Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Jose
Jul 24, 2007

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer
https://twitter.com/bobby/status/999466056501682176

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

800peepee51doodoo
Mar 1, 2001

Volute the swarth, trawl betwixt phonotic
Scoff the festune

Futuresight posted:

Yeah I'm not a fully-convinced anarchist. I do believe that hierarchy causes a lot of problems in society and that anti-capitalist critiques are largely critiques of power structures in general narrowly applied to just within economics. I think as long as we have hierarchy we will have to deal with people who are corrupted by it, who grow to look down on those lower than them, who seek to increase their power and the rewards it brings, and we will constantly have to fight back against efforts of the powerful to undermine checks against their power.

But... yeah I'm not entirely sure anarchy is sustainable. So my position is basically that we should seek to minimise hierarchy and differences in power between people and ensure the rewards for being higher are kept well in check. I think we should be constantly trying to move towards anarchy, decentralising and delegating power and responsibilities wherever we can until the point that it proves unworkable. If that hits anarchy then awesome. If not, well I think we'll be better off being closer than not. Keeping the problems of hierarchy in check from wherever that is will require a lot of vigilance, but I imagine so would maintaining an anarchistic society.

When I first started dating my gf, who is very anarchist and has been involved in that scene for years, we had a lot of discussions about anarchism. At one point, after she got somewhat exasperated with my constant questioning of "but how will it woooorrrrkkkk??" she just said "I don't know if it would but isnt it an ideal worth striving for?" and I had to admit that, yeah, it is. So I'm basically where you are now. I don't know that I would identify as anarchist but I sure would like to see hierarchies dismantled or minimized, state power reduced and capitalism bulldozed into a landfill.

I think people can get too hung up on pragmatism and lose sight of any vision of what society could be. I want a world without bosses and cops. Maybe it's not possible, but let's at least loving try.

Phi230
Feb 2, 2016

by Fluffdaddy
a world without bosses and cops is possible but not under the bourgeois idealism known as anarchism

Kit Walker
Jul 10, 2010
"The Man Who Cannot Deadlift"

800peepee51doodoo posted:

When I first started dating my gf, who is very anarchist and has been involved in that scene for years, we had a lot of discussions about anarchism. At one point, after she got somewhat exasperated with my constant questioning of "but how will it woooorrrrkkkk??" she just said "I don't know if it would but isnt it an ideal worth striving for?" and I had to admit that, yeah, it is. So I'm basically where you are now. I don't know that I would identify as anarchist but I sure would like to see hierarchies dismantled or minimized, state power reduced and capitalism bulldozed into a landfill.

I think people can get too hung up on pragmatism and lose sight of any vision of what society could be. I want a world without bosses and cops. Maybe it's not possible, but let's at least loving try.

I’m largely in the same boat as you. My wife is...not an anarchist but adjacent and moves in radical/anarchist circles. We had a similar conversation and I couldn’t help but feel that any sort of system that removes hierarchies completely and has people do things based on a sort of voluntary basis would eventually become de facto ruled by the people who most involve themselves. And that’s not really better than our current system. I’ve seen really lovely people rise to the top in these circles because they just always get involved in everything and everyone else starts deferring to them. And it’s drat hard to then get them out of power because everyone is willing to cover for them. It’s really drat easy to get power and influence if that’s what you’re after and I don’t think the desire for power will vanish with hierarchies

And that’s not getting into racial politics. People are loving blind to their own prejudices and these communities tend to not have anyone pointing these things out. People get that discrimination is bad but often don’t recognize how it manifests

Bullfrog
Nov 5, 2012

Kit Walker posted:

I’m largely in the same boat as you. My wife is...not an anarchist but adjacent and moves in radical/anarchist circles. We had a similar conversation and I couldn’t help but feel that any sort of system that removes hierarchies completely and has people do things based on a sort of voluntary basis would eventually become de facto ruled by the people who most involve themselves. And that’s not really better than our current system. I’ve seen really lovely people rise to the top in these circles because they just always get involved in everything and everyone else starts deferring to them. And it’s drat hard to then get them out of power because everyone is willing to cover for them. It’s really drat easy to get power and influence if that’s what you’re after and I don’t think the desire for power will vanish with hierarchies

And that’s not getting into racial politics. People are loving blind to their own prejudices and these communities tend to not have anyone pointing these things out. People get that discrimination is bad but often don’t recognize how it manifests

The main problem is that people don't actually do the work of dismantling the hierarchy, and instead just say "poof, it's gone". It's the mirrored version of authcom "everything we decide is Correct and everyone who disagrees is counterrevolutionary".

