|
Acebuckeye13 posted:I'm the other way around, I recognize the reference but not the show You're off the hook. iospace posted:I recognize the show, but the context is completely illuding me. And you get the flamethrower. E: fanart https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCraY4JHgcU
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2018 13:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 10:41 |
|
|
Acebuckeye13 posted:I'm the other way around, I recognize the reference but not the show Same here, that's why I posted it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2018 14:14
|
|
|
A Place Further Than The Universe It's about a group of high school girls who decide to go to Antarctica.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2018 14:22
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/sorayasaga/status/972109255640694789 Technically sort of fanart. It's unofficial art by Soraya Saga of Yuuou from Xenoblade 2 (a rare Blade she did the character design for) going to see The Shape of Water.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2018 16:20
|
|
|
Hunt Down the Freeman gets its own Full-Life Consequences adaptation.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2018 02:15
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/nyoron/status/972535168442417157
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2018 02:21
|
|
|
    
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2018 12:54
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2018 13:36
|
|
|
the artist missed an opportunity to make Toad look entirely different from what he looks like.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2018 14:20
|
|
|
   
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2018 15:01
|
|
|
 Source  Source  Source  Source  Source
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2018 16:56
|
|
|
"Muddy Jaguar" isn't nearly as cool a name as "Warmonger".
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2018 20:38
|
|
|
Who What Now posted:"Muddy Jaguar" isn't nearly as cool a name as "Warmonger". Jaguars arnt always completely black when they have that sort of melanism  phone posting a picture so it might not come up
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2018 21:40
|
|
|
Hihohe posted:Jaguars arnt always completely black when they have that sort of melanism No worries, I got you (gotta put the image address in the tags, not just the imgur page)
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2018 21:52
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2018 21:58
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Artgerm/status/970678650902257665 https://twitter.com/Artgerm/status/970718861786996736 Twitter feed is SFW
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2018 22:00
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/WowaTheU/status/972582504162123778 Robert Denby posted:Twitter feed is SFW lame
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2018 22:02
|
|
|
Robert Denby posted:https://twitter.com/Artgerm/status/970678650902257665 I think he may have spent more time shading the boobs than anything else.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2018 22:04
|
|
|
   Source
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2018 22:07
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2018 00:35
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Viper_XTR/status/973203373573861377
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2018 00:46
|
|
|
Who What Now posted:I think he may have spent more time shading the boobs than anything else. The more I stare at them, the more I think you might be right. https://twitter.com/wankotkt/status/941259260943523840
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2018 00:54
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2018 02:40
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/KeatonPatti/status/973288869469868038 Machine made Fanfics
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2018 06:01
|
|
|
Huzzah! posted:https://twitter.com/KeatonPatti/status/973288869469868038 This style of joke confuses me because a lot of them are too cohesive to be created through machine learning. Have bots just gotten actual attention spans and ability to create context, or is it all just lovely frameworks for absurdist humor?
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2018 07:58
|
|
|
A lot of the things like the botnik harry potter and fire and fury bot-written stories are slightly edited by people to be legible or given segments of bot writing and they pick the most legible version.
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2018 08:35
|
|
|
Count Uvula posted:This style of joke confuses me because a lot of them are too cohesive to be created through machine learning. Have bots just gotten actual attention spans and ability to create context, or is it all just lovely frameworks for absurdist humor? The latter.
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2018 09:16
|
|
|
Yeah, 100% dude wrote absurdist shitpost fan fiction under the premise of machine learning to explain the inexplicability, bad judgement, and weird factoids that nominally would not be present.
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2018 09:23
|
|
|
i know that isn't the first one of these to do it but could they at least try harder than not at all to make it seem like you aren't just making it up, and just not say you MADE A COMPUTER WATCH 1,000 HOURS OF x
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2018 10:04
|
|
|
The way these work is somebody gets a predictive text engine, like what suggests words on your phone’s keyboard, and feeds it a bunch of text from particular sources. Then, they start to type stuff, and whenever they get a suggestion that makes any grammatical sense, they use it. So, they’re half written by computers and half by humans.
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2018 11:03
|
|
|
Double Punctuation posted:The way these work is somebody gets a predictive text engine, like what suggests words on your phone’s keyboard, and feeds it a bunch of text from particular sources. Then, they start to type stuff, and whenever they get a suggestion that makes any grammatical sense, they use it. So, they’re half written by computers and half by humans. All of the ones I’ve seen have also had people editing whatever the bot spews out into something slightly more coherent. So instead of making the bot generate an entire script it generates a bunch of sentences or paragraphs and a human picks and chooses through that to make a “machine generated script”. Tbh after the first few I think most are just monkey cheese humor but with a layer of ~oooo tech~ on top
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2018 12:19
|
|
|
Yeah, it's either a predictive text keyboard or they wrote it themselves. Either way, saying "A COMPUTER WROTE THIS" is wrong.
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2018 12:34
|
|
|
The Scrubs one worked well because it plays off the formula so well, the Frasier one was where the joke got stale.
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2018 13:26
|
|
|
Also looking at the text of the tweet again, I'm pretty sure they're goofing on predictive text stuff, not actually claiming that it was generated by one, mostly because you can't feed a predictive text keyboard video.
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2018 13:31
|
|
|
Waffleman_ posted:Also looking at the text of the tweet again, I'm pretty sure they're goofing on predictive text stuff, not actually claiming that it was generated by one, mostly because you can't feed a predictive text keyboard video. Look at this joke-getter over here!
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2018 13:46
|
|
|
The height of this whole thing was the Harry Potter book.
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2018 14:31
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2018 15:46
|
|
|
   
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2018 20:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 10:41 |
|
|
https://twitter.com/Psi02904530/status/970161656834732033
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2018 22:14
|
|