|
They said they had no details on pricing at this time. It was the only part of the Steam I caught, though.
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2017 16:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 00:52 |
|
|
Just looked through the last page and didn't see this posted http://www.dacardworld.com/search?Search=warhammer Deep Conquest sale
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 02:35
|
|
|
omnibobb posted:Just looked through the last page and didn't see this posted Well then. Considering I already collect dead card games as a hobby, this is 
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 06:37
|
|
|
Well speaking of dead games, is anyone interested in my ~6k doomtown (ccg) cards? 
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 07:42
|
|
|
I hope the digital version of LotR fixes the bullshit difficulty (and has an easy mode that actually makes things easier).
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2017 00:47
|
|
|
Well, I did jump on that w40k Conquest deal, so Wife and I put together a couple of decks and played our first game today. It was rather fun, though we're still getting some of the timings down (and some of the mechanics could have been better explained in the getting started guide) so we ended up playing with our nose in the bigger rulebook. Definitely going to be on the lookout to finish out the collection (Missing 7 expansions, one pack and the expansion of which are easy enough to find, the others are apparently silver-plated unobtanium, but oh well. Proxies are a thing I guess.) OWLS! fucked around with this message at 02:04 on Dec 24, 2017 |
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2017 01:51
|
|
|
I have a collection problem, and the first few packs of the last cycle we're VERY hard to get. I had to resort to eBay for the last pack I was missing.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2017 04:30
|
|
|
There's apparently a polish gaming site that still has bits of the last cycle in stock, but holy crap the shipping costs.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2017 05:18
|
|
|
OWLS! posted:There's apparently a polish gaming site that still has bits of the last cycle in stock, but holy crap the shipping costs. Might stil be cheaper than eBay.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2017 05:28
|
|
|
My guess is they knew well in advance when their expiration date with GW was going to be and planned accordingly by only printing a bare minimum for those last expansions to avoid taking losses. Between some Gen Con deals and the recent DACW deal I've now got everything except those last 6 packs. I've actually heard that the whole last cycle is worth skipping though, so I'm not stressing about their scarcity.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2017 06:57
|
|
|
I was unsleeving a bunch of old decks I had made and putting them away in the binder and I'm missing a whole Conquest deck
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2017 16:16
|
|
|
speaking of conquest does anyone have reccs for starter decks? ive got basically the whole thing but no one to play it with
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2018 17:53
|
|
|
omnibobb posted:I was unsleeving a bunch of old decks I had made and putting them away in the binder and I'm missing a whole Conquest deck bt dubs, I found the deck this weekend
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2018 22:13
|
|
|
Finally got around to unwrapping Arkham Horror and solo'd the first scenario. It was real fun. Turn one I put out Roland's .38 and the very first treachery forced me to discard it the next turn before I could use it  Didn't stop him from punching and machete-ing his way past unspeakable horrors with a trusty beat cop by his side. This game is fun and I can't wait to get into the next scenario. Do you all play campaign style, or just one scenario at a time?
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2018 07:03
|
|
|
I play one scenario at a time, but I’ve basically moved to OCTGN for playing it
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2018 12:56
|
|
|
canyoneer posted:Finally got around to unwrapping Arkham Horror and solo'd the first scenario. It was real fun. Turn one I put out Roland's .38 and the very first treachery forced me to discard it the next turn before I could use it Campaign style, usually 2-3 scenarios per meetup. Also, thre's a dedicated thread for it here: https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3806880
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2018 22:12
|
|
|
Did anyone try LOTR Digital at PAX?
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2018 10:35
|
|
|
GrandpaPants posted:Did anyone try LOTR Digital at PAX? Very curious about how this plays compared to the analog version. A lot of the preview videos make it look overly simplified...
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2018 14:04
|
|
|
GrandpaPants posted:Did anyone try LOTR Digital at PAX? They announced last week that they wouldn't have a playable version available.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2018 15:02
|
|
|
MeinPanzer posted:Very curious about how this plays compared to the analog version. A lot of the preview videos make it look overly simplified... It simplifies things, changes things, adds things. It's a pretty different game (except for the art).
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2018 15:04
|
|
|
sassassin posted:It simplifies things, changes things, adds things. It's a pretty different game (except for the art). I'm keeping an open mind, but, as I wrote before, if the game isn't different enough in an interesting way from the analog version I'd hesitate to spend nearly as much money on it as I have on physical cards.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2018 18:00
|
|
|
Beneath the Sands may be thematically clever but holy poo poo it's the definition of a go nowhere quest. Ending with 12 threat after 15 rounds feels weird. Also take chump blockers. Lots of them.
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2018 20:04
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkY7zHBNzyU Beware, you have to look at streamers. Haven't watched it yet, so can't really speak to any mechanical changes. Edit: Wow I really don't like how the targeting seems to be RNG. In the card game, it was a good tactical decision to figure out who's defending and who's attacking and who's questing, whereas this is just...random. GrandpaPants fucked around with this message at 00:27 on Feb 14, 2018 |
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2018 23:54
|
|
|
No shadow cards makes it just another hearthstone clone
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2018 00:30
|
|
|
These mechanical decisions and the design so far are kind of turning me off. I hope they revamp the overall design to make the cards in play look more like actual cards.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2018 17:25
|
|
|
I know this is the "Living Card Game" thread, but are there any card games with a similar model coming out by companies other than FFG?
