|
Jabor posted:Should kick out the horses too imo, hikers only i’d be okay with this
|
# ? May 8, 2018 00:12 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 07:24 |
|
wat https://twitter.com/substitute/status/993614246922502145 quote:In 2015, she created a character named “Rococo Basilisk” for a video of her song “Flesh Without Blood.” “I don’t know if you’ve heard of Roko’s Basilisk,” she told Fuse. “[This character] is doomed to be eternally tortured by an artificial intelligence, but she’s also kind of like Marie Antoinette.” Chris Knight fucked around with this message at 00:26 on May 8, 2018 |
# ? May 8, 2018 00:23 |
|
Chris Knight posted:Elon was researching the idea of joking about Rococo Basilisk, and when he saw Grimes had already joked about it, he reached out to her
|
# ? May 8, 2018 00:29 |
|
i showed you my basilisk answer me
|
# ? May 8, 2018 00:32 |
|
what if this relationship was meant to happen and by ridiculing it elon musk will punish you
|
# ? May 8, 2018 00:33 |
|
rococo’s modern basilisk
|
# ? May 8, 2018 00:34 |
|
President Beep posted:rococo’s modern basilisk i would watch the heck out of this
|
# ? May 8, 2018 00:38 |
|
for your sake i would hope so
|
# ? May 8, 2018 00:39 |
|
Jabor posted:Should kick out the horses too imo, hikers only nah any legitimate user should be given access when reasonable
|
# ? May 8, 2018 00:46 |
|
I can guarantee that people "got it" before ol musky
|
# ? May 8, 2018 00:49 |
|
The Leck posted:jesus christ, that sentence maybe they're awkward enough for each other?
|
# ? May 8, 2018 00:51 |
|
MononcQc posted:what if this relationship was meant to happen and by ridiculing it elon musk will punish you
|
# ? May 8, 2018 01:08 |
|
https://twitter.com/maeve_mcdermott/status/993643404671234048
|
# ? May 8, 2018 01:12 |
|
suh’ cuute
|
# ? May 8, 2018 01:13 |
|
who’s the waiter?
|
# ? May 8, 2018 01:13 |
|
wtf don’t post unmarked Silicon Valley spoilers
|
# ? May 8, 2018 01:15 |
|
isnt the met gala another one of those events that have been wrecked by techbros like burning man?
|
# ? May 8, 2018 01:15 |
|
yeah but they were always bad
|
# ? May 8, 2018 01:20 |
|
lancemantis posted:nah any legitimate user should be given access when reasonable horses aren't legitimate, their owners are even less lancemantis posted:isnt the met gala another one of those events that have been wrecked by techbros like burning man? lol what are you smoking. the event started as a place for the scions of old money to show off their latest designer outfits with some occasional invited guests who weren't already rich as hell, and then some students and designers who weren't rich allowed in as part of the deal changing the source of the money isn't wrecking it
|
# ? May 8, 2018 01:21 |
|
ah now I remember: burning man is where techbros go to pretend to be artists, and the met gala is where they go to pretend to be celebrities
|
# ? May 8, 2018 01:23 |
|
called itthe information posted:Uber Finds Deadly Accident Likely Caused By Software Set to Ignore Objects On Road i lust for uber death
|
# ? May 8, 2018 01:39 |
|
Fuzzy Mammal posted:called it can their technology not, you know, factor in object size in such cases?
|
# ? May 8, 2018 01:45 |
|
President Beep posted:can their technology not, you know, factor in object size in such cases? the tuning is to ignore things that are considered to be false readings
|
# ? May 8, 2018 01:46 |
|
move fast break
|
# ? May 8, 2018 01:47 |
|
hobbesmaster posted:the tuning is to ignore things that are considered to be false readings i’m having a difficult time imagining something human and bicycle sized that wouldn’t cause a problem for a car. e: really not trying to be a wise rear end here. maybe there’s some common scenario that i just don’t realize
|
# ? May 8, 2018 01:49 |
|
President Beep posted:i’m having a difficult time imagining something human and bicycle sized that wouldn’t cause a problem for a car. you're right. it is hard to imagine. their system must be exceptionally bad and the onus should be on them to prove otherwise. release the data dara!
