|
Vib Rib posted:The jury returned with a not guilty verdict. The implied conservative line is “we should go back to when POC suspected of crimes real or imagined were lynched by mob.” It’s why Ramirez agreeing with them is hilarious and pathetic.
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 01:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 05:56 |
|
|
Vib Rib posted:The jury returned with a not guilty verdict. All of the jurors are guilty of living in Man Fagcisco, capital of the People's Gaypublic of Drugifornia, and therefore have inherently compromised morality.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 02:13
|
|
|
Debt is only bad when the Democratic party does it. I don't know what I expected.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 02:33
|
|
1
|
Prism posted:'Figth' Trump wrote it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 05:03
|
|
|
The only moral DEBT is my DEBT.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 05:33
|
|
|
Lightning Knight posted:The implied conservative line is “we should go back to when POC suspected of crimes real or imagined were lynched by mob.” It’s why Ramirez agreeing with them is hilarious and pathetic. Dude is hispanic-japanese Hed be lynched then impounded back then
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 06:40
|
|
|
If it wasn't for Pelosi's eyes I wouldn't even know that there are supposed to be faces there.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 07:32
|
|
|
Fister Roboto posted:If it wasn't for Pelosi's eyes I wouldn't even know that there are supposed to be faces there. Schumer is the only one you really have to look for. You can fairly easily pick out Wormbama and Biden, and Pelosi's hair sticks up enough that you realize there's a face. But Chuck, Chuck is camouflaged.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 07:34
|
|
|
Ramirez is a creature of non-euclidean space. Concepts like 'depth' or 'perspective' are wholly alien to him.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 07:37
|
|
|
the_steve posted:Schumer is the only one you really have to look for. You can fairly easily pick out Wormbama and Biden, and Pelosi's hair sticks up enough that you realize there's a face. But Chuck, Chuck is camouflaged.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 07:59
|
|
|
Honest question, who would actually recognize who these people are, if they even recognize them as people, if they didn't follow Ramirez's work for years now? Like, how would anyone recognize those as caricatures?
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 07:59
|
|
|
Trapezium Dave posted:After my eyes pick out Schumer I start seeing an unbroken chain of faces across the whole entire mountain side. That's natural. You'll be fine until you start hearing colors that you can't count to.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 08:03
|
|
|
Ashsaber posted:Honest question, who would actually recognize who these people are, if they even recognize them as people, if they didn't follow Ramirez's work for years now? Like, how would anyone recognize those as caricatures? I don't recognize any of them except wormbama, and him only because I've read this thread. Even knowing who they're supposed to be, I can barely see it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 08:36
|
|
|
CoolCab posted:someone’s getting a visit from the secret service But the label 
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 08:36
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 09:04
|
|
|
1  2  3  4  5  6 
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 09:46
|
|
|
Ashsaber posted:Honest question, who would actually recognize who these people are, if they even recognize them as people, if they didn't follow Ramirez's work for years now? Like, how would anyone recognize those as caricatures? The tortoise on the far left is pretty recognizable, I think. Not sure why it's looking at the sky though.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 09:49
|
|
|
Ashsaber posted:Honest question, who would actually recognize who these people are, if they even recognize them as people, if they didn't follow Ramirez's work for years now? Like, how would anyone recognize those as caricatures? The only reason I "recognized" "Obama" was because people in this thread have posted, in the last couple of months, Ramirez's old (lovely) Obama comics (mostly the lazy ones where he "refuses to say islamic terror" which is just one picture mirrored and cut and pasted for the entire strip) to mock just how little his worm-head Obama actually looked like Obama and how lovely Ramirez's art is. I was kind of able to puzzle out that it was Pelosi on the end only because I was fairly sure he'd make Clinton more round-faced (and those are the only two women he'd ever draw on Rushmore in this situation), and had no idea it was Schumer (0%), but guessed it might be Biden because, you know, vice president, next to Obama, but only on that pure deduction by association, rather than the caricature itself.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 09:58
|
|
|
In Swedish law a parent cannot deny their children inheritance. A legally incorrect cartoon.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 10:10
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 10:23
|
|
3
|
Erenthal posted:In Swedish law a parent cannot deny their children inheritance. A legally incorrect cartoon. Also what is the tattoo (?) on her shoulder? An octopus?
