Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
IOwnCalculus
Apr 2, 2003





Dagen H posted:

Yep. Ford used cork intake end gaskets, which tended to push out from under the manifold and leak.

E: replace them with a fat bead of RTV.

In particular, use The Right Stuff. SBCs have a similar setup and the rubber end gaskets are loving useless. A big bead of Right Stuff seals it up good.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

shy boy from chess club
Jun 11, 2008

It wasnt that bad, after you left I got to help put out the fire!

IOwnCalculus posted:

In particular, use The Right Stuff. SBCs have a similar setup and the rubber end gaskets are loving useless. A big bead of Right Stuff seals it up good.

Ah yes the rear China wall. I've fought that bastard for years on my 283. Last attack was Indian head glued the cork gasket to the wall and set the intake on it overnight to dry. Then Indian head on the intake side and again overnight to dry them I torqued it down. Nothing before worked, dry gasket, rtved gasket, just rtv, nothing. It would always blow out when I would open the secondaries so I haven't done that either since then.

I bet that's what it is on sinisters truck since it only leaks under acceleration. Can't believe I didn't think of that before after my years long battle with that fucker on mine.

0toShifty
Aug 21, 2005
0 to Stiffy?

Wezlar posted:

I've been having trouble with my battery dying, tested my battery and got the alternator tested and both are checking out fine. Tested the draw with a multimeter and I got .6.

I've read some conflicting things about what is acceptable in a modern car (its a 2003 ford explorer, fully loaded with an aftermarket stereo), someone said .75 is acceptable if you drive it every day on a modern vehicle, other places have said no more than 50 miliamps? So I'm not really sure what to think here? Would .6 really be a short killing my battery?

I consider 0.15A to be absolute maximum, and even that is gonna drain the battery.

A lot of cars will use more power for up to 5 minutes after the vehicle is turned off and the doors are closed as different modules transition into a low power mode. Stuff like alarms, body control module, etc. So wait a bit before diving in.

If it's still draining, then yes, start pulling fuses. Start with aftermarket stuff like the radio and any amps. go for power locks and windows next.

Queen_Combat
Jan 15, 2011

shy boy from chess club posted:

Ah yes the rear China wall. I've fought that bastard for years on my 283. Last attack was Indian head glued the cork gasket to the wall and set the intake on it overnight to dry. Then Indian head on the intake side and again overnight to dry them I torqued it down. Nothing before worked, dry gasket, rtved gasket, just rtv, nothing. It would always blow out when I would open the secondaries so I haven't done that either since then.

I bet that's what it is on sinisters truck since it only leaks under acceleration. Can't believe I didn't think of that before after my years long battle with that fucker on mine.

Turns out Indian Head shellac doesn't work on ACVWs though. They just run too hot and cook the sealant into charcoal dust. I wouldn't use it on hot areas. The Right Stuff did work for me.

JawKnee
Mar 24, 2007





You'll take the ride to leave this town along that yellow line

kid sinister posted:

What size is the radio opening? You may need to get an adapter plate since most radios come in single DIN. If you're getting bluetooth, then you'll pretty much be getting hands free calling too, which might involve threading a microphone wire through your dash and finding a location to mount the mike.

I like Crutchfield. They have a Canadian site, but their prices are high, or at least they are on their US site. However, their search functions are second to none and their instructions are great too. They can tell you exactly what tools you'll need to remove the stock radio (like on Fords), antenna plug adapters/extensions, etc. They also sell wire pigtails that will match up to your factory's radio plug. That way you don't have to cut and match wires inside the hole in the dash. Instead, you can match up wires on your desk with lots of light and space, then carry the radio over to plug it in.

I guess use Crutchfield's site to find what you want, then see if you can find those parts cheaper elsewhere?

ExecuDork posted:

I dunno if you're still checking this thread, but I second Crutchfield, at least to find what you want. Your requirements should be pretty easy to satisfy, by my guess.

