|
Incoherence posted:The Facebook button is basically a big visible tracking image: you can make them 1px in size and invisible if you just want the side effects. One common use for tracking pixels is in mass emails, where you use the loading of the tracking pixel as evidence that the user read the email (and didn't just delete it). My bulk email provider calls them beacons. And they only show it was opened, not read
|
# ? Feb 26, 2018 22:20 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 22:21 |
|
loquacius posted:If the PMs at my company our selling our tracking data they're certainly not telling me about it [extremely Max Schrems voice] what does the privacy policy say? you DO have a privacy policy... right? Burt Sexual posted:My bulk email provider calls them beacons. And they only show it was opened, not read
|
# ? Feb 26, 2018 22:25 |
|
Fun weird turn for the gun argument is that after Trump's election, leftists, minorities and probably women are buying up and learning to use guns in droves.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2018 09:29 |
Back at my last job I was tasked to add tracking "pixels" to mobile apps aimed at small children. We had this in our privacy policy on the website, but nobody reads that poo poo anyway (and hoo boy imagine me trying to explain to management how "pixel" was inaccurate). It wasn't too bad on iOS, but our apps would get regularly slammed on Android (where everybody can see everything) with people asking "why does this company feel they need to track my child's activity?" Fuckin gross.
|
|
# ? Feb 27, 2018 17:23 |
|
runupon cracker posted:Back at my last job I was tasked to add tracking "pixels" to mobile apps aimed at small children. We had this in our privacy policy on the website, but nobody reads that poo poo anyway (and hoo boy imagine me trying to explain to management how "pixel" was inaccurate). It wasn't too bad on iOS, but our apps would get regularly slammed on Android (where everybody can see everything) with people asking "why does this company feel they need to track my child's activity?" Fuckin gross. It's honestly super refreshing to hear that a bunch of regular people actually noticed and called you guys out instead of just, you know, being tracked and managed like livestock
|
# ? Feb 27, 2018 18:44 |
|
Sorry I'm late today, one of my kidneys is trying to kill mequote:So the worst thing I ever have ever done was this. I cheated on my girlfriend of four years with a woman who was engaged, and then when my relationship ended mailed the fiancé a video of the affair, I took without the woman knowing. Honestly I care more about the fact that you (a) had the affair in the first place and (b) recorded her without her consent than that you sent her fiance the video That part could actually be spun as benevolent since you got him out of a relationship with a cheater, if one conveniently ignores the part where she cheated with you But yeah this entire story reeks of self-destructive tendencies and I'm not surprised to hear that it ended with all parties involved (and then some) being involuntarily alone Anyway some background on this next one: it makes more sense if you go into it with the knowledge that physiognomy is like phrenology, but for faces rather than skulls quote:Obviously the intellectual part of me knows that physiognomy is a quack and has been disproved, but deep down in the superstitious part of me I think there is something to it. There has also been a lot of harm caused by people who promote physiognomy to spread racism and hate. Or it's just racists trying to add some plausibility to the absurdity of their claims. Either way- that's all kinds of messed up and that kind of stuff has no place in our world. Yeah I think it's more likely you have social anxiety than that you're psychic, but you never know I guess
|
# ? Feb 27, 2018 19:42 |
|
loquacius posted:Yeah I think it's more likely you have social anxiety than that you're psychic, but you never know I guess or does he?
|
# ? Feb 27, 2018 19:46 |
|
That guy is gonna have his mind blown by that Seinfeld episode
|
# ? Feb 27, 2018 20:11 |
|
quote:Obviously the intellectual part of me knows that ...and that's where I stopped reading.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2018 20:21 |
|
lmao yeah I'm sure you were able to keep anonymous with the video filmed in your bedroom. Gee why is this filmed in my friend's house, in his bedroom. I have no idea who she could've cheated with!
|
# ? Feb 27, 2018 20:24 |
|
No honey, I have no idea who I'm having sex with in that video
|
# ? Feb 27, 2018 20:36 |
|
Guys, the angle was funny so she'd never know. I don't see what's so unbelievable about that.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2018 21:09 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F89St823hgI
|
# ? Feb 28, 2018 10:30 |
|
quote:2 years ago I had a wonderful life. I had been married for 3 years and had a baby daughter. I loved my family more than life itself. I had a job I enjoyed and my wife and I had just purchased our first home. Things were going remarkably well. quote:Just feel the need to tell someone that I hate most aspects of my day-to-day life. I don't mean this in a suicidal way as that is not anywhere on my radar, more in a sense that most of the activities that I need to engage in daily are not enjoyable to me at all.
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 19:51 |
|
quote:2 years ago I had a wonderful life. I had been married for 3 years and had a baby daughter. I loved my family more than life itself. I had a job I enjoyed and my wife and I had just purchased our first home. Things were going remarkably well. Hahahaha,
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 20:00 |
|
that is hella illegal - at least one party needs to consent to a recording she's going to get slammed hard in court
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 20:03 |
|
Caganer posted:that is hella illegal - at least one party needs to consent to a recording What makes you think she didn't consent?
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 20:04 |
|
The wife didn't secretly set up a camera to trap him, they both set it up and knew about it and obviously were okay with it.
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 20:07 |
|
RCarr posted:What makes you think she didn't consent? one of the people IN THE ROOM need to consent.
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 20:08 |
|
RCarr posted:What makes you think she didn't consent? Either way I doubt it would be illegal as parents can consent on behalf of their children and the baby monitor wasn’t even intended for that purpose. He just happened to stupidly do something in front of it.
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 20:12 |
|
Runaktla posted:Either way I doubt it would be illegal as parents can consent on behalf of their children and the baby monitor wasn’t even intended for that purpose. He just happened to stupidly do something in front of it. [Jeff winger voice] You can certainly think these things, but you'd be wrong for several reasons. First, any space where intimate activity such as a bedroom is occurring has a "reasonable expectation of privacy". The hooker has a reasonable expectation of privacy, regardless of the parents' views on monitoring the baby. Secondly if the baby is not in the room (and I suspect he pit the baby in it's carrier or pen while he had sex) then the wife can't give consent on behalf of a baby who is not in the room. I actually have a background in these matters, and while the recording can be entered into evidence during divorce proceedings, nothing would stop the husband from then taking a copy to the local police and pressing charges. Depending on the state if there's a revenge porn law you could even be looking at felony charges. A lot of risk considering pretty much all states are no fault divorce so no one cares if you cheated, it has zero impact on asset allocation
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 20:17 |
|
You can have a "reasonable expectation of privacy" if you are committing a crime? So if I murdered someone in that bedroom, and happened to say out loud "My name is RCarr, I live at 123 fake street, and I am now leaving the room.", which the baby monitor recorded, that evidence would get thrown out in court?
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 20:19 |
|
RCarr posted:You can have a "reasonable expectation of privacy" if you are committing a crime? Yes. The evidence could be used still since it was not collected by a law enforcement official nor collected at the behest of one. Most prosecutors would not charge someone who recorded a murderer but it would technically be illegal.
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 20:22 |
|
Voter discrimination is "technically illegal" but that doesn't stop the South, no sir
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 20:30 |
|
SciFiDownBeat posted:Voter discrimination is "technically illegal" but that doesn't stop the South, no sir weird how all those southern states that no longer had federal oversight in 2016 went red
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 20:32 |
|
Also there’s no way to prove it was a crime unless they literally got “Hey can I have the money for the sex we had” “yes here is the sex money, prostitute” recorded on the baby monitor
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 20:36 |
|
Good to know, for my clients (attorney, but not family law). I was just taking a guess based upon how I see other laws play out.
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 20:57 |
|
Do you really have a reasonable expectation of privacy if you personally set a recording device in your room, and then personally ensure that it is permanently casting to your wife's phone, and then you gently caress next to it
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 21:20 |
|
ALFbrot posted:Do you really have a reasonable expectation of privacy if you personally set a recording device in your room, and then personally ensure that it is permanently casting to your wife's phone, and then you gently caress next to it Should I repost my explanation?
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 21:21 |
|
To be clear I’m not a lawyer I just have extensive knowledge of recording laws
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 21:22 |
|
Oh just a creeper then Do you also happen to have extensive knowledge on age of consent and Romeo and Juliet laws
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 21:32 |
|
Maybe he's a private eye. Also, why didn't the husband just say he was watching porn?
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 22:02 |
|
Hello prostitute. I, Steve Smithson wish to have sex with you while my wife, Sarah Smithson, is away. Oh yes, sex with you, it's so good etc., you are much more talented than my wife Sarah Smithson, who is away right now from my house at 12 Cheater Street, presumably because this is your job as a prostitute.
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 22:10 |
|
ALFbrot posted:Oh just a creeper then no but i do have extensive knowledge of which public transit systems you can drink on bart: no caltrain: yes amtrak: "You may consume private stock alcoholic beverages only in Sleeping Car accommodations for which you have a valid ticket." while driving: yes (in mississippi)
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 22:13 |
|
Solice Kirsk posted:Maybe he's a private eye. One of those fancy new porns you can put your own voice into, turned up real loud It's a dumb story anyway though because it involves anon and his wife apparently wiring their house with spy mics in every room, to be activated at any time by either party, anon forgetting about it completely, and his wife activating it with the intention of showing her sister that their baby was not currently crying
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 22:17 |
|
Edit: wrong thread
Caganer fucked around with this message at 22:35 on Mar 1, 2018 |
# ? Mar 1, 2018 22:21 |
|
Boring life (but not cheating goon) - this is how my life was pre-divorce. We both came to feel as if we were basically roommates who happened to have kids together. I hope it gets better for you
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 22:21 |
|
Caganer posted:no but i do have extensive knowledge of which public transit systems you can drink on LIRR: yes MTA: yes but only in a paper bag with a straw
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 22:24 |
|
- Some states make it a crime to record things (generally a phone call or discussion) without the other party's consent. Most states do not make it a crime. - The fact that information relating to a crime may have been obtained through the commission of another crime, by a private citizen, does not, in and of itself, make that evidence inadmissible in Court. - "Reasonable Expectation of Privacy" applies to a) what police can search without a warrant, and b) whether the information obtained about one private citizen, by another private citizen, if published or given to anyone else, would support a civil suit for defamation. - You have a baby monitor in your house, that you know about, that you know can be accessed anywhere in the world by your wife. "I was so loving horny for skeezy hooker that I forgot about it" is not sufficient to argue that the evidence is inadmissible in a divorce proceeding or a criminal case against you for solicitation, or sufficient to argue that it was an 'invasion of your privacy' to support a civil suit against your ex-wife for defamation by publication of private facts. - Its probably also not sufficient to support the prosecution of your wife for "eavesdropping" under the relevant state's criminal statute, if it in fact has one - which is different from the "one party consent" crime of recording a conversation. I'd also bet my last dollar that you could search high and low for 50 year and not find an investigator willing to present a case, or a prosecutor willing to file charges against your wife on these facts, even if they met the technical elements of the "eavesdropping" offense (which they probably don't.) "Knowledge of law" with nothing else is kinda like "knowing what the pieces on a chess board do." Its enough to launch a discussion about chess, but insufficient to describe the game, how its played, and what the cause-and-effect outcomes of those moves might be.
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 22:26 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 22:21 |
|
sandoz posted:MTA: yes but only in a paper bag with a straw is that a LAW or just a zizek style meta rule https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9YgBF58Qks
|
# ? Mar 1, 2018 22:28 |