|
Al Borland Corp. posted:Lucas was right to put these out over every three years. Two is too much of a rush. Hell, eighteen months to every two years put an incredible strain on the original series Star Trek movies, and those were produced on relative shoestring budgets by Paramount's television division. The only way it's possible for them to do it with giant spectacles like Star Wars is because each movie has a different director, so they get a head-start by beginning pre-production while the previous movie is still shooting or in editing. Fuligin posted:It baffles me that Disney was so eager to wring every drop of the franchise instead of letting it breathe a little. The only reason we don't have like a half-dozen Cars movies by now is because Pixar takes three to four years to produce a single film. Timby fucked around with this message at 18:24 on Jan 31, 2018 |
# ? Jan 31, 2018 18:22 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 06:36 |
|
Fuligin posted:I see these stories on TLJ doing below expectations for the second part of a trilogy, but it seems kind of obvious that Rogue One screws that up a bit? At best it performed at the low end of expectations; I think it's fair to say that it didn't do as well as Disney probably hoped for but it still did well by just about any metric other than by comparison to TFA. I think there's probably one or two factors why it didn't do as well as it could have separate from the content of the movie itself, with the competition from Jumanji et al. (which TFA didn't have) being the big one. I wouldn't be surprised if other studios start putting movies out over Christmas, because they're not "scared" of Star Wars like they were for TFA and Rogue One.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 18:29 |
|
Wheat Loaf posted:At best it performed at the low end of expectations Oh my God stop it
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 18:31 |
|
My quick calculations estimate it made a 100% profit. Low end of expectations.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 18:34 |
|
Fuligin posted:I see these stories on TLJ doing below expectations for the second part of a trilogy, but it seems kind of obvious that Rogue One screws that up a bit? They might not literally be part of the same series, but to most folks I know Star Wars is Star Wars and audience exhaustion three years in a row isn't hard to anticipate. It baffles me that Disney was so eager to wring every drop of the franchise instead of letting it breathe a little. They spent a lot of money getting the rights to the IP.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 18:48 |
|
It was only 4 billion.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 18:49 |
|
Fuligin posted:I see these stories on TLJ doing below expectations for the second part of a trilogy, but it seems kind of obvious that Rogue One screws that up a bit? They might not literally be part of the same series, but to most folks I know Star Wars is Star Wars and audience exhaustion three years in a row isn't hard to anticipate. It baffles me that Disney was so eager to wring every drop of the franchise instead of letting it breathe a little. Star Wars will continue to make a lot of money because ofc Star Wars but it's going to stop being a cultural event like it once was. Instead it'll be like hey you wanna go see that new Star Wars with baby Chewbacca, you wanna go see the new Star Wars with the monkey, you wanna go see the gay Star Wars etc.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 18:58 |
|
euphronius posted:It was only 4 billion. And ticket sales alone have been north of $4 billion, to say nothing of all the merchandising and other ancillary revenue streams. That first Force Friday was obscene.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 18:58 |
|
Hate to tell you Star-tards but the Star Wars bubble is about to burst. Just look at the comic book movie bubble.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 19:20 |
|
Timby posted:Oh my God stop it But I've done my reading this time! I found a graph and everything! More seriously, among other things, I read a Wall Street Journal article the other day (accessible here, but it's behind a paywall - the same information is summarised here) suggesting that TLJ fell $200m short of analysts' projections owing to a faster-than-expected decline in January.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 19:39 |
|
UmOk posted:Hate to tell you Star-tards but the Star Wars bubble is about to burst. Just look at the comic book movie bubble. It's potentially a good thing in the long run because people got so loving bored making superhero movies all the time that they had to start actually writing more interesting films like Logan and Deadpool. Maybe the same thing will happen to Star Wars and it can just become a background setting for more complex narratives than the one type of story Star Wars currently knows how to tell.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 19:42 |
|
Wheat Loaf posted:More seriously, among other things, I read a Wall Street Journal article the other day (accessible here, but it's behind a paywall - the same information is summarised here) suggesting that TLJ fell $200m short of analysts' projections owing to a faster-than-expected decline in January. Note that's not Disney's expectations.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 19:46 |
|
exquisite tea posted:It's potentially a good thing in the long run because people got so loving bored making superhero movies all the time that they had to start actually writing more interesting films like Logan and Deadpool. Maybe the same thing will happen to Star Wars and it can just become a background setting for more complex narratives than the one type of story Star Wars currently knows how to tell. jj abrams needs to make the last movie of the trilogy before that happens, which will probably be another inoffensive piece of garbage.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2018 02:15 |
Strange that people compare the price Disney paid to the box office gross without accounting for, say, advertising, various cuts taken, etc. etc. etc.
