|
COACHS SPORT BAR posted:so shaggs what's the best mail client to use on the finest microsoft os, windows 7 upgrade to windows 10 and use windows 10 mail client.
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2017 19:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 22:48 |
|
|
There Will Be Penalty posted:no outlook on macos app store lol yeah, love how they have crafted the description  *clicks more* 
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2017 19:22
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:upgrade to windows 10 and use windows 10 mail client. it is actually really good *except* if you are (and email) bilingual, since it for some reason overrides the os setting for correcting spelling mistakes, so every time i write an email in swedish i need an additional 4 clicks to change the language or it'll randomly change or capitalize words. sort of annoying since it is precisely the sort of thing that microsoft used to always get right
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2017 19:41
|
|
|
for all of androids other failings i do think the thing that gnawed on me most when i had an android phone was how terribly localized it was. it is not a *huge* cost to get right, it just needs focus, attention to detail and committal. which is a pretty good list of qualities google does not have
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2017 19:44
|
|
|
I was using Outlook yesterday and I pasted in some console output in to the front of the email and it decided I was typing in Czech and no amount of disabling automatic language detection or manually specifying English would make it stop underlining every single word in that message as misspelled. Michaelsoft.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2017 19:45
|
|
|
the only reason i use a desktop email client is to have my email database local. this is the same reason i can't just migrate to another email client. it's a thunderbird life for meeee~~~
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2017 19:53
|
|
|
i use em client since thunderbird never ended up working out for me
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2017 19:56
|
|
|
Sapozhnik posted:I'm sort of wondering if Windows Driver Signing didn't have the right idea here. you mean like the default gatekeeper settings on osx? double-clicking an unsigned app on a fresh osx install just tells you its not signed. if you wanna run it, you either have to right click->open then go through a dialog box or enable the poweridiot "just run whatever lol idgaf" option in sysprefs.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2017 20:00
|
|
|
makes sense yeah
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2017 20:04
|
|
|
Sapozhnik posted:makes sense yeah its pretty great imo 
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2017 20:55
|
|
|
Agile Vector posted:in my defense it is about 15 years of emails and accounts so im surprised every time it opens and works. itll probably break next time I try to read something lol
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2017 00:22
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:upgrade to windows 10 and use windows 10 mail client. ON IT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rp2rhM8YUZY
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2017 00:29
|
|
|
aaaaa yessss
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2017 01:26
|
|
|
gently caress whoever decided what we need to get out of a first-run experience is a sardonic personal assistant that won't shut up
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2017 02:48
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:gently caress whoever decided what we need to get out of a first-run experience is a sardonic personal assistant that won't shut up lol btw someone tell whoever at apple that i dont need to "click continue to learn more about your new operating system" when my iphone got updated from ..1 to ..2 or whatever
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2017 04:50
|
|
|
i upgraded my pc and evga installed the counterstrike font and ms unactivated itself
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2017 22:50
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLMCR66zjZo
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2017 00:48
|
|
|
Cybernetic Vermin posted:i am saying you're being stupid ascribing windows on arm existing as an attempt to compete with a specific product, as it is clearly just strategically sound to have around it would be "strategically sound" to have a windows arm build in your back pocket why would it be strategically valuable to induce OEM partners to produce actual products around it, though? particlarly bad products that cost 2x as much as a low-end PC
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2017 04:16
|
|
|
Reminds me of the intro to another brick in the wall pt 3
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2017 08:42
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:why would it be strategically valuable to induce OEM partners to produce actual products around it, though? particlarly bad products that cost 2x as much as a low-end PC twice
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2017 08:45
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:it would be "strategically sound" to have a windows arm build in your back pocket Allegedly there's no inducement -- licensing Windows for ARM costs as much as licensing Windows for x86. From Microsoft's perspective, Qualcomm and Intel competing to produce the best Windows laptop hardware is fuckloads better than Intel doing whatever the gently caress it's been doing for the last decade. Plus this no doubt bought Qualcomm's assistance in the alleged upcoming Microsoft mobile phone attempt, round 51.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2017 16:32
