|
mastershakeman posted:and speaking of deep bombs lol at hurts' terrible fleaflicker 10 yards underthrown
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 20:05 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 07:09 |
|
Emron posted:If you want an image of the future, imagine a 320 pound offensive tackle blocking a free safety on play action post routes forever
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 20:07 |
|
How many healthy linebackers does Bama have right now?
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 20:08 |
|
G-Hawk posted:I think I saw about 15 flea flickers during bowl season, and one of them worked. Most were either underthrown, or thrown into double coverage. Trick plays rule but maybe try some different ones, everyone i think it's because most QBs aren't allowed to throw more than 20 yards more than once a game (especially down the middle) and have no idea how to do it
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 20:08 |
|
Emron posted:If you want an image of the future, imagine a 320 pound offensive tackle blocking a free safety on play action post routes forever this rules, where do I sign up
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 20:14 |
|
Emron posted:If you want an image of the future, imagine a 320 pound offensive tackle blocking a free safety on play action post routes forever It's a gateway drug that leads to 2 and 3-QB A-11 formations, next thing you know guys are flipping through the air doing Johnny Rico poo poo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pn_EiAzW2uQ&t=114s
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 20:22 |
|
Korranus posted:It's a gateway drug that leads to 2 and 3-QB A-11 formations, next thing you know guys are flipping through the air doing Johnny Rico poo poo I’d be down for that, minus the fascism
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 20:23 |
|
You just don't have the courage to be a citizen
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 20:24 |
|
Emron posted:I’d be down for that, minus the fascism lol if you think we're not already there.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 20:32 |
|
Sab0921 posted:lol if you think we're not already there. We’re not QUITE to “service guarantees citizenship,” but give it about a year and a half
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 20:33 |
|
pillsburysoldier posted:I wonder how much ratings are going to dip for UGA Alabama. Wasn't the LSU - Alabama rematch pretty low too? https://twitter.com/SolidVerbal/status/948243268168450048
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 20:34 |
|
people love oregon i guess
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 20:36 |
|
mastershakeman posted:people love oregon i guess Well one was against OSU and OSU is pretty consistently the biggest rating draw in college football. A little surprised that Auburn/Oregon one was so high, but I guess Cam Newton was a pretty massive star by that point
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 20:41 |
|
That was also back when Oregon was a new and exciting thing and was supposed to complete their rise to the top
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 20:49 |
|
Oregon - OSU was probably also buoyed by the novelty of being the first playoff championship.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 20:52 |
|
Korranus posted:That was also back when Oregon was a new and exciting thing and was supposed to complete their rise to the top And it was the beginning of OSU’s resurgence since hiring Meyer, marking the beginning of a new dynasty in cfb. Just a huge ratings game all around. And it had the teensy factor of being the first ever playoff championship game. EDIT gently caress YOU GENERAL DOG YOU SON OF A BITCH
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 20:52 |
|
I think the trend to look at in the ratings is that the game does much better when there’s teams from different geographical areas in it. When it’s an all-southern affair, whether that’s just SEC or ACC/SEC, the ratings dip.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 21:00 |
|
Emron posted:If you want an image of the future, imagine a 320 pound offensive tackle blocking a free safety on play action post routes forever Either that or the end of helmeted football and the proliferation of Rugby. But your scenario sounds metal as gently caress, we’d have to rename it MurderBall.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 21:02 |
|
P sure Bama is going to bullshit their way to yet another natty but this isn’t a great matchup for them. They’re incredibly banged up in the front seven and that offense isn’t nearly as dynamic as Oklahoma’s was. I think the main things in their favor are Georgia being drained and pushed to the extreme yesterday and essentially having to miss a practice day because of travel. Bama got to coast and take a three hour bus ride home.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 21:03 |
|
HOTLANTA MAN posted:P sure Bama is going to bullshit their way to yet another natty but this isn’t a great matchup for them. They’re incredibly banged up in the front seven and that offense isn’t nearly as dynamic as Oklahoma’s was. I think the main things in their favor are Georgia being drained and pushed to the extreme yesterday and essentially having to miss a practice day because of travel. Bama got to coast and take a three hour bus ride home. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTq01Q-zAQM&t=435s Bama ain't missing that tackle IMO
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 21:09 |
|
Oregon had a hot-as-hell offense back then. Why wouldn't everyone want to tune in for that? They were a loving circus for a few years; it was awesome.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 21:18 |
|
I’m just stoked that we are in the conversation because I had us in for 9 wins and a SECCG appearance as our ceiling. As long as we can keep it competitive and not totally be embarrassed it’ll all be good.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 21:20 |
|
Emron posted:We’re not QUITE to “service guarantees citizenship,” but give it about a year and a half You realize plenty of sane, successful, thriving countries have mandatory conscription, right?