Ranger Stereo Swap 3 by Martin Brummell, on Flickr
I put a JVC head unit in my '97 Ranger using 100% parts I bought at Canadian Tire because I had a free afternoon and I didn't want to wait a week or however long to get stuff from the internet. Five things were on my shopping list:
1. Head unit. (I paid about $90 for mine)
2. Connector from my head unit's brand to a universal intermediate. In practice, "universal" means whatever setup the manufacturer of the wire connector chooses.
3. Connector from that "universal" intermediate to Ford.
4. Space-filling dashboard surround to make my new single-DIN head unit fit properly into the big 2-DIN + 90's-everything-is-ovals Ford dashboard
5. Tools for head unit removal.
EDIT: I just remembered that in this case, I was able to find a single wire set that connected the head unit to Ford, without an arbitrary intermediate. But I had to pick up a pack of crimp connectors to make it work.

Total was about $150 or so. This was 2.5 years ago in Alberta. I was not looking for bluetooth so I don't know what's involved in setting that up. My requirements were CD player, USB, aux-in, and a proper pause button as well as a volume control that doesn't switch to something else if your clumsy hand waving around in a moving vehicle hits it too hard or at an angle or whatever. No-CD-player are called "mechless".

For number 5, I ended up buying a more-or-less complete set of tools for any* OEM head unit, it was cheap at only twice the price of the Ford-specific ones.
* Any of about 8 or 10 brands of car manufacturers.

I swapped in a Sony unit in the Ford ute I had in Australia, using the same procedure (but a mix of about 3 different stores instead of Crappy Tire), the process was the same. Personally, I would not go with Sony again - the controls were awkward, it was too easy to accidentally be scrolling through a menu of dynamic-balance options when I was trying to turn down the volume.

I have encountered people who believe there is only one type of head unit tool in existence, typically the tool that their buddy used to replace the OEM unit on his mid-80's shitbox, whatever that was. They get very confused when you show them your completely normal, entirely typical car. As usual, watch out for idiots and try to resist the urge to punch them.

Just went to Canadian Tire and looked at this JVC kd-x240bt (which is actually on-sale in store, but isn't showing that online, for $90CAD), and then checked crutchfield.com for whether it would fit/what I would need for it. Haven't picked it up yet but I probably will.

Thanks for the advice

Queen_Combat
Jan 15, 2011
I had the KD-X50BT, the 2-generations-prior of that, and it was a solid unit. Thumped my car pretty hard (for a head unit, everything is relative) when I wanted to.

Of course, that car was a 72 Beetle, so take that into consideration.

QuarkJets
Sep 8, 2008

My 1995 Toyota Camry has a Prestige security system with a nice little key fob, model number on the back is APS2k4. The fob's completely hosed; it's gone into the ocean one too many times and no longer works. Apparently they don't make these things anymore so the price on Amazon/Ebay/elsewhere is exorbitant, like $50 for one of these pieces of poo poo when I don't think that the entire alarm system even costed that much when it was new.

Googling around I've seen hints that you can replace this transmitter with a newer model that's still in production, and presumably cheaper, but I haven't been able to unveil any definitive answers. Does anyone here have any ideas?

For reference the keyfob looks like this:
https://www.amazon.com/Prestige-APS2K4CF50CS-Replacement-Transmitter/dp/B00E1SDOBY/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1511502133&sr=8-1&keywords=aps2k4

lol yeah right I'm not paying $60 for a new fob. Get bent, Discount Mobile Video!

StormDrain
May 22, 2003

Thirteen Letter
Re:Alarm Keyfob...

I think $50 seems like a worthwhile cost for something that, if it fails, could leave you stranded literally anywhere. I’d either pay up or not use it, rather than try something with less than 100% reliability.

randomidiot
May 12, 2006

by Fluffdaddy

(and can't post for 11 years!)

So it sounds like that alarm is either an APS800 or APS885.

Looks like this might work. I can't vouch for this company, i just googled APS885 remote. This is the same remote on ebay (looks like the same seller too).

randomidiot fucked around with this message at 17:36 on Nov 24, 2017

incogneato
Jun 4, 2007

Zoom! Swish! Bang!
I'm trying to figure out if I should get new winter tires, or if the older studded tires I have are fine. Disclaimer: I know next to nothing about cars (or tires).