It takes an active, honest, critical and continuous discussion and awareness among all people involved to actually work past those issues. One big misunderstanding about anarchism is that there are no rules or structure or anything. No, you can still have scheduled meetings and processes and stuff. It's good to have some kind of shared code of conduct or something too that everyone writes together at the beginning so you have something to refer back to when it comes to your goals, and it can help reduce the effect of soft power since it represents the ideals of the group and remains transparent and citeable by everyone.

Admiral Ray
May 17, 2014

Proud Musk and Dogecoin fanboy
The purest anarchic systems to date are Homeowners Associations

TehRedWheelbarrow
Mar 16, 2011



Fan of Britches

Admiral Ray posted:

The purest anarchic systems to date are Homeowners Associations

good thing I voted down that particular anarchy.

I require the ability to paint a giant dong on my house if I feel that it needs dongin

Captain_Maclaine
Sep 30, 2001

Every moment that I'm alive, I pray for death!

Azathoth posted:

Not trying to be confrontational, but aren't the most successful examples of stateless anarchism briefly-existing entities that got brutally crushed by the nearest hierarchical society?

Like, I don't disagree that the end point of a world where everyone lives in such entities actually sounds pretty awesome, I just don't think that there's a path to both making that happen and sustaining it without a literal apocalyptic scenario that drastically reduces the world population.

I am, however, open to examples of anarchic societies that exist outside of enclaves under the protection of a larger state.

This is a problem similarly faced historically by purely pacifistic societies: when they exist they generally do so either very briefly before being absorbed by violent neighbors, are protected by some quirk of geographic isolation, or have a client-patron understanding with a violent neighbor who'll shield them from aggression.

This is of course not to snidely dismiss either pacifistic or anarchic societies as pointlessly impossible (though in the case of the former I think you kinda can), but rather to acknowledge that achieving either will be very difficult, require considerable effort, and will face significant pushback from aggressive outside forces.

Retromancer
Aug 21, 2007

Every time I see Goatse, I think of Maureen. That's the last thing I saw. Before I blacked out. The sight of that man's anus.

rudatron posted:

The identification with villians probably goes hand in hand with a total rejection of radical politics + the failure of utopianism. When you've a priori rejected that anything can get better.

Suggesting its some long game for murdering climate refugees is probably giving it far too much intentionality imo, even if that is sort of the inevitable outcome. For most, its just has to be a result of an entrenched and immovable political pessimism.

Cant help but think of that stalin quote that the fall of the ussr would lead to the 'blackest reaction', the fall of the soviets of course being symbolic of the impossibility of the radical.

I don't know how the alt right makes Thanos' goals square with ethnic cleansing though. He specifically says multiple times through the movie that there will be no conditions that will make someone live or die. His ideas were rejected by his own people partially because the ruling class would not be exempt from the purge.

Ague Proof
Jun 5, 2014

they told me
I was everything

placebo effect

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

I really want to know what counts as a “good day” for that dick. Although I also really don’t.

Ague Proof
Jun 5, 2014

they told me
I was everything

business hammocks posted:

I really want to know what counts as a “good day” for that dick. Although I also really don’t.

when he can just about convince himself that the ruler says 6

Bullfrog
Nov 5, 2012


drat, thats sad. being that the average dick size is 25 inches, he has a long way to go.

Jewel Repetition
Dec 24, 2012

Ask me about Briar Rose and Chicken Chaser.
Dick exercises are just regular exercises that make you lose weight so your dick looks bigger

DAD LOST MY IPOD
Feb 3, 2012

Fats Dominar is on the case


Bullfrog posted:

drat, thats sad. being that the average dick size is 25 inches, he has a long way to go.

the average is 25? I thought it was 18.8. this is very unsettling

Ague Proof
Jun 5, 2014

they told me
I was everything
the real quote is more bizarre than I remembered

quote:

The average is 5.5 ? I thought it was 4. This is very unsettling

i wonder if he thought they meant flaccid

Your Gay Uncle
Feb 16, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

I hope O'reilly is played by Cam'ron in white face.

