|
this is to UI design what spaceballs is to security
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2018 20:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 00:50 |
|
|
Klyith posted:this is to UI design what spaceballs is to security Not enough skinny jeans or mustaches to implement a single page app that looks good.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2018 23:48
|
|
|
Is it worth going through the hassle of setting up Two-Channel Auto-Type Obfuscation on KeePass and using it where you can or is it way too much for a regular person like me on my home desktop (i.e. no work or sensitive data) and copying/pasting through KeyPass is enough?
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 21:05
|
|
|
Mystic Stylez posted:Is it worth going through the hassle of setting up Two-Channel Auto-Type Obfuscation on KeePass and using it where you can or is it way too much for a regular person like me on my home desktop (i.e. no work or sensitive data) and copying/pasting through KeyPass is enough? That feature is mostly BS -- since keyloggers are typically way more sophisticated than just key/clipboard spies -- but it doesn't really hurt to turn it on for entries where you use auto-type already. Auto-type is pretty handy, but be real careful with it. If your focus is on the wrong form element or something, it could result in your password being auto-typed into the wrong textbox. It's best for forms/dialogs that will never change their layout (i.e. nothing on the lovely web that has bored/stupid product-manager-directed redesigns of login forms)
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 23:09
|
|
|
What I do is disable the enter key at the end of the auto-type key sequence, so I can review exactly what box it stuck my password into.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2018 12:53
|
|
|
EssOEss posted:What I do is disable the enter key at the end of the auto-type key sequence, so I can review exactly what box it stuck my password into. Just worth noting that while this will stop you from accidentally entering your password in to a random field, if a malicious site is trying to exploit autofill it could be reading the form values with Javascript or just submitting the form in the background.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2018 15:26
|
|
|
"This code uses the _mm_stream_si128() Intel intrinsic to cause your CPU to play music on AM radio at 1580kHz".
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2018 21:12
|
|
|
D. Ebdrup posted:"This code uses the _mm_stream_si128() Intel intrinsic to cause your CPU to play music on AM radio at 1580kHz". That is so loving cool.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2018 21:23
|
|
|
D. Ebdrup posted:"This code uses the _mm_stream_si128() Intel intrinsic to cause your CPU to play music on AM radio at 1580kHz". Holy poo poo this owns.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2018 22:19
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/EFF/status/954171556455788544 https://twitter.com/SwiftOnSecurity/status/954196685181407232 Edit: https://twitter.com/SwiftOnSecurity/status/954204279929176065 Absurd Alhazred fucked around with this message at 05:15 on Jan 19, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 05:08
|
|
|
The easy-mode takeaway from that is stop trusting 3rd party sources. The hard-mode takeaway is what is the solution for people locked away from the official app distribution by a state actor? Using those apps to avoid surveillance is why they need to rely on side-loading in the first place.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 05:19
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:https://twitter.com/EFF/status/954171556455788544 Last link is a no go. Screenie?
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 05:27
|
|
|
Samizdata posted:Last link is a no go. Screenie? poo poo, I didn't think to screenshot it. It was something about a website not functioning in Safari so they tried to use Brave without adblock and it immediately attempted to hijack to an untrusted website.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 05:29
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/SwiftOnSecurity/status/954208996495327232 This time with screenshot:
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 05:33
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:https://twitter.com/SwiftOnSecurity/status/954208996495327232 poo poo, man, the crap some sites go to to get ad bucks. And the "legit" advertisers ask us why we block ads...