|
|
# ? Feb 1, 2018 02:26 |
|
Milky Moor posted:Strange that people compare the price Disney paid to the box office gross without accounting for, say, advertising, various cuts taken, etc. etc. etc.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2018 03:06 |
|
Disney has likely already made back their 4 billion with merch alone.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2018 03:10 |
|
Timby posted:And ticket sales alone have been north of $4 billion, to say nothing of all the merchandising and other ancillary revenue streams. That first Force Friday was obscene. gently caress that - May 4th is already on its way to being a national holiday. It was worth it and then some, their return on the franchise is only getting started.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2018 04:56 |
|
Pops Mgee posted:Disney has likely already made back their 4 billion with merch alone. There's 4 billion worth of TFA toys still sitting in warehouses.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2018 16:42 |
|
sassassin posted:There's 4 billion worth of TFA toys still sitting in warehouses. I seriously doubt they've made 4 billion "worth" of TFA toys period.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2018 18:10 |
|
Solo trailer on Monday during Good Morning America
|
# ? Feb 1, 2018 21:14 |
|
hahaha all the men 18-35 who watch Good Morning America are gonna be like "whaaaat!? an unasked for treat"
|
# ? Feb 1, 2018 21:15 |
|
Han Solo: He Lives for Love and Fights for Family
|
# ? Feb 1, 2018 21:23 |
|
I know it'll never happen but I'd love it if Solo had the first Star Wars sex scene.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2018 21:25 |
|
The first movie titled after its rotten tomato score
|
# ? Feb 1, 2018 21:26 |
|
Han: I'm gonna be a good boy Ron Howard: he wouldnt
|
# ? Feb 1, 2018 21:28 |
|
Detective No. 27 posted:I know it'll never happen but I'd love it if Solo had the first Star Wars sex scene. Star Wars has shown penetration before. Also lots of procreation.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2018 21:29 |
|
moist turtleneck posted:Han: I'm gonna be a good boy "That's the LAST time I stick my neck out for a big eyed brunette's little rebellion!" It wasn't.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2018 21:29 |
|
I want Han to meet Jyn Erso and they should kiss Han learns the "I know" line from Jyn when she ghosts him
|
# ? Feb 1, 2018 21:31 |
|
He ends the movie by picking up the "You'll be dead!" guy (played by Clint Howard this time) on lightsaber crystal planet and shuttling him to Tattooine. He'll be the connective tissue of all side stories going forward
|
# ? Feb 1, 2018 21:35 |
|
Al Borland Corp. posted:"You'll be dead!" guy (played by Clint Howard this time) cosigning this hard
|
# ? Feb 1, 2018 21:43 |
|
4 billion is about 200 million a year profit for 25 years adjusted to present value
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 00:24 |
|
Detective No. 27 posted:I know it'll never happen but I'd love it if Solo had the first Star Wars sex scene.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 01:14 |
|
Mon Cal opera
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 01:27 |
|
Wrong thread
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 01:29 |
|
Solo will use a lightsaber to fatally end the antagonist in a similar manner as Obi Wan using a gun on General Grievous.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 01:57 |
|
*Tosses ancient phallic totem of power away.* "So civilized."
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 02:16 |
|
I thought the movie stank booty rear end
|
# ? Feb 3, 2018 20:16 |
|
Al Borland Corp. posted:He ends the movie by picking up the "You'll be dead!" guy (played by Clint Howard this time) on lightsaber crystal planet and shuttling him to Tattooine. He'll be the connective tissue of all side stories going forward He wouldn’t even need makeup lol
|
# ? Feb 3, 2018 20:22 |
|
That DICK! posted:I thought the movie stank booty rear end Agree. Close thread
|
# ? Feb 3, 2018 20:41 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 06:36 |
|
Why don't you close your face.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2018 20:52 |