|
OldAlias posted:f12 induced hacker panic i was on a website a week or so ago where they had one of those "roll over image and show the zoomed in section under your mouse" things but you couldn't click to just load the whole image in full anywhere, or even right-click on the image to open it alone. frustrating. so i F12d and found the image link and pasted it into a new tab and there it was, easy the student behind me was stunned, like complete jaw-dropped shock, said "did you just...like...hack that website??"
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2018 02:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 14:48 |
|
|
what's a good router with powerful antennae on a budget? I live in a weird house that's all right angles and weird spaces so I need something better than the lovely dlink dir-605l i have right now. i'm in india so my range of options is limited how bad is this thing (besides its looks)? https://www.amazon.in/TP-Link-TL-WR941HP-450Mbps-Wireless-N-Router/dp/B01M3RVEQ4?ref=ast_p_ep  sorry if this post is a little scattershot, i've been looking at router reviews for about 1.5 hours so my mind has gone a little numb
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 20:54
|
|
|
antennae strength is limited by the FCC and anything you buy is going to be the allowed maximum. there's no such thing as a "powerful" one unless you flash the firmware into illegality in the usa but i have no idea what india allows, maybe you can get a ultra strength one there they couldn't sell in the states get one that you like the features of because they're all going to be roughly of the same strength. throughput is a diff matter and they vary wildly based on how many dollars the company puts into the chipsets, i dunno ubiquiti is good for larger installations but i just got a random one from the wirecutter or whatever amazon said was their best seller and it works fine Bhodi fucked around with this message at 20:59 on Apr 8, 2018 |
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 20:57
|
|
|
drat how'd the fcc get control over the radio signals in india
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 21:00
|
|
|
Dodoman posted:what's a good router with powerful antennae on a budget? I live in a weird house that's all right angles and weird spaces so I need something better than the lovely dlink dir-605l i have right now. look for separate WiFi antennas/access points for outdoor use. we have one like that in our office and it’s absurdly beefy
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 21:17
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:drat how'd the fcc get control over the radio signals in india by being a large enough market for consumer electronics over the last 60 years that global R&D for WiFi is focused on what will be allowed in the US if you have a big place don’t think about a single AP, think about getting multiple APs that either mesh over WiFi (there’s a shitload of these and I’ve never used any) or have a wired backhaul (ubiquiti is the system you’ll get a lot of recs for)
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 22:04
|
|
|
Don't the higher 5ghz channels let you go up to something silly on transmit power like 5W?
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2018 00:12
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:Don't the higher 5ghz channels let you go up to something silly on transmit power like 5W? as i said, outdoor or indoor/outdoor transmitters
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2018 00:21
|
|
|
Does it really matter what transmit power the access point has if the devices don't have similar power?
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2018 09:48
|
|
|
those ubiquity ones seem to appeal coz if you need more than one then its good coz you wont have issues. if you have only one AP guess u can skimp a lot more
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2018 11:26
|
|
|
I should be looking at the round ubiquiti AP models? In any case these posts have been more helpful than the wirecutter articles with their weird graphs (though that might have just been my lack of sleep causing extra confusion)
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2018 15:09
|
|
|
ShadowHawk posted:Does it really matter what transmit power the access point has if the devices don't have similar power? everything in the house is either n or ac, would that be a problem?
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2018 15:10
|
|
|
Bhodi posted:antennae strength is limited by the FCC and anything you buy is going to be the allowed maximum. there's no such thing as a "powerful" one unless you flash the firmware into illegality in the usa but i have no idea what india allows, maybe you can get a ultra strength one there they couldn't sell in the states India sells antibiotics recipe-free on street pharmacies, helping the next world-killing plague evolve by leaps and bounds. I’d guess they’re not that fussy on wlan amplitude.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2018 18:04
|
|
|
Dodoman posted:I should be looking at the round ubiquiti AP models? if you plan to have more than one, then without a doubt
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2018 01:56
|
|
|
is this just a typo or is ecmascript declarative and not procedural or what?
