Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
reignonyourparade
Nov 15, 2012

Postoyevsky posted:

yes how could you ever tell the difference between having surplus value vacuumed up by rich assholes vs. democratically getting to decided, with your fellow workers, what to do with that surplus value :thunk:

The people whining about how the coop workers are exploiting themselves seem to be incapable for some reason.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Infernot
Jul 17, 2015

"A short night wakes me from a dream that seemed so long."
Grimey Drawer

Karl Barks posted:

this argument happens every time someone brings up co-ops, literally no one thinks this or has ever claimed it. co-ops, trade unions, etc are all just important tools to build class consciousness. it's a bunch of alienating pedantic academic BS when people bring up that point. sorry for getting feisty. radical candor.

Can you explain how these things build class consciousness? I think I get why you think that but of everyone I've talked to in a union there's been maybe one that even seemed to understand why their union was important in regards to their workplace and their place as a collective group of workers. Most just see it as more money and better benefits. And with co-ops I don't see how having a democratic™ capitalist enterprise makes them conscious of the gulf / relationship between worker and capitalist. I think class consciousness can only be realized on a large scale when capitalism's in crisis, like recessions and depressions and even war.

big business man
Sep 30, 2012

Infernot posted:

Can you explain how these things build class consciousness? I think I get why you think that but of everyone I've talked to in a union there's been maybe one that even seemed to understand why their union was important in regards to their workplace and their place as a collective group of workers. Most just see it as more money and better benefits. And with co-ops I don't see how having a democratic™ capitalist enterprise makes them conscious of the gulf / relationship between worker and capitalist. I think class consciousness can only be realized on a large scale when capitalism's in crisis, like recessions and depressions and even war.

both are exercises in working cooperatively with other workers - labor unions in particular are building "class consciousness" by default, even if the workers themselves don't understand the buzzwords or terminology. going to a union meeting, picketing, striking, etc, are all important exercises and the building blocks of class consciousness.

Ruzihm
Aug 11, 2010

Group up and push mid, proletariat!


reignonyourparade posted:

The people whining about how the coop workers are exploiting themselves seem to be incapable for some reason.

Well, you can either choose to run yourself out of business or realize profits approximately at the same rate as as everyone else.

Love 2 vote on who to lay off as overproduction occurs. :confuoot:

big business man
Sep 30, 2012

Ruzihm posted:

Well, you can either choose to run yourself out of business or realize profits approximately at the same rate as as everyone else.

Love 2 vote on who to lay off as overproduction occurs. :confuoot:

material conditions at co-ops are almost universally better for workers than in a traditional workplace, op. hope this helps.

there's multiple in the DC Metro region that have been around for decades

Ruzihm
Aug 11, 2010

Group up and push mid, proletariat!


Postoyevsky posted:

material conditions at co-ops are almost universally better for workers than in a traditional workplace, op. hope this helps.

there's multiple in the DC Metro region that have been around for decades

You could say this about air conditioned workplaces, and while they are good and cool (:haw:) they aren't revolutionary. Eventually you have to lay someone off and that person no longer benefits from the air conditioning.

big business man
Sep 30, 2012

Ruzihm posted:

You could say this about air conditioned workplaces, and while they are good and cool (:haw:) they aren't revolutionary. Eventually you have to lay someone off and that person no longer benefits from the air conditioning.

you could say that, good point op

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Ruzihm posted:

You could say this about air conditioned workplaces, and while they are good and cool (:haw:) they aren't revolutionary. Eventually you have to lay someone off and that person no longer benefits from the air conditioning.

NO DUH.

The whole loving point of this discussion is that co-ops aren't revolutionary, they're a middling step between where we are now and Full Gay Space Communism.

Same with unions, higher minimum wage, etc. We can't wait around for the revolution, we need to improve poo poo now and then keep working to further improve poo poo.

And bonus, if you show people that better things are possible, it makes them more likely to look at their own situation and go "hey this sucks, I want that better thing!"

Infernot
Jul 17, 2015

"A short night wakes me from a dream that seemed so long."
Grimey Drawer

Postoyevsky posted:

both are exercises in working cooperatively with other workers - labor unions in particular are building "class consciousness" by default, even if the workers themselves don't understand the buzzwords or terminology. going to a union meeting, picketing, striking, etc, are all important exercises and the building blocks of class consciousness.

