|
Four leagues, four playoff appearances, two top seeds. Lost to my wife in the last week of regular season play by 0.06 points. Would sacrifice three of the four playoff appearances for 0.07 points.
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 16:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 20:55 |
|
|
RCarr posted:Had some collusion in my dynasty league go down this weekend, which involved the 2nd place team and the 7th place team (his friend) both losing on purpose (by sitting all their studs and either leaving roster spots empty or plugging in suspensed/IR/Inactive players), in order for the 2nd place team to drop to 4th to get himself a better playoff matchup. (First place team is decimated by injuries). I used fantasypros rankings and plugged in the highest ranked players for both teams, which resulted in one of them winning, and therefore moving the 2nd place team to 3rd instead of 4th. This means he now plays me and I’m sure I will lose now, since I was trying to do the right thing. Should have been an immediate disqualification and elimination from the playoffs for both of them. Put whoever was next in line in the playoffs so you can lose to them instead
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 16:20
|
|
|
Need QB Advice: I currently own Stafford(vs CHI), Smith(vs LAC), and Goff(@ SEA) Waiver options: Prescott(@ OAK) Ryan(@ TB) Garoppolo(vs TEN) Keenum(vs CIN) Bortles(vs HOU) I should pick up Prescott for this week, right? Who should I drop?
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 16:37
|
|
|
RCarr posted:Need QB Advice: If you are going to play him, drop Stafford
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 16:47
|
|
|
Okay so I need a QB since I lost Wentz. 6 pt TDs, 300 yards gets you a bonus point. Keenum vs. Cin (someone surprisingly dropped him) Foles @ NYG Garoppolo vs. Ten Cutler @ Buf Flacco @ Cle It's gotta be Keenum, right?
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 16:51
|
|
|
why not handsome jimmy
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 16:56
|
|
|
It's Keenum
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 16:56
|
|
|
VietCampo posted:why not handsome jimmy I've got space so I'm grabbing both him and Keenum.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 16:58
|
|
|
Kloaked00 posted:Started off 1-4 and just beat the 4th place guy to secure my spot in the playoffs. Bortles
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 17:06
|
|
|
Alfalfa posted:If you are going to play him, drop Stafford Drop Stafford over Goff and Smith?
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 17:10
|
|
|
A Nightmare of the Fantasy Wealthy: I have Rodgers @CAR and Ben vNE. I bet this comes down to a 10 point difference but given that NE lost to Miami, I'm worried the NE defense is going to come out firing on all cylinders. I'm happy in that Brady will too and Ben will be forced to throw a lot. But then how do you sit Rodgers? Guy is playing for his team's playoff life and Rodgers is the best of the best. But in Carolina... Ugh!
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 17:43
|
|
|
I'd go Ben. Rodgers hasn't played in how many weeks?
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 17:48
|
|
|
RCarr posted:I'd go Ben. Rodgers hasn't played in how many weeks? Same
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 18:01
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:Four leagues, four playoff appearances, two top seeds. Wait, why? According to this, you are still in the playoffs even with the loss? Week 15 Waiver Wire: QB RB WR TE
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 18:05
|
|
|
Drunk Nerds posted:Wait, why? He lost to his wife in fantasy. His wife. Also she did way better than my team in goon slow draft, so lol also.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 18:06
|
|
|
VietCampo posted:He lost to his wife in fantasy. His wife. She's the top seed in another league. In our family league she's the second seed behind me. My wife is good at fantasy. I expect that we're both going to win and then Gordon will bring her the championship.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 18:13
|
|
|
Any ideas for TE this week? I have Brate who doesn't seem like the answer, but the alternatives don't look much better. Witten, Cook, Ebron and Watson are all available.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 18:19
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:then Gordon will bring her the championship. As he should. All Hail Josh Gordon.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 18:20
|
|
|