Darkman Fanpage
Jul 4, 2012

DAD LOST MY IPOD posted:

the average is 25? I thought it was 18.8. this is very unsettling

Kit Walker
Jul 10, 2010
"The Man Who Cannot Deadlift"

DAD LOST MY IPOD posted:

the average is 25? I thought it was 14.88. this is very unsettling

TehRedWheelbarrow
Mar 16, 2011



Fan of Britches
:frog:

no.

Tias
May 25, 2008

Pictured: the patron saint of internet political arguments (probably)

This avatar made possible by a gift from the Religionthread Posters Relief Fund

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

American anarchism is a shallow tradition where anybody can call themselves an anarchist, even if they don't really believe in socialism or left wing politics in general. Being dogmatically anti-authoritarian isn't enough, but most of the lifestylists aren't going to learn about left wing anarchism because they refuse to read.

Sorry, but nobody in this tradition get to call themselves anarchists. It's a socialist movement explicitly born in and developed by the 1800s labor movement. Think about it linguistically: How much loving sense does it make to place "anarcho-" in front of any kind of market ideology? It cannot be anarchist if it removes power from illegitimate rulers to place it in the hands of capitalists, end of loving discussion

Grimoire
Jul 9, 2003

Ague Proof posted:

the real quote is more bizarre than I remembered

The most brutal of self owns.

My pet theory of incels is that they are massive closet cases. The level of visceral disgust toward women, female biology (roasties), and anything feminine means they will self sabotage even if they do not manage to scare away a woman. Meanwhile, their idealization of hypermasculinity and image and dick size obsession on places like BBforums is more in line with the gay community than straights. Incels don't hate Stacy because she won't get with them, they hate her because she stole Chad. Or they hate them both because they are ashamed of their own sexuality.

Azathoth
Apr 3, 2001

Bullfrog posted:

The main problem is that people don't actually do the work of dismantling the hierarchy, and instead just say "poof, it's gone". It's the mirrored version of authcom "everything we decide is Correct and everyone who disagrees is counterrevolutionary".

It takes an active, honest, critical and continuous discussion and awareness among all people involved to actually work past those issues. One big misunderstanding about anarchism is that there are no rules or structure or anything. No, you can still have scheduled meetings and processes and stuff. It's good to have some kind of shared code of conduct or something too that everyone writes together at the beginning so you have something to refer back to when it comes to your goals, and it can help reduce the effect of soft power since it represents the ideals of the group and remains transparent and citeable by everyone.

Legit curious how an anarchist system deals with someone inside the group being an intentional bad actor and trying to accumulate power for selfish reasons, particularly if the person is not caught before accumulating said power in the absence of a higher authority to stop them.

I get that what I'm describing is a fundamental issue that all systems of government struggle with, but I don't see a solution via anarchism other than "people band together to use their combined power to stop the person", but that action necessarily involves a consolidation of power too, and history is replete with examples of people taking power temporarily during a crisis then not giving it up afterwards.

In more hierarchical forms of government, different parts can check each other, at least theoretically, to keep things running smoothly.

TehRedWheelbarrow
Mar 16, 2011



Fan of Britches

Azathoth posted:

Legit curious how an anarchist system deals with someone inside the group being an intentional bad actor and trying to accumulate power for selfish reasons, particularly if the person is not caught before accumulating said power in the absence of a higher authority to stop them.

I get that what I'm describing is a fundamental issue that all systems of government struggle with, but I don't see a solution via anarchism other than "people band together to use their combined power to stop the person", but that action necessarily involves a consolidation of power too, and history is replete with examples of people taking power temporarily during a crisis then not giving it up afterwards.

In more hierarchical forms of government, different parts can check each other, at least theoretically, to keep things running smoothly.

this was a major problem during occupy.

it lead to subgroups alliances and cliques.

little a anarchism is as productive as the weirdest/most malicious actor.

Tias
May 25, 2008

Pictured: the patron saint of internet political arguments (probably)

This avatar made possible by a gift from the Religionthread Posters Relief Fund
otoh, in the liberated catalanian territories, people just refused to work with those who wanted to set up militias and private farms, and they had to dwi or starve to death.

pushpins
Sep 11, 2006


Title text (optional; no images are allowed, only text)

Ague Proof posted:

the real quote is more bizarre than I remembered


i wonder if he thought they meant flaccid

The Supreme GentleDong

Phi230
Feb 2, 2016

by Fluffdaddy

Tias posted:

otoh, in the liberated catalanian territories, people just refused to work with those who wanted to set up militias and private farms, and they had to dwi or starve to death.

they had to drive while intoxicated or starve to death???

