|
Nuns with Guns posted:Does Green Ronin still have some sort of working relationship with Suleiman? I don't get why you wouldn't drop his rear end as fast as possible at this point. Oh right, then that'd be them admitting some kind of serious fault. Supposedly no, but they kept working with him well after they were informed about what he had done, so 
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2018 02:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 12:20 |
|
|
It's often hard for people to accept that people they know, or like, or are friends with, have done something awful, and when all your employees are your buddies you may not have the intestinal fortitude to fire them (and accept you're also likely ending your friendship and possibly making an enemy). People behave irrationally and this is a good example. I don't know for sure if that's the reason of course, but it fits with my own experiences.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2018 03:00
|
|
|
Nuns with Guns posted:Does Green Ronin still have some sort of working relationship with Suleiman? I don't get why you wouldn't drop his rear end as fast as possible at this point. Oh right, then that'd be them admitting some kind of serious fault. Their last comment on it was that he was removed from the citadel project and they wouldn't work with him again. No timeline but better than frog God did, or paizo until I kept their feet to the fire on one of their multiple gently caress ups.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2018 03:13
|
|
|
In more evidence of how hosed up the RPG.net moderation rules are, you can't call people liars when they are factually liars.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2018 03:39
|
|
|
Roadie posted:In more evidence of how hosed up the RPG.net moderation rules are, you can't call people liars when they are factually liars. :colbertfacepalmingfourtimes.gif:
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2018 03:55
|
|
|
Fermat is not a good mod.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2018 04:01
|
|
|
Nuns with Guns posted:Does Green Ronin still have some sort of working relationship with Suleiman? I don't get why you wouldn't drop his rear end as fast as possible at this point. Oh right, then that'd be them admitting some kind of serious fault. Not to my knowledge.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2018 07:33
|
|
|
They did say they'd ceased working with him. On the other hand, who fancies taking them at their word these days?
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2018 09:30
|
|
|
It blows my mind that people would set up false accusations against the One Shot people. Or at least, false in that one case. They're such nice people, I've met them and JPC has liked several of my Tweet responses to him, we're practically best friends. I guess even a small actual play podcast can't escape the MAGA CHUDS.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 03:13
|
|
|
Admiral Joeslop posted:It blows my mind that people would set up false accusations against the One Shot people. Or at least, false in that one case. They're such nice people, I've met them and JPC has liked several of my Tweet responses to him, we're practically best friends. They're honestly medium large for a podcast lacking a celebrity or a McElroy. Big if you factor in the AP angle. Six times our size anyway dang it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 04:09
|
|
|
yea in the pretty small pond of actual play podcasts they're fairly big considering they have no voice actors/celebs/the crazy lightning in a bottle MBMBAM fandom adding juice
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 04:41
|
|
|
theironjef posted:They're honestly medium large for a podcast lacking a celebrity or a McElroy. Big if you factor in the AP angle. Six times our size anyway dang it. That's true. They had that gathering/party at GenCon and had to spill out into the actual restaurant instead of just the party room, as people kept filtering in. I'm sure they've squared it away with a lawyer but I have to wonder how far they can take it using Star Wars; WotC doesn't care about TAZ using 5e as they get exposure but I don't know what Disney would think of it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 11:29
|
|
|
Does the Star Wars book licensing have a provision prohibiting commercial use? E: doesn’t look like it! Subjunctive fucked around with this message at 12:10 on Mar 16, 2018 |
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 12:05
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/HillaryMonahan/status/974439081479491585 looks like we're not the only ones seeing that STOP policy as hosed up and bullshit
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 14:48
|
|
|
I missed that part. What utter bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 16:01
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:https://twitter.com/HillaryMonahan/status/974439081479491585 "Hey could you please stop raping me?" "No in fact i'm gonna rape you again!" "Hang on I need to call in an impartial 3rd party arbitration team to determine if this is, in fact, rape."
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 16:11
|
|
|
Warthur posted:They did say they'd ceased working with him. What basically owns about this post is that even though Green Ronin may have gotten rid of the rape-man, they can still be treated as if the rape-man is still present and/or actively being endorsed because we can’t trust anything they may say after loving up the first time. Unfucking themselves is unattainable, any attempt is always going to be in bad faith. In retrospect the last paragraph comes off as kind of bitchy sounding, but I want to add that I actually do this sort of thing all the time, and I love it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 19:01
|
|
|
Oh, gently caress off.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 19:11
|
|
|
Kurieg posted:"Hey could you please stop raping me?" I love how this is like some kinda terrible Archer bit. "Hey, hey Jerry, you see Mike's hand on my tit? Yea, ok cool could you take the fuckman form up to HR and sign as my witness that I confronted Mike about his behavior?" "Yea this is a sane policy written with your safety in mind."
