Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
ded redd
Aug 1, 2010

by Fluffdaddy

Fans posted:

That they didn’t even whip this seems completely hosed. They’ve completely hosed the Dreamers over

They can do whatever they like as long as they have enough people in all the right places to bend their value system entirely around whatever decisions Democrats in congress make as the right one by default.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

B B
Dec 1, 2005

I just called the Democratic Party of Virginia to see what their thoughts are on Kaine and Warner's votes. Their staffer said that there was another side to the issue, and that shutting down the government would have had too negative an impact on military and Virginia families.

So, yeah, I am done.

B B fucked around with this message at 17:30 on Feb 9, 2018

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


B B posted:

I just called the Democratic Party of Virginia to see what their thoughts are on Kaine and Warner's votes. Their staffer said that there was another side to the issue, and that shutting down the government would have had too negative an impact on military and Virginia families.

So, yeah, I am done.

disgusting. what other side? the deport all immigrants side?

Dead Reckoning
Sep 13, 2011

Condiv posted:

disgusting. what other side? the deport all immigrants side?
Shutting down the government has costs, for NIH researchers, for the CDC, for the EPA, the people who administer Medicaid, and dozens of other important government institutions. I know of a project to remediate groundwater at a superfund site that keeps getting delayed due to the shutdowns. Even if you assume the Republicans aren't ever going to cut a deal on DREAMers, there is literally nothing the Dems can do to force them as the minority party. Unlike the death cult wing of the GOP, Dems actually want a working government, so what purpose does shutting down the government serve? Not everyone thinks DREAMers are literally more important than every other issue. Shutdown brinksmanship works for the Freedom Caucus because for them & their voters, never having a working government is far more tolerable.

B B
Dec 1, 2005

Dead Reckoning posted:

Shutting down the government has costs, for NIH researchers, for the CDC, for the EPA, the people who administer Medicaid, and dozens of other important government institutions. I know of a project to remediate groundwater at a superfund site that keeps getting delayed due to the shutdowns. Even if you assume the Republicans aren't ever going to cut a deal on DREAMers, there is literally nothing the Dems can do to force them as the minority party. Unlike the death cult wing of the GOP, Dems actually want a working government, so what purpose does shutting down the government serve? Not everyone thinks DREAMers are literally more important than every other issue. Shutdown brinksmanship works for the Freedom Caucus because for them & their voters, never having a working government is far more tolerable.

It's also literally the only leverage Democrats have to protect a vulnerable group of people they have professed to care about for years, and they didn't even actually try to use it.

Ytlaya
Nov 13, 2005

Brony Car posted:

I don’t want to make too many excuses for the Democrat since I think they could still be making stands they aren’t making that would look bad in the short term but would help the party on the long term. I just get distressed when I see voters get alienated and opt out of the process when it’s more important than ever to stay engaged.

While I personally disagree with the decision to not vote Democratic in the general, not voting does not mean not being engaged. You can be engaged and not vote. And, probably more importantly, the ultimate source of this sort of thing isn't "people making bad decisions," but rather "the Democratic Party behaving in ways that make people not want to vote for them." When people focus on the individuals who are choosing not to vote, it makes me extremely skeptical about what their real intentions are, because such an action is a lot more consistent with "wanting to feel more correct in an argument" than "wanting to actually change things in a way that makes more people vote."

CAPS LOCK BROKEN
Feb 1, 2006

by Fluffdaddy
All this will teach nonwhite people is that a white supremacist government cannot be trusted, no matter if the democrats or republicans are in charge

Dead Reckoning
Sep 13, 2011

B B posted:

It's also literally the only leverage Democrats have to protect a vulnerable group of people they have professed to care about for years, and they didn't even actually try to use it.
That "leverage" is actually "loving up vital government services until we get what we want on DREAMers." The logical endpoint of that strategy is becoming "the party of No" and encouraging Republicans to make as bigly a mess as possible of the government so that Dems can use the Goldfish like memory of the electorate to run on a platform of Republican failures. This is probably fine if you're on the "single payer and amnesty for illegal immigrants or death", no-compromise, burn-it-all-down train, but one party's elected officials pursuing the most ideologically and electorally satisfying strategy instead of being decent stewards of the government was the thing I and a lot of other people shat on the Republicans for doing during the Obama administration.