Car: 2006 Pontiac Vibe (2wd). It's not a car that really inspires confidence in poor road conditions.
Usage: 95% of the winter will be just wet and non-freezing temps (Portland, Oregon). I do want to drive into the mountains this winter for snowshoeing and other winter sports, so occasional snowy/icy plowed highways and snowpacked parking lots. Hopefully not much snowy side roads.

I currently have a set of Nokian Hakkapelliitta 2 (studded) that my dad gave me a long while back. They're at least 10 years old (I'm estimating, could be older), but the tread still looks good to my amateur eyes. They've been used very infrequently, some seasons not at all.

I understand that modern winter tires have improvements in rubber technology and other fancy poo poo that makes them as good or better than studded tires. I've also read that studded tires can possibly have worse stopping and traction on non-freezing wet pavement than regular winter tires. I'm also aware that studded tires are terrible for road surfaces, which makes me feel a bit guilty when they're on.

With all that in mind, would it be wise to just buy a brand new set of winter tires? Or would they even make any practical difference versus the older studded set I currently have?

Related question: Is it wise to carry chains in these sort of conditions, despite having good winter tires? Or is that redundant or even counterproductive to the winter tire's work? A lot of people around here carry chains in the winter, but I wonder if it's a holdover from the days when winter tires weren't as good.

incogneato fucked around with this message at 18:10 on Nov 24, 2017

Goober Peas
Jun 30, 2007

Check out my 'Vette, bro


incogneato posted:

I'm trying to figure out if I should get new winter tires, or if the older studded tires I have are fine. Disclaimer: I know next to nothing about cars (or tires).

Car: 2006 Pontiac Vibe (2wd). It's not a car that really inspires confidence in poor road conditions.
Usage: 95% of the winter will be just wet and non-freezing temps (Portland, Oregon). I do want to drive into the mountains this winter for snowshoeing and other winter sports, so occasional snowy/icy plowed highways and snowpacked parking lots. Hopefully not much snowy side roads.

I currently have a set of Nokian Hakkapelliitta 2 (studded) that my dad gave me a long while back. They're at least 10 years old (I'm estimating, could be older), but the tread still looks good to my amateur eyes. They've been used very infrequently, some seasons not at all.

I understand that modern winter tires have improvements in rubber technology and other fancy poo poo that makes them as good or better than studded tires. I've also read that studded tires can possibly have worse stopping and traction on non-freezing wet pavement than regular winter tires.

With all that in mind, would it be wise to just buy a brand new set of winter tires? Or would they even make any practical difference versus the older studded set I currently have?

Related question: Is it wise to carry chains in these sort of conditions, despite having good winter tires? Or is that redundant or even counterproductive to the winter tire's work? A lot of people around here carry chains in the winter, but I wonder if it's a holdover from the days when winter tires weren't as good.

Whether you buy new tires or not - dump the 10 year old tires. They're dead, even if they look good. You're going to have issues with flat spots, dry rot, and tread separation. A good tire shop won't even mount them if they know they're that old.

IOwnCalculus
Apr 2, 2003





Double check the date codes on those tires first:


But yes if they're legit 10 years old, they're done. Any shop should check the age of a tire before they mount it, and any shop I've ever worked with would absolutely refuse to touch a 10 year old tire for any purpose other than disposal.

incogneato
Jun 4, 2007

Zoom! Swish! Bang!
Cool, thanks all! New tires it is.

I'll do some research on winter tires, but if anyone has recommendations I'm happy to start there. I'm assuming the current recommendation is non-studded? I'd rather not rip up the local roads with studs, unless they're just objectively way better or something.

Invalido
Dec 28, 2005

BICHAELING
Studs are a lot better in certain icy conditions - you're guaranteed to always have at least some grip on studs, which isn't always the case without them. On most frozen surfaces it's pretty much a wash compared to studless tires of comparable quality. They're worse that studless in every other conceivable way; road wear, noise, fuel efficiency, ride comfort, traction on dry road etc.

ExecuDork
Feb 25, 2007

We might be fucked, sir.
Fallen Rib

incogneato posted:

Cool, thanks all! New tires it is.