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 10:33
|
|
|
Samurai Sanders posted:Can they deny one child it and give it all to another? No, each biological or adopted child is entitled to an equal share of the inheritance. If the deceased has a will, say donating everything to their cat, each child is still entitled by law to 50% of the share they would have recieved of the full inheritance had there been no wil.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 10:45
|
|
|
Samurai Sanders posted:
It's a tattoo of an octopus: 
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 11:05
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 13:37
|
|
|
Trapezium Dave posted:After my eyes pick out Schumer I start seeing an unbroken chain of faces across the whole entire mountain side. the_steve posted:That's natural. You'll be fine until you start hearing colors that you can't count to. Yessss. I want you guys at my xmas party.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 14:05
|
|
|
That's a fantastic McConnell
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 15:14
|
|
|
 Observer:  "Trump dumps: the not so special relationship - Chris Riddell on the US president’s retweeting of Britain First extremist videos" Sunday Telegraph:  Tory war with Met police over 'thousands of pornographic images on computer of Damian Green' Independent on Sunday:  Sunday Times: 
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 15:54
|
|
|
Alhazred posted:It's a tattoo of an octopus: It's worse; a tattoo of a cthulhu
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 16:22
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 16:27
|
|
|
Man, I thought Gamble was a Republican but this is a very strong anti-supply-side-economics argument Did I just remember wrong?
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 17:09
|
|
|
Visit your dad Zelda.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 17:15
|
|
|
Michael is a good house elf.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 17:31
|
|
|
 Kirschen posted:Pollard’s parole terms after he served 30 years of a life sentence, include a curfew that confines him to his Manhattan home from 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. preventing him from attending his synagogue and require him to submit any computer, including an employer’s, for inspection. He must also wear a GPS-monitoring device that forces him, as an observant Jew, to violate the Sabbath.. Pollard, 62, must also remain in the US for another five years, despite his having served a longer sentence for spying for an ally than anyone in US history. It is inconceivable that he could still disclose obsolete secrets from more than 30 years ago.  Sportslich posted:After years of mediocre quarterbacks, horrible coaches and disappointing seasons, most Eagles fans (myself included), find it difficult to just sit back and enjoy the ride. Go Birds!
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 18:08
|
|
|
"Please let go of the spy we used against you US, but how dare you give Russia our intel!"
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 18:15
|
|
|
Kirschen is garbage but I actually don’t see the value in treating a 62 year old guy who’s been in prison for decades like he’s some great security risk. I don’t know that he needs to be pardoned but the terms of his parole are excessive from where I’m sitting. Kirschen’s only interested in it because he’s a dickhead though.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 18:21
|
|
|
How does a GPS violate the Sabbath? I'm pretty sure orbital positioning devices aren't mentioned in the Torah.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 18:29
|
|
|
Jews are supposed to rest on the Shabbath, and how can poor Pollard rest when he's always under surveillance???
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 18:41
|
|
|
Cat Mattress posted:How does a GPS violate the Sabbath? I'm pretty sure orbital positioning devices aren't mentioned in the Torah. Some very Orthodox Jews consider any electronics to be ‘work’ for purposes of the Sabbath, because completing a circuit counts as ‘lighting a fire’. There are a bunch of goofy ways they get around that rule though.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 18:42
|
|
|
fool_of_sound posted:Some very Orthodox Jews consider any electronics to be ‘work’ for purposes of the Sabbath, because completing a circuit counts as ‘lighting a fire’. There are a bunch of goofy ways they get around that rule though. God hates you if you press elevator buttons during the Sabbath. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shabbat_elevator
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 19:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 05:56 |
|
|
Erenthal posted:No, each biological or adopted child is entitled to an equal share of the inheritance. If the deceased has a will, say donating everything to their cat, each child is still entitled by law to 50% of the share they would have recieved of the full inheritance had there been no wil. Or to put that into actual English - in Sweden, the children are always entitled to at least 50% of the inheritance, shared among them. So in a situation with two children, the parent's will can alter the amount of inheritance between 25% to 75% of the full sum.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2017 19:13
|
|