And how many unions participate in strikes these days? The recent ones I can think of are the teachers strikes that happened in several states, but as far as I can tell it's just union reps doing a bit of negotiating with the bosses and the workers not partaking much in collective action. I do agree that unions are an exercise for workers' action, but from my experience class consciousness isn't something they produce, and at least here in the US unions are pretty much dead and what's left of unions they are fangless.
I'm just curious, what do you define class consciousness as if the workers aren't conscious of their relationship with capitalists, and in regards to capitalism as a whole? I've always heard Leninists banging on that we have to spread class consciousness but I feel like people use the term for any vaguely left activity by workers.

big business man
Sep 30, 2012

i mean technically, getting paid $1.00/hr is better than literal slavery. eventually though that person will get laid off and won't benefit from that $1/hr.

makes you think!!!

big business man
Sep 30, 2012

Infernot posted:

And how many unions participate in strikes these days? The recent ones I can think of are the teachers strikes that happened in several states, but as far as I can tell it's just union reps doing a bit of negotiating with the bosses and the workers not partaking much in collective action. I do agree that unions are an exercise for workers' action, but from my experience class consciousness isn't something they produce, and at least here in the US unions are pretty much dead and what's left of unions they are fangless.
I'm just curious, what do you define class consciousness as if the workers aren't conscious of their relationship with capitalists, and in regards to capitalism as a whole? I've always heard Leninists banging on that we have to spread class consciousness but I feel like people use the term for any vaguely left activity by workers.

literally every single union still in existence participates in strikes, even the lovely ones. you can only recently think of the teachers strikes because youre grossly misinformed on the US labor movement. class consciousness is absolutely produced by being in a labor union, even if, like I said, they don't understand the terminology.

belgend
Mar 6, 2008

me when The Club do another win

saying every union does strikes highly minimalizes the ideas of struggle within the union and bootlickers

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

Ruzihm posted:

You could say this about air conditioned workplaces, and while they are good and cool (:haw:) they aren't revolutionary. Eventually you have to lay someone off and that person no longer benefits from the air conditioning.

is there any one thing that IS revolutionary? co-ops have obvious benefits, like not laying complete control of an entire enterprise at the feet of 1 or 2 people. when crises happen, do you think a co-op is more or less likely to sell off assets than a private company? the point is that allows for a great deal of organization between workers, preventing the atomization and alienation you see in most corporate workplaces. the utility of a co-op changes in an actual socialist society, but the benefits seem obvious to me...


Infernot posted:

Can you explain how these things build class consciousness? I think I get why you think that but of everyone I've talked to in a union there's been maybe one that even seemed to understand why their union was important in regards to their workplace and their place as a collective group of workers. Most just see it as more money and better benefits. And with co-ops I don't see how having a democratic™ capitalist enterprise makes them conscious of the gulf / relationship between worker and capitalist. I think class consciousness can only be realized on a large scale when capitalism's in crisis, like recessions and depressions and even war.

it's about building structures that organize people so that when the time comes, they are in a position of power and not at the mercy of capitalists. like postoyevsky said, a co-op (or union, or whatever structure) puts people in the mindset that they're in this together, instead of working towards the wealth of someone else.

where are most people 8-12 hours a day? they're at work, it's where organizing should be done.

Pablo Nergigante
Apr 16, 2002

quote:

The game industry is not exactly known for valuing workers. Big studios are rife with soul-destroying crunch and end-of-project layoffs. French studio Motion Twin, developer of the Castlevania-inspired roguelike Dead Cells, is trying something different: Workers own and manage the company. There is no boss.

Motion Twin describes itself as an “anarcho-syndical workers cooperative.” What this means in practical terms is that all of its 11 workers are, in theory, equal. Same pay, same say.

“We actually just use a super basic formula: if a project finds success, people are basically paid more in bonuses, and everyone is paid the absolute same way,” said longtime Motion Twin game designer Sébastien Bénard in an email. “The devs and the artists are paid the same amount of money, and people like me who have been here for 17 years are paid the same amount as people who were recruited last year.”

