org has a ton of spam problems, so I purchased KnowBe4 to lessen the vulnerability. C-levels demanded getting the training first before sending the phish test for a baseline, and I obliged. Everybody completed training, sent the phish test today, and guess who clicked on the link? No, not just C-levels, it was everybody! 60% click rate so far. But yes of the C-levels it was closer to 80%.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:45
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:finally got around to wrapping up our MS audit to realize we have 16 server licenses and 2 sql server cores short. c o o l
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:51
|
|
|
Judge Schnoopy posted:Our org has a ton of spam problems, so I purchased KnowBe4 to lessen the vulnerability. C-levels demanded getting the training first before sending the phish test for a baseline, and I obliged. Everybody completed training, sent the phish test today, and guess who clicked on the link? They sent their admins to the training, duh.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 22:03
|
|
|
Judge Schnoopy posted:Our org has a ton of spam problems, so I purchased KnowBe4 to lessen the vulnerability. C-levels demanded getting the training first before sending the phish test for a baseline, and I obliged. Everybody completed training, sent the phish test today, and guess who clicked on the link? i wonder how many people "fail" by clicking the link in a vm because they are curious, but didn't actually provide info. I'm sure not many but i would be curious to see
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 22:10
|
|
|
I've seen people get popped by forwarding the email to coworkers as a warning, and one of those coworkers clicked the link.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 22:15
|
|
|
RFC2324 posted:i wonder how many people "fail" by clicking the link in a vm because they are curious, but didn't actually provide info. I can guarantee there are no VMs running anywhere in this organization. I'm the only IT guy, nobody else understands what a VM is. And forwarding a malicious link to somebody else in the org is just as bad as clicking it yourself, I'm cool with them getting popped for that.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 22:17
|
|
|
Judge Schnoopy posted:I can guarantee there are no VMs running anywhere in this organization. I'm the only IT guy, nobody else understands what a VM is. oh any place with 60% fail isn't going to have anyone who thinks to sandbox it, I'm just curious in a more general sense
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 22:32
|
|
|
If the link is like knowbe4.com/you-hosed-up.html?referral=username@domain.com I would probably remove the query string or change it to something else. Or if it's a shortener like bit.ly or goo.gl you can put a + on the end to get the stats page with the full URL.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 22:35
|
|
|
Avenging_Mikon posted:We've worked really hard to get users to delegate their own calendars to their admins. I'm not going to do poo poo on my end involving actually changing/confirming permissions because it will undo *all* of that. As far as the users are concerned, we have one level of permission that we offer. Full mailbox AND calendar access, no separation between them.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 22:36
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:If the link is like knowbe4.com/you-hosed-up.html?referral=username@domain.com I would probably remove the query string or change it to something else. Or if it's a shortener like bit.ly or goo.gl you can put a + on the end to get the stats page with the full URL. It's certainly going to be a secret key, because otherwise I would just prank my coworkers.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 22:37
|
|
|
Dr. Arbitrary posted:It's certainly going to be a secret key, because otherwise I would just prank my coworkers.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 22:51
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:My boss was parting out two new SQL servers for DR, and since I think they have more sockets/cores I asked him if we would be good on licenses. He said we didn't need new licenses since they were going to be idle DR nodes, but even if that's true I had to press him a few times to get him to understand that if we fail over to that environment, our current licenses probably won't cut it. Sounds like the new servers are an upgrade, set them up to replace your existing SQL servers, then use the existing for DR. Force his had on more licenses, but end up with a better overall system.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 22:56
|
|
|
Judge Schnoopy posted:I can guarantee there are no VMs running anywhere in this organization. I'm the only IT guy, nobody else understands what a VM is. I've had people forward what they thought might be a malicious link to IT. "Is this is a virus?" I liked those people
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 23:02
|
|
|
I'm actually super lucky, my users are paranoid and good about asking on phishy emails ( ). Between that and Mimecast, we don't have a ton of issues with spam or phishing.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 23:06
|
|
|
I am upset about our click rate of 12% or so.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 23:27
|
|
|
Does anybody else work in an organisation that seems to put more effort into attempts at convincing themselves everything is fine, than just tackling the issues?
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 23:34
|
|
|
TheFace posted:Sounds like the new servers are an upgrade, set them up to replace your existing SQL servers, then use the existing for DR. Force his had on more licenses, but end up with a better overall system.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 23:43
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:Does anybody else work in an organisation that seems to put more effort into attempts at convincing themselves everything is fine, than just tackling the issues? 
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 23:48
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:Does anybody else work in an organisation that seems to put more effort into attempts at convincing themselves everything is fine, than just tackling the issues? Yes, I work at a ski resort.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 00:04
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:Does anybody else work in an organisation that seems to put more effort into attempts at convincing themselves everything is fine, than just tackling the issues? Yes, I too work at "everywhere."
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 00:13
|
|
|
My org is pretty good about acknowledging that everything is broken always.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 00:27
|
|
|
I've had other IT people send me angry tickets because they keep falling for the fake phishing emails. I'm not even in security, I'm a UNIX admin.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 00:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 12:47 |
|
|
alg posted:I've had other IT people send me angry tickets because they keep falling for the fake phishing emails. I'm not even in security, I'm a UNIX admin. tell them to contact windows
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 00:55
|
|