|
Make sure to listen to this song while looking at the map: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nEf2nuH_Xc
|
# ? Feb 11, 2018 04:18 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 07:16 |
|
fishmech posted:Literally nowhere, not a single ZIP code area registered a plurality for the Mets. Wait, really? Not even Queens? I'm more alone then ever.
|
# ? Feb 11, 2018 04:39 |
|
TapTheForwardAssist posted:Make sure to listen to this song while looking at the map: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nEf2nuH_Xc quote:Savannah Georgia, December 22, 1864
|
# ? Feb 11, 2018 05:28 |
|
re: that baseball map, I think one user brought it up, but otherwise everyone's ignoring the effect of transplants from other places staying loyal to their old teams. People move around a lot, and there definitely are places in the US where transplants make up a big portion of the population compared to those raised in the area. When I went to high school in central Florida in the early '00s, I think people like me who were born in the area might have actually been outnumbered by Californians, Georgians, and New Yorkers. Or at least it often felt that way. Also, could the data have been affected by people who aren't very invested in the MLB and are just kinda "uh sure I like the Yankees/Sox, whatever I guess" because those teams are familiar to the disinterested? That might contribute to the Yankee/Sox presence in places that aren't near any MLB franchises.
|
# ? Feb 11, 2018 05:33 |
|
Pervis posted:. The odd age brackets were similar to going to a Metallica concert - a shitload of people in their 40's and 50's and then a bunch of teenagers. It should be also mentioned that Metallica played a concert in the parking lot of the coliseum right before the raider game in the afc championship against the titans https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vQbzVIzKmgo
|
# ? Feb 11, 2018 06:00 |
|
The only Mets fan I'm aware of is, fittingly, Peter Parker.
|
# ? Feb 11, 2018 06:50 |
|
|
# ? Feb 11, 2018 07:22 |
|
Portugal disappoints, though I suppose there wasn't a clear Slavic favorite.
|
# ? Feb 11, 2018 07:32 |
|
Quorum posted:What the hell is up with Lynchburg, Virginia? Are they just weirdly into the Nats or something? So I being from Lynchburg can answer this! The red Sox own the local baseball team so we have good relations with them and also no other teams are nearby really so yeah that's why
|
# ? Feb 11, 2018 10:30 |
|
Is it called Citrus because the characters apparently share head shape with Johnny Lemon?
|
# ? Feb 11, 2018 15:20 |
|
Countries that have gained independence from the UK.
|
# ? Feb 11, 2018 15:47 |
|
I appreciate that it goes with the Statute of Westminster rather than the British North America Act for Canada. I’ve been saying that for years!
|
# ? Feb 11, 2018 18:58 |
|
Stickarts posted:I appreciate that it goes with the Statute of Westminster rather than the British North America Act for Canada. I’ve been saying that for years! The conscription crisis is proof of this argument.
|
# ? Feb 11, 2018 19:54 |
|
What's the date it's going for with Australia?
|
# ? Feb 11, 2018 21:35 |
|
Redeye Flight posted:What's the date it's going for with Australia? Statute of Westminster Adoption Act 1942 (of the Parliament of Australia) An Act to remove Doubts as to the Validity of certain Commonwealth Legislation, to obviate Delays occurring in its Passage, and to effect certain related purposes, by adopting certain Sections of the Statute of Westminster 1931, as from the Commencement of the War between his Majesty the King and Germany Date of Royal Assent: 9 October 1942 Retroactively applies from: 3 September 1939
|
# ? Feb 11, 2018 21:43 |
|
Is there any merit to Papua New Guinea gaining independence from the UK instead of from Australia?
|
# ? Feb 11, 2018 21:49 |
|
Smirr posted:Is there any merit to Papua New Guinea gaining independence from the UK instead of from Australia? Yeah that's confusing me as well. They've clearly not counted other instances of former imperial territory that gained independence from places that gained independence (IE: Bangladesh), so that one just uh.... ?
|
# ? Feb 11, 2018 22:58 |
|
And Namibia. :cryingsun:
|
# ? Feb 11, 2018 22:59 |
|
Stickarts posted:I appreciate that it goes with the Statute of Westminster rather than the British North America Act for Canada. I’ve been saying that for years! They're still using the wrong flag though
|
# ? Feb 12, 2018 02:17 |
|
sweek0 posted:Countries that have gained independence from the UK. Should it really be 1776? That's when we declared independence, not when it was won or recognized.
|
# ? Feb 12, 2018 02:57 |
|
|
# ? Feb 12, 2018 05:03 |
|
Delaware
|
# ? Feb 12, 2018 05:15 |
|
Man, PA's all about it!