Well this should be interesting... 3 #1 seeds and a #2 seed with 4 semifinal match-ups next week. Between the 4 leagues I am on winning streaks of 10, 4, 4 and 2. I have Zeke stashed in three of them and Aaron Rodgers AND Zeke in the BML (Using Brees vs the Jets this week to make sure A-Aron is good to go however. Opponent has Kamara, Ingram and Thomas and will start all three. THROW ALL THE PASSES DREW!) In a random Week 14 fact I started Ben over Wentz in Dynasty and will follow that up with starting Cam over Ben this week because I am crazy. Mahomes is my #4 so don't let the door hit you on the way out next year Alex Smith. Will start Week 15 at $345. 4 wins this week is $1270 locked in and if I go 8-0 the last two weeks it's $2675 The gently caress FANTASY FOOTBALL post will be with this comical 1-7/0-8 finish after running through these 4 leagues all year.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 18:28
|
|
|
Drunk Nerds posted:Two years ago I was up 19 against my friend in the BML semis and Brandin Cooks dashed my dreams on MNF. Tuesday morning means open season for relentless mockey. My insults are raining down upon him like ticker tape at my inevitable victory parade. I decided my opening salvo should be high class. So I messaged him, "we've had this date with each other from the beginning." He replied "WOW," so I thjnk he gets it Drunk Nerds fucked around with this message at 19:11 on Dec 12, 2017 |
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 19:02
|
|
|
I'm on to the semi finals against the only other person in my league to put up 1400 points so far. If I win here I am probably better then 50% to win the league, but he has Kamara, AB, and I just lost Wentz. Its Tuesday and I'm freaking out already. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 19:59
|
|
|
Any reason for keeping SEA for weeks 15 and 16 or start streaming? Saints, Vikings, Bills, Panthers, Skins are all available.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 20:16
|
|
|
Octoduck posted:Any reason for keeping SEA for weeks 15 and 16 or start streaming? Saints, Vikings, Bills, Panthers, Skins are all available. Saints this week and Vikes next (especially if A-Aron doesn't come back).
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 20:17
|
|
|
So, so hey guys, hey. How did extremely controversial non-recommended Seattle running back Mike Davis do? I know we usually don't go and revisit past histories, but in this case I had to get through like two pages about him so let's take a look. 15 rushes for 66 yards, and one catch for -1 yards. He left briefly with a rib injury but then returned, but then left again near the end of the game. Jacksonville is somehow a Good Team and the Seahawks were playing away, e.g., not in their gimmick stadium. They were also down and thus forced into passing more than perhaps they would have in a more balanced game. Depending on PPR, he got six to seven points in most scoring schemes. This is adequate as a waiver-wire fill-in, particularly when the team loses the game. I think he still belongs on a waiver-wire pickup article, but he did not score enough points that it's a slam-dunk. Next week the Seahawks are in a division match against the Rams, who have been bad against the run this season. Mike Davis is officially listed as Questionable, so monitor his status. I think he remains the lead back if he's able to play, and this is a decent matchup for Seattle RBs.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 20:57
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:So, so hey guys, hey. How did extremely controversial non-recommended Seattle running back Mike Davis do? I know we usually don't go and revisit past histories, but in this case I had to get through like two pages about him so let's take a look. I snagged him in both my main leagues just to sit on him.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 21:03
|
|
|
Mike Davis argument was a push imo. Edit: also you guys talked me into Davis instead of Theo on the streaming piece and look where that got us Spoeank fucked around with this message at 21:59 on Dec 12, 2017 |
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 21:55
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/john_keim/status/940690450356113408 in pieces enjoy your baffling round 5 selection next year, Jordan
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 22:13
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:https://twitter.com/john_keim/status/940690450356113408 Dude averaged 4.5 receptions per game. Of course he will be a 5th round snag.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 22:15
|
|
|
Alfalfa posted:Dude averaged 4.5 receptions per game. Of course he will be a 5th round snag. That's only if you count just the games he played in.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 22:19
|
|
|
Jordan Reed will be the Zach Ertz of next year
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 22:23
|
|
|
Yeah I avoid Reed like the plague. Every season.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 22:26
|
|
|
RisqueBarber posted:Jordan Reed will be the Zach Ertz of next year I agree, but Zach Ertz had an seventh round ADP this year. Jordan Reed was drafted in the fourth after he was already hurt. Jordan Reed in the second half of your draft erryday. In 2018.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 22:27
|
|
|