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2018 00:02
|
|
|
VS 2PCG. It's mostly Marvel, with Aliens and Predator sets.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2018 01:10
|
|
|
agscala posted:I know this is the "Living Card Game" thread, but are there any card games with a similar model coming out by companies other than FFG? Shadowfist gets an annual kickstarter. Doomtown just went back to Pinnacle.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2018 13:57
|
|
|
Apparently they're finally getting organized play sorted out more fully for Ashes. I wish more people had that near me, it had some really interesting stuff going on and I would love to have a group that played it competitively.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2018 15:40
|
|
|
PaybackJack posted:Apparently they're finally getting organized play sorted out more fully for Ashes. I wish more people had that near me, it had some really interesting stuff going on and I would love to have a group that played it competitively. It got a decent following at my LCGS, but their distribution model was so hosed up that nobody could get existing products for months and so everyone kinda stopped playing it. Cool game, though.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2018 16:13
|
|
|
PaybackJack posted:Apparently they're finally getting organized play sorted out more fully for Ashes. I wish more people had that near me, it had some really interesting stuff going on and I would love to have a group that played it competitively. Wow, that seems way too late considering all the hype around Ashes in 2015. Honestly, I'm surprised they're even trying. Do you think it will actually revitalize the scene for that game?
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2018 20:12
|
|
|
Reposting here since I'm apparently too stupid to see that this thread exists: So I managed to pick up the Lord of the Rings LCG from FFG at a board gaming flea market for an absolute steal (8 Euros, with the core set + the first Shadows of Mirkwood adventure pack, and in perfect condition). My husband and I have been playing steadily for the past couple weeks, and he's been loving it. He really dislikes competitive gaming, but co-op like this is right up his ally. And it helps that he likes LOTR as a property. For just casual weekend play between us (or with another couple we occasionally game with, who are also fantasy/card game nerds), should I continue with buying the Shadows of Mirkwood adventure packs to keep with a coherent "campaign" structure, or is there another recommended box for me to go with first? I like the look of a lot of the Khazad-Dum stuff since I'm a big fan of dorfs, but I've also heard a lot of people strongly recommending doing the saga expansions (Black Riders) as a next-step.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2018 16:23
|
|
|
Honestly, they are all strong choices if you really want the campaign structure, which would also nudge the black riders ahead. I think the game has been totally superseded by Arkham but it's still a fine game in its own right.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2018 16:36
|
|
|
Thirsty Dog posted:Honestly, they are all strong choices if you really want the campaign structure, which would also nudge the black riders ahead. It's really mostly about the IP. LOTR interests the people I want to play with, while Lovecraft doesn't. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2018 16:44
|
|
|
Black Riders is an extremely good campaign.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2018 18:21
|
|
|
Drone posted:Reposting here since I'm apparently too stupid to see that this thread exists: I would prioritize packs/boxes with player cards that you want to incorporate into your decks. If you like Dwarves, the Hobbit boxes are good for that. Starting with the Heirs of Numenor box the designers started writing a lot more narrative text which adds to the experience of playing a cycle sequentially, so I'd encourage you to do so at least starting with that box.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2018 18:41
|
|
|
Shadows of Mirkwood isn't particularly good design wise. It was okay at release, but now I find it rather hard to recommend other than for the player cards. The dwarf cycle is way better already and in general enjoyable. Saga boxes are probably the best choice for a casual play as they have a lot of familiar content.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2018 18:47
|
|
|
Am I reading The last quest card of Dunland trap correctly that there are a minimum of TWENTY TURNS in a 4 player game?
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2018 04:32
|
|
|
Epi Lepi posted:I would prioritize packs/boxes with player cards that you want to incorporate into your decks. If you like Dwarves, the Hobbit boxes are good for that. Starting with the Heirs of Numenor box the designers started writing a lot more narrative text which adds to the experience of playing a cycle sequentially, so I'd encourage you to do so at least starting with that box. Print off proxies for cards you want. It's insanely expensive and wasteful to buy quest packs just for 3 of a card you think could be good. Chazani posted:Shadows of Mirkwood isn't particularly good design wise. It was okay at release, but now I find it rather hard to recommend other than for the player cards. The dwarf cycle is way better already and in general enjoyable. Yup. Core + Dwarrowdelf + Saga campaign is the definitive collection for good lotrsy quests without inflexible gimmicks and/or crippling difficulty spikes.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2018 05:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 00:52 |
|
|
sassassin posted:Print off proxies for cards you want. It's insanely expensive and wasteful to buy quest packs just for 3 of a card you think could be good. Man I own all of the cards, expensive and wasteful is miles behind me.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2018 07:21
|
|