|
mastershakeman posted:Lol no you wouldn't . I've seen judges take over a year to do unimportant written decisions on simple issues You make a compelling case. Perhaps the bigger problem is I’d have to stop being a deliberate rear end in a top hat.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 14:50 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 05:00 |
|
ActusRhesus posted:You make a compelling case. Perhaps the bigger problem is I’d have to stop being a deliberate rear end in a top hat. Nope. A judge in Cook county would ask in English if anyone needed a translator, and when they said yes, laugh at them and say obviously not Maybe this is all just Cook county poo poo where judges would show up with obvious buzzes after lunch and audio recording was banned
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 14:52 |
|
ActusRhesus posted:You make a compelling case. Perhaps the bigger problem is I’d have to stop being a deliberate rear end in a top hat. Once again, false.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 14:59 |
|
Ok. Doing it. Just did a pretty high visibility case. Strike while iron is hot!
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 15:04 |
|
Lol all these high profile cases are so ripe for “interventions” and “amicus curiae” bullshit by crazy people https://twitter.com/big_cases/status/1004726570198630400?s=21
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 15:25 |
|
I used to love crazy amicus. Probably what I miss most about appeals.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 15:28 |
|
ActusRhesus posted:You make a compelling case. Perhaps the bigger problem is I’d have to stop being a deliberate rear end in a top hat. Instead you can be a deliberative rear end in a top hat
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 15:28 |
|
It *would* make a significant portion of the habeas bar collectively poo poo themselves...
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 15:46 |
|
ActusRhesus posted:It *would* make a significant portion of the habeas bar collectively poo poo themselves... Just replace "dentist" with "jurist" in the little shop of horrors song and you're good to go
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 15:49 |
|
I *do* love musical theater. Speaking of... file under “ways you can enjoy free time when on the state employment gravy train”... my amateur Gilbert and Sullivan hobby has lead to a paid acting gig.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 15:52 |
|
ActusRhesus posted:You make a compelling case. Perhaps the bigger problem is I’d have to stop being a deliberate rear end in a top hat. Your bench must be different.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 16:51 |
|
ActusRhesus posted:I *do* love musical theater. Speaking of... file under “ways you can enjoy free time when on the state employment gravy train”... my amateur Gilbert and Sullivan hobby has lead to a paid acting gig. Wait till someone leaks that World of Warcraft Video you did.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 16:55 |
|
blarzgh posted:Wait till someone leaks that World of Warcraft Video you did. A. It was drunk commentary on Dragon Age. B. I know someone who still belongs to a WoW raiding guild. It’s like 2002 never ended.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 16:59 |
|
The Honorable Eldereiiennne Leafheart, Elven Princess of the Deodeneine'' presiding.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 17:00 |
|
blarzgh posted:The Honorable Eldereiiennne Leafheart, Elven Princess of the Deodeneine'' presiding. I think the gamer nerd community is grossly underrepresented in the judiciary. I will remedy this by employing a boffer gavel.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 17:07 |
|
blarzgh posted:The Honorable Eldereiiennne Leafheart, Elven Princess of the Deodeneine'' presiding.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 17:12 |
|
gently caress I'd have voted for her. AR - can you give me an example of when a habeas petition is warranted? Not a real case just a hypo. All I know about habeas is it's really hard to get and really easy to gently caress up. Although I have a reported case where I mandamused a habeas, but that was family law....
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 17:32 |
|
ActusRhesus posted:A. It was drunk commentary on Dragon Age. UMMM ACTUALLY WOW CAME OUT IN 2004
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 17:38 |
|
Hot Dog Day #91 posted:gently caress I'd have voted for her. Some things I’ve seen: Ineffective assistance. Lawyer failed to file appellate papers. When I see this I usually call habeas counsel and tell them to file a motion for late appeal. State does not object. I’ve also had cases where right after Padilla came out defendant was not advised of potential for deportation. I’ve also seen a due process violation case Bc the prosecutor (who was subsequently shamed into retirement) failed to disclose the fact a key witness got a deal for testimony. And failed to correct testimony claiming he wasn’t getting a deal. Said prosecutor recently tried to testify in one of my jury trials as an expert. Best. Porter. Hearing. Ever. There’s also a lot of “incorrect calculation of jail credit” claims. But we usually concede those if they have merit. Math is math.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 18:11 |
|
Most are bullshit ineffective assistance claims. Then they claim habeas counsel was ineffective. Then they claim second habeas counsel was ineffective. I once referred to it on the record as “Matryoshka dolls of frivolity”. It’s effectively a welfare system for a few law firms that can’t hack it in any other practice. My greatest regret is agreeing to take on our habeas case load. But they’re finally putting me back on jury work. And it was a ton of courtroom play time/poo poo you just can’t make up. Example: ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to ensure proper courtroom decorum. For not preventing the petitioner from trying to urinate in a water pitcher under counsel table. They brought this claim with a straight face. This article covers it well. https://www.google.com/amp/www.courant.com/breaking-news/hc-habeas-reform-effort-20180502-story,amp.html
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 18:35 |
|
.
