|
CrazyTolradi posted:Wishing McGiggins would practice eugenics on your posts. Oh I'd do it too.
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 04:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 18:20 |
|
|
The Peccadillo posted:People burst with excitement at the opportunity to say it in an acceptable context this is why everyone wants to be in a tarantino movie
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 04:18
|
|
|
Kendrick Lamar did nothing wrong
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 04:19
|
|
|
Dude McAwesome posted:Kendrick Lamar did nothing wrong
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 04:22
|
|
|
GoldStandardConure posted:this is why everyone wants to be in a tarantino movie He casts himself as "guy who says the n-word excessively" in stuff the same way he insisted on being the hands that choked that lady to death in Inglorious Basterds and spit in Uma Therman's face on Kill Bill. The man's got a weird cruelty fetish
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 04:24
|
|
|
McGiggins posted:Oh I'd do it too. Dude, gently caress off
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 04:27
|
|
|
Nah. In other news, what happened with the whole adani thing? I heard it got canned and then was on again and then got canned and now Clive is doing Adani 2: Electric Boogalo?
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 05:07
|
|
|
Who is this bloke?
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 05:11
|
|
|
By the way, just in case you missed it yep the Greens are still basically sex pests.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 06:16
|
|
|
Aesculus posted:By the way, just in case you missed it yep the Greens are still basically sex pests. What an incredible thing to be upset by.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 06:21
|
|
|
JBP posted:What an incredible thing to be upset by. You tend to assume the worst after a party literally protects rapists with legal threats until the story goes public because of factional infuence 
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 06:23
|
|
|
in the 1970s, when cunnilingus had yet to be invented,
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 06:29
|
|
My first car was a stick
|
Pretty sure the reason nobody is discussing it at the moment is that it's a month old.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 06:33
|
|
|
Cunnilingus owns.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 06:34
|
|
|
grab em [greens voters] by the pussy
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 06:37
|
|
|
Doctor Spaceman posted:Pretty sure the reason nobody is discussing it at the moment is that it's a month old. Nobody posted it then too so better late than never. It's almost time for a new thread anyway so this'll probably get buried soon too 
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 06:39
|
|
|
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-05-27/shorten-vows-to-stop-the-boats-vic-labor-defers-debate/9805320 posted:In a sign of how sensitive this issue is, the Victorian Labor state conference today shut down a potentially damaging debate over the party's policy on offshore processing. 
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 06:43
|
|
|
CFMEU... not good???
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 06:43
|
|
|
Shorten killing it (my enthusiasm for voting labor) right now
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 06:49
|
|
|
liberals : will deffo murder browns labor : will deffo murder browns but like three members of the caucus will feel bad about it Remember back when labor was umming and uhhing over gays marrying, and loving Penny Wong was on Q&A and poo poo having to go along with 'Oh yeah nah no gay marriage, that poo poo isn't going to happen no worries mate'. gently caress labor and dickhead unions.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 07:03
|
|
|
Robodog posted:liberals : will deffo murder browns Lmao
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 07:06
|
|
|
They're not going to change the policy because the numbers are not there. Forcing a debate to divide the party and gently caress the election up is cool and good strategy
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 07:07
|
|
|
JBP posted:They're not going to change the policy because the numbers are not there. Forcing a debate to divide the party and gently caress the election up is cool and good strategy A party with principles that stiil wins a significant share of the vote but isn't the biggest is better than a party that will do whatever it takes to be the biggest party, even if it means selling all their principles for votes.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 07:12
|
|
|
bandaid.friend posted:Shorten killing it (my enthusiasm for voting labor) right now He almost lasted a whole day.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 07:32
|
|
|
Aesculus posted:A party with principles that stiil wins a significant share of the vote but isn't the biggest is better than a party that will do whatever it takes to be the biggest party, even if it means selling all their principles for votes. It's literally one policy. The Labour party has never been a welcome to all comers party and most likely never will be. Expecting it of them is dumb.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 07:33
|
|
|
JBP posted:They're not going to change the policy because the numbers are not there. Forcing a debate to divide the party and gently caress the election up is cool and good strategy Labor bad, unions happy for families to be kept in detention centres. Cool.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 07:36
|
|
|
You Am I posted:Labor bad, unions happy for families to be kept in detention centres. I'm not speaking for myself it's dogshit. On balance politically it's a nothing policy if you leave it and a potential threat if you change it. That's the problem. JBP fucked around with this message at 07:45 on May 27, 2018 |
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 07:41
|
|
|
Since Labor didn't feel like pushing gay marriage until they lost power, maybe the next time the LNP take over Labor can trick them into shutting down off shore detention too.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 07:41
|
|
|
JBP posted:I'm not speaking for myself it's dogshit. On balance politically it's a nothing policy if you leave it and a potenitaly threat if you change it. That's the problem. Doing nothing is the best solution - Labor's 2019 Election Policy standpoint
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 07:44
|
|
|
You Am I posted:Doing nothing is the best solution - Labor's 2019 Election Policy standpoint 100% accurate
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 07:45
|
|
|
JBP posted:It's literally one policy. The Labour party has never been a welcome to all comers party and most likely never will be. Expecting it of them is dumb. I mean, sure, it's not a vote-winner and there are probably bigger things to focus on. It's still absolute poo poo to shut down discussion of how we can help these people who are being actively tortured in concentration camps and to still basically condone it.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 08:12
|
|
|
JBP posted:It's literally one policy. The Labour party has never been a welcome to all comers party and most likely never will be. Expecting it of them is dumb. Yeah, it was called the White Australia policy.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 08:17
|
|
|
JBP posted:Cunnilingus owns. Hell yeah, Fury Road was great
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 08:39
|
|
|
JBP posted:I'm not speaking for myself it's dogshit. On balance politically it's a nothing policy if you leave it and a potential threat if you change it. That's the problem. Rubbish. The Coalition will attack Labor for being 'weak on borders" no matter what they do. Don't adopt a policy to prevent your opponents from attacking you if they're going to attack you on that issue anyway. Of course the true correct answer is that Labor should never have gone along with the stupid refugees=threat angle in the first place. The positions of political parties not only follow public discourse, but they also lead and guide public discourse by adjusting what people think is acceptable. When the Coalition started cracking on about boat arrivals Labor found themselves at a crossroads where they could have decided whether this was an important issue or not, and message to that. But they stupidly decided to say "of course refugees are a threat and we're better at dealing with it", at once conceding an attack angle that their opponents can use forever. Like climate change, treating refugees in a humane manner should never have become a political issue at all, just something to quietly get on with. But Labor decided to cynically pander to the bigot base, thus signalling that the views of bigots were legitimate political discourse, and surprise surprise it's now far easier to be a bigot.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 08:57
|
|
|
You gotta do what you gotta do. Vote Labor. *pushes refugee child into a woodchipper*
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 09:01
|
|
|
CrazyTolradi posted:Yeah, it was called the White Australia policy.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 09:23
|
|
|
get hosed Labor
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 09:53
|
|
|
To give JBP credit where it's due, he is correct in that Labor have never been a party given towards more open immigration policies and generally supported White Australia on the whole.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 10:01
|
|
|
But our point was that it's bad.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 10:30
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 18:20 |
|
|
AgentF posted:But our point was that it's bad. I don't believe JBP disagreed that it is bad.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2018 11:30
|
|