|
# ? Feb 12, 2018 05:16 |
|
Dreddout posted:Delaware delaware was a slave state that had much heavier cultural ties to the north than most slave states, but still had southern style racism and segregation
|
# ? Feb 12, 2018 05:18 |
|
Yeah honestly I find it more impressive to have had it on the books and decide "No. We want this to be okay" when still in the 1700s than the states that simply never bothered to make a law about it at all. (Kansas is also impressive because that was actively during Bleeding Kansas.)
|
# ? Feb 12, 2018 05:22 |
|
TapTheForwardAssist posted:Man, PA's all about it! Not enough to have just not outlawed interracial marriage in the first place, unlike NY/NJ/CT/VT/NH out of the states that were states by 1800.
|
# ? Feb 12, 2018 05:24 |
|
I wonder if interracial couples got married in those states like how same sex couples used to go to Massachusetts and if anyone has ever documented that.
|
# ? Feb 12, 2018 06:09 |
|
Duckbox posted:I wonder if interracial couples got married in those states like how same sex couples used to go to Massachusetts and if anyone has ever documented that. Almost certainly, and in fact the plaintiffs in Loving v. Virginia did just that. They skipped the border to D.C. to actually get married, but when they returned Virginia refused to acknowledge the validity of the marriage certificate. The case itself actually settled that as a civil contract, marriage licenses issued by any US state had full legal reciprocity in all 50. In the 18th and 19th centuries, your neighbors would probably have just chased you out or had your heirs disinherited anyway, so if you left to get married to someone of another race, you probably just stayed gone.
|
# ? Feb 12, 2018 06:24 |
|
fishmech posted:Not enough to have just not outlawed interracial marriage in the first place, unlike NY/NJ/CT/VT/NH out of the states that were states by 1800. Want to take a wild guess as to why NH and VT never passed a law against interracial marriage?
|
# ? Feb 12, 2018 06:48 |
|
TapTheForwardAssist posted:Want to take a wild guess as to why NH and VT never passed a law against interracial marriage? Whatever thing you are going to come up with, I assure you that it probably also applies to states who did pass laws against it. They both were recorded as having slaves in the 1790 census, even though it is sometimes believed that Vermont's 16 are meant to have been tabulated as free blacks. And Massachusetts (and Maine, being part of it at the time) had removed all local slaves from the state even though slave transport and sale in the harbor was allowed for a while after. fishmech fucked around with this message at 07:01 on Feb 12, 2018 |
# ? Feb 12, 2018 06:58 |
|
fishmech posted:That's Arrington, VA and a few other outer suburbs of Lynchburg, and that red is the Red Sox (by fractions of a percent over Yankees). i was a cubs fan when i was kid in the early 90s because other than local channels the only national channel was WGN
|
# ? Feb 12, 2018 07:12 |
|
Inescapable Duck posted:The only Mets fan I'm aware of is, fittingly, Peter Parker. Maybe he can get some photos of that MENACE, Spider-Man!
|
# ? Feb 12, 2018 07:24 |
|
Redeye Flight posted:What's the date it's going for with Australia? fishmech posted:Statute of Westminster Adoption Act 1942 (of the Parliament of Australia) 1986. Wow. 1901 is the correct answer
|
# ? Feb 12, 2018 07:27 |
|
Anime game Fate/Grand Order features a selection of heroes from history and myths around the world. Here is where they are from:
|
# ? Feb 12, 2018 11:30 |
|
IE states that allow pigs to rape people in their custody
|
# ? Feb 12, 2018 12:04 |
|
Kanine posted:
When has doing something illegal ever gotten a US cop in trouble?
|
# ? Feb 12, 2018 12:14 |
|
Jerry Cotton posted:When has doing something illegal ever gotten a US cop in trouble? yeah it should be noted two pigs in nyc recently raped a young woman in their custody and most likely will not face any punishment despite it not being legal there
|
# ? Feb 12, 2018 12:55 |
|
Kanine posted:yeah it should be noted two pigs in nyc recently raped a young woman in their custody and most likely will not face any punishment despite it not being legal there According to the map it appears legal. Also what exactly does that map mean? Does it mean having sex with someone in custody is not explicitly defined as illegal or are you people barbaric enough to explicitly write down that raping prisoners is perfectly fine?
|
# ? Feb 12, 2018 15:32 |
|
Kanine posted:
But if you outlaw it only the bad cops will do it!
|
# ? Feb 12, 2018 15:48 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 07:16 |
|
Orange Devil posted:According to the map it appears legal. Getting proper consent for sex with someone you have in your custody is arguably impossible, even if the law says that it's not illegal to have sex with them.
|
# ? Feb 12, 2018 15:56 |