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 19:18
|
|
|
Bedlamdan posted:What basically owns about this post is that even though Green Ronin may have gotten rid of the rape-man, they can still be treated as if the rape-man is still present and/or actively being endorsed because we can’t trust anything they may say after loving up the first time. Unfucking themselves is unattainable, any attempt is always going to be in bad faith.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 19:19
|
|
|
imagine trusting anything a corporation says
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 19:34
|
|
|
Serf posted:imagine trusting anything a corporation says
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 19:35
|
|
|
Y-you monsters, it's almost like you just don't trust corporate PR at all!
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 19:36
|
|
|
Bedlamdan posted:What basically owns about this post is that even though Green Ronin may have gotten rid of the rape-man, they can still be treated as if the rape-man is still present and/or actively being endorsed because we can’t trust anything they may say after loving up the first time. Unfucking themselves is unattainable, any attempt is always going to be in bad faith. You're so loving dense that you might actually be responsible for the sinking of the Titanic. Your intense stupidity and small-minded evil pettiness could drag down a 50,000 ton ocean liner to the bottom of the sea. You loving imbecile. Shut the gently caress up.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 19:36
|
|
|
Bedlamdan posted:What basically owns about this post is that even though Green Ronin may have gotten rid of the rape-man, they can still be treated as if the rape-man is still present and/or actively being endorsed because we can’t trust anything they may say after loving up the first time. Unfucking themselves is unattainable, any attempt is always going to be in bad faith. This is a terrible post. We have now entered into a posting zone of recursive bad faith.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 19:49
|
|
|
Comrade Gorbash posted:It's kind of incredible how unaware you are that you're an evil piece of poo poo. The Deleter posted:You're so loving dense that you might actually be responsible for the sinking of the Titanic. Your intense stupidity and small-minded evil pettiness could drag down a 50,000 ton ocean liner to the bottom of the sea. You loving imbecile. Shut the gently caress up. I’m not even saying you’re obliged to trust Green Ronin, fam. gently caress them, I have zero investment in them as a consumer, and them being hated is at least at least funny for me! It’s just that, even if they do try to change things now or later on, I can still continue to poo poo on them for loving up in the first place. They mishandled Suleiman, and being honest, no truly good person would have hosed up like that in the first place.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 20:03
|
|
|
Bedlamdan posted:I’m not even saying you’re obliged to trust Green Ronin, fam. gently caress them, I have zero investment in them as a consumer, and them being hated is at least at least funny for me!
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 20:08
|
|
|
Comrade Gorbash posted:What the gently caress are you even saying at this point? That Green Ronin won’t ever be able to salvage its reputation no matter what it might do, and that’s funny and cool, at least to me. What are you projecting onto my statements?
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 20:13
|
|
|
Bedlamdan posted:What basically owns about this post is that even though Green Ronin may have gotten rid of the rape-man, they can still be treated as if the rape-man is still present and/or actively being endorsed because we can’t trust anything they may say after loving up the first time. Unfucking themselves is unattainable, any attempt is always going to be in bad faith. The rich thing is, based on my reading of the STOP policy had they applied it to CAS they might not have had to get rid of him.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 20:14
|
|
|
Warthur posted:The rich thing is, based on my reading of the STOP policy had they applied it to CAS they might not have had to get rid of him. And I don’t think that’s unintentional. It seems fairly obvious from their handling of the situation that they don’t think they should have had to fire him.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 20:20
|
|
|
A more accurate acronym for their policy would have been PAUSE.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 20:26
|
|
|
Bedlamdan posted:That Green Ronin won’t ever be able to salvage its reputation no matter what it might do, and that’s funny and cool, at least to me.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 20:35
|
|
|
dwarf74 posted:Hah hah! It is funny you see! I was only pretending to be a bad
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 20:36
|
|
|
Alien Rope Burn posted:A more accurate acronym for their policy would have been PAUSE. Please Always Underestimate Sexual prEdators.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 20:37
|
|
|
Powerless Against Uh Suleiman's Eyes Having trouble with the U, I've tried looking at synonyms for smouldering and sexy and entrancing and all that but nothing's really grabbing me.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 20:44
|
|
|
Uxorious.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 20:49
|
|
|
His eyes would be a lot less of a problem if they were more uxorious.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 20:50
|
|
|
dwarf74 posted:Hah hah! It is funny you see! I was only pretending to be a bad poster! I mean, I am a little surprised something like
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 20:50
|
|
|
Unstoppable?
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2018 21:38
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 12:20 |
|
|
Unconscionable
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2018 00:01
|
|