TehRedWheelbarrow
Mar 16, 2011



Fan of Britches
(deal with it)

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy
https://twitter.com/ccourtne/status/999661545738162176

Ague Proof
Jun 5, 2014

they told me
I was everything
the amendments were given to us by GOD, not government. except the one about the slaves

StashAugustine
Mar 24, 2013

Do not trust in hope- it will betray you! Only faith and hatred sustain.

Ague Proof posted:

the amendments were given to us by GOD, not government. except the one about the slaves

all men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, unless they're immigrants in which case gently caress 'em

MizPiz
May 29, 2013

by Athanatos

Tias posted:

Sorry, but nobody in this tradition get to call themselves anarchists. It's a socialist movement explicitly born in and developed by the 1800s labor movement. Think about it linguistically: How much loving sense does it make to place "anarcho-" in front of any kind of market ideology? It cannot be anarchist if it removes power from illegitimate rulers to place it in the hands of capitalists, end of loving discussion

That's not going to stop them. People on the right are going to adopt "anarchist" as part of their political identity now that "libertarian" has been turned into a joke and the left is going let them.

Which is frankly a tragedy because anarchism would be the easiest way to introduce a leftist mode a governance while retaining at least the idealized version of the American identity.

Phi230
Feb 2, 2016

by Fluffdaddy

MizPiz posted:

That's not going to stop them. People on the right are going to adopt "anarchist" as part of their political identity now that "libertarian" has been turned into a joke and the left is going let them.

Which is frankly a tragedy because anarchism would be the easiest way to introduce a leftist mode a governance while retaining at least the idealized version of the American identity.

We already have anarcho-capitalists who just wind up as being full on nazis in a few months time so I wouldn't worry about right wing appropriation

Captain_Maclaine
Sep 30, 2001

Every moment that I'm alive, I pray for death!

Phi230 posted:

We already have anarcho-capitalists who just wind up as being full on nazis in a few months time so I wouldn't worry about right wing appropriation

Lol remember that time during the early part of the Greek debt crisis that an ancap tried to introduce his ideology to actual Greek anarchists and they beat the gently caress out of him in response?

TehRedWheelbarrow
Mar 16, 2011



Fan of Britches
that story is like a cuddle blanket some days

Phi230
Feb 2, 2016

by Fluffdaddy

Captain_Maclaine posted:

Lol remember that time during the early part of the Greek debt crisis that an ancap tried to introduce his ideology to actual Greek anarchists and they beat the gently caress out of him in response?

that story is a bright light in this dark world

FMguru
Sep 10, 2003

peed on;
sexually

sneakyfrog posted:

that story is like a cuddle blanket some days

quote:

It hurt really bad and I remember yelling "you're breaking the NAP" and things like that. "Stop initiating force against me."
makes me :unsmith:

Pornographic Memory
Dec 17, 2008

Captain_Maclaine posted:

Lol remember that time during the early part of the Greek debt crisis that an ancap tried to introduce his ideology to actual Greek anarchists and they beat the gently caress out of him in response?

regardless of whether that story factually happened or not i want it to be real and it feels real so that's good enough for me

it does kind of make me miss the days when libertarians were only latent fascists rather than actual fascists though

Grimoire
Jul 9, 2003

Phi230 posted:

that story is a bright light in this dark world

Euro anarchists go hard.

Also I'm close enough to A to have had to deal with this:
How to deal with the lifestylist or post-left factions? Tell 'em they ain't actually anarchist, then go do work with with a local org or DSA libsocs or FNB or the IWW or whoever actually does poo poo. Easy.
The existence of dipshits who influence nothing outside of a Crimethinc blog post does not effect me. Or anyone.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

800peepee51doodoo
Mar 1, 2001

Volute the swarth, trawl betwixt phonotic
Scoff the festune

Phi230 posted:

We already have anarcho-capitalists who just wind up as being full on nazis in a few months time so I wouldn't worry about right wing appropriation

Ancaps are absurd because they believe that private property is a thing that can exist outside of government enforcement of property law. They tie themselves in knots trying to come up with totally-not-the-government-guys-we-swear private police forces and DRO's and poo poo. Its hilarious.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply