|
met the local PHON candidate today while walking the dogs. she's taken out a partial mortgage on her home to pay for election expenses, which is kind of sad. we managed to find common ground in health and DV policy, and also being insulted by the LNP running a paper candidate.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 00:29 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 02:19 |
|
Imagine calling someone a terrorist in a big man youtube vid only to have your mum call the paper and give you a spray/tell them you have autism lmao
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 00:33 |
|
JBP posted:Imagine calling someone a terrorist in a big man youtube vid only to have your mum call the paper and give you a spray/tell them you have autism lmao He's not the fuhrer, he's a very naughty boy.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 00:44 |
|
had hitler's mother been alive things may have been very different.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 00:50 |
|
one of the new senators is being referred to the high court over a citizenship issue....
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 01:05 |
|
MysticalMachineGun posted:How do you keep missing the point by such a wide margin? The majority of this thread hate the Libs, think they barely scraped in last election and are counting the days until Turnbull hits 30 losing news polls and gets the arse. Adhering to this law - emphasis on law - has already claimed the scalp of Malcolm "stupid fuckhead" Roberts and may bring down the entire Turnbull government. I'm not saying some of the current crop shouldn't face consequences (not all - Frydenberg's case in particular is ludicrous). I'm also not saying I don't enjoy something which could bring down the Turnbull government. But it's precisely this attitude - the thing which you began your counterpoint with! - that is dumb and tribalistic and myopic. You should be able to look at laws in isolation: is this a reasonable way to run things? You should also consider what might happen if we had a hypothetical ALP/Greens coalition government and the shoe was on the other foot, with the Libs close to taking power in an early election because some Greens backbencher didn't realise their obscure ancestry entitled them to apply for citizenship. It was a dumb law when Ludlam and Waters had to resign, and it's no less dumb just because it's now claiming Liberal scalps. If you think otherwise you're no better than the American right-wingers who have abandoned any concept of sensible norms and judge everything as fake/bad or good/true through a filter of whether it's in favour of "their side." And the Centrelink comparison people keep bringing up is specious. Both things are bad. You don't have to approve of a witch-hunt of foreigners in Parliament just because the present, temporary government has done bad things to welfare recipients. You can actually be critical of both! edit - Part of the reason this all irritates me so much is because I also happen to b a dual citizen and resent the implication, written in law, that dual citizens are somehow less Australian, less trustworthy, less suitable to serve their community and their country. And I think the reaction in a lot of the Australian press and public depends on how Anglo-Saxon you are. Dual citizenship is really, really common (as we are discovering) and by steering deeper into this crackpot 1901 law we're just emphasising how unworldly and xenophobic we are as a nation. freebooter fucked around with this message at 01:08 on Nov 10, 2017 |
# ? Nov 10, 2017 01:05 |
|
I would blow Dane Cook posted:one of the new senators is being referred to the high court over a citizenship issue.... Nah, just an "employed by the commonwealth" issue it seems.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 01:13 |
|
freebooter posted:edit - Part of the reason this all irritates me so much is because I also happen to b a dual citizen and resent the implication, written in law, that dual citizens are somehow less Australian, less trustworthy, less suitable to serve their community and their country. renounce then
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 01:19 |
|
how much is all this high court citizenship bullshit costing?
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 01:37 |
|
freebooter posted:edit - Part of the reason this all irritates me so much is because I also happen to b a dual citizen and resent the implication, written in law, that dual citizens are somehow less Australian, less trustworthy, less suitable to serve their community and their country. And I think the reaction in a lot of the Australian press and public depends on how Anglo-Saxon you are. Dual citizenship is really, really common (as we are discovering) and by steering deeper into this crackpot 1901 law we're just emphasising how unworldly and xenophobic we are as a nation. I agree that it's a dumb, out-dated and yes, xenophobic law. In a new parliament we should look at a referendum to get it changed. But this current, gutless government that can't even handle a free vote on whether two people who love each other should get married can go and get hosed. If the ALP were in power, had made the same steps as the Libs I'd be saying the same thing.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 01:42 |
|
Why didn't the Libs just go "this is a stupid, antiquated law that is denying voters their favoured representatives and costing millions of dollars and we are going to change this ASAP" then get all the minors and Greens on board using whatever dogwhistles and horseshit it was going to take? Like they can't even defend their own people adequately.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 01:46 |
|
Because of their vast and abiding respect for the law and traditions?