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

Dead Reckoning posted:

That "leverage" is actually "loving up vital government services until we get what we want on DREAMers." The logical endpoint of that strategy is becoming "the party of No" and encouraging Republicans to make as bigly a mess as possible of the government so that Dems can use the Goldfish like memory of the electorate to run on a platform of Republican failures. This is probably fine if you're on the "single payer and amnesty for illegal immigrants or death", no-compromise, burn-it-all-down train, but one party's elected officials pursuing the most ideologically and electorally satisfying strategy instead of being decent stewards of the government was the thing I and a lot of other people shat on the Republicans for doing during the Obama administration.

Weren't you a Republican?

Fans
Jun 27, 2013

A reptile dysfunction
Kinda hosed up your issue with Republicans is how they act and not their actual aims.

If the Democrats spent their entire time saying no to lovely Republican policies that sounds like a superb use of their time.

Mr Hootington
Jul 24, 2008

I'M HAVING A HOOT EATING CORNETTE THE LONG WAY

Dead Reckoning posted:

Shutting down the government has costs, for NIH researchers, for the CDC, for the EPA, the people who administer Medicaid, and dozens of other important government institutions. I know of a project to remediate groundwater at a superfund site that keeps getting delayed due to the shutdowns. Even if you assume the Republicans aren't ever going to cut a deal on DREAMers, there is literally nothing the Dems can do to force them as the minority party. Unlike the death cult wing of the GOP, Dems actually want a working government, so what purpose does shutting down the government serve? [B
b] Not everyone thinks DREAMers are literally more important than every other issue. [/b] Shutdown brinksmanship works for the Freedom Caucus because for them & their voters, never having a working government is far more tolerable.

Yes we know you hate people that are not white.

None of this matters since we are all dead soon.

Fans posted:

Kinda hosed up your issue with Republicans is how they act and not their actual aims.

If the Democrats spent their entire time saying no to lovely Republican policies that sounds like a superb use of their time.

He is a literal nazi.

Dead Reckoning
Sep 13, 2011

Nonsense posted:

Weren't you a Republican?
I know this may come as a shock to some, but being to the right of D&D does not a Republican make. Though apparently being a centrist Democrat is just as bad these days.

Dead Reckoning fucked around with this message at 18:27 on Feb 9, 2018

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy

Dead Reckoning posted:

I know this may come as a shock to some, but being to the right of D&D does not a Republican make. Though apparently centrist Democrats are just as bad these days.

REally it neans that the person probably shoukd be sent to a prison camp to improve their demeanor.

The Kingfish
Oct 21, 2015


We HAVE to start using the primary system to get rid of these failure democrats.

Mr Hootington
Jul 24, 2008

I'M HAVING A HOOT EATING CORNETTE THE LONG WAY

Dead Reckoning posted:

I know this may come as a shock to some, but being to the right of D&D does not a Republican make. Though apparently centrist Democrats are just as bad these days.

Lmao you vote republican because you value guns over living humans.

Instant Sunrise
Apr 12, 2007


The manger babies don't have feelings. You said it yourself.
Reminder that Dead Reckoning wanted to get rid of the 14th amendment because it was helping too many undocumented immigrants.

Spun Dog
Sep 21, 2004


Smellrose

Mr Hootington posted:

Lmao you vote republican because you value guns over living humans.

That's totally unfair. Racism is also a contributing factor and shouldn't be forgotten.

Dead Reckoning
Sep 13, 2011

Fans posted:

If the Democrats spent their entire time saying no to lovely Republican policies that sounds like a superb use of their time.
And if the cost of that intransigence included, say, a freeze on all federal environmental remediation efforts and leaving national parks untended until voters put D's back in power, you would consider that acceptable?

InnercityGriot
Dec 31, 2008
I can't even believe people are still trotting out the weak rear end "lesser of two evils" thing. I believed in it. Guess what? It isn't inspiring. It doesn't work. It forces you to constantly concede and slide further to the right. It isn't politically effective. Yet, there's such a huge chunk of the Democratic party that has operated with this being their primary strategy for so long, they are incapable of thinking any other way. And they've trained their loyal voters to think this way too, so they're almost as intransigent as Fox New viewers. If your reaction to a person facing personal strife from policy that Democrats are too scared to attack, is to tut-tut about the importance of that person's vote to maintaining a broken status quo, you are lacking in basic empathy for your fellow man and also lacking the introspection to understand why people don't bother to vote in giant droves. But I guess the moderate white who can't make up his or her mind about how racist they want to be that election is a more important demographic, somehow.