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2018 17:30
|
|
|
Corla Plankun posted:is this just a typo or is ecmascript declarative and not procedural or what? eczemascript is still procedural but you gotta declare variables and var is how you declare a mutable one
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2018 17:43
|
|
|
Corla Plankun posted:is this just a typo or is ecmascript declarative and not procedural or what? javascript is the worst
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2018 18:03
|
|
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:eczemascript is still procedural but then how can it be visible before it is even declared?
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2018 18:14
|
|
|
Corla Plankun posted:but then how can it be visible before it is even declared? Shaggar posted:javascript is the worst
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2018 18:14
|
|
|
Corla Plankun posted:but then how can it be visible before it is even declared? because the documentation is bad?
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2018 20:07
|
|
|
its not bad documentation. javascript considers it defined for the entire function, not just the for control block. in that code it exists prior to the declaration but the value is undefined. you could assign a value by doing myVarVariable="whatever" without declaring it before its declared in the for block.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2018 23:01
|
|
|
it's called variable hoisting. it's dumb, but never actually causes problems in real code.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2018 23:08
|
|
|
the cool and good thing is, the declarations are hoisted but the assignments aren't. yay javascript.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2018 03:02
|
|
|
emails from my domain keeps getting spammed because they aren't authenticated. how do i stop this? i read something on MailChimp about modifying DNS records and routing it through them, is this all i would need to do?
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2018 17:25
|
|
|
You need an SPF record.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2018 17:31
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:You need an SPF record. poo poo stile project forums have been dead for years good luck
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2018 17:33
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:You need an SPF record. thanks, this helped me find the right docs on Gandi to get it working. no more scary red checkmark by my emails now. Agile Vector posted:poo poo stile project forums have been dead for years good luck also yeah spf record types are apparently deprecated, rip
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2018 18:18
|
|
|
why does hulu think that my IP address (for a residential comcast connection) is actually a VPN service that needs to be blocked?
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2018 05:44
|
|
|
Shaman Linavi posted:thanks, this helped me find the right docs on Gandi to get it working. no more scary red checkmark by my emails now.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2018 07:09
|
|
|
DuckConference posted:why does hulu think that my IP address (for a residential comcast connection) is actually a VPN service that needs to be blocked? They've seen what you watch with it and assumed that no one would ever do so were they not protected by an anonymizing product?
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2018 15:21
|
|
|
DuckConference posted:why does hulu think that my IP address (for a residential comcast connection) is actually a VPN service that needs to be blocked? Maybe you go on a list of tor exit node IPs?
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2018 15:34
|
|
|
DuckConference posted:why does hulu think that my IP address (for a residential comcast connection) is actually a VPN service that needs to be blocked? comcast ran out of ip addresses a few years ago so they have been buying IP blocks helter skelter the prior owner of the block probably actually was a vpn service
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2018 15:46
|
|
|
Okay I have no idea why this stupid poo poo isn't working but gently caress you bashcode:code:I just want to do this horseshit in powershell where it makes sense
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2018 16:19
|
|
|
install powershell
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2018 16:20
|
|
|
cool some stupid program was throwing in hidden carriage returns that were being parsed
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2018 16:28
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:install powershell It's A Mac!
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2018 16:28
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:cool some stupid program was throwing in hidden carriage returns that were being parsed I once disabled spam filtering for my entire organization by editing a file using pico rather than vi this way. Still can't figure out how but it was like 12 years ago so  .
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2018 16:32
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:It's A Mac! powershell is available on linuxes now, including osx: https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2018 16:35
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:It's A Mac! https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/scripting/setup/installing-powershell-core-on-macos?view=powershell-6
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2018 16:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 14:48 |
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:Okay I have no idea why this stupid poo poo isn't working but gently caress you bash stop using bash use python or perl or something
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2018 16:46
|
|