|
Alhazred posted:Apparently more than americans because I couldn't find the english equivalence to vorspiel and nachspiel (the drinking you do before and after the party). Pregaming for the former.
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 20:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 07:19 |
|
|
Terrible Manson caricature, but good Marx caricature if you ignore the swastika.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 20:07
|
|
11
|
Avenging_Mikon posted:He's an rear end in a top hat. Close enough for me. Well you just keep fighting that good fight, bro  I mean, I don't disagree on any particular point, but "Everyone should be mad about everything" sure is a Ted-Rall-level take Alhazred posted:Apparently more than americans because I couldn't find the english equivalence to vorspiel and nachspiel (the drinking you do before and after the party). Vorspiel is pregaming, and nachspiel is either postgaming or an afterparty
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 20:08
|
|
15
|
Ah, I see Branco has finally decided to give Mueller the Perfidious Jew makeover.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 20:09
|
|
|
Avenging_Mikon posted:He's an rear end in a top hat. Close enough for me. Come the gently caress on with this.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 20:09
|
|
|
 1 2 3
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 20:18
|
|
|
Good. Bad. I am the one with a pen. Roruz is going to have lots of cartoons to edit.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 20:31
|
|
|
Avenging_Mikon posted:He's an rear end in a top hat. Close enough for me. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 20:33
|
|
|
 Apparently, it is not enough to write "vatican" on the license plate and mention the popemobile: the only way to recognise the driver as the pope is to give him a comically exaggerated mitre (drawn with doubtful perspective) instead of his usual zucchetto.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 20:40
|
|
16
|
FOOLS!! If only you had a nonzero tolerance for sexual harassers, like Rick McKee does, you would not have found yourself caught in such a devilish rhetorical trap!!
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 20:40
|
|
Kopijeger posted:
OK I'm not a car guy but that's awesome.
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 20:41
|
|
|
loquacius posted:"Everyone should be mad about everything" sure is a Ted-Rall-level take As always, Ted Rall miraculously exists at the exactly correct and appropriate level of indignation; everyone more angry cares too much/about the wrong things, and everyone less upset is a stooge for the status quo.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 20:48
|
|
|
Kopijeger posted:
if I had the cash I would absolutely buy a Pontiff Edition Lamborghini
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 20:58
|
|
|
It just occurred to me that 17 year olds today are about as far removed from Bill Clinton as I am from Gerald Ford. Should we really expect them to give a poo poo about his presidency? They probably remember the Clinton administration the exact same way I remember Ford's: reruns of SNL.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 21:01
|
|
|
davebo posted:It just occurred to me that 17 year olds today are about as far removed from Bill Clinton as I am from Gerald Ford. That just means you're young 
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 21:09
|
|
|
Kopijeger posted:
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 21:15
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 21:22
|
|
|
Jerry Cotton posted:That just means you're young Yeah but it works for any age. I don't know about any scandals in the Truman administration but would today's 64 year olds still give a poo poo? I guess I just want all the Lewinski stuff to die off soon so I at least have some idea how long people are going to harp on it. It's been 20 years so I fully expect Republicans to be shouting about Benghazi and her emails in 2037, but it'd be nice if it ended there. Edit: Apparently Truman investigated the IRS and fired 166 people, but people speculated it was his own corruption?
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 21:23
|
|
|
davebo posted:It just occurred to me that 17 year olds today are about as far removed from Bill Clinton as I am from Gerald Ford. Should we really expect them to give a poo poo about his presidency? They probably remember the Clinton administration the exact same way I remember Ford's: reruns of SNL. Yeah, but Chappaquiddick
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 21:25
|
|
|
 I'm not really sure what Bagley is trying to say here, other than "factory farming bad."
