|
this is amazing
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 04:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 14:42 |
|
|
I keep hearing that Griffin and Pat need to get together for a project but I've never gotten the feeling that the two like each other at all. They hardly interact and when they do it sounds like neither is really trying beyond courtesy. Pat and Simone on the other hand, there is a strong dynamic that plays really well. This video rules.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 05:05
|
|
|
man it stinks when podcasts don't come out when they usually do.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 06:24
|
|
|
Finally caught up and the latest Final Yahoo was kind of a bummer. A family member recently disappeared town the Flat Earth rabbit hole and "The Government is covering up the ancient race of giants who built our world" is a pretty common part of the mythology. Given that it's Yahoo Answers, the odds are in favor of it just being another one of the trolls trolling trolls that make up a majority of the platform and not a True Believer, but still. New Butt Order fucked around with this message at 13:43 on Dec 12, 2017 |
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 13:40
|
|
|
TORONTO!!!! LISTEN!!!! E: I like when Justin peaks his mic right in my goddamn ear for a loving half a minute singing Immigrant Song badly. Waffleman_ fucked around with this message at 19:01 on Dec 12, 2017 |
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 18:45
|
|
|
I was loving writhing in my seat when they called on a guy with a sign, pleading for them to have learned their lesson.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 19:53
|
|
|
Waffleman_ posted:I was loving writhing in my seat when they called on a guy with a sign, pleading for them to have learned their lesson. it was even worse sitting three rows away because there were like four of them and they couldn't coordinate who was going to talk since they were all wearing the same shirt but only one was holding the sign, and there's a bunch of their arguing that i don't think came through on the mic. it really exemplified the value of the dueling questions format.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 23:09
|
|
|
We were on the opposite row from them and holy gently caress it was awkward. I had no idea what they were promoting but apparently it's a University of Washington Huskies thing, because of course college bros have to ruin everything.
Propaganda Hour fucked around with this message at 23:27 on Dec 12, 2017 |
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2017 23:25
|
|
|
when my phone gave me a notification about MBMBaM and Toronto, and then it was just a gag from the episode, I was sad because I would like them to come to Toronto
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 00:44
|
|
|
I think new rule: No signs. You're at a comedy show, not Wrestlemania.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 00:48
|
|
|
honestly griffin and the bros should just realize if the people didn't take the time to email them a question, it's going to be a bad question or a terrible bit. and as always, never involve your audience in a show, from audience questions to fan submitted songs.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 00:53
|
|
|
So the Dog Pound people were college bros trying to promote their own poo poo and arguing with each other, but what was the furry question? I don't understand what the question asker was trying to say and it seemed to upset the McElroys?
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 01:31
|
|
|
All she got out was that she had too many furries in her D&D game and the McElroys felt like she was trying to set them up.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 01:32
|
|
|
Waffleman_ posted:All she got out was that she had too many furries in her D&D game and the McElroys felt like she was trying to set them up. And it is, at its core, a bummer question. "How do I become more exclusive and unaccepting to my friend's lifestyle?" I don't think they'll ever answer that question. That said, I laughed more at this live episode than I have in a long time at the brothers.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 01:40
|
|
|
So they thought she was trying to trick them into saying something offensive? Or was she just being an rear end in a top hat and saying "I don't like that some of my friends are furries" in which case, what is someone like that doing at a McElroys live show? Either way, I guess that's another good example of why they had to start to crack down on live questions. I thought the show was really hilarious otherwise. Some of the jokes really hit it out of the park!
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 01:42
|
|
|
I don't think audience questions add anything to the show. The past few times when they said they were moving to audience questions I thought, "Oh, here we go.  "I'd be much happier with more Yahoo's or another bit.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 01:50
|
|
|
The Berzerker posted:when my phone gave me a notification about MBMBaM and Toronto, and then it was just a gag from the episode, I was sad because I would like them to come to Toronto I felt the opposite. When I saw the name of the episode I was worried they had gone to Toronto and I'd somehow missed it when in reality I'd be at that show in a second, then I was glad it was a goof. Still would be nice if they came to Ontario somewhere though.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 01:52
|
|
|
Cartoon Violence posted:So they thought she was trying to trick them into saying something offensive? Or was she just being an rear end in a top hat and saying "I don't like that some of my friends are furries" in which case, what is someone like that doing at a McElroys live show? Either way, I guess that's another good example of why they had to start to crack down on live questions. I think it was just like 'what the gently caress do you want us to say kick the furries out?'
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 02:03
|
|
|
Waffleman_ posted:I think new rule: No signs. Counter-argument: Permit only one sign. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 02:06
|
|
|
So was the question that there are people who in real life identify as furries in the D&D group, that there are players playing anthropomorphic characters in the D&D group, or both? Because only the middle question is not a bummer and could lead to some goofs. Joking about different animals and fantasy beasts and whether they would make a good cleric or ranger or whatever.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 03:17
|
|
|
She didn't get that far to be sure. Also the second is still kind of a lovely question. If you're running the game, then you should have vetoed it at the beginning when they made the characters if it bothered you. If you're not running the game, the GM was obviously fine with it, so it's really just your problem.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 03:18
|
|
|
if you don't like playing dnd as a big gnoll rear end in a top hat with huge str who trips and grapples everyone and then laughs at them you're no fun
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 06:53
|
|
|
I'm a 10th level pony berserker.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 07:47
|
|
|
Ojjeorago posted:I'm a 10th level pony berserker. Most animals are kinda berserkers already.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 07:53
|
|
|
Only if you make direct eye contact
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 18:49
|
|
|
creationist believer posted:So was the question that there are people who in real life identify as furries in the D&D group, that there are players playing anthropomorphic characters in the D&D group, or both? Because only the middle question is not a bummer and could lead to some goofs. Joking about different animals and fantasy beasts and whether they would make a good cleric or ranger or whatever. They have in-game furries roles in DnD, they're called druids.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 19:25
|
|
|
Or Aaroka or Shifters or Kenku or.:.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 19:38
|
|
|
my group's furry is a dragonborn
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 21:06
|
|
|
I like to try out different furry races in my games. It's fun to mess around with.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 22:01
|
|
|
Okay now I'm confused, are we talking about furries as a moniker for any anthropomorphic DnD race with fur rather than hair or furries as in people that pretend they're animals. I thought they were referring to the latter. I don't know much about DnD other than TAZ and I'm not making some obscure goof.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 22:09
|
|
|
um excuse me posted:Okay now I'm confused, are we talking about furries as a moniker for any anthropomorphic DnD race with fur rather than hair or furries as in people that pretend they're animals. Yes
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 22:31
|
|
|
the time for getting the brothers to go against furries ended way back when they told some guy living with his parents that it was okay to spend $1000+ on a fursuit
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 22:36
|
|
|
Ariong posted:Most animals are kinda berserkers already. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 22:52
|
|
|
The brothers were previously on record as being against furries, but a push towards "chase your bliss" and "don't yuck any yums" made them at least tolerate them, and also stop directly insulting them.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 22:52
|
|
|
They only thing I wanna yuck is the phrase yuk my yum. It sounds wicked gross and creepily infantile.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 22:56
|
|
|
Yeah, I don't like it, but it's the phrase they use, and it's less to type than "criticize someone's fetishes".
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 23:01
|
|
|
Kink shame works for most, but I know it's what they use so I hear ya
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 23:10
|
|
|
Also 'yuck your yums' can be used for non sexual activity while 'kink' and all tends to imply that. It's a yuck phrase in itself though yea.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 23:23
|
|
|
This phrasing was solved years ago. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aO3Gb5mkwTc
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 23:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 14:42 |
|
|
Looks like we got a bunch of yum-yuckers here.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 00:14
|
|