I'll do some research on winter tires, but if anyone has recommendations I'm happy to start there. I'm assuming the current recommendation is non-studded? I'd rather not rip up the local roads with studs, unless they're just objectively way better or something.
For your use, no studs. I loved my studded General Arctic Altimaxes but I was literally driving across frozen rivers and on a small city`s worth of not-plowed, snow-compacted-to-ice for 6 months of winter. Portland + trips to the mountains is pretty much the exact use case for regular winter tires, no studs.

Tirerack.com has generally excellent reviews and they do a whole series of tests on winter tires every year. Burn some time watching their videos and reading their opinions.

autism ZX spectrum
Feb 8, 2007

by Lowtax
Fun Shoe
Studs have super limited usage in places where roads are plowed. From my experience pretty much any midrange winter tire is good, and even Hankooks offer a discernible advantage over all seasons. If you've got money to spare get a well reviewed brand name tire, otherwise you should be fine with a lesser winter tire but you might get fewer seasons out of them.

shy boy from chess club
Jun 11, 2008

It wasnt that bad, after you left I got to help put out the fire!

I've had a few sets of Firestone Winterforces and they are cheap and fantastic in the snow. Never tried them on ice but I love them, they work awesome.

incogneato
Jun 4, 2007

Zoom! Swish! Bang!

Breakfast Feud posted:

If you've got money to spare get a well reviewed brand name tire, otherwise you should be fine with a lesser winter tire but you might get fewer seasons out of them.

I don't mind spending a bit more for the peace of mind that I'm less likely to get stuck up on the mountain outside cell service. Or slide off the mountain.

After reading reviews, I've narrowed it down to Michelin X-Ice Xi3 or Nokian Hakkapeliitta R2. The Nokians seem to be widely considered the better tire, but they're a full $200+ more for a set ($185 per tire, Michelins are $127 each). That's a big jump, and it's hard to tell with the reviews if it's really that significant of a difference. I'm leaning toward the "second place" Michelins, given our relatively light usage.

Discount Tire has a $100 rebate going on right now, which takes away the sting a bit either way.

MrOnBicycle
Jan 18, 2008
Wait wat?

incogneato posted:

I don't mind spending a bit more for the peace of mind that I'm less likely to get stuck up on the mountain outside cell service. Or slide off the mountain.

After reading reviews, I've narrowed it down to Michelin X-Ice Xi3 or Nokian Hakkapeliitta R2. The Nokians seem to be widely considered the better tire, but they're a full $200+ more for a set ($185 per tire, Michelins are $127 each). That's a big jump, and it's hard to tell with the reviews if it's really that significant of a difference. I'm leaning toward the "second place" Michelins, given our relatively light usage.

Discount Tire has a $100 rebate going on right now, which takes away the sting a bit either way.

The Michelin tires finished 4-5th in most of the yearly big magazine tests of winter tires in Sweden. The Nokian tire finished 1st (joint with Continental Viking Contact 6)-3rd in the same magazines. There isn't a massive difference between the top tires though. The main difference seems to be that the Michelin tire handles a bit worse in wet / snow. I can't view the specifics since it's behind a paywall.
Winter tires are serious business in Sweden. Much because we are required by law to have them on in winter condition, which usually means dec-march. Winter conditions range from pretty much snow being on the roads 100% of the winter in the north to constant thawing, freezing and generally treacherous conditions in the middle / south.

incogneato
Jun 4, 2007

Zoom! Swish! Bang!

MrOnBicycle posted:

The Michelin tires finished 4-5th in most of the yearly big magazine tests of winter tires in Sweden. The Nokian tire finished 1st (joint with Continental Viking Contact 6)-3rd in the same magazines. There isn't a massive difference between the top tires though. The main difference seems to be that the Michelin tire handles a bit worse in wet / snow. I can't view the specifics since it's behind a paywall.
Winter tires are serious business in Sweden. Much because we are required by law to have them on in winter condition, which usually means dec-march. Winter conditions range from pretty much snow being on the roads 100% of the winter in the north to constant thawing, freezing and generally treacherous conditions in the middle / south.

Interesting, what were the others between the Nokians and the Michelins? Most things I found (granted in English) indicated Nokian > Michelin > Bridgestone. What other ones should I be looking at?

