|
Uncle Wemus posted:What did he say Essentially Kennedy tried to primary Carter, a sitting president, lost, and his speech was full of side eye and some vague allusions to unity. He also refused to stand with Carter as a gesture of unity. Lanyard types trip over themselves saying the speech was VERY GOOD and IMPORTANT.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 19:43 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 02:00 |
|
Darkman Fanpage posted:https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/956927877873881088 wow i think bad dem response to this may just be Peak Suck
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 19:45 |
|
Matt Zerella posted:Essentially Kennedy tried to primary Carter, a sitting president, lost, and his speech was full of side eye and some vague allusions to unity. He also refused to stand with Carter as a gesture of unity. Michael Harrington didn't run in 1980 because Kennedy decided to enter the race lol
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 19:48 |
|
To be fair, Carter was neoliberal trash, while Teddy and the congressional dems supported a jobs guarantee and national health care.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 19:56 |
|
The Little Kielbasa posted:To be fair, Carter was neoliberal trash, while Teddy and the congressional dems supported a jobs guarantee and national health care. That's fair.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 20:00 |
|
keep kicking sand in his face, no sympathy for either of you twats
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 20:01 |
|
Hillary was a bad candidate???
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 20:03 |
|
Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.), said: "Michael Harrington never believed that we could not do better and never stopped urging us to try harder. My memories of Michael are kaleidoscopic--a charming Irish politician working the floor at a Democratic convention, a thundering Old Testament prophet demanding that our country honor its promise to the poor and the weak, a worldly intellectual. . . . "Our nation is immensely richer because of his work," Kennedy added.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 20:03 |
|
https://twitter.com/ahumorlessfem/status/956772780145500160?s=17 *laughs*
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 20:11 |
|
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/jan/26/john-mcdonnell-davos-uk-business-wef-voters "John McDonnell: I'm in Davos to tell the elite they are held in contempt" Imagine if a single person in the Democratic party would say this to the press.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 20:12 |
|
The SOTU response has usually been done by some sad sap that the establishment is pushing, and they usually fail miserably. Of course that's because the SOTU is usually given by a president with actual chops in oration that some back bencher can't really compete with, so maybe Kennedy will do well. Of course the buried lede here is that the democratic party still has a Kennedy in mothballs so lol
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 20:23 |
|
oh man the next kennedy they trot out in a big competitive election is going to be a huge failson and get the Jeb! treatment
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 20:32 |
|
Feldegast42 posted:The SOTU response has usually been done by some sad sap that the establishment is pushing, and they usually fail miserably. Of course that's because the SOTU is usually given by a president with actual chops in oration that some back bencher can't really compete with, so maybe Kennedy will do well. Yeah I can't think of a single time an SOTU response has been given by anyone that actually amounted to anything Rubio is probably the closest, which is worth a LOL in itself and yeah MA politics is MA politics
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 20:36 |
|
loquacius posted:Yeah I can't think of a single time an SOTU response has been given by anyone that actually amounted to anything Ernst no longer has bread bag shoes.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 20:38 |
|
Feldegast42 posted:The SOTU response has usually been done by some sad sap that the establishment is pushing, and they usually fail miserably. Of course that's because the SOTU is usually given by a president with actual chops in oration that some back bencher can't really compete with, so maybe Kennedy will do well. I remember Jindal and Rubio and well lol
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 20:38 |
|
both jindal and rubio were pretty lol-worthy
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 20:40 |
|
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 20:43 |
|
can't wait for the sotu response by rising star joe kennedy - nobody
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 20:43 |
who was the sad sack that gave last year's response? I don't remember anything he said but I remember laughing at the haunted diner he was in
|
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 20:43 |
|
SKULL.GIF posted:who was the sad sack that gave last year's response? I don't remember anything he said but I remember laughing at the haunted diner he was in i think his legal name is Haunted Diner Guy
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 20:45 |
Burns Strider https://twitter.com/BStrider/status/708821887917232129
|
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 20:51 |
|
Al! posted:hey remember when dem congressman gary condit murdered the girl he was having an affair with and only got away with it because 9/11 happened??????? talk about saved by the bell. thanks osama that's that dudes' name! i remember that poo poo! in the weeks before 9/11 it was like all over the news and in the papers and poo poo like the oj case. and then 9/11 happened and you never heard another word about it. i used to think about that poo poo sometimes
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 20:56 |
|
Of course! Stealing this too
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 20:56 |
|
https://twitter.com/jacobinmag/status/956932574110199808quote:Left-wing proponents of Medicare for All shouldn’t hesitate to drive home how much money the average worker will save with a transition to single payer. But the moment we insist a policy is a social good on the basis of the benefits reaped by the business community, we’ve ceded the political goals of our project. Let’s say Medicare for All failed to save employers money: would this make the demand any less worthy? From a capitalist perspective, yes, but from a socialist perspective, of course not. quote:Even the most liberal business elites will seek to minimize the harm single-payer might inflict on profitability. If we let the liberal business elite come to appear as credible and trusted allies in this fight, they will undoubtedly try to shave down coverage, ease the tax burden on the wealthy, or implement means-testing in hard times. Not only would such concessions hurt the efficacy of a single-payer Medicare for All system, they would make the whole program more vulnerable to conservative sabotage. quote:Much of the work of single-payer organizing lies in convincing people they’re being duped and exploited by the rich. Because Medicare for All is a fairly clear-cut case of egregious, unnecessary exploitation that impacts hundreds of millions of people’s lives at the most intimate level, it’s well-suited for this necessary conversation about class interests and class enemies. It’s also the most popular and radical demand for large-scale decommodification we’ve seen in over a generation. Put it this way: at this moment in American history, single-payer requires class war, and class war requires single-payer. https://twitter.com/SenSanders/status/922816418894270466
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 20:58 |
|
Serf posted:that's that dudes' name! i remember that poo poo! in the weeks before 9/11 it was like all over the news and in the papers and poo poo like the oj case. and then 9/11 happened and you never heard another word about it. i used to think about that poo poo sometimes wanna know how that got wrapped up?????? they falsely accused an illegal immigrant of murdering her
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 20:58 |
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:https://twitter.com/jacobinmag/status/956932574110199808 classic WJ post
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 20:59 |
|
Al! posted:wanna know how that got wrapped up?????? they falsely accused an illegal immigrant of murdering her that dude definitely murdered her tho
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 21:00 |
|
LolGary Condit Wiki posted:In 1988, Condit was a member of the "Gang of Five" – with Charles M. Calderon of Whittier, Gerald R. Eaves of Rialto, Rusty Areias of Los Banos and Steve Peace of Chula Vista which failed to unseat Willie Brown as Speaker of the California State Assembly, by making a deal with Republicans. Peace co-wrote and produced the 1988 film Return of the Killer Tomatoes, in which Condit appeared in an uncredited, nonspeaking cameo during a fight sequence.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 21:00 |
|
i thought this detail was far more important quote:Because of the Levy scandal, Condit was portrayed on an episode of South Park, where he was considered responsible for the disappearance of Chandra Levy.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 21:04 |
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:https://twitter.com/jacobinmag/status/956932574110199808 shut the gently caress up whiskeyjuvenile
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 21:05 |
|
have fun being progressive meanwhile i'm out here building socialism
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 21:09 |
|
GalacticAcid posted:just remembered david brock im surprised he doesnt get more attention here. he looks like the hypothetical offspring of frankenstein and frankenstein’s monster
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 21:10 |
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:have fun being progressive we see you
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 21:11 |
|
I'm told that Dinesh is something, but what
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 21:13 |
|
Weeping Wound posted:I'm told that Dinesh is something, but what i believe his name translates to "Dinesh of the Sousaphone"
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 21:18 |
|
Karl Barks posted:we see you good, we're trying to be visible in our community
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 21:23 |
Ol Standard Retard posted:shut the gently caress up whiskeyjuvenile *laughs*
|
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 21:25 |
Wj is right Bernie is the compromise candidate
|
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 21:27 |
|
Weeping Wound posted:I'm told that Dinesh is something, but what hosed up if true
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 21:29 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 02:00 |
|
Guy Goodbody posted:It's actually really good timing for the Dems to be building up a Kennedy. the whole family is going to get a ton of free publicity soon years ago in politoons i said chappaquidick would outlast the heat death of the universe and i will be right
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 21:29 |