|
http://www.pewforum.org/fact-sheet/changing-attitudes-on-gay-marriage/quote:In Pew Research Center polling in 2001, Americans opposed same-sex marriage by a margin of 57% to 35%. quote:Among people who are religiously unaffiliated, a solid majority have supported same-sex marriage since 2001. Today, 85% of religious “nones” say same-sex couples should be allowed to marry. guys we can't support things that are currently unpopular we gotta appeal to the chuds
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 16:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 08:52 |
|
|
Look, let's just change the name of ICE back to INS and stop separating kids from parents when we lock them in cages? Will that work? Will you vote for me now?
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 16:23
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:voters are going to take "abolish ice" as "abolish all border control" and basically no amount of campaigning is going to make that idea a popular one You might be able to get past this by reminding voters that ice was created less than 20 years ago and it's not the only border enforcement agency
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 16:23
|
|
|
spacetoaster posted:Look, let's just change the name of ICE back to INS and stop separating kids from parents when we lock them in cages? Will that work? Will you vote for me now? but the polls
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 16:24
|
|
|
The Muppets On PCP posted:http://www.pewforum.org/fact-sheet/changing-attitudes-on-gay-marriage/ I wonder what the numbers would be for pre-existing condition coverage, I suppose it wasn't around long enough for people to really take it for granted and for a lot of people to experience what a life changing difference it could be.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 16:24
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:only 25% of americans want to abolish ice so i think there's actually no political benefit at all to "campaigning hard on it." HEY I WONDER HOW IT GOT TO 25% FROM 0
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 16:27
|
|
|
Thoguh posted:That's not what most people mean though. It's the boogyman that the GOP is throwing up and the handful of people in this thread who want to abolish borders are probably an appreciable percentage of the overall population that supports that idea. only because the media and political establishments have decreed it to be an unacceptable idea, and so no one with a voice has the guts to make the very real case for abolishing our current border control laws
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 16:30
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:HEY I WONDER HOW IT GOT TO 25% FROM 0 it would own hard the Dems had media connections they could use to periodically drag the spotlight away from Trump and point out that a bunch of the kids getting reunited are underweight and covered in lice then blame it on ice
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 16:30
|
|
|
Jeb! Repetition posted:You might be able to get past this by reminding voters that ice was created less than 20 years ago and it's not the only border enforcement agency it's not only not the only border enforcement agency, it's also not even a border enforcement agency
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 16:30
|
|
|
No you see the polls show we need to roll back on same sex marriage, surely that would differentiate us Democrats from the Republicans. Now excuse me while my spouse buys half a million of dollars in stock in the armaments industry.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 16:33
|
|
|
17 whole seats! don't exhaust yourself there, DLCC https://twitter.com/PoliticsWolf/status/1017788591831855110
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 16:40
|
|
|
HiHo ChiRho posted:No you see the polls show we need to roll back on same sex marriage, surely that would differentiate us Democrats from the Republicans. listen if we support gay marriage people will think we want to allow people to gently caress dogs
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 16:45
|
|
|
Guys I polled a majority of whites and they say they oppose the Civil Rights Act, better not do anything to indicate we support that Instead we should support the Civil Opportunity Act which would decrease discrimination by a sustainable amount and would eliminate it entirely by 2050
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 16:49
|
|
|
access to civil rights
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 16:53
|
|
|
let's just improve access to civil rights edit: goddamn it lol
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 16:53
|
|
|
we gave rights to some folks
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 16:54
|
|
|
if you like your civil rights you can keep them
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 16:54
|
|
|
I once imitated cc itt saying "orphan death gets me rock hard." Glad to see that it turned out I was only 15% away from the truth -- he has to see how "not letting children suffer" is polling first before he can crank his hogg.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 16:56
|
|
|
Nikita Khrushchev posted:if you like your civil rights you can keep them lmao
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 16:56
|
|
|
Agean90 posted:You are once again mistaking the outcome of a focused pr campaign as a natural law and saying to do nothing about it. The Centrist Special
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 16:57
|
|
|
good lord she's beyond parody at this point https://twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1017788671125278720
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 16:58
|
|
|
CC please reply to this with your thoughts/experiences from the campaign trail when you're off probation https://twitter.com/jonfavs/status/1017800441667596289 Venom Snake too Nichael?