If god is dead and existence is a lie, would now be a good time to drop Doyle for Ebron? Of course it is, you silly gently caress, nothing matters. You look at Ebron's production the last four weeks, you notice the fact the Lions still have something to play for, you see Jack Doyle's lack of production and the fact the Colts don't seem to want to be the heartbreakers by beating competitive teams. So you make the move. You drop Doyle for Ebron. Nothing happens. No one cares. None of this matters. You ignore your own advice of patience to ride the "hot hand." Also, KENNY BRIT JUST SIGNED WITH THE PATRIOTS! MVP Sleeper. Dudes in a coma.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 23:42
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:So, so hey guys, hey. How did extremely controversial non-recommended Seattle running back Mike Davis do? I know we usually don't go and revisit past histories, but in this case I had to get through like two pages about him so let's take a look. I didn't mention him this week, because I think he will have no impact. If he's on the wire, let someone else have him. I'm honestly baffled by all the Mike Davis love. I just don't get it. He was the 38th best running back last week in 0.5 ppr. He had 15 carries for 66 yards, but one of those runs was for 21 yards. His other 14 carries were for 45 yards. I barely cared enough to write that. In hindsight, I probably cared too much. It's okay to not care about Mike Davis. It should probably be your default emotion.  decypher posted:If god is dead and existence is a lie, would now be a good time to drop Doyle for Ebron? I touched on this in my waiver wire tight end piece. Eric Ebron, like all tight ends, are pain. Drunk Nerds posted:
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 00:28
|
|
|
Anyone else think Cousins might be a bust for the rest of the season?
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 01:11
|
|
|
RisqueBarber posted:Jordan Reed will be the Zach Ertz of next year I think he's another bad year away from quitting.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 01:11
|
|
|
Sataere posted:I didn't mention him this week, because I think he will have no impact. If he's on the wire, let someone else have him. I'm honestly baffled by all the Mike Davis love. I just don't get it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 01:20
|
|
|
Sataere posted:I didn't mention him this week, because I think he will have no impact. If he's on the wire, let someone else have him. I'm honestly baffled by all the Mike Davis love. I just don't get it. Eh, he beat Barber marginally, and all your other waiver targets last week were ~70% owned, which probably meant a good chance of not being available in competitive leagues. There's no love for Mike Davis, there's just people who need a JAG that is a safe bet for volume and no other healthy RBs to
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 01:20
|
|
|
Yeah exactly. In a 12-team league where everyone owns at least 4 running backs, that's 48 owned running backs. 38th-best means he has to be owned, and if he's on the wire, he's definitely a candidate for pickup for any team that needs a waiver wire running back. He's the starting lead back on an NFL team. At any stage of the season, any such man must be owned. That does not mean he's an exciting guy to start or anything: but no such exciting starting guys will be on the waivers in most leagues in the late season. Admit it, Sataere: you remember him being awful as a niner, you know in your heart he must still therefore be awful as a seahawk, and this is preventing you from recognizing that he's actually a useful player that should be owned in most formats.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 01:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 20:55 |
|
|
Tiptoes posted:It's week 15 and Mike Davis is averaging 18 touches the last two games. You shouldn't just ignore a player like that, even if he should not have been started against the Jaguars D. The Seahawks have the lowest-scoring aggregate RB score on the year, he's their fifth-best RB and they were going up against a top-ten fantasy rush defense. If you want us to repeat the same recommendations as everywhere else when they're lovely recommendations, then I don't know what to tell you. Like I still want to remind folks that this line of thought focusing solely on Mike Davis and his touches talked you all out of a free Theo Riddick who was freely available and who had eighteen more yards and two scores. (note this is not gloating this is a counter-example). Sometimes touches are poo poo. Mike Davis's 66 yards rushing were the most by a Seattle RB this season since Thomas Rawls had 93 in week 3. So he was a second flex at best, despite the touches. It's fine if you guys think he should have been in there but here's the rub: he's not great, the offensive line is a joke, the offense is all passing and they were in a terrible matchup. This is why he wasn't on there. I'm sorry we didn't copy and paste other waiver wire articles. Spoeank fucked around with this message at 01:40 on Dec 13, 2017 |
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 01:36
|
|