MrOnBicycle
Jan 18, 2008
Wait wat?

incogneato posted:

Interesting, what were the others between the Nokians and the Michelins? Most things I found (granted in English) indicated Nokian > Michelin > Bridgestone. What other ones should I be looking at?

Friction tires:
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 2
Continental WinterContact TS860
Continental VikingContact 6

... and in case you are interested in studded tires:
Continental ContiIceContact 2 (1st / 2nd in tests)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8 (1st / 4 th)
Pirelli Winter Ice Zero (3rd / 4th)

I'd say bottom line is that they are all very good tires, and I'd probably pick the cheapest one of them.

As a comparison, a tire that's often raved about in the US, the Blizzak, finishes behind all of the above, in all the tests. The tests are made by (usually) 4 big players. One of them is usually "Teknikens Värld", the magazine that do the (in)famous moose tests.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgVue72wqnI

MrOnBicycle fucked around with this message at 18:39 on Nov 25, 2017

incogneato
Jun 4, 2007

Zoom! Swish! Bang!

MrOnBicycle posted:

Friction tires:
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 2
Continental WinterContact TS860
Continental VikingContact 6

It looks like all of those are only available in Europe for some reason. I even found an auto website discussing how good the UltraGrip Ice 2 are compared to the Goodyears in the United States, and bemoaning Goodyear's apparent lack of interest to bring them here.

I appreciate the detailed response though. I may just bite the bullet and shell out for the Nokians.

kid sinister
Nov 16, 2002
1988 F150 oil leak update:

Holy gently caress was this truck dirty! I took me 2 whole days to get the lower intake manifold off and everything inside cleaned up. There was SO much grime inside and out. 2 bolts had so much gunk on the outsides, I had to pull intake off with them still in their holes because they couldn't fit out. The fuel injectors were so clogged, I don't know how it even ran. I used a grand total of 11 razor blades to scrape all of the old gaskets off the heads and intake. The good news is that I think I found the leak! The back seal just fell apart in my hands and it sure was oily on that little shelf behind it. I still need to put it back together in the morning.

I swear, my truck must have lost a full 20 pounds in gunk since I started fixing all of the leaks this year. That counts for weight reduction, right?

edit: the intake gaskets down there were Ford, so they're probably original. The front and back seals were indeed cork, which is a natural product, on a 29 year old truck. Leak found?

kid sinister fucked around with this message at 00:32 on Nov 26, 2017

DogonCrook
Apr 24, 2016

I think my 20 years as hurricane chaser might be a little relevant ive been through more hurricanws than moat shiitty newscasters
It sounds like it. Because it didnt make any sense for the bottom end to lose oil like that otherwise even if it wasnt sealed well.

Those passageways can get nasty over time you might want to run some seafoam in the oil for a 100 miles or so before oil changes a couple times, or check the pressure. How long did the valves tic after you put oil back in it after you fully lost pressure, or am i remembering that wrong?

kid sinister
Nov 16, 2002
I haven't heard them since, but I did notice that my truck didn't sound normal. Of course, I've swapped so many parts recently that I'm not sure what "normal" sounds like now. It does have an exhaust leak at the left manifold-pipe connection so I'm sure that's changing the sound. How do I fix that one anyway? The slide flange is rusty and bent to hell now, so the pipe flare doesn't match up well now. How do I fix that by the way?

Revvik
Jul 29, 2006
Fun Shoe
2004 Scion xB, bagged.

I did my own alignment after redoing a ton of suspension items. Car tracks straight, but the steering wheel is off at an angle. Sometimes, the VSC (not trac control) starts going haywire, beeping at me and trying to alter the car’s braking, accelerating, etc.
Won’t turn back off until I drop below 20mph, ish. Is this the result of the crooked steering wheel after the alignment? (Probably.) If it is, is this correctable by removing the steering wheel and re-orienting it so it is straight, instead of putting the car back on stands and changing the specs of the tie rods yet again?

rdb
Jul 8, 2002
chicken mctesticles?