Discendo Vox fucked around with this message at 04:02 on Jul 13, 2021 |
# ? Jun 7, 2018 19:49 |
|
You get me.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 19:54 |
|
ActusRhesus posted:Most are bullshit ineffective assistance claims. Then they claim habeas counsel was ineffective. Then they claim second habeas counsel was ineffective. I thought habeus matters were usually farmed out to clerks & scrubs. Huh.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 20:02 |
|
Not in CT. We give them trials. Because we are idiots. Which creates an interesting power disparity. We are so worried the appellate court will do something dumb that we put solid prosecutors in habeas. But it’s a file churning scheme so most petitioner’s counsel have been out of law school five minutes, and are idiots who have never tried a felony case. Hell. A motor vehicle case. I almost feel badly about loving with them. Then I remember how much their firm is billing the state and say fire away.
ActusRhesus fucked around with this message at 20:52 on Jun 7, 2018 |
# ? Jun 7, 2018 20:25 |
|
I drove 60 miles to country court for an 8:30 trial where the state moved to continue, now I'm waiting around in a McDonald's until 1:00 for a preliminary hearing where the guy bailed out last night. Real nice use of time.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 21:17 |
|
I am trying to respond to an argument that a kidnapping conviction is unconstitutional because putting someone into the trunk of a car at gunpoint, driving them to a second car, putting them in that trunk at gunpoint, driving them to an isolated building, marching them across a lawn, and carrying them up a flight of stairs is “merely incidental” to raping them. My first draft was “hahahahahahahahahahahaha.”
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 21:32 |
|
ActusRhesus posted:I am trying to respond to an argument that a kidnapping conviction is unconstitutional because putting someone into the trunk of a car at gunpoint, driving them to a second car, putting them in that trunk at gunpoint, driving them to an isolated building, marching them across a lawn, and carrying them up a flight of stairs is “merely incidental” to raping them. Sounds like an 80s romantic comedy.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 21:40 |
|
Double jeopardy means you can’t do two or more crimes at the same time.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 21:52 |
|
ActusRhesus posted:I *do* love musical theater. Speaking of... file under “ways you can enjoy free time when on the state employment gravy train”... my amateur Gilbert and Sullivan hobby has lead to a paid acting gig. The law's the true embodiment Of everything that's excellent It has no kind of fault or flaw And I, my Lords, embody the law.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 21:57 |
|
I had a call today where it seemed like my client had a contest about who could do the most legally damaging thing. It’s a multi-way tie for first.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 22:20 |
|
Alaemon posted:The law's the true embodiment Heh. I was in that show. I’m now testifying as an expert witness for the guy who played the lord chancellor. Last G&S I did had 6 lawyers in the cast.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 23:03 |
|
ActusRhesus posted:Heh. I was in that show. I’m now testifying as an expert witness for the guy who played the lord chancellor. Last G&S I did had 6 lawyers in the cast. From all this I almost assume you're a GULC grad and spent your time in GGSS.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 23:10 |
|
Kalman posted:From all this I almost assume you're a GULC grad and spent your time in GGSS. Nah. But two of the guys in my Gondoliers cast were. I’m barely tier one state school all the way!
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 23:12 |
|
ActusRhesus posted:Heh. I was in that show. I’m now testifying as an expert witness for the guy who played the lord chancellor. Last G&S I did had 6 lawyers in the cast. Pirates, Mikado, and Iolanthe are my big three faves. Exceedingly safe choices, I know.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 23:27 |
|
Kalman will now call you a racist. Pirates will always be my fave. A. Because pirates. B. Because it’s amazing. C. Because it’s the first one I ever performed in, and C. I got a best choreography nomination last time I directed it. My kicklines were on point.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2018 23:38 |
|
Pirates was my first, but admittedly the Joseph Papp production with Kevin Kline (who I still quite like as Pirate King). The thing the Papp does especially well that I love is the humor behind "With Cat-Like Tread." The Pirates doing this super-fortissimo song about being stealthy is always funny to me, and the movie goes full-bore with that aspect. I play a bard in a friend's D&D campaign and I randomly blurted out a verse of Modern-Major General mid-session (because something made me think "I know our mythic history, King Arthur's and Sir Caradoc's..." was germane). It was one of those awkward moments where I thought "I'm sitting here playing D&D and I still might be too nerdy for this crowd." Without delving into the debate surrounding Mikado, I think it's one of their best works. Both G and S are at the top of their respective games. Give me a good performance of "The Sun Whose Rays" and I am doing fine. It's one of those pieces like (non-G&S) "Un bel di" or the Flower Duet from Lakme that put me in (the closest thing my dark, shriveled heart has to) my happy place.
|
# ? Jun 8, 2018 00:14 |
|
I imagine there are more than a few partners out there who made it by marrying another partner’s elderly, ugly daughter.
|
# ? Jun 8, 2018 00:17 |
|
disjoe posted:I imagine there are more than a few partners out there who made it by marrying another partner’s elderly, ugly daughter.
|
# ? Jun 8, 2018 01:18 |
|
I watched liar liar today and its representation of the legal profession prior to the birthday wish is startlingly accurate.
|
# ? Jun 8, 2018 02:22 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 05:00 |
|
I will never not laugh at the wife's face.
|
# ? Jun 8, 2018 03:22 |