Feldegast42
Oct 29, 2011

COMMENCE THE RITE OF SHITPOSTING

Oh for Gods sake vote, and when you aren't voting then get involved in activism and clearing out the deadwood in the democratic party. Not voting changes nothing and perpetuates the current situation even more than voting for the dems

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!!
May 31, 2006

Dead Reckoning posted:

And if the cost of that intransigence included, say, a freeze on all federal environmental remediation efforts and leaving national parks untended until voters put D's back in power, you would consider that acceptable?

it is not our fault that the subject refused to obey orders, DR. sometimes you just have to act out of self defense.

Rent-A-Cop
Oct 15, 2004

I posted my food for USPOL Thanksgiving!

Feldegast42 posted:

Oh for Gods sake vote, and when you aren't voting then get involved in activism and clearing out the deadwood in the democratic party. Not voting changes nothing and perpetuates the current situation even more than voting for the dems
Vote for a socialist tho.

bird food bathtub
Aug 9, 2003

College Slice
Look into your closest chapter of Democratic Socialists of America. At least the one I attend is pretty straightforward about the goal of gutting the Democratic party, hollowing it out and taking it over from the inside with progressives by primarying every centrist corporate-cock sucking waste of time in the face of problems for real people.

Not gonna hold my breath for their goals of full-bore socialism but I'll work with them on the primarying process and it's actually a tangible, real-world solution to do stuff like tail-light replacement programs, kicking slumlords poo poo in with the courts and pounding the pavement/knocking on doors for candidates.

Harold Fjord
Jan 3, 2004

Dead Reckoning posted:

I know this may come as a shock to some, but being to the right of D&D does not a Republican make. Though apparently being a centrist Democrat is just as bad these days.

It always has been.

PRIMARY BAD DEMS :unsmigghh:

The Kingfish
Oct 21, 2015


The Left's field of political battle is the Democratic National Committee. National extraparty politics are a secondary concern.

Mister Fister
May 17, 2008

D&D: HASBARA SQUAD
KILL-GORE


I love the smell of dead Palestinians in the morning.
You know, one time we had Gaza bombed for 26 days
(and counting!)

Condiv posted:

tbh, i'm kinda surprised how spineless the dems are being wrt dreamers.for all their banging on about caring about immigrants and immigration, when the rubber met the road they've abandoned them totally

Democrats don't even put up anything resembling opposition with a divided government, why would anyone be surprised if they cave when they have almost 0 power whatsoever?

Fans
Jun 27, 2013

A reptile dysfunction

Dead Reckoning posted:

And if the cost of that intransigence included, say, a freeze on all federal environmental remediation efforts and leaving national parks untended until voters put D's back in power, you would consider that acceptable?

I mean yes? Those don’t stack up anywhere close to hundreds of thousands of people being deported or losing their healthcare.

B B
Dec 1, 2005

bird food bathtub posted:

Look into your closest chapter of Democratic Socialists of America. At least the one I attend is pretty straightforward about the goal of gutting the Democratic party, hollowing it out and taking it over from the inside with progressives by primarying every centrist corporate-cock sucking waste of time in the face of problems for real people.

Not gonna hold my breath for their goals of full-bore socialism but I'll work with them on the primarying process and it's actually a tangible, real-world solution to do stuff like tail-light replacement programs, kicking slumlords poo poo in with the courts and pounding the pavement/knocking on doors for candidates.

Actually, yeah, I think this is what I am going to do. I've been eyeing the D.C. chapter for a while, and I am finally fed up enough with the Dems that I am going to go to a meeting to feel it out.