|
|
|
windows 10 mobile was already windows on arm. the big difference here is the built-in x86 emulator/vm idk what the market is tho cause they already tried slow x86 on portables before and it was called netbooks. I guess maybe if the battery life is really really good? still probably not worth it idk why they don't just do stuff to get more people into the windows store. even if its x86 only apps you get more people looking at the store from both the dev and consumer sides.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2017 17:40
|
|
|
michaelsoft wandows
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2017 17:43
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:windows 10 mobile was already windows on arm. the big difference here is the built-in x86 emulator/vm 30 day battery life (which they did not get in round 1 w/surface rt). that's it. there's still no software even for x86 since it's locked to the app store no one uses, and what does exist works worse that the cheapest bargain basement shitbox laptop on the market
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2017 18:58
|
|
|
and again, five years ago some guys off the xda forums had the rt running arbitrary win32 executables using WINE based shim
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2017 19:01
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:there's still no software even for x86 since it's locked to the app store no one uses Did that change? I thought the story was you could upgrade from 10S to Pro (for free, for now) and install any x86 apps.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2017 19:14
|
|
|
oh yeah, looks like they do support upgrading from 10s to pro/home. cool, so they've reached the level of functionality some nerds slapped together five years ago
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2017 19:26
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:idk what the market is tho cause they already tried slow x86 on portables before and it was called netbooks. I guess maybe if the battery life is really really good? still probably not worth it no* arm chip is even as fast as slow x86, either imagine a netbook, but slower, and more expensive * edit: no commercially available arm chip. some smartass always wants to post apple benchmarks but apple ain't gonna sell you their chip design Notorious b.s.d. fucked around with this message at 05:28 on Dec 11, 2017 |
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 05:25
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:no commercially available arm chip. some smartass always wants to post apple benchmarks but apple ain't gonna sell you their chip design hey ms saved apple time do to the same and anger intel before their own shift to macos arm
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 07:01
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:* edit: no commercially available arm chip. some smartass always wants to post apple benchmarks but apple ain't gonna sell you their chip design i adore the fact that every discussion of ARM has to be all "excepting apple because then it's not even a loving contest"
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 20:03
|
|
|
Agile Vector posted:hey ms saved apple time do to the same and anger intel before their own shift to macos arm there's a timeline in which microsoft and apple have worked out a deal to include the office suite as part of iOS along with integrated OneDrive support.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 20:04
|
|
|
somehow even hippy dippy RISC-V cores manage to eke out better benchmarks per watt than Cortex-A53s though so god knows what's going on with ARM's own-brand application processor IP
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 20:27
|
|
|
risc-v is the future
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 20:48
|
|
|
risc rules
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 21:04
|
|
|
risc-v is the esperanto of ISAs but hey, any day now...
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 23:10
|
|
|
Sapozhnik posted:risc-v is the esperanto of ISAs yeah except we actually need an esperanto for ISAs? something not-too-weird that's easy to apply and extend without being sued. a common tongue among hobbyists, academics, researchers etc
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 01:49
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:yeah except we actually need an esperanto for ISAs? dsyp
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 01:52
|
|
|
I'm the Apple and Intel grade microarchitecture engineer who would work for free just purely for the love of the craft, you know? as opposed to working for one of those two companies and earning 7 figgies
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 05:39
|
|
|
crapple also can afford to budget putting a big wide chunk of silicon in their phones while the competition is pinching sub-pennies for the cheapest eight cores that can fit the lower than lucky goldstar budgets of the world
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 05:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 22:48 |
|
|
Bulgakov posted:crapple also can afford to budget putting a big wide chunk of silicon in their phones while the competition is pinching sub-pennies for the cheapest eight cores that can fit the lower than lucky goldstar budgets of the world thats still the good phones, theres still the blu ones that somehow shave the bom to hay pennies despite having ample profits from user data sales
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 06:42
|
|