Video games

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

and uhhh yes, AC is good and I think workers should have it, especially in hot humid environments

big business man
Sep 30, 2012

belgend posted:

saying every union does strikes highly minimalizes the ideas of struggle within the union and bootlickers

it's not necessarily mutually exclusive. there's plenty of members in my union who still go on strike (we have several hundred members on strike right now) who are without question bootlickers, Trump supporters, what have you. they just (correctly) recognize that striking during contract disputes benefits them personally.

It's a factual thing, though, that unions still do participate in strikes. I'm certainly not one to minimize the challenges and struggles within the US labor movement (and the necessity of increasing militancy, direct actions, prioritizing the rank and file, etc)

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES
A/C is a clever ploy to trick me into coming to work, and I have to say it's effective.

Infernot
Jul 17, 2015

"A short night wakes me from a dream that seemed so long."
Grimey Drawer

Postoyevsky posted:

literally every single union still in existence participates in strikes, even the lovely ones. you can only recently think of the teachers strikes because youre grossly misinformed on the US labor movement. class consciousness is absolutely produced by being in a labor union, even if, like I said, they don't understand the terminology.

Enlighten me on the US labor movement then. Where are the strikes happening? I'd love to see how you're gauging class consciousness, there must be a precise measurement tool if you're so sure.

quote:

In 2017, there were 7 major work stoppages involving 1,000 or more workers and lasting at least one shift, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Since the series began in 1947 this is the second lowest number of major work stoppages recorded in a year, the lowest annual total was 5 in 2009. (See table 1.) Major work stoppages beginning in 2017 idled 25,000 workers, the second lowest number of workers idled annually since 1947. The lowest number of workers idled was 13,000 in 2009. In 2017 the information industry sector had the most workers idled by a major work stoppage with 15,000 workers, which accounted for over half of all workers idled. Public administration accounted for the second largest number of workers idled by major work stoppages with over 5,000 workers, or a fifth of all workers idled. (See tables 1 and 2.) In 2017, the largest major work stoppage by days idle occurred between Charter Communications and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers union with 345,600 total days idle and involving 1,800 workers. This work stoppage was one of two major work stoppages within the information industry, the second was between AT&T and the Communication Workers of America involving 13,200 workers and lasting one day.

Sounds like the US labor movement is blossoming thanks to record low union membership and work stoppages.

Sheng-Ji Yang
Mar 5, 2014


Infernot posted:

a democratic™ capitalist enterprise

a cooperative is democratic worker ownership of the means of production. that is inherently not capitalist

Proust Malone
Apr 4, 2008

WampaLord posted:

NO DUH.

The whole loving point of this discussion is that co-ops aren't revolutionary, they're a middling step between where we are now and Full Gay Space Communism.

Same with unions, higher minimum wage, etc. We can't wait around for the revolution, we need to improve poo poo now and then keep working to further improve poo poo.

And bonus, if you show people that better things are possible, it makes them more likely to look at their own situation and go "hey this sucks, I want that better thing!"

revolutions tend to go to the parties that have plans and means when the crisis hits. This is true of revolutionary movements as well as reactionary ones. hell, the shock doctrine is exactly this for reactionary capital.

Plans like this are good but only relate tangentially to the idea of enacting FGSM when the revolution comes. That involves spreading your ideas and having your people in place and in power when the time comes.

smarxist
Jul 26, 2018

by Fluffdaddy

Infernot posted:

Enlighten me on the US labor movement then. Where are the strikes happening? I'd love to see how you're gauging class consciousness, there must be a precise measurement tool if you're so sure.


🅱️-Meter

Ruzihm
Aug 11, 2010

Group up and push mid, proletariat!


Karl Barks posted:

is there any one thing that IS revolutionary?

organizing production, or at least a substantial sector of production, around non circulating labor vouchers would be revolutionary, yes.

Pablo Nergigante
Apr 16, 2002

Bring back company scrip imo

big business man
Sep 30, 2012

Infernot posted:

Enlighten me on the US labor movement then. Where are the strikes happening? I'd love to see how you're gauging class consciousness, there must be a precise measurement tool if you're so sure.

Sounds like the US labor movement is blossoming thanks to record low union membership and work stoppages.