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 01:50 |
|
I would rather be seen as a strong, do poo poo villain when it comes to anything in politics than a weak faffer like Turnbull.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 01:54 |
|
JBP posted:I would rather be seen as a strong, do poo poo villain when it comes to anything in politics than a weak faffer like Turnbull.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 02:07 |
|
JBP posted:Why didn't the Libs just go "this is a stupid, antiquated law that is denying voters their favoured representatives and costing millions of dollars and we are going to change this ASAP" then get all the minors and Greens on board using whatever dogwhistles and horseshit it was going to take? It requires a referendum to change the constitution. And while it's all piling up at Turnbull's feet now, the timeline was: - Two greens realise their error/issue and resign - Libs (and Labor? Can't remember) go "tut tut, should've had your poo poo sorted, bad luck" - Multiple MPs (independents and Libs) referred to high court - Libs try to witch-hunt Labor members with funny names - Turnbull says Joyce will be exonerated by HC - Everything goes to poo poo and both sides of politics are presumably digging up dirt on each other to refer as many MPs to the HC as possible So before they didn't want it changed because: - it didn't affect them - it does affect them but the HC will let them off - the HC didn't let them off but look over there! Labor and independents who are in trouble too! Muuuuuuum!
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 02:14 |
|
Ah yeah I blindly ignored the constitution, which is how a strong leader operates.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 02:25 |
|
strength and constitution are for martial peasants, all a wizard needs is intelligence.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 02:28 |
|
Trigger warning if you're not in the mood for inhumanity. This is in response to living conditions on Manus:Andrew Bolt posted:Horrific, but only if you're some work-shy bum too lazy to clean up after yourself. FTR, this is in response to an article highlighting the lack of running water in the toilets and the wheelie bin wells the prisoners have constructed to have access to water. This fucker deserves more than glitter and cream.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 02:43 |
|
quote:PM risks snap by-election as John Alexander considers resignation http://www.theaustralian.com.au/nat...26f54cf720bb50d
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 02:51 |
|
The only reason we had an election and lost is because of this bullshit citizenship debacle. Nothing to do with our lovely policies and lack of leadership. The adults were in charge and the economy was humming but that constitution crap only helped Labor steal power. - Liberals in 6 months We continue to stop the boats - Labor in 6.1 months
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 03:31 |
|
StudlyCaps posted:
I took the youtube kids app off the old ipad I lend my daughter over that crap, it's been going on basically since Google released the app. The worst part is that the messed up poo poo shows up in the recommended next list, and even I couldn't tell the difference from the thumb half the time :/ She has kids iview and a netflix profile set to the lowest age group. Kids iview is great.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 03:50 |
|
Seriously what was going on with that pregnant spiderman video?
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 03:53 |
|
People in the automation thread are saying it's either generated by algorithms or by people working off algorithmically generated scripts and titles.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 03:56 |
|
Why doesn't Disney shut it down?
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 04:01 |
|
Disney don't won Spiderman... yet.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 04:06 |
|
Nah don't these videos basically use all sorts of characters from everything under the sun? Surprisingly no one cares?
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 04:10 |
|
Tasmantor posted:People in the automation thread are saying it's either generated by algorithms or by people working off algorithmically generated scripts and titles. Trabisnikof posted:dear god oh my god
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 04:10 |
|
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 04:13 |
|
no option for 'I was forced to get nbn or have no home internet connection' though
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 04:24 |
|
. There's no option for "Where's my nbn, the building next door has it, how hard is it to drag a cable an extra 5m you scum fucks
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 04:31 |
|
My NBN experience on the old Foxtel HFC network has been pretty poor so far. I can't complain about the speeds - they are in fact as advertised. But the connection stability is loving appalling, with pings spiking as high as 650 ms every few seconds. I was a big online gamer. I can't do it any more without tearing my hair out. And there is no other option.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 04:37 |
|
ha ha ha there's no legal requirement to provide low latency. Only advertised bandwidth. Stupid plebs. but in order for me to provide accurate medical advice I need low latency NO REQUIREMENT!
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 04:38 |
|
Ranter posted:ha ha ha there's no legal requirement to provide low latency. Only advertised bandwidth. Stupid plebs. Playing Mercy is not medical advice.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 04:43 |
|
My experience with the NBN has been near flawless. Note: I have FTTP.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 04:52 |
|
I have FTTB NBN and it owns.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 04:53 |
|
We also have fttb. Hope you never have to move though because we are looking and it's loving dire out there.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 04:56 |
|
Yeah, FTTP owns.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 04:59 |
|
G-Spot Run posted:We also have fttb. Hope you never have to move though because we are looking and it's loving dire out there. I had a valuer in recently and I hope they just want to buy another investment property because I like where I live
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 05:04 |
|
The YouTube situation is basically because the site is Newgrounds with less porn and less moderation, and used for absolutely everything from corporate official marketing to music videos to blogger turf wars to deranged autistic fetish animation. They have no interest in providing a curated experience. You can't and shouldn't leave your kids alone with it.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 05:11 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 02:19 |
|
Everyone I know under 35 with a child blocks the living poo poo out of the internet until it's basically 5 white listed sites, but my friends are all sick deviants that know the price of parental laxity.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2017 05:14 |