|
EmmyOk posted:Titties on second thought i shoulda kept my prior prior nickname
|
# ? May 4, 2018 23:09 |
|
|
# ? May 17, 2024 01:21 |
|
LITERALLY A BIRD posted:What is happening here right now
|
# ? May 4, 2018 23:47 |
|
Well I suppose there are worse alternatives
|
# ? May 5, 2018 03:16 |
|
oldpainless posted:I like giant titties Prepare to die, villain
|
# ? May 5, 2018 04:42 |
|
LITERALLY A BIRD posted:Well I suppose there are worse alternatives True, enough of this boobies love in we're having. Let's talk about eating hot dog sandwiches with our Chicago style deep dish pizza with pineapple and ham while we don't tip our waiter all while several quarts of our chili with beans and loose corn boils on top of our electric stove set to Celsius.
|
# ? May 5, 2018 04:51 |
|
Solice Kirsk posted:True, enough of this boobies love in we're having. Let's talk about eating hot dog sandwiches with our Chicago style deep dish pizza with pineapple and ham while we don't tip our waiter all while several quarts of our chili with beans and loose corn boils on top of our electric stove set to Celsius. But is the pizza circumcised? This is important.
|
# ? May 5, 2018 04:57 |
|
Solice Kirsk posted:True, enough of this boobies love in we're having. Let's talk about eating hot dog sandwiches with our Chicago style deep dish pizza with pineapple and ham while we don't tip our waiter all while several quarts of our chili with beans and loose corn boils on top of our electric stove set to Celsius. Didn't work the proper way to cook a steak into that D+
|
# ? May 5, 2018 05:03 |
|
ToxicSlurpee posted:But is the pizza circumcised? This is important. i ate it, unironically
|
# ? May 5, 2018 05:04 |
|
Len posted:Didn't work the proper way to cook a steak into that D+ .....damnit.....
|
# ? May 5, 2018 05:09 |
|
Krankenstyle posted:i ate it, unironically You do you. I won't kink shame.
|
# ? May 5, 2018 05:10 |
|
Len posted:Didn't work the proper way to cook a steak into that D+ Honestly I thought his post was pretty well done.
|
# ? May 5, 2018 05:13 |
|
LITERALLY A BIRD posted:Honestly I thought his post was pretty well done. This whole discussion is pretty raw.
|
# ? May 5, 2018 05:34 |
|
LITERALLY A BIRD posted:Honestly I thought his post was pretty well done. He was definitely in rare form
|
# ? May 5, 2018 06:05 |
|
|
# ? May 5, 2018 07:47 |
|
That's the longest way of saying "round up" I've ever seen.
|
# ? May 5, 2018 13:32 |
|
the airplane will take off you should always switch doors
|
# ? May 5, 2018 17:32 |
|
Gonna eat that meaty plane too
|
# ? May 5, 2018 18:00 |
|
Syd Midnight posted:the airplane will take off The Monty Hall problem is the best. It goes so hard against most people's intuition that they either refuse to, or simply cannot, process it. It's so well-known, now, that I suspect it's not so contentious, but it was great in its day.
|
# ? May 5, 2018 18:08 |
|
I've been waiting for a steak derail, this is close enough. I saw a movie written by Joss Whedon called "In Her Eyes." The plot of the movie is mostly irrelevant, what matters is that the main male and female protagonists are fated to be in love but at the movie's outset they are both with other people. So that the audience don't dislike the main characters we have to establish that the people they are in relationships with are terrible monsters and thus are deserving of being left. In the case of the female character her husband start off as nice, he has an affable charm and seems to care for her. As the story progresses he becomes increasingly belittling, then controlling and abusive. Eventually his long and storied character arc is completed when he remorselessly abuses his power as a doctor to have the main character thrown into a mental asylum because he can. In the case of the male character, his prior love interest is demonised in the course of a single scene. She likes her steak well done, with tomato ketchup.
|
# ? May 5, 2018 18:25 |
|
Flossie posted:In the case of the male character, his prior love interest is demonised in the course of a single scene. She likes her steak well done, with tomato ketchup. It was her misteak.
|
# ? May 5, 2018 22:13 |
|
if her weird hellsteak was such a dealbreaker, he shoulda brought it up before they went out the eat steaks.
|
# ? May 5, 2018 22:39 |
|
Krankenstyle posted:if her weird hellsteak was such a dealbreaker, he shoulda brought it up before they went out the eat steaks. Sounds like he should of known her steak in the whole affair.
|
# ? May 5, 2018 23:00 |
|
Foul Ole Ron posted:Sounds like he should of known her steak in the whole affair. lmbo
|
# ? May 5, 2018 23:27 |
|
Veni Vidi Ameche! posted:The Monty Hall problem is the best. It goes so hard against most people's intuition that they either refuse to, or simply cannot, process it. It's so well-known, now, that I suspect it's not so contentious, but it was great in its day. The talk page for its wikipedia article is amazing. It has more archives than the talk page for the Holocaust.
|
# ? May 6, 2018 04:28 |
|
The real question when it comes to the Monty Hall problem, though, is what if you just deliberately pick the goat? I mean, goats are pretty rad and you'd have a 100% chance of winning the goat, right?
|
# ? May 6, 2018 05:25 |
|
ToxicSlurpee posted:The real question when it comes to the Monty Hall problem, though, is what if you just deliberately pick the goat? I mean, goats are pretty rad and you'd have a 100% chance of winning the goat, right? Please don't steal jokes from xkcd.
|
# ? May 6, 2018 05:28 |
|
Syd Midnight posted:The talk page for its wikipedia article is amazing. It has more archives than the talk page for the Holocaust. Spanning 2004 to 2013, and an additional fifteen pages of archives for "Monty Hall Problem/Arguments." Yep. That's pretty great. It starts right out with an argument over the phrasing of the question. The question specifically says, "The host opens a door to reveal a goat," and someone manages to argue for pages about, "But what if the host doesn't open a door that reveals a goat?" Another dude keeps trying in vain to explain that it does not matter whether the host could open a door that doesn't show a goat, because that is not the scenario being discussed. What ever happened to Romeo Rose? Edit: Yeah. It's bad enough when you only have to read them once.
|
# ? May 6, 2018 06:26 |
|
Veni Vidi Ameche! posted:What ever happened to Romeo Rose?
|
# ? May 6, 2018 06:33 |
|
People tend to understand that one easier when you explain it to them that the free door opening makes it so that if they chose a goat initially, then switching wins. If they chose the car, switching loses. And of course they had a 2/3 chance of picking a goat.
|
# ? May 6, 2018 06:40 |
|
I don't even know what this is about and screw overthinking it, just pick a loving door, if you get a goat take the goat.
|
# ? May 6, 2018 07:43 |
|
Aphrodite posted:People tend to understand that one easier when you explain it to them that the free door opening makes it so that if they chose a goat initially, then switching wins. If they chose the car, switching loses. Another explanation that helps people understand the answer intuitively is extrapolating it to 100 doors with 99 goats and 1 car. You pick a door, and then the host opens 98 doors all which revealing goats. Now, there are two unopened doors left; the one you chose and one random door that the host did not open. What is the more likely scenario? That the one door you chose at the start had the car, or the random door that the host didn't open?
|
# ? May 6, 2018 08:14 |
|
I summon all the goats to stampede and take over the studio.
|
# ? May 6, 2018 08:39 |
|
His teeth became so ridiculous his entire head imploded
|
# ? May 6, 2018 15:37 |
|
syscall girl posted:His teeth became so ridiculous his entire head imploded Wait what? Last I heard he was selling off one of his hideous guitars or something. Or maybe he said he was but didn't? Romeo Rose is one of those stories I can't explain to anyone because it's just: "FAKE TEETH. UGLY GUITARS. 90'S VAMPIRE LARP. CREEPY." In my head when I see his name pop up. At least he was mostly harmless right?
|
# ? May 6, 2018 18:13 |
|
joylessdivision posted:In my head when I see his name pop up. At least he was mostly harmless right? He bragged about raping women while they slept. Edit: Maybe he just defended it? Details hazy, at this point.
|
# ? May 6, 2018 19:10 |
|
joylessdivision posted:At least he was mostly harmless right? Romeo Rose is Throwing a Racist, Pro-Rape Tantrum on Twitter
|
# ? May 6, 2018 20:21 |
|
Yeah, he's another guy who thinks he's entitled to access women's bodies whenever he wants and doesn't understand why everyone else thinks that's bad and he's bad because that's his world view and he assumes everyone else is like him. Some are just whiny assholes destined to be lonely, some are monsters that should be locked up. How to distinguish who is the former and who is the latter is extremely difficult before they rape and/or murder others so I would be careful calling him harmless.
|
# ? May 6, 2018 20:30 |
|
Picnic Princess posted:Yeah, he's another guy who thinks he's entitled to access women's bodies whenever he wants and doesn't understand why everyone else thinks that's bad and he's bad because that's his world view and he assumes everyone else is like him. Some are just whiny assholes destined to be lonely, some are monsters that should be locked up. How to distinguish who is the former and who is the latter is extremely difficult before they rape and/or murder others so I would be careful calling him harmless. He does a disservice to everyone who is conventionally unattractive. We're not all like that I swear.
|
# ? May 6, 2018 20:35 |
|
When he was posting here and got set up with that goon's friend, I thought for sure she was going to get rufied and raped. There is something genuinely broken with that fucker and I hope he doesn't hurt someone.
|
# ? May 6, 2018 22:27 |
|
|
# ? May 17, 2024 01:21 |
|
syscall girl posted:He does a disservice to everyone who is conventionally unattractive. #notalluggos
|
# ? May 7, 2018 02:33 |