Kanine
Aug 5, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo

InnercityGriot posted:

I can't even believe people are still trotting out the weak rear end "lesser of two evils" thing. I believed in it. Guess what? It isn't inspiring. It doesn't work. It forces you to constantly concede and slide further to the right. It isn't politically effective. Yet, there's such a huge chunk of the Democratic party that has operated with this being their primary strategy for so long, they are incapable of thinking any other way. And they've trained their loyal voters to think this way too, so they're almost as intransigent as Fox New viewers. If your reaction to a person facing personal strife from policy that Democrats are too scared to attack, is to tut-tut about the importance of that person's vote to maintaining a broken status quo, you are lacking in basic empathy for your fellow man and also lacking the introspection to understand why people don't bother to vote in giant droves. But I guess the moderate white who can't make up his or her mind about how racist they want to be that election is a more important demographic, somehow.

this is why revolutionary/insurrectionist politics will always actually matter more.

Terror Sweat
Mar 15, 2009

Dead Reckoning posted:

I know this may come as a shock to some, but being to the right of D&D does not a Republican make. Though apparently being a centrist Democrat is just as bad these days.

Centrist dems are just republicans that aren't openly racist

Kanine
Aug 5, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo

Terror Sweat posted:

Centrist dems are just republicans that aren't openly racist

:yeah:

Fans
Jun 27, 2013

A reptile dysfunction
Also yeah the vote that matters is that primary vote. Vote for whoever is in the national and pour your energy into making sure these fucks lose their chance next time if necessary.

Megaman's Jockstrap
Jul 16, 2000

What a horrible thread to have a post.

Feldegast42 posted:

Oh for Gods sake vote, and when you aren't voting then get involved in activism and clearing out the deadwood in the democratic party. Not voting changes nothing and perpetuates the current situation even more than voting for the dems

The average Dem loves the deadwood in the party. We're where we are because the average Democrat is a complete political dipshit with the memory of a concussed goldfish.

Kanine
Aug 5, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo
we're currently in a global crisis on multiple levels caused by the inherent contradictions of capitalism and the lie that politicians work for us, abandon both bourgeoisie parties and embrace a bottom-up system like democratic confederalism that actually works for the people by the people.

Kanine fucked around with this message at 19:10 on Feb 9, 2018

Ytlaya
Nov 13, 2005

InnercityGriot posted:

I can't even believe people are still trotting out the weak rear end "lesser of two evils" thing. I believed in it. Guess what? It isn't inspiring. It doesn't work. It forces you to constantly concede and slide further to the right. It isn't politically effective. Yet, there's such a huge chunk of the Democratic party that has operated with this being their primary strategy for so long, they are incapable of thinking any other way. And they've trained their loyal voters to think this way too, so they're almost as intransigent as Fox New viewers. If your reaction to a person facing personal strife from policy that Democrats are too scared to attack, is to tut-tut about the importance of that person's vote to maintaining a broken status quo, you are lacking in basic empathy for your fellow man and also lacking the introspection to understand why people don't bother to vote in giant droves. But I guess the moderate white who can't make up his or her mind about how racist they want to be that election is a more important demographic, somehow.

This is the thing - even from a purely pragmatic perspective, it doesn't make sense to focus on the people who aren't voting instead of the party apparatus that makes decisions that make them not want to vote.

It would be one thing if someone made a "it's still best to vote to prevent GOP control" argument alongside a much bigger argument about why it's the Democratic Party's fault for not motivating people to vote, but that's almost never the case. These folks almost always solely focus on voters rather than the party. They might grudgingly admit that the party is flawed, but that isn't the thing they choose to focus on. This is because, as I mentioned before, their main goal isn't to actually cause material change - it's to feel correct in arguments.

ded redd
Aug 1, 2010

by Fluffdaddy
For those of you wondering why Schumer has been working so closely with McConnell on this.

quote:

WASHINGTON — A group of Latino and immigration rights activists protested Tuesday over what the group is calling Sen. Chuck Schumer’s (D-N.Y.) “Latino problem,” denouncing the lawmaker’s “extreme” positions on immigration reform.

At a number of events across the country — including rallies in New York City and Los Angeles — groups of immigration rights activists criticized Schumer for his “hard-line immigration policy proposals,” which the protesters say do not align with Latino voters’ immigration reform priorities.

“Senator Schumer is now the lead Democrat on immigration, the same position occupied by [former Sen.] Ted Kennedy,” Cesar Vargas, executive political director of the DREAM Action Coalition, said Tuesday. “Sen. Kennedy made it his cause to champion and prioritize family reunification whereas Schumer is prioritizing more enforcement that is breaking families apart.”