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 05:49
|
|
|
Why is that news? It’s well known that there are poo poo ad networks out there that serve malware, loving JavaScript bitcoin miners, and system prompts that try to look as close to iOS/android assets as possible.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 08:07
|
|
|
Boris Galerkin posted:Why is that news? It’s well known that there are poo poo ad networks out there that serve malware, loving JavaScript bitcoin miners, and system prompts that try to look as close to iOS/android assets as possible.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 09:12
|
|
|
Whoever is behind the SwiftOnSecurity account is just a scub-tier Windows computer janitor who thinks spamming furry stuff is hi-lar-ious. Oh and they get burrhurt easily if you call them out.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 10:44
|
|
|
Back in my day we had Bruce Schneier memes and we liked it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 10:50
|
|
|
I have followed and then unfollowed the Swift Twitter account a couple of times because the sheer amount of shitposting is overwhelming. Also the quantity of manual janitoring they promote is insane, like crafting a bunch of regex filters to redirect suspect email to themselves personally for inspection and then sitting back with a poo poo eating grin as though that’s somehow the greatest way to solve phishing.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 11:29
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:The SwiftOnSecurity twitter account is one of those parody accounts where you're supposed to think it's hilarious that a woman could be any good at computers. I thought the joke wasn't "a woman" but "Taylor Swift" specifically? Is that not the case? poo poo. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 16:23
|
|
|
Avenging_Mikon posted:I thought the joke wasn't "a woman" but "Taylor Swift" specifically? Is that not the case? The “joke” is that it’s a pop star AND that it’s a lol woman, though the emphasis is on the later. As an experiment, replace Taylor Swift with Bruno Mars in your mind.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 17:43
|
|
|
Dadbod Apocalypse posted:The “joke” is that it’s a pop star AND that it’s a lol woman, though the emphasis is on the later. As an experiment, replace Taylor Swift with Bruno Mars in your mind. Yeah, still funny.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 17:46
|
|
|
Proteus Jones posted:Yeah, still funny. Yep.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 17:53
|
|
|
Dadbod Apocalypse posted:The “joke” is that it’s a pop star AND that it’s a lol woman, though the emphasis is on the later. As an experiment, replace Taylor Swift with Bruno Mars in your mind. Funnier if it's The Rock. Or Macho Man, but Proteus Jones posted:Yeah, still funny.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 18:04
|
|
|
Stone Cold on Security would loving own. brb spinning up that gimmick account
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 18:17
|
|
|
If your joke is "CELEBRITY doing THING" then that's going to become stale 1k tweets later.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 18:19
|
|
|
A parody macho man account with legit secfuck content would be p amazing
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 18:20
|
|
|
cheese-cube posted:If your joke is "CELEBRITY doing THING" then that's going to become stale 1k tweets later.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 18:29
|
|
|
Mick Foley on Security
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 18:36
|
|
|
Weekly Infosec Podcast by Gilbert Gottfried
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 18:39
|
|
|
Nah. I just want to see Denis Leary do a thing on infosec.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 18:41
|
|
|
cheese-cube posted:Weekly Infosec Podcast by Gilbert Gottfried If he puts as much effort into it as he did with his delivery of The Aristocrats then I am sold.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 19:34
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:If he puts as much effort into it as he did with his delivery of The Aristocrats then I am sold. Same, actually. This would be great.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 19:36
|
|
|
It makes things easier when you realise that every single CVE submission is just an Aristocrats joke.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 19:38
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:Mick Foley on Security
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 19:44
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:The SwiftOnSecurity twitter account is one of those parody accounts where you're supposed to think it's hilarious that a woman could be any good at computers. I think she mentioned once that Taylor Swift is actually her name. It just so happens that it's a name shared by a pop star. Dadbod Apocalypse posted:The “joke” is that it’s a pop star AND that it’s a lol woman, though the emphasis is on the later. As an experiment, replace Taylor Swift with Bruno Mars in your mind. I don't see her gender emphasized anywhere in her tweets, but I've only been following for a few months. poemdexter fucked around with this message at 20:04 on Jan 19, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 20:02
|
|
|
poemdexter posted:I think she mentioned once that Taylor Swift is actually her name. It just so happens that it's a name shared by a pop star.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 20:17
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:They also post pictures of themself, but if you look carefully they are actually pictures of Taylor Swift, the famous pop singer/songwriter. Welp. I enjoy her dystopian future tech fanfiction more than anything else.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 20:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 00:50 |
|
|
he/she wrote a manifesto on why swift was chosen. https://pastebin.com/mSYM5HS4 https://swiftonsecurity.tumblr.com/post/96422201504/do-you-worry-that-reporting-on-the-leaks-from-an
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2018 20:23
|
|