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/rhode-island/articles/2018-07-26/nurses-end-strike-at-2-rhode-island-hospitals-return-friday

https://www.timesrecord.com/articles/maine-1/unions-authorize-strike-against-consolidated/

http://www.niagara-gazette.com/news/local_news/mount-st-mary-s-hospital-union-set-to-go-on/article_539a54ea-90da-11e8-868f-8f28b4670e8b.html

https://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-racing/articles/228524/pari-mutuel-employees-union-votes-to-strike-in-ca

https://www.casino.org/news/downtown-las-vegas-casinos-reach-deals-with-culinary-union

https://www.peoplesworld.org/article/porcelen-specrail-strikers-hold-firm/

hope this helps

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

Ruzihm posted:

organizing production, or at least a substantial sector of production, around non circulating labor vouchers would be revolutionary, yes.

okay and how are you going to do that

Emmideer
Oct 20, 2011

Lovely night, no?
Grimey Drawer
A co-op having democratic say over who it lays off in time of economic crisis is leagues better than unilateral lay-offs from on high. Believe it or not, workers are capable of assessing their own economic and personal conditions, and sharing them in a public space. Even in traditional organizations, allowing workers to know lay-offs are coming and leaving them to the decision making has relatively positive outcomes, like those workers who planned on finding another job or moving voluntarily accepting lay-offs so those more in need/desire for the job are able to stay. I'm sure it's not fun, and I'm also sure there are some politics involved, but there is a gulf between that and some CEO pointing at the people he likes the least and Trumpishly saying "You're fired."

Infernot
Jul 17, 2015

"A short night wakes me from a dream that seemed so long."
Grimey Drawer

Sheng-Ji Yang posted:

a cooperative is democratic worker ownership of the means of production. that is inherently not capitalist

Of course, hence why thanks to Mondragon we're slowly replacing evil profit of capitalism with bosses and stuff with socialist democratic egalitarian profit, where workers get to decide how best to circulate capital like before with bosses but instead by a vote among their fellow workers. And that same vote on laying off themselves. Not to mention the socialistic democratic idea of private property that cooperatives still uphold. Socialistic democratic estrangement of labor is a good thing but undemocratic capitalist estrangement and wage labor is bad. All of this is precisely why places with a lot of cooperatives are mixed economies like what high school economics taught you (you know, a healthy mix of socialism and capitalism. Like Scandinavia!). Silly ultras, we're halfway to bringing heaven on Earth, we just need more worker owned big businesses.

smarxist
Jul 26, 2018

by Fluffdaddy

Infernot posted:

Of course, hence why thanks to Mondragon we're slowly replacing evil profit of capitalism with bosses and stuff with socialist democratic egalitarian profit, where workers get to decide how best to circulate capital like before with bosses but instead by a vote among their fellow workers. And that same vote on laying off themselves. Not to mention the socialistic democratic idea of private property that cooperatives still uphold. Socialistic democratic estrangement of labor is a good thing but undemocratic capitalist estrangement and wage labor is bad. All of this is precisely why places with a lot of cooperatives are mixed economies like what high school economics taught you (you know, a healthy mix of socialism and capitalism. Like Scandinavia!). Silly ultras, we're halfway to bringing heaven on Earth, we just need more worker owned big businesses.

Also three continents of slave labor.

big business man
Sep 30, 2012

Infernot posted:

Of course, hence why thanks to Mondragon we're slowly replacing evil profit of capitalism with bosses and stuff with socialist democratic egalitarian profit, where workers get to decide how best to circulate capital like before with bosses but instead by a vote among their fellow workers. And that same vote on laying off themselves. Not to mention the socialistic democratic idea of private property that cooperatives still uphold. Socialistic democratic estrangement of labor is a good thing but undemocratic capitalist estrangement and wage labor is bad. All of this is precisely why places with a lot of cooperatives are mixed economies like what high school economics taught you (you know, a healthy mix of socialism and capitalism. Like Scandinavia!). Silly ultras, we're halfway to bringing heaven on Earth, we just need more worker owned big businesses.

yeah why do anything at all to make peoples lives marginally better.

higher minimum wage? nah thats just supporting wage slavery. truly a galaxy brain take right here, folks

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

Infernot posted:

we just need more worker owned big businesses.

who is saying this

Infernot
Jul 17, 2015

"A short night wakes me from a dream that seemed so long."
Grimey Drawer

Postoyevsky posted:

yeah why do anything at all to make peoples lives marginally better.

higher minimum wage? nah thats just supporting wage slavery. truly a galaxy brain take right here, folks

There's a difference between improving the lives of workers and arguing that cooperatives and unions are socialism lmao. If what you gleaned from my parody of some of you is that workers shouldn't be struggling for better conditions and participating in a labor movement, then unfortunately I have to make you retake your GED test.

