i actually have reasons to post here unlike half of the people with impostor syndrome

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Serious Hardware/Software Crap > YOSPOS > i actually have reasons to post here unlike half of the people with impostor syndrome

«‹›239 »

cinci zoo sniper: Mar 15, 2013

bob dobbs is dead posted:

lol
just lol

# ? Dec 17, 2017 22:31

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ? Jun 9, 2024 02:58

FlapYoJacks: Feb 12, 2009

CRIP EATIN BREAD posted:

alias gityolo='git commit -am "DEAL WITH IT" && git push -f origin master'

Wow, look at this loving scrub. Here, let me fix this for you.

[alias]
yolo = !"git add -A; git commit -am \"$(echo $(curl -s http://whatthecommit.com/index.txt)\" (http://whatthecommit.com)\")\" && git push -f origin master";

# ? Dec 17, 2017 22:31

cinci zoo sniper: Mar 15, 2013

*in middle aged computer voice* back when i was young, there were no problems learning things

# ? Dec 17, 2017 22:31

FlapYoJacks: Feb 12, 2009

Also I use git at work with gitlab. Every once in a great while I will use git-bfg to clean out the repo, but our repo has a huge amount of binary files and people can't seem to use git-lfs correctly ever.

Other than that, gitlab is cool and good and a great web-frontend for git that should always be used. It destroys github and bitbucket, that's for sure.

# ? Dec 17, 2017 22:35

cinci zoo sniper: Mar 15, 2013

ratbert90 posted:

Also I use git at work with gitlab. Every once in a great while I will use git-bfg to clean out the repo, but our repo has a huge amount of binary files and people can't seem to use git-lfs correctly ever.

Other than that, gitlab is cool and good and a great web-frontend for git that should always be used. It destroys github and bitbucket, that's for sure.

we use it at my new work so im slowly learning whats and how in gitlab - ive used mostly bitbucket before, and some github, and now i have administrate our departmental gitlab (and "train" people to use git (what to click in sourcetree to save sql scripts to ~le butt~))

mildly uncomfortable to host any important projects on gitlab.com after that backup fiasco, and i sure as hell wont self-host it for my personal needs

# ? Dec 17, 2017 22:50

Soricidus: Oct 21, 2010; freedom-hating statist shill

i use bitbucket because github makes you pay for private repos. the issue tracking is kinda poo poo because they want to sell you jira but otherwise it seems fine. what does gitlab do that's better?

# ? Dec 17, 2017 23:14

a witch: Jan 12, 2017

gitlab is better at deleting your data, supporting gamergate, and freezing browsers

# ? Dec 17, 2017 23:23

cinci zoo sniper: Mar 15, 2013

Soricidus posted:

i use bitbucket because github makes you pay for private repos. the issue tracking is kinda poo poo because they want to sell you jira but otherwise it seems fine. what does gitlab do that's better?

for personal projects the issue tracker seems to be needs suiting

# ? Dec 17, 2017 23:26

Sapozhnik: Jan 2, 2005; Nap Ghost

gitlab is open sores github

it seems ok but the deployment process is just a big pile of what the gently caress. it's written in a mix of three languages and there are two canonical ways to deploy it:

1. docker lol
2. git clone their repository and then create some gitignored config files right there in that checkout

also it expects to be launched from sysvinit in tyool almost 2018 so you can bet the authors have Systemd Opinions

# ? Dec 17, 2017 23:26

Luigi Thirty: Apr 30, 2006; Emergency confection port.

gah, I figured out how to print debug info to the screen to figure out why my flat shading is hosed up and apparently I�ve got some calculation issue where the polygon Z changes when X changes? that shouldn�t be happening

it could be one of several matrixes that are wrong, or the matrix*vector operation results, or...

# ? Dec 17, 2017 23:48

NihilCredo: Jun 6, 2011; iram omni possibili modo preme:
plus una illa te diffamabit, quam multæ virtutes commendabunt

Sapozhnik posted:

gitlab is open sores github

it seems ok but the deployment process is just a big pile of what the gently caress. it's written in a mix of three languages and there are two canonical ways to deploy it:

1. docker lol
2. git clone their repository and then create some gitignored config files right there in that checkout

also it expects to be launched from sysvinit in tyool almost 2018 so you can bet the authors have Systemd Opinions

if you want to deploy it as a docker (highly recommended) here's the config i use. the runner auto-registers without you having to do anything, and all the stuff is saved under a folder in the host so it's easy to backup:

code:

    gitlab:
        image: gitlab/gitlab-ce        
        restart: always

        environment:
            GITLAB_SHARED_RUNNERS_REGISTRATION_TOKEN: ${GITLAB_TOKEN}
            GITLAB_OMNIBUS_CONFIG: |
              external_url 'http://${MACHINE_URL}:${GITLAB_PORT}'
            # Add any other gitlab configuration poo poo here, like email accounts and whatnot

        ports:
            - ${GITLAB_PORT}:${GITLAB_PORT}
            - 443:443
            - 22:22
        
        volumes:
            - ${DOCKER_BINDS}/gitlab/config:/etc/gitlab
            - ${DOCKER_BINDS}/gitlab/logs:/var/log/gitlab
            - ${DOCKER_BINDS}/gitlab/data:/var/opt/gitlab
              
    gitlab_runner:
        image: sgillespie/gitlab-runner
        restart: always
        
        depends_on: [gitlab]
        links: [gitlab]
         
        environment:        
            CI_SERVER_URL: [url]http://[/url]${MACHINE_URL}:${GITLAB_PORT}
            DOCKER_IMAGE: mono:latest # Shouldn't really matter as you can override this in the gitlab-ci.yaml file
            DOCKER_VOLUMES: /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock
            DOCKER_NETWORK_MODE: bridge
            DOCKER_EXTRA_HOSTS: gitlab:${MACHINE_URL}
            REGISTRATION_TOKEN: ${GITLAB_TOKEN}
            RUNNER_EXECUTOR: docker
            RUNNER_TOKEN: ${GITLAB_RUNNER_TOKEN}
                
        volumes:        
            - /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock
            - ${DOCKER_BINDS}/gitlab-runner/config:/etc/gitlab-runner

# ? Dec 18, 2017 00:46

redleader: Aug 18, 2005; Engage according to operational parameters

Luigi Thirty posted:

gah, I figured out how to print debug info to the screen to figure out why my flat shading is hosed up and apparently I’ve got some calculation issue where the polygon Z changes when X changes? that shouldn’t be happening

it could be one of several matrixes that are wrong, or the matrix*vector operation results, or...

that definitely sounds like a math error. goonspeed

# ? Dec 18, 2017 01:07

redleader: Aug 18, 2005; Engage according to operational parameters

just hosed up a deployment. it was number 219

# ? Dec 18, 2017 01:08

Mao Zedong Thot: Oct 16, 2008

gitlab is github for poors

it bad

# ? Dec 18, 2017 01:15

jony neuemonic: Nov 13, 2009

Mao Zedong Thot posted:

gitlab is github for poors

it bad

yeahhh i�ll just keep using bitbucket. i have enough things to janitor, why add one more?

# ? Dec 18, 2017 01:41

Valeyard: Mar 30, 2012; Grimey Drawer

tef posted:

nah we called them conflicts

yeah but merge conflicts are also the same problem in git, thats just a scm problem not specific to any specific one

# ? Dec 18, 2017 02:04

Valeyard: Mar 30, 2012; Grimey Drawer

jony neuemonic posted:

yeahhh i�ll just keep using bitbucket. i have enough things to janitor, why add one more?

bitbucket ftw

# ? Dec 18, 2017 02:05

DaTroof: Nov 16, 2000; CC LIMERICK CONTEST GRAND CHAMPION
There once was a poster named Troof
Who was getting quite long in the toof

Valeyard posted:

yeah but merge conflicts are also the same problem in git, thats just a scm problem not specific to any specific one

ime i get fewer merge conflicts in git than svn or tfs and spend a lot less time janitoring chevrons

been a few years but when i worked a lot with svn it wasn't uncommon for branches to die of neglect just because they were too much hassle to merge

# ? Dec 18, 2017 02:10

tef: May 30, 2004; -> some l-system crap ->

DaTroof posted:

ime i get fewer merge conflicts in git than svn or tfs and spend a lot less time janitoring chevrons

been a few years but when i worked a lot with svn it wasn't uncommon for branches to die of neglect just because they were too much hassle to merge

never had to fix permissions errors with git

# ? Dec 18, 2017 02:21

comedyblissoption: Mar 15, 2006

Valeyard posted:

yeah but merge conflicts are also the same problem in git, thats just a scm problem not specific to any specific one

When I used SVN I had massive issues to merge simple changes in branches to the trunk. Such branch merges in git would have taken like a few seconds.

One time when my coworker did a big refactoring, he then pulled the latest code and it absolutely clobbered his current changes. He also couldn't go back to where he was before when it was all working locally.

# ? Dec 18, 2017 02:33

Colonel Taint: Mar 14, 2004

Merge conflicts don't happen to me often enough for me to care a lot about it, but I still don't understand how conflict resolution works with git mergetool - no matter which merge tool I use. Most times I wind up making one of them look like the version I want, but then it will inevitably complain about something and it's a whole :psyduck:

with trash files in the directory until I just abort the merge and try to redo it but just hand-edit the conflicts.

# ? Dec 18, 2017 02:44

Valeyard: Mar 30, 2012; Grimey Drawer

comedyblissoption posted:

When I used SVN I had massive issues to merge simple changes in branches to the trunk. Such branch merges in git would have taken like a few seconds.

One time when my coworker did a big refactoring, he then pulled the latest code and it absolutely clobbered his current changes. He also couldn't go back to where he was before when it was all working locally.

i see that kind of problem with git as well, far too frequently

svn is bad

git is bad

everything is bad

# ? Dec 18, 2017 02:46

comedyblissoption: Mar 15, 2006

Colonel Taint posted:

Merge conflicts don't happen to me often enough for me to care a lot about it, but I still don't understand how conflict resolution works with git mergetool - no matter which merge tool I use. Most times I wind up making one of them look like the version I want, but then it will inevitably complain about something and it's a whole with trash files in the directory until I just abort the merge and try to redo it but just hand-edit the conflicts.

A 3-way GUI merge tool like P4Merge helps a lot. You see your changes, someone else's changes, and importantly what happened before anyone's changes.

3-way merge is a lot better than 2-way merge.

# ? Dec 18, 2017 02:53

carry on then: Jul 10, 2010; by VideoGames
(and can't post for 10 years!)

eschaton posted:

is your system producing a single deliverable product? how many independent components is it built from?

I work on a large product with contributions from a large number of teams, not something that lives in a single repository and builds a single executable, so daily builds provide a useful synchronization point for everyone

yeah it�s a single product although it�s multiple install images across the supported operating environment. interesting that people mention downstream embedded adopting daily�all our embedders/stack products wait until the quarterly release is gm before picking it up, but it�s an application server so maybe there�s a difference there

thanks all

# ? Dec 18, 2017 03:13

Blinkz0rz: May 27, 2001; MY CONTEMPT FOR MY OWN EMPLOYEES IS ONLY MATCHED BY MY LOVE FOR TOM BRADY'S SWEATY MAGA BALLS

if you're having merge issues your branches are either a) too complex, or b) living too long

# ? Dec 18, 2017 16:06

Maximum Leader: Dec 5, 2014

gitlab is written in ruby and about as slow as you'd expect. dont except it to even start at sub 4gb ram

# ? Dec 18, 2017 17:11

Corla Plankun: May 8, 2007; improve the lives of everyone

that sounds like ops's problem to me fam

# ? Dec 18, 2017 18:03

Sapozhnik: Jan 2, 2005; Nap Ghost

Maximum Leader posted:

gitlab is written in ruby and about as slow as you'd expect. dont except it to even start at sub 4gb ram

yeech. and i feel iffy about each of my JVMs taking up 300MB of RAM (ORMs lol)

# ? Dec 18, 2017 18:42

crazypenguin: Mar 9, 2005; nothing witty here, move along

Valeyard posted:

yeah but merge conflicts are also the same problem in git, thats just a scm problem not specific to any specific one

has it been so long since you've used svn that you've forgotten what it was like?

I think for the 5 years I used svn, there was not one single instance of branching/merging working. I'm not talking about merge conflicts. I mean what svn called merge conflicts, but were just svn being svn.

one time I had reason to branch off a branch, and I think it opened up a portal to hell

# ? Dec 18, 2017 19:18

crazypenguin: Mar 9, 2005; nothing witty here, move along

I don't think I've yet used git for as long as I used svn, but I've definitely had to do weird poo poo like delete trunk in svn and mess around with svn-props more than I've had to blow away clones in git.

# ? Dec 18, 2017 19:22

cinci zoo sniper: Mar 15, 2013

my worst git crime is semi-recurrent

code:

git rm -r --cached . 
git add .
git commit -am "Removes ignored files"

# ? Dec 18, 2017 19:30

anthonypants: May 6, 2007; by Nyc_Tattoo; Dinosaur Gum

i updated visual studio code this morning and it complained that git wasn't installed

# ? Dec 18, 2017 19:41

necrotic: Aug 2, 2005; I owe my brother big time for this!

Thanks to gitlab GitHub has finals been adding new and good features. Thanks gitlab, I can keep not using you!

# ? Dec 18, 2017 19:42

Toady: Jan 12, 2009

https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/929389759624916992

# ? Dec 18, 2017 19:42

eschaton: Mar 7, 2007; Don't you just hate when you wind up in a store with people who are in a socioeconomic class that is pretty obviously about two levels lower than your own?

Toady posted:

https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/929389759624916992

obviously Carmack should really write his own DVCS

# ? Dec 18, 2017 19:55

Sapozhnik: Jan 2, 2005; Nap Ghost

Toady posted:

https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/929389759624916992

carmack has outed himself as a libertarian shitrobot so no danger of that on my part!

# ? Dec 18, 2017 20:31

Doc Block: Apr 15, 2003; Fun Shoe

LOL that he sold id Software to Bethesda and then quit to go do VR poo poo at Occulus/Facebook. And now that the VR gold rush is over, welp :laugh:

Doc Block fucked around with this message at 20:44 on Dec 18, 2017

# ? Dec 18, 2017 20:42

Shaggar: Apr 26, 2006

VR is probably a more interesting problem and its gonna get more popular as the processing power gets cheaper.

# ? Dec 18, 2017 20:49

Shaggar: Apr 26, 2006

also theres a company that has a wireless conversion thing for the vive coming out that looks rad as gently caress

# ? Dec 18, 2017 20:51

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ? Jun 9, 2024 02:58

JawnV6: Jul 4, 2004; So hot ...

my afternoon started with an innocent question about stack sizes, this has horrifically led to a meeting being scheduled 2 days out

# ? Dec 18, 2017 23:58

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Serious Hardware/Software Crap > YOSPOS > i actually have reasons to post here unlike half of the people with impostor syndrome

«‹›239 »