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 21:37
|
|
14
|
Selachian posted:I'm not really sure what Bagley is trying to say here, other than "factory farming bad." That's all that needs to be said, honestly.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 22:02
|
|
|
Selachian posted:
The Queen cover is a giant robot which has killed a bunch of people, but was only doing as programmed and has no conception that it's done anything wrong. Factory farming is a colossus acting in a similarly automatic way and causing comparable damage.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 22:11
|
|
|
Just found an unsent email in my Drafts folder with the subject line "POLITICAL CARTOONS," untouched and unopened since 2014 the contents: quote:The Tea Party is Audrey 2, and John Boehner is Rick Moranis. I think 2014-era me was expecting to be able to come up with more of those
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 22:14
|
|
|
the_steve posted:I'm not a personal fan of Zelda, but, can't we all agree that I think the real problem is too many developers trying to force stories into their games. Doesn't matter what you play as as long as it doesn't affect gameplay and the game is good 
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 22:32
|
|
|
Selachian posted:
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 22:51
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 22:51
|
|
|
Come on now, the man had a family for god sakes!
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 23:02
|
|
|
It's stated in the stupidest terms, but that's a legitimate critique of neoliberal takes on immigration. If the reason you support immigrants is because you don't want to pay for a living wage in your produce, you're implicitly saying that some people should work to support the economic system without adequate payment.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 23:14
|
|
|
"At least I'm an honest Racist, unlike those two-faced liberals." 
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 23:16
|
|
|
I was under the impression immigrants came here of their own free will.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2017 23:54
|
|
|
Replace democrats with kulaks and you get something much better
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 00:29
|
|
|
T-man posted:It's stated in the stupidest terms, but that's a legitimate critique of neoliberal takes on immigration. If the reason you support immigrants is because you don't want to pay for a living wage in your produce, you're implicitly saying that some people should work to support the economic system without adequate payment. How exactly do you manage to be so dumb you know something is stupid, but still pretend it's strawman argument is based on real things?
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 00:31
|
|
|
AVeryLargeRadish posted:Come on now, the man had a family for god sakes! 
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 00:37
|
|
|
 Guardian:  "Martin Rowson on Brexit developments – Theresa May hopes for treats while fat cats attend to their chow" Telegraph:  Collapse of German coalition talks underlines Merkel's weaknesses Independent:  Theresa May's cabinet agrees to pay more to break Brexit deadlock Times:  Evening Standard: 
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 00:56
|
|
|
Fulchrum posted:How exactly do you manage to be so dumb you know something is stupid, but still pretend it's strawman argument is based on real things? Who gives a poo poo if the author is disingenuous, the argument itself is a strong one divorced from this context. It's an important discussion we should have on the left -- why do we support immigration, and is that immigration just a tacit way of recreating an exploited class -- regardless of right wing meme makers bungling its execution. It's like many other cartoons where we can a) debate the author's stupid argument and b) discuss the topic in a more robust and intellectually honest way. Oh, and if we're being snippy, it's spelled "fulcrum."
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 01:41
|
|
|
T-man posted:It's stated in the stupidest terms, but that's a legitimate critique of neoliberal takes on immigration. If the reason you support immigrants is because you don't want to pay for a living wage in your produce, you're implicitly saying that some people should work to support the economic system without adequate payment.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 01:52
|
|
|
T-man posted:Who gives a poo poo if the author is disingenuous, the argument itself is a strong one divorced from this context. It's an important discussion we should have on the left -- why do we support immigration, and is that immigration just a tacit way of recreating an exploited class -- regardless of right wing meme makers bungling its execution. It's like many other cartoons where we can a) debate the author's stupid argument and b) discuss the topic in a more robust and intellectually honest way. We can acknowledge that immigrants constitute a large portion of low-skill workers in this country while also supporting increasing the standard of living for all low-skilled workers. I don't see republicans trying to help low-skill and low-wage workers as they kill unions and fight against enacting a living wage. The image presents a poo poo argument in even shittier terms.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 01:53
|
|
|
If anything a lot of the big business that Republicans love to slobber over keeps hiring illegals, including the president, while parroting how we just keep letting these undocumented migrants in, close borders (except as my personal servants!).
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 01:56
|
|
|
Crabtree posted:If anything a lot of the big business that Republicans love to slobber over keeps hiring illegals, including the president, while parroting how we just keep letting these undocumented migrants in, close borders (except as my personal servants!). Im guessing that image was from some antifa communist
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 02:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 07:19 |
|
|
Despera posted:I was under the impression immigrants came here of their own free will. Well...
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2017 02:13
|
|