Revvik posted:

2004 Scion xB, bagged.

I did my own alignment after redoing a ton of suspension items. Car tracks straight, but the steering wheel is off at an angle. Sometimes, the VSC (not trac control) starts going haywire, beeping at me and trying to alter the car’s braking, accelerating, etc.
Won’t turn back off until I drop below 20mph, ish. Is this the result of the crooked steering wheel after the alignment? (Probably.) If it is, is this correctable by removing the steering wheel and re-orienting it so it is straight, instead of putting the car back on stands and changing the specs of the tie rods yet again?

It looks like that vehicle does use a steering angle sensor, so yes, having the wheel off like that may gently caress it up. You will need to figure out how to recalibrate its zero point.

DogonCrook
Apr 24, 2016

I think my 20 years as hurricane chaser might be a little relevant ive been through more hurricanws than moat shiitty newscasters

kid sinister posted:

I haven't heard them since, but I did notice that my truck didn't sound normal. Of course, I've swapped so many parts recently that I'm not sure what "normal" sounds like now. It does have an exhaust leak at the left manifold-pipe connection so I'm sure that's changing the sound. How do I fix that one anyway? The slide flange is rusty and bent to hell now, so the pipe flare doesn't match up well now. How do I fix that by the way?

Oh i was wondering if it lasted a minute or two or 10 mins but if you dont remember its cool i was just curious. Oil has to work its way back up. Lots of stuff can cause it like timing issues, fuel, exhaust manifold leaks etc so i wouldnt worry because all your other issues could cause it too. With all thats sludge your engine probably looks gross all over so id just keep an eye on it and treat the sludge for awhile personally. At the end of the day a 302 can handle a good amount of sludge you just dont want it to get out of hand because they are prone to it imo. To be honest ive never worked on a good example though its always been beaters so i could be wrong about them but it all sounds familiar.

Revvik
Jul 29, 2006
Fun Shoe

rdb posted:

It looks like that vehicle does use a steering angle sensor, so yes, having the wheel off like that may gently caress it up. You will need to figure out how to recalibrate its zero point.

Yeah I figured but there’s not a lot of information out there on the reset procedure. Which is why I’m wondering if I can fake it out by taking the steering wheel off and putting it back on centered. Going to try that later today I guess.

The only information I could find is that yes, the car will check the angle of the steering wheel against the angle of the wheels and go “holy poo poo you’re gonna die” and try to fix things.

rdb
Jul 8, 2002
chicken mctesticles?

Revvik posted:

Yeah I figured but there’s not a lot of information out there on the reset procedure. Which is why I’m wondering if I can fake it out by taking the steering wheel off and putting it back on centered. Going to try that later today I guess.

The only information I could find is that yes, the car will check the angle of the steering wheel against the angle of the wheels and go “holy poo poo you’re gonna die” and try to fix things.

You probably need a bi directional scan tool, TIS/mongoose cable etc. I don’t think you will be able to fake it. You can buy a counterfeit mongoose cable and copy of techstream for $20 but you will need a 32 bit windows computer to run it from what I gather.

Karma Comedian
Feb 2, 2012

I know that regional differences play a big role in pricing, but how much (ballpark) should I be expecting to pay a shop to regear my front end?

97 Jeep Wrangler with a stock d30

PainterofCrap
Oct 17, 2002

hey bebe



Revvik posted:

Yeah I figured but there’s not a lot of information out there on the reset procedure. Which is why I’m wondering if I can fake it out by taking the steering wheel off and putting it back on centered. Going to try that later today I guess.

The only information I could find is that yes, the car will check the angle of the steering wheel against the angle of the wheels and go “holy poo poo you’re gonna die” and try to fix things.

Isn't there a wider tooth on the steering-shaft spline that indicates the centerline?

Astonishing Wang
Nov 3, 2004

Karma Comedian posted:

I know that regional differences play a big role in pricing, but how much (ballpark) should I be expecting to pay a shop to regear my front end?

97 Jeep Wrangler with a stock d30

I just looked into this for my jeep. Theres a local dude with a shop that does it as a hobby, he charges 300 per axle, labor only. The shop nearby charges closer to 450 per axle. A rebuild kit runs a little over 100 I think, with gears on top of that.