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 21:23 |
|
Crotch Bat posted:You realize plenty of sane, successful, thriving countries have mandatory conscription, right? Yeah, you’re right, I’m probably reading way too far into it and Verhoeven just wanted to make a plain ol sci fi movie.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 21:29 |
|
Crotch Bat posted:You realize plenty of sane, successful, thriving countries have mandatory conscription, right? Those countries generally haven't been in an actual war for 70+ years and don't stand any real chance of going to war any time soon (Austria, Finland), or if there is a significant chance of full-on war, it's going to be an existential one (South Korea, Israel). In the US, all of the wars we're fighting and likely to fight in the future are far away and not really crucial to the continued existence of our country or our people.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 21:50 |
|
Emron posted:Yeah, you’re right, I’m probably reading way too far into it and Verhoeven just wanted to make a plain ol sci fi movie. Actually, yes. It was only called Starship Troopers because the script they had was basically a knock off, so they just licensed the book. Verhoeven never read it.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 21:54 |
|
The movie is better than the book
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 21:55 |
|
Sash! posted:Actually, yes. It was only called Starship Troopers because the script they had was basically a knock off, so they just licensed the book. Verhoeven never read it. iirc, he read a little bit of it, then quit when he realized it was quasi-fascist garbage and resolved to make the movie as ridiculous and over-the-top as possible to show how stupid the book was.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 21:57 |
|
Speaking of getting rid of penalties, could they get rid of illegal formation without loving things up?
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 22:02 |
|
Pakled posted:Those countries generally haven't been in an actual war for 70+ years and don't stand any real chance of going to war any time soon (Austria, Finland), or if there is a significant chance of full-on war, it's going to be an existential one (South Korea, Israel). In the US, all of the wars we're fighting and likely to fight in the future are far away and not really crucial to the continued existence of our country or our people. Right but that's sheer geographical and ideological luck because given our location (surrounded by 2 oceans), our ungodly amount of military power (by leaps and bounds the best navy and air force making footholds on coasts virtually impossible), and the fact our country of 350+ million has more guns than people (even if anyone miracled a foothold on either coast they'd have to fight a heavily armed populace across 3,000 miles of rapidly changing land). If we ever actually retreat into a more isolationist pre-WWII mindset or just decided to kick back and minimize the standing army we probably will have to move to some sort of conscription. If we're going to insist on carrying the Western world on our military shoulders we have to keep a large standing army which makes conscription unnecessary. Most of that ends up tying into the rest of the world agreeing to continue using the dollar. If China ever manages to convince them to give up the dollar (unlikely not impossible) we're probably going to give the West the finger and take our toys home and play with them alone. Crotch Bat fucked around with this message at 22:07 on Jan 2, 2018 |
# ? Jan 2, 2018 22:05 |
|
Korranus posted:That was also back when Oregon was a new and exciting thing and was supposed to complete their rise to the top Man, I miss seeing Oregon fans that had never stepped foot in the Northwest all over Texas. I wonder what jersey those fans wear now.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 22:08 |
|
Spacebump posted:Man, I miss seeing Oregon fans that had never stepped foot in the Northwest all over Texas. I wonder what jersey those fans wear now. Oregon -> Baylor -> Clemson
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 22:10 |
|
PostNouveau posted:Oregon -> Baylor -> Clemson This is 1000% correct.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 22:11 |
|
gonna be odd when UCLA fans are everywhere
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 22:11 |
|
D.N. Nation posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTq01Q-zAQM&t=435s they missed plenty against zeke a few years back, let alone against mississippi state and auburn just a month ago
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 22:13 |
|
the mean lunch lady posted:Speaking of getting rid of penalties, could they get rid of illegal formation without loving things up? Not really, unless you want to get rid of ineligible downfield like we were talking about earlier (or make everyone eligible). The formation is how eligible receivers are determined.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 22:13 |
|
PostNouveau posted:Oregon -> Baylor -> Clemson It's never been cool to be a Baylor fan, even when they were winning.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 22:15 |
|
Getting rid of illegal motion is something I'd be down for, though. I want more CFL in my life.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 22:16 |
|
PostNouveau posted:Oregon had a hot-as-hell offense back then. Why wouldn't everyone want to tune in for that? They were a loving circus for a few years; it was awesome. Yeah, the Kelly/Helfrich Ducks' offense was entertaining as hell.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 22:17 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 07:09 |
|
get rid of illegal motion, all players eligible for receptions, except can't throw past line of scrimmage if anyone is downfield. then make offensive holding legal so that QBs have time for deep bombs perfect
|
# ? Jan 2, 2018 22:18 |