|
lol
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 02:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 10:33 |
|
|
lol https://twitter.com/sparkyblix/status/1016846407070830592
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 02:08
|
|
|
drat, forgot that those kind of statehood/partition referendums just ask congress to ultimately pass a bill, so dems would need to pull all that poo poo off well before the 2040 date that ornstein threw out there. my previous post was based off the assumption that dems could add those senate seats just by controlling state-level government in urban and densely populated blue states. if dems have to control the senate anyways, there are prob more elegant solutions than to just add more and more states.
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 02:09
|
|
|
ocasiomentum
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 02:11
|
|
|
Finicums Wake posted:ocasiomentum 
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 02:15
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/klnynews/status/1016834708989186049?s=19
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 02:28
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/disco_socialist/status/1016659740447817728?s=19 https://twitter.com/disco_socialist/status/1016774619376730112?s=19
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 02:29
|
|
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:why is that “unsettling?” unless of course you are classist. He would rather the rulers be ones wearing his team's jersey instead of the other one's
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 02:31
|
|
|
also why are you idiots still talking about the dems as if they will still be a viable party in the future? reform voting destroy the two party system.
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 02:31
|
|
|
Time for a Buttigieg Ocasio ticket?
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 02:32
|
|
|
etalian posted:Time for a Buttigieg Ocasio ticket? gently caress NO
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 02:38
|
|
|
Matt Zerella posted:gently caress NO
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 02:46
|
|
|
etalian posted:Time for a Buttigieg Ocasio ticket? Pass.
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 02:47
|
|
|
etalian posted:Time for a Buttigieg Ocasio ticket? Buttigieg does have a poster and thats just mainly because he has a funny name
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 02:49
|
|
|
Matt Zerella posted:gently caress NO
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 03:04
|
|
|
buttigieg doubters, you will know shame, in the end
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 03:07
|
|
|
Jazerus posted:buttigieg doubters, you will know shame, in the end wrong. he succ
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 03:08
|
|
|
Gene Hackman Fan posted:https://twitter.com/disco_socialist/status/1016659740447817728?s=19 the piss tape is real
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 03:18
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:like the entire project of the Republicans has been to be in power permanently. They even thought they had it with Reagan going into HW Bush OK, but on the other hand, we'll regularly say the Dems hosed up for assuming that Clinton would win in 2016, or that otherwise various measures that could be easily undone by GOP victories didn't matter. Not doing this might have enabled "planning on what happens when the pendulum swings back the other way." edit: whoops, this is from way back.
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 03:34
|
|
|
But what will this mean for Democrats in Alabama?
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 03:54
|
|
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:But what will this mean for Democrats in Alabama? maybe
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 03:56
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Farmers4Bernie/status/1016848286622322693 
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 03:57
|
|
|
GunnerJ posted:OK, but on the other hand, we'll regularly say the Dems hosed up for assuming that Clinton would win in 2016, or that otherwise various measures that could be easily undone by GOP victories didn't matter. Not doing this might have enabled "planning on what happens when the pendulum swings back the other way." the difference is the dems assumed hillary would win when there was no reason for them to be that confident that trump couldnt win except pure ideology. the polling was basically 50-50
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 03:57
|
|
|
 ~Credentials~
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 03:59
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1016803526788505601 Biden's ears are burning.
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 04:04
|
|
|
comedyblissoption posted:American wages don't have to decline for immigrants (legal or otherwise) to have an adverse affect on american laborers' aggregate economic interest in a capitalist context. Wages stagnating while workers' productivity keeps increasing is an adverse effect. I meant to say that the study authors referenced by this page's Table 2, were examining the impact of immigration on wages, not whether wages declined during the period of immigration. I'm assuming the study authors, who looked at 1990+, took the possibility of a labor shortage into account. Your point still makes intuitive sense to me, though. Could you offer a citation? I also found a Politifact article that discusses the "does immigration decrease wages for native workers" question in depth. I found a paper from the Levy Institute of the Bard College which examines unemployment by comparing immigration rates across states, and they found that it didn't have any impact on unemployment, but it significantly increased the percentage leaving the labor force among those with a high school diploma or less education (Table 2) while decreasing it for those with some college or more, averaging out to a 0.4% increase in leaving the labor force. By age, 15-24 and 65+ were the demographics most affected. The author notes that most academic literature suggests that immigration does not strongly affect wages, but the increase could be driven either by an actual decline in wages or a false expectation of a decline in wages. To be clear, I think that regardless of the economic impact, anyone who sets foot over the border should be legally allowed to stay, granted permanent residency after staying some amount of time like a year, and then American citizenship upon passing an American citizenship test.
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 04:11
|
|
|
Matt Zerella posted:https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1016803526788505601 Another successful Onion prediction https://www.theonion.com/russian-television-scores-hit-with-new-game-show-who-wa-1819565399
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 04:12
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/YoungerPope/status/1016885299786539008?s=19
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 04:23
|
|
|
Bernie Sanders
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 04:24
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 04:27
|
|
|
she's taking Jeb!'s shtick...
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 04:35
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 04:57
|
|
|
Democratic Cynthialists, motherfucker
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 04:57
|
|
|
does the dsa let in dem cynts?
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 05:01
|
|
|
lol that owns. unironically for once. we need a hundred ocasios-cortez tho
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 05:02
|
|
|
i get to be a aoc hipster among my friends tho yeah i heard of aoc before she was cool 
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 05:02
|
|
|
Sapozhnik posted:lol that owns. unironically for once. what if we elect her to a hundred different offices instead
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 05:03
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1016803196050780160
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 05:04
|
|
|
Why would the Oc be causing problems for the dems? Oh right, this is flop sweat nate and his milquetoast spreadsheets we're talking about here
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 05:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 10:33 |
|
|
Grimoire posted:Why would the Oc be causing problems for the dems? you're trying really hard here he's referring to how the dem leadership is openly quaking about ocasio and denying that she and the wave of dsa are any threat at all to establishment dems, and doomsaying that if the dems continue to swing left thanks to dsa/jd it'll send these Mythical Moderates over to the right
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2018 05:12
|
|