Karma Comedian
Feb 2, 2012

Astonishing Wang posted:

I just looked into this for my jeep. Theres a local dude with a shop that does it as a hobby, he charges 300 per axle, labor only. The shop nearby charges closer to 450 per axle. A rebuild kit runs a little over 100 I think, with gears on top of that.

Oh that's not bad at all.

Gotta get mine into the shop for some unrelated things too. I finally got it running, then I went trail riding today with a group of friends and it started acting weird. It just doesn't sound quite right? A lot rougher than it should. And I don't know dick about aftermarket efis and chevy v8s so :derp:

0toShifty
Aug 21, 2005
0 to Stiffy?

Karma Comedian posted:

Oh that's not bad at all.

Gotta get mine into the shop for some unrelated things too. I finally got it running, then I went trail riding today with a group of friends and it started acting weird. It just doesn't sound quite right? A lot rougher than it should. And I don't know dick about aftermarket efis and chevy v8s so :derp:

Has it been sitting for a while? Maybe just bad gas?

Karma Comedian
Feb 2, 2012

0toShifty posted:

Has it been sitting for a while? Maybe just bad gas?

I mean, maybe at least in part, but I topped it off and then went trail riding and added 5 more gallons after. Its throwing a map sensor voltage code, but again I've got no experience with aftermarket efi systems so I'm not about to tear into it unsupervised

Hed
Mar 31, 2004

Fun Shoe
I am going to replace the plugs and some other maintenance on my 2011 Ford Edge 3.5L V6. Is this anti-seize acceptable for my plugs?

The guide I found recommended another but I had the first one left over from brakes; I don't really know why it wouldn't work given the temperature and other ratings but the recommended stuff is nickel and this is aluminum. Plugs I'm going to use are the OE, which are platinum.

Parts Kit
Jun 9, 2006

durr
i have a hole in my head
durr
2006 Honda SI coupe

Car has been draining its battery over long weekends without driving. I got out my multimeter and started doing a parasitic draw check. Got a 0.37 amp draw with the vehicle shut off.

Since my stereo is aftermarket and the previous owner did some dumbfuck things to the wiring it was my first pull, but that didn't do poo poo. But pulling the "Back Up" fuse in the under hood fuse box dropped the drawn down to zero. Keeping in mind the stereo is still unhooked what sort of places should I be looking for? I did notice there is some intermittent drops in the audio on the way home today, like maybe one or more of the passenger side speakers dropped out briefly.

If I can't track this down tonight can I just pull that fuse and keep going? Looks like it might also give the ECU its backup, but would it really matter since my other option is to pull the battery cut off from my truck and use it until I can do this during daylight? I'm trying to hunt down my Haynes manual or an online wiring diagram so I can confirm/deny that bit.

edit: Oookay, can't pull that one because it sends power to something that controls a lot of important poo poo. But it looks like it also sends power into the interior fuse box for some accessory poo poo so off I go pulling those fuses!

Parts Kit fucked around with this message at 02:24 on Nov 28, 2017

autism ZX spectrum
Feb 8, 2007

by Lowtax
Fun Shoe

Parts Kit posted:

2006 Honda SI coupe

edit: Oookay, can't pull that one because it sends power to something that controls a lot of important poo poo. But it looks like it also sends power into the interior fuse box for some accessory poo poo so off I go pulling those fuses!

You're on the right track here. If you can rustle up a wiring diagram you'd be in even better shape.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Parts Kit
Jun 9, 2006

durr
i have a hole in my head
durr
I found it. It is possibly the most single retarded car thing I have ever seen, previous owners not withstanding.

It's the god drat driver's power door lock button. Yes, the button.

The button is pulling over one third of one amp. The spring return for it broke some time ago so it gets stuck on the "lock" side and when it's not in the middle it draws loving 0.37 amps. Get it in the middle (which I did totally by accident while reaching for something else) and the drain immediately drops to zero. The unlock side drains a lot too, but not nearly as much.

As to how much poo poo I've got to remove to get at the thing? Basically all the plastic on the god drat door! And it's got a single wiring harness for the locks and the power windows so yay for that!

Imagine a :ughh: slowly growing to fit your entire screen, that's me right now.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply