Mirificus posted:

Mr Fronts posted:

Thread, turn back.

WRONG WAY
GO BACK

Jst0rm posted:

average age is now 32 to 40 and growing.

taxx

Quavers posted:

That Kazan is Chris Roberts

Contingency posted:

Thanks--the Zappos case cited is somewhat relevant--http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1152&context=historical
Basically, Zappos had a breach and they used their site's ToS to force victims into arbitration. The courts disagreed for a couple reasons:
Terms changed without user acknowledgment--not applicable to RSI since they make you acknowledge your acceptance.
Unilateral right to change the ToS. Basically, Zappos said in their ToS that they could change the terms at any time. As a consequence, binding arbitration was only binding upon users since Zappos could write themselves out of it and the judge decided the arbitration clause could be thrown out as it was an illusory promise. I skimmed through the current ToS and didn't see a similar "we can change the agreement whenever" statement.

TheSickeningTruth posted:

Page 4828 was epic, thank you Mirificus.

Saint Drogo posted:

Q-tard. Christian. Incel. Literal motherfucker.

You truly can be anything in the 'Verse.

Mirificus posted:

Mirificus posted:

Daztek posted:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcfUUuwX2VU



HOT TUB is IN!!! (soon)

Lord Stimperor posted:

And so the sickening truths have been revealed

Dooguk posted:

Q. Are all Star Citizens like Space_Addict?

A. No, some of them use Nvidia graphics cards.

Beexoffel posted:

That's true, the ToS change is acknowledgeable and acknowledged by the SC users.
What I thought is similar to the example, is that the acknowledged ToS seems to relieve CIG from any obligation to objectively deliver a product. They seem to be able to claim "it's in development" forever.

Tinfoil Papercut posted:

Some, not all, also shy away from incest.

Agony Aunt posted:

"its only 1.0 and tier 1, the really good stuff will come with 2.0 and tier 2 stuff, these things take time, and development only really started 1 year ago! Bloody goons with their FUD!"

quote:

ONE LAST HEIST

I wanted my last job to be high-risk. I wanted to steal from someone while they were present at their base instead of on the other side of the solar system. I warped into a system and immediately heard a couple players discussing resources and refineries. And they were standing right in front of their base. Perfect.

I stood around suspiciously for a while as they worked and chatted with each other, then I sauntered into their base alone and found the only item inside, a save point. I pocketed it. A moment later, as I was headed to the exit with the save point in my inventory, one player asked the other, "When was the last time you saved?"

"It's been a little bit," the other replied. "I saved when I built that save point."

They were actually discussing the save point I had just stolen and was leaving their base with. The heist just got real. It kicked into higher gear when one player entered the base to try to use the save point I was walking out with in my backpack.

Okay, it technically didn't kick into any gear, high or low, but it was pretty funny as they discovered their save point was suddenly missing. You can watch my daring heist below, or here on YouTube, and I'd suggest both sound (so you can hear them talk) and full-screen (so you can see what I'm typing to them in text chat). They were good sports.

Youtube version

As I headed back to my singleplayer lifestyle to retire, I noticed that my teleporter now lists the random players' games I invaded as destinations. Presumably if I can use my teleporter to visit their planet bases, they can do the same and visit me? I wonder if I'll be working on my base some day and someone will come through to reclaim their stolen save point.

I'll be ready if it happens. I've got plenty to spare.

Sandweed posted:

I fear that Mirificus bot has gained sentience and is trying to hurt us for what we have done to them.

Tinfoil Papercut posted:

Remember when Diablo III had a real money AH and Blizzard had to shut it down in order to salvage the game which turned out to be the worst of the series in no small part because that thing had existed?

Bayonnefrog posted:

"worst of the series"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diablo_III#Reception

D3 fastest selling PC game to date

One of the best selling PC games of all time

30 mil unites sold as of June 2015

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Baxta posted:

I forgot I uninstalled Diablo 3 after looking up why the game was so stupidly broken hard in some points. Apparently they patched this pretty quickly.

It was because Jay Wilson had found the highest level of difficulty the internal Devs could do and doubled it. Pretty sure the meme "and then we doubled it!" will haunt him forever.