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

Infernot posted:

cooperatives and unions are socialism lmao.

no one thinks this

Larry Parrish
Jul 9, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Postoyevsky posted:

yeah why do anything at all to make peoples lives marginally better.

higher minimum wage? nah thats just supporting wage slavery. truly a galaxy brain take right here, folks

every time the minimum wage in cali goes up a little more, all prices go up about twice as much, so uhh

big business man
Sep 30, 2012

Infernot posted:

There's a difference between improving the lives of workers and arguing that cooperatives and unions are socialism lmao. If what you gleaned from my parody of some of you is that workers shouldn't be struggling for better conditions and participating in a labor movement, then unfortunately I have to make you retake your GED test.

dunno who's arguing that cooperatives and unions are socialism, but it isn't me and it isn't anyone that i've seen itt

take a deep breath champ

big business man
Sep 30, 2012

Larry Parrish posted:

every time the minimum wage in cali goes up a little more, all prices go up about twice as much, so uhh

wrong

Emmideer
Oct 20, 2011

Lovely night, no?
Grimey Drawer
If someone asks me "should I start a co-op?", one of the questions I ask in return isn't going to be "how socialist do you wanna be?" Co-ops are alternatives to businesses; if you want to start a business and also be a little less poo poo that your average business, you'd run it like a co-op. However, if you don't plan on building a business, with all that entails, you shouldn't start a co-op.

There are a whole host of options avaliable that are 'friendlier' capitalism. I see no inherent problem with them, because they are not alternatives to socialism, they are alternatives to present day capitalism. If your goal is instead Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism as quickly as possible, I wouldn't recommend a co-op only because you'd probably see greater returns by withholding all labor but political labor. Whether you want to risk that is up to you and your personal situation.

Sheng-Ji Yang
Mar 5, 2014


Infernot posted:

Of course, hence why thanks to Mondragon we're slowly replacing evil profit of capitalism with bosses and stuff with socialist democratic egalitarian profit, where workers get to decide how best to circulate capital like before with bosses but instead by a vote among their fellow workers. And that same vote on laying off themselves. Not to mention the socialistic democratic idea of private property that cooperatives still uphold. Socialistic democratic estrangement of labor is a good thing but undemocratic capitalist estrangement and wage labor is bad. All of this is precisely why places with a lot of cooperatives are mixed economies like what high school economics taught you (you know, a healthy mix of socialism and capitalism. Like Scandinavia!). Silly ultras, we're halfway to bringing heaven on Earth, we just need more worker owned big businesses.

cool but coops arent capitalist

Larry Parrish
Jul 9, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
so your saying being a failson with Daddy's Money is actually praxis. i see

Sheng-Ji Yang
Mar 5, 2014


Larry Parrish posted:

every time the minimum wage in cali goes up a little more, all prices go up about twice as much, so uhh

lmao they absolutely do not

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Infernot
Jul 17, 2015

"A short night wakes me from a dream that seemed so long."
Grimey Drawer

Karl Barks posted:

who is saying this

quote:

co-ops make sense in certain industries, trade unions work in others. China's SOEs are basically corporate structures that have embedded Communist party representatives. it really depends on the situation. the United States has a history of trade unionism, and to a lesser extent co-ops. google Mondragon Corporation, it'll blow ur mind

It blew my mind that you can have a multi-billion dollar corporations ran by workers in capitalism. Also, previously you said that co-ops are the most likely avenue for workers to organize themselves "to do labour to make all the things that we need and and want to do" which I assume the other person who posted this original phrase you responded to, is referring to socialism. So it's not a leap to say you probably think co-operatives are "socialistic" or some other meaningless term and different somehow from capitalism.

Karl Barks posted:

no one thinks this

quote:

a cooperative is democratic worker ownership of the means of production. that is inherently not capitalist

This is on the same page, big fella. And as I talked about above, I'm getting a similar vibe that you think co-ops are something different than capitalist businesses...

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5