In Schumer’s home state of New York, more than 100 protesters rallied outside the senator’s New York City office to denounce what the group calls his “punitive” approach to comprehensive immigration reform, specifically the senator’s “[border] enforcement-first” attitude.

“Latino voters came out powerfully in the name of real immigration reform, not the [border] enforcement-first approach being pushed by Sen. Schumer,” Arturo Carmona, executive director of Presente.org, said in a written statement.

“Sen. Schumer’s extreme positions reflect his ‘LATINO PROBLEM:’ going against the Latino electorate by supporting punitive, damaging comprehensive immigration reform measures that polls tell us Latino voters clearly do not — and will not — support,” Carmona added.

A March 2013 poll by Latino Decisions, a Latino political opinion research firm, found that a majority of Latinos — 70 percent — prefer comprehensive immigration reform that includes a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants over reform that made citizenship contingent on border security.

Schumer spokesman Max Young told the New York Daily News, however, that the senator is working “tirelessly” to create a comprehensive immigration bill that, among other things, includes a path to citizenship.

“Senator Schumer is working tirelessly to craft the best comprehensive bill that provides a path to citizenship, accelerates family reunification, establishes a coherent policy that ends illegal immigration and allows for future legal immigration - and that can be passed into law, “ Young said.

Schumer — who is the lead Democrat of the bipartisan “gang of eight” tackling immigration reform — said during a January press conference that the bipartisan coalition’s proposal “will never put these people on a path to citizenship until we have secured the border.”

In 2010, Schumer also wrote and helped pass the Emergency Border Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, which appropriated more than $600 million toward border security reinforcement. Schumer also pushed for national identification cards, which would prevent employers from hiring illegal immigrants. Schumer called the measure, “the nub of solving the immigration dilemma politically speaking.”

“If you say they can’t get a job when they come here, you’ll stop [illegal immigration],” Schumer told Wall Street Journal in a 2010 interview.

During Tuesday’s New York City protest, the immigration rights activists also presented a petition to Schumer’s district office calling on him to return more than $100,000 in political donations from the private prison industry, including donations from the GEO Group and the Corrections Corporation of America. The petition, which has gathered more than 30,000 signatures, states that immigration activists “can’t trust Sen. Schumer to push for fair legislation” as long as Schumer continues to accept contributions from an industry that has a “vested interest in increased detention of immigrants.”

According to a 2011 report by the American Civil Liberties Union, private prisons have profited from “an unprecedented increase” in the number of immigrants detained in private facilities, housing nearly half of all immigrants detained by the federal government. The ACLU also reported that between 1999 and 2009, the Corrections Corporation alone spent more than $18 million lobbying federal lawmakers.

It’s statistics like these that the protesters say they find especially troubling.

Esther Portillo-Gonzales, an organizer for the immigration-rights group Families for Freedom, was among the activists urging Schumer to return the donations to the private prison industry, saying the senator “needs to prioritize family unity over profiting from our incarceration.”

“New York is home to millions of migrants from all over the world,” Portillo-Gonzales stated. “Yet Senator Schumer’s intimate links to private prisons [sic] companies say clearly that he is not a friend of our communities.”

On Sunday, Schumer told NBC’s “Meet the Press” that an immigration reform deal had been reached by the gang of eight.

“With the agreement between business and labor, every major policy issue has been resolved on the gang of eight,” Schumer said Sunday. “We’ve drafted some of it already, the rest will be drafted this week. So I’m very optimistic that we will have an agreement among the eight of us next week.”

Eggplant Squire
Aug 14, 2003


Schumer is such trash. It's an embarrassment he's the leader of the Senate.

Frijolero
Jan 24, 2009

by Nyc_Tattoo
Schumer's literally, unironically a racist Zionist


Frijolero fucked around with this message at 19:29 on Feb 9, 2018

Mr Hootington
Jul 24, 2008

I'M HAVING A HOOT EATING CORNETTE THE LONG WAY
Remember whne he was a good pick to replace reid?

Me either

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Khisanth Magus
Mar 31, 2011

Vae Victus
Isn't the majority/minority leaders just the people who have served the longest from each party.

  • Locked thread