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 16:59
|
|
|
SKULL.GIF posted:CC please reply to this with your thoughts/experiences from the campaign trail when you're off probation Look, you just don't GET how elections work. Now give me your lovely homemade lawn signs, its trashing our focus group messaging and candidate branding.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 17:03
|
|
|
Joementum posted:17 whole seats! don't exhaust yourself there, DLCC one of their targeted seats is in the NY State Senate which already has a Dem majority, but is controlled by the GOP because of conservative Dems flipping and supporting the GOP instead
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 17:04
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/kevinroose/status/1017783938616647682
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 17:06
|
|
|
kinda curious why all of a sudden dems are having such a hard time with digital campaigns when obama's was pretty decent
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 17:09
|
|
|
The Muppets On PCP posted:kinda curious why all of a sudden dems are having such a hard time with digital campaigns when obama's was pretty decent Bernie won't let them have his mailing list, so Dems are stuck with Hillary's Guess the average age for Hillary Clinton's mailing list
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 17:15
|
|
|
I think "Shockingly, even after what happened in 2016" could be prepended to basically any political headline involving D strategy
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 17:16
|
|
|
EugeneJ posted:Bernie won't let them have his mailing list, so Dems are stuck with Hillary's 69
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 17:17
|
|
|
The Muppets On PCP posted:kinda curious why all of a sudden dems are having such a hard time with digital campaigns when obama's was pretty decent afaik the obama campaign (and bernie campaign for that matter) operated outside of the dnc/dccc's infrastructure, and the last time that machine did anything of note was the wave election in 2006
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 17:23
|
|
|
Phone posted:access to civil rights tax credits for districts that allow African Americans to vote
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 17:25
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:tax credits for districts that allow African Americans to vote 
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 17:27
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:tax credits for districts that allow African Americans to vote jfc
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 17:29
|
|
|
don't think of it as 'concentration camps for babies' think of it as a...'future voter consolidation center'
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 17:30
|
|
|
Twitter posts that are like 'uhhh I bet the Queen and Mr. Rosenstein colluded to make sure Mr. Trump was there as his son gets Indicted!'
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 17:32
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:voters are going to take "abolish ice" as "abolish all border control" and basically no amount of campaigning is going to make that idea a popular one Given that abolishing ICE is a good thing, you would have to prove not just that it's unpopular, but that it's unpopular to the extent that it will make people not vote who would otherwise have voted. You people always act like polls directly translate to voting (in the sense of "people will vote for a politician that supports something that they poll positively about, and vice versa"), but that isn't remotely logical. It's entirely possible for a majority to disapprove of an idea while it still having almost zero impact on actual voting, and it's also possible for the minority who approves to be influenced to vote while those who don't approve don't change their voting (resulting in a net increase despite lack of overall popularity, due to supporters having stronger feelings about the issue). Since we can't really know what would happen, you should default to supporting the thing that is morally right.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 17:37
|
|
|
 https://twitter.com/MrGregTowns/status/1017794121656758272 #TheResistance
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 17:39
|
|
|
As I have stated often: concerned citizen is a dickhead lanyard who is wrong about every bit of analysis he has posted in this bitch of a timeline. The inverse of his statements will always be the correct interpretation.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 17:42
|
|
|
Feldegast42 posted:Guys I polled a majority of whites and they say they oppose the Civil Rights Act, better not do anything to indicate we support that Stuff like this is what proves that these center-left/centrist types don't actually care about these issues as much as they claim to. If you frame the same issue using a morally obvious political topic (like slavery or civil rights), the analogy to their words/actions is super obviously that of someone who doesn't actually care about the topic in question. If someone constantly made the same sort of contrarian arguments against abolitionists, it would be obvious that they either don't care about slavery, or are against ending it. You see this the most when it comes to topics like wealth inequality/poverty; if you create an analogy using their same argument with respect to something like racism, it sounds exactly the same as the stuff racists say (or at least someone who doesn't care about racism). When they talk about racist white socialist bros, it's entirely projection; they're imagining that the left views social justice in the same way they view issues like material inequality/poverty.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 17:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 08:52 |
|
|
nice
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2018 17:51
|
|