|
isn't he autistic e: lol, but isn't he actually autistic
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2018 17:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 09:32 |
|
|
yes
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2018 17:37
|
|
|
there's your answer then
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2018 17:37
|
|
|
confusing series of posts
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2018 17:41
|
|
|
Someone bought WJ my avatar because I agreed with him about something in the Suck Zone and the circle jerk there melted down about it, as far as i can gather
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2018 17:43
|
|
|
class to me seems important in regards to incarceration because even if a person is originally harassed by police due to being of colour, a wealthy POC is still more likely to avoid prison simply due to having access to better lawyers. I don’t see harassment of minorities by law enforcement and class distinctions in incarceration rates as mutually exclusive. A wealthy POC is still more likely to avoid prison than a poor white person
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2018 17:49
|
|
|
when you think about it, a vanguard party is just a more organized circle jerk
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2018 17:49
|
|
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:when you think about it, a vanguard party is just a more organized circle jerk a revolution occurs when everyone finishes at the same time
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2018 17:51
|
|
|
when the revolution cums,
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2018 18:07
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/MaoistRebelNews/status/432701876128067584
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2018 21:58
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2018 23:24
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/jamieson/status/958432401927131137
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 15:56
|
|
|
One of my best friends worked really hard on that union drive. Shameful.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 16:00
|
|
|
does this relate to the NLRB or is it firmly in the courts now? i.e. is it something a newly stacked trump NLRB could just nuke overnight ala net neutrality and the FCC?
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 16:05
|
|
|
zegermans posted:does this relate to the NLRB or is it firmly in the courts now? i.e. is it something a newly stacked trump NLRB could just nuke overnight ala net neutrality and the FCC? NLRB certification occurred in December 2017
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 16:19
|
|
|
GalacticAcid posted:NLRB certification occurred in December 2017 that... surprises me
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 16:21
|
|
|
zegermans posted:does this relate to the NLRB or is it firmly in the courts now? i.e. is it something a newly stacked trump NLRB could just nuke overnight ala net neutrality and the FCC? i'm a union organizer and am in this exact same position with a completely unrelated company basically what will happen is: Columbia will refuse to bargain indefinitely as it appeals the decision. Much as in my case right now, there is no "stay on bargaining," Columbia has a duty to bargain right now. They will exhaust all of their appeal options, will still refuse to bargain. After 1 year with no contract, the NLRB certification expires and they grad students lose their union. There is very, very little ability to force Columbia to actually bargain. The only actual ability the grad students will have to force Columbia to bargain is striking/direct action. The courts will order them to bargain over and over and it won't really matter.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 16:32
|
|
|
harvard basically pulled the same stunt recently. there was also a huge campaign headed by like 2 students that was super anti-union. they seemed to even have funding for their efforts, which made me think it was astro turfed.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 17:00
|
|
|
Postoyevsky posted:i'm a union organizer and am in this exact same position with a completely unrelated company I vaguely recall reading about this back in the day with the card check idea that Obama folded on - a company can just stall out NLRB certification by plugging their ears and going lalala for a year?
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 17:02
|
|
|
Karl Barks posted:harvard basically pulled the same stunt recently. there was also a huge campaign headed by like 2 students that was super anti-union. they seemed to even have funding for their efforts, which made me think it was astro turfed. I assume Harvard has some nice solid old oaks to string these class traitors up from?
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 17:03
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/mccainenl/status/958433655126478852
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 17:15
|
|
|
 I wonder what would happen if a bunch of workers refused to abide by an NLRB decision. I'm sure a total lack of consequences and then winning by default after a year, right?
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 17:31
|
|
|
zegermans posted:that... surprises me It did me as well at the time.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 17:49
|
|
|
zegermans posted:I assume Harvard has some nice solid old oaks to string these class traitors up from? lol cmon
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 18:07
|
|
|
Goon Danton posted:
right! also this will just continue getting worse because liberal capitalism has successfully domesticated people to the point that nobody will actually challenge authority by any effective means
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 19:14
|
|
|
zegermans posted:I vaguely recall reading about this back in the day with the card check idea that Obama folded on - a company can just stall out NLRB certification by plugging their ears and going lalala for a year? Yes. You can file for injunctions and battle it out legally, but that's costly (even for us, and I work for an national union with 100,000+ members in the US/Canada) The way you typically handle companies who refuse to bargain is you organize the members and have strikes, rallies, etc but there's still nothing forcing them to negotiate. The fact that solidarity and secondary strikes are illegal is very intentional and makes it much, much easier for companies to just blatantly ignore labor law. in the past we (or the Columbia grad students) could get other unions to strike/picket (such as the other on-campus unions) and effectively shut everything down until they bargained with the grad students We won an NLRB appeal recently and the employers response to a letter we sent demanding they begin the bargaining process was a single line email from their counsel which im directly pasting here quote:our position remains: we do not recognize the unit as appropriate and we will not be bargaining
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 19:36
|
|
|
you, dumb: democrats like Bill Clinton killed organized labor me, smart: democrats like Harry Truman killed organized labor
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 19:54
|
|
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:you, dumb: democrats like Bill Clinton killed organized labor Truman vetoed Taft Hartley but the senate overrode his veto with GOP and Dixiecrat votes
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 19:59
|
|
|
all democrats are trash
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 20:05
|
|
|
GalacticAcid posted:Truman vetoed Taft Hartley but the senate overrode his veto with GOP and Dixiecrat votes well whatever still the Democrats
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 20:06
|
|
|
GalacticAcid posted:Truman vetoed Taft Hartley but the senate overrode his veto with GOP and Dixiecrat votes truman is the "the buck stops here" president. with a motto like that, he gets the blame despite his symbolic veto.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 20:06
|
|
|
that’s...sure a take
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 20:07
|
|
|
anyway Truman does suck a lot for NSC-86 and permawar and Korea and inventing Cold War liberalism
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 20:08
|
|
|
Since Truman wasn't a MTW, he is dead to me
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 20:10
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 20:50
|
|
|
what a stupid troll, the real article isquote:
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 21:03
|
|
|
holy poo poo, excellent detective work........i had been fooled
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 21:04
|
|
|
bruenig is a saint!!!
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 21:10
|
|
|
MATT BRUENIG INNOCENT!!!
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 21:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 09:32 |
|
|
Man this guy really went downhill after the first few seasons of the Simpsons huh
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2018 21:28
|
|