|
# ? May 8, 2018 01:53 |
|
I was told this a month ago by someone that works in the AI space, and he heard it from a friend of his. Apparently the object-detection network in a major self-driving car has a known-false positive that reports a pedestrian backing out, and it was such an issue it was causing the car to stop when nothing was there. Often in an unsafe manner. They put another layer of heuristics after the object-detection network to filter out certain "false positive" misclassificatons. I would guess you're seeing the results of that. Somewhere, they had a "pedestrian on a bike" false positive that was causing them to stop uncontrollably, so they put some in some code to ignore it because it was wrong. Oops.
|
# ? May 8, 2018 01:57 |
|
Elon Fucks
|
# ? May 8, 2018 01:58 |
|
Suspicious Dish posted:I was told this a month ago by someone that works in the AI space, and he heard it from a friend of his. Apparently the object-detection network in a major self-driving car has a known-false positive that reports a pedestrian backing out, and it was such an issue it was causing the car to stop when nothing was there. Often in an unsafe manner. They put another layer of heuristics after the object-detection network to filter out certain "false positive" misclassificatons. I would guess you're seeing the results of that. Somewhere, they had a "pedestrian on a bike" false positive that was causing them to stop uncontrollably, so they put some in some code to ignore it because it was wrong. Oops. JFC!!!
|
# ? May 8, 2018 02:00 |
|
“oh man. our robot car keeps imagining that it’s seeing brake lights. gently caress it. welcome to my ignore list.”
|
# ? May 8, 2018 02:01 |
|
the alternative is coming to a screeching halt in traffic every time a plastic bag or sheet of paper blows across the street
|
# ? May 8, 2018 02:07 |
|
the alternative is not doing this dumb poo poo because it’s literally killing people
|
# ? May 8, 2018 02:08 |
|
if your roadgoing product is designed to ignore things pedestrian shape then it shouldn’t exist
|
# ? May 8, 2018 02:10 |
|
President Beep posted:the alternative is not doing this dumb poo poo because it’s literally killing people
|
# ? May 8, 2018 02:10 |
|
President Beep posted:if your roadgoing product is designed to ignore things pedestrian shape then it shouldn’t exist but they had a bicycle. so clearly they were a cyclist. dumbass!!!
|
# ? May 8, 2018 02:11 |
|
Suspicious Dish posted:I was told this a month ago by someone that works in the AI space, and he heard it from a friend of his. Apparently the object-detection network in a major self-driving car has a known-false positive that reports a pedestrian backing out, and it was such an issue it was causing the car to stop when nothing was there. Often in an unsafe manner. They put another layer of heuristics after the object-detection network to filter out certain "false positive" misclassificatons. I would guess you're seeing the results of that. Somewhere, they had a "pedestrian on a bike" false positive that was causing them to stop uncontrollably, so they put some in some code to ignore it because it was wrong. Oops. lol
|
# ? May 8, 2018 02:19 |
|
Suspicious Dish posted:I was told this a month ago by someone that works in the AI space, and he heard it from a friend of his. Apparently the object-detection network in a major self-driving car has a known-false positive that reports a pedestrian backing out, and it was such an issue it was causing the car to stop when nothing was there. Often in an unsafe manner. They put another layer of heuristics after the object-detection network to filter out certain "false positive" misclassificatons. I would guess you're seeing the results of that. Somewhere, they had a "pedestrian on a bike" false positive that was causing them to stop uncontrollably, so they put some in some code to ignore it because it was wrong. Oops. some earlier version of this reportedly saw fixed road signs as being in the path of the vehicle and would freak out as well
|
# ? May 8, 2018 02:19 |
|
what’s next? an autonomous car thinks of a road and dies?
|
# ? May 8, 2018 02:24 |
|
FMguru posted:the alternative is coming to a screeching halt in traffic every time a plastic bag or sheet of paper blows across the street also yes thats preferable in part bc i lust for uber death
|
# ? May 8, 2018 02:28 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 07:24 |
|
Suspicious Dish posted:I was told this a month ago by someone that works in the AI space, and he heard it from a friend of his. Apparently the object-detection network in a major self-driving car has a known-false positive that reports a pedestrian backing out, and it was such an issue it was causing the car to stop when nothing was there. Often in an unsafe manner. They put another layer of heuristics after the object-detection network to filter out certain "false positive" misclassificatons. I would guess you're seeing the results of that. Somewhere, they had a "pedestrian on a bike" false positive that was causing them to stop uncontrollably, so they put some in some code to ignore it because it was wrong. Oops. if you find yourself adding all these bespoke tweaks to your ML network to make the test cases give you the results you want, it's probably time to take a step back and reassess your approach
|
# ? May 8, 2018 02:28 |