Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


she made an antibullying site and zoe quinn warned her about how she'd get attacked. gamergaters started harassing her and because she's dumb she thought quinn was behind it. and so the gamergaters "red pilled" her.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Corsair Pool Boy
Dec 17, 2004
College Slice
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/venezuela-verge-massive-humanitarian-economic-collapse-culprit-socialism-ncna899461

Yes, the problem is 'socialism', not the rampant corruption detailed in the article. What the author describes has almost nothing to do with the conclusion.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Groovelord Neato posted:

she made an antibullying site and zoe quinn warned her about how she'd get attacked. gamergaters started harassing her and because she's dumb she thought quinn was behind it. and so the gamergaters "red pilled" her.

Yea she loving rules, she literally took Quinn saying 'man good luck they're gonna come at you hard' and then when the people who called her the n-word said "ZOE QUINN DID THIS" she said 'aw drat that Zoe Quinn'.

Zwabu
Aug 7, 2006

Groovelord Neato posted:

she made an antibullying site and zoe quinn warned her about how she'd get attacked. gamergaters started harassing her and because she's dumb she thought quinn was behind it. and so the gamergaters "red pilled" her.

With stuff like this I always go with the simpler assumption that person is simply getting paid money to be one of the good ones.

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


she is but nobody is going to make up that story about their "conversion" and it's what happened.

https://twitter.com/zei_nabq/status/1028418672921141248

Groovelord Neato fucked around with this message at 00:12 on Aug 12, 2018

twistedmentat
Nov 21, 2003

Its my party
and I'll die if
I want to
LOL @ JP shilling for gold now.

Is Candice Owens the woman who made that Red Pill movie about "hey I am a feminist, but I think this MRAs actually have a point and women are actually terrible"?

STAC Goat
Mar 12, 2008

Watching you sleep.

Butt first, let's
check the feeds.

Oh, I have no doubt that Owens is just a straight up conwoman who just took awhile to identify the best grift. I just remembered there was some transparently hypocritical and embarrassing origin story to her celebrity.

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



I see they are now going Putin > Mueller because WITCH HUNT

https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1027904344707026944

nine-gear crow
Aug 10, 2013

twistedmentat posted:

LOL @ JP shilling for gold now.

Is Candice Owens the woman who made that Red Pill movie about "hey I am a feminist, but I think this MRAs actually have a point and women are actually terrible"?

No, that’s a completely different (and white) woman. She kind of disappeared into obscurity after We Hunted The Mammoth just kind of stopped bothering to check in on her. Though how you go from being an avowed objective third party observer on the matter to a true believer in the cause by listening to Paul Elam for any length of time is truly an accomplishment in stupidity.

Angry_Ed
Mar 30, 2010




Grimey Drawer

FlamingLiberal posted:

I see they are now going Putin > Mueller because WITCH HUNT

https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1027904344707026944

Instead of Master Shake I guess he wants to be called Matryoshka Shake

HootTheOwl
May 13, 2012

Hootin and shootin

FlamingLiberal posted:

I see they are now going Putin > Mueller because WITCH HUNT

https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1027904344707026944
They've been in love with Putin for years, ever since he made Obama look bad. Now we're finding out Putin might have paid for it too.

Pirate Radar
Apr 18, 2008

You're not my Ruthie!
You're not my Debbie!
You're not my Sherry!

D1Sergo posted:

The funny thing is to me it IS exactly like catcalling: demanding personal attention from someone who doesn't owe you poo poo.

Gonna start calling it catcalling when people try to own me online

LeeMajors
Jan 20, 2005

I've gotta stop fantasizing about Lee Majors...
Ah, one more!


Corsair Pool Boy posted:

https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/venezuela-verge-massive-humanitarian-economic-collapse-culprit-socialism-ncna899461

Yes, the problem is 'socialism', not the rampant corruption detailed in the article. What the author describes has almost nothing to do with the conclusion.

Sort of like how the Socialism killed 20M people in Soviet Russia, not unchecked and brutal authoritarianism.

These people are painfully stupid with nary a nuanced thought. gently caress em. You can't get through to them.

McGlockenshire
Dec 16, 2005

GOLLOCKS!

Zwabu posted:

With stuff like this I always go with the simpler assumption that person is simply getting paid money to be one of the good ones.

Never attribute to malice that which can be equally explained by stupidity. The very fact that she fell for the most incredibly moronic and blatant gator misdirection demonstrates that she's absurdly, profoundly stupid.

Corsair Pool Boy
Dec 17, 2004
College Slice

LeeMajors posted:

Sort of like how the Socialism killed 20M people in Soviet Russia, not unchecked and brutal authoritarianism.

These people are painfully stupid with nary a nuanced thought. gently caress em. You can't get through to them.

Props to NYT for giving people from the poor little put-upon non-partisan Cato Institute a platform though, right?

OneEightHundred
Feb 28, 2008

Soon, we will be unstoppable!

Pirate Radar posted:

Gonna start calling it catcalling when people try to own me online
Reminds me more of "1v1 me bro."

Dr. Arbitrary posted:

I think that's why he likes to debate college students. If he accidentally got in the ring with someone who has some comedy chops, it could turn into a bloodbath.
The reason he likes to debate college students is because he's "debating" them in the Q&A of his own talks, so there's no motion or anything, which means he can effectively set the victory conditions at whatever he feels like.

The whole trick is that "debate me" means "convince me," and what he wants to be convinced of is controlled in a way that it's ridiculous and unwinnable. There's no way to prove anything to someone that thinks that any sort of government assistance is going to lead to Soviet Union-esque fuckery, that the government can't do anything better than the private sector, that discrimination doesn't exist unless there's a big fat "no blacks" sign, and that inequality is caused by lazy people not bootstrapping enough.

That's also why he keeps falling back on the conglomeration of anecdotes that he calls "the Left," so he can put people on the spot to defend it.

bird food bathtub
Aug 9, 2003

College Slice

HootTheOwl posted:

They've been in love with Putin for years, ever since he made Obama look bad. Now we're finding out Putin might have paid for it too.

They're also pretty OK with Russia's treatment of gender/sexual differences.

Like, REALLY OK with it.

BarbarianElephant
Feb 12, 2015
The fairy of forgiveness has removed your red text.

LeeMajors posted:

Sort of like how the Socialism killed 20M people in Soviet Russia, not unchecked and brutal authoritarianism.

Socialism didn't *stop* the brutal authoritarianism, though, did it? Socialism isn't the answer to all life's ills.

LeeMajors
Jan 20, 2005

I've gotta stop fantasizing about Lee Majors...
Ah, one more!


OneEightHundred posted:

Reminds me more of "1v1 me bro."

The reason he likes to debate college students is because he's "debating" them in the Q&A of his own talks, so there's no motion or anything, which means he can effectively set the victory conditions at whatever he feels like.

The whole trick is that "debate me" means "convince me," and what he wants to be convinced of is controlled in a way that it's ridiculous and unwinnable. There's no way to prove anything to someone that thinks that any sort of government assistance is going to lead to Soviet Union-esque fuckery, that the government can't do anything better than the private sector, that discrimination doesn't exist unless there's a big fat "no blacks" sign, and that inequality is caused by lazy people not bootstrapping enough.

That's also why he keeps falling back on the conglomeration of anecdotes that he calls "the Left," so he can put people on the spot to defend it.

This is also why CREATIONIST VS EVOLUTIONIST debates are always unsatisfactory, masturbatory theater. The deck is always stacked to where the evolutionary rationalist has to convince a dyed-in-the-wool creationist to renounce his faith or he has lost. Period.

BarbarianElephant posted:

Socialism didn't *stop* the brutal authoritarianism, though, did it? Socialism isn't the answer to all life's ills.

I can't tell if I'm being whooshed or not.

LeeMajors fucked around with this message at 04:28 on Aug 12, 2018

BarbarianElephant
Feb 12, 2015
The fairy of forgiveness has removed your red text.

LeeMajors posted:

This is also why CREATIONIST VS EVOLUTIONIST debates are always unsatisfactory, masturbatory theater. The deck is always stacked to where the evolutionary rationalist has to convince a dyed-in-the-wool creationist to renounce his faith or he has lost. Period.

As pointless as debating a flat earther. Since one side is based on faith not reason, faith cannot be defeated by reason. So everyone might as well give up and go home. They'd have better luck convincing the creationist of evolution via theological debate: it's at least compatible.

Hunt11
Jul 24, 2013

Grimey Drawer
I don't know about that. When somebody in either this or the general Trump thread posted an argument from him about how men and woman are so different I believe that the only correct response is to take off your shirt and start rubbing your nipples.

Pirate Radar
Apr 18, 2008

You're not my Ruthie!
You're not my Debbie!
You're not my Sherry!

Hunt11 posted:

I don't know about that. When somebody in either this or the general Trump thread posted an argument from him about how men and woman are so different I believe that the only correct response is to take off your shirt and start rubbing your nipples.

This works for a surprising number of situations.

ToxicSlurpee
Nov 5, 2003

-=SEND HELP=-


Pillbug

LeeMajors posted:

This is also why CREATIONIST VS EVOLUTIONIST debates are always unsatisfactory, masturbatory theater. The deck is always stacked to where the evolutionary rationalist has to convince a dyed-in-the-wool creationist to renounce his faith or he has lost. Period.

That actually isn't pointless. In that case you aren't debating the creationist who will never, ever change their opinion you are putting arguments against creationism out for the audience to look at. Extreme creationists will never change but the people listening may very well see all the holes in the argument or, at the very least, understand better that science isn't some horrible abomination that hates God.

LeeMajors
Jan 20, 2005

I've gotta stop fantasizing about Lee Majors...
Ah, one more!


ToxicSlurpee posted:

That actually isn't pointless. In that case you aren't debating the creationist who will never, ever change their opinion you are putting arguments against creationism out for the audience to look at. Extreme creationists will never change but the people listening may very well see all the holes in the argument or, at the very least, understand better that science isn't some horrible abomination that hates God.

I haven't attended all of them, but I suppose they aren't entirely worthless. I still think their utility is debatable though. The terms and pacing of the debate are always set by the creationist because the burden of proof is always unattainable. It's why arguing in good faith with a cultist is completely impossible.

Like, yes, I agree we should publicize as much resistance to this nonsense as possible--but the majority of the crowds seem to be of the 'owning the libs' variety and are equally uninterested in academic honesty.

Dr. Arbitrary
Mar 15, 2006

Bleak Gremlin

OneEightHundred posted:


The reason he likes to debate college students is because he's "debating" them in the Q&A of his own talks, so there's no motion or anything, which means he can effectively set the victory conditions at whatever he feels like.

I think we're on the same page.

The point is that it's not a good faith exchange of ideas, you've got to be able to set your own terms on the fly and own the room.

Very few people are prepared to do that. You've basically got to be a professional pundit or a professional charlatan to do that.

fishmech
Jul 16, 2006

by VideoGames
Salad Prong
Quite frankly, those creationist debates only matter when they're in an active phase of getting in public schools again.

And then mostly, it's useful for driving the people operating those into letting it slip that their "intelligent design" is about God, at which point state legislators and various judges can strike it down for just being creationism again.

PhazonLink
Jul 17, 2010

LeeMajors posted:

This is also why CREATIONIST VS EVOLUTIONIST debates are always unsatisfactory, masturbatory theater. The deck is always stacked to where the evolutionary rationalist has to convince a dyed-in-the-wool creationist to renounce his faith or he has lost. Period.



vaguely related, but I seen a tv commercial for that noah's ark museum on tv. it was as stupid as you think it was.

e: also yeah Bill Nye said he did debates for the children in lovely fundie places to show that there is another view point and a whole group or people/world of people that arent fundies.

PhazonLink fucked around with this message at 06:49 on Aug 12, 2018

nine-gear crow
Aug 10, 2013

PhazonLink posted:

vaguely related, but I seen a tv commercial for that noah's ark museum on tv. it was as stupid as you think it was.

e: also yeah Bill Nye said he did debates for the children in lovely fundie places to show that there is another view point and a whole group or people/world of people that arent fundies.

And now the generation that grew up with him vehemently hates him because he said that transgendered people exist, because millennials are the stupidest and angriest age cohort ever and the reason that the one that came after them is called Generation Z is because they're going to be the last generation, period.

Jazerus
May 24, 2011


nine-gear crow posted:

And now the generation that grew up with him vehemently hates him because he said that transgendered people exist, because millennials are the stupidest and angriest age cohort ever and the reason that the one that came after them is called Generation Z is because they're going to be the last generation, period.

are you, uh, familiar with millennials that don't build their entire lives around a mixture of misogyny and video games

RareAcumen
Dec 28, 2012




Jazerus posted:

are you, uh, familiar with millennials that don't build their entire lives around a mixture of misogyny and video games

Yeah that should be a joke but there's no wink to the audience to solidly signify it.

ErIog
Jul 11, 2001

:nsacloud:

HootTheOwl posted:

They've been in love with Putin for years, ever since he made Obama look bad. Now we're finding out Putin might have paid for it too.

Actually Levin is one of the guys on the right old and jingoistic enough to have never gone in on the Putin worship stuff. He really does hate Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, etc. He just defends the president because he likes the nativist policies. It was really funny during the primary because it was, "Trump is not a conservative. He does not have conservative values, and that's why I support Ted Cruz." Then the literal second Trump became the frontrunner it was full on Trump apologism. It rivals Hannity in terms of lack of ideological rigor.

Cythereal
Nov 8, 2009

I love the potoo,
and the potoo loves you.

BarbarianElephant posted:

As pointless as debating a flat earther. Since one side is based on faith not reason, faith cannot be defeated by reason. So everyone might as well give up and go home. They'd have better luck convincing the creationist of evolution via theological debate: it's at least compatible.

Personally I believe in both evolution and a divinely created universe. It's one of the things that annoys me about Creationists with a capital C, they tend to have a really strange and limited idea of God.

Grand Prize Winner
Feb 19, 2007


LeeMajors posted:

I still think their utility is debatable though.


Oh good, more debates

SystemAddict
Dec 24, 2007

by R. Guyovich
Man the left is loving dumb and getting dumber.

Xand_Man
Mar 2, 2004

If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous


Cythereal posted:

Personally I believe in both evolution and a divinely created universe. It's one of the things that annoys me about Creationists with a capital C, they tend to have a really strange and limited idea of God.

Yeah, "I'm a Deist" has gotten me a lot of confused looks and short-circuited many tedious conversations.

(Oooh, rock me Amadeus)

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


SystemAddict posted:

Man the left is loving dumb and getting dumber.

nah.

Cythereal
Nov 8, 2009

I love the potoo,
and the potoo loves you.

Xand_Man posted:

Yeah, "I'm a Deist" has gotten me a lot of confused looks and short-circuited many tedious conversations.

(Oooh, rock me Amadeus)

I'm a Christian who emphatically believes in the importance of science and secular education, and rejects in the strongest terms the strain of anti-intellectualism so common in conservative Christianity. I just tend to get labeled "You're not a TRUE Christian" followed by the repent-and-convert spiel.

Faustian Bargain
Apr 12, 2014


Groovelord Neato posted:

charlie kirk is saying his donors will give 100k in charity in cortez's name if she debates candance lmao. you know the person who got poo poo stomped by joe rogan.
I’m guessing they mean they’ll donate to some dumb right wing organization in her name.

Star Man
Jun 1, 2008

There's a star maaaaaan
Over the rainbow

Cythereal posted:

I'm a Christian who emphatically believes in the importance of science and secular education, and rejects in the strongest terms the strain of anti-intellectualism so common in conservative Christianity. I just tend to get labeled "You're not a TRUE Christian" followed by the repent-and-convert spiel.

I'd still rather have the company of a progressive Christian over a flippant atheist.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Cythereal
Nov 8, 2009

I love the potoo,
and the potoo loves you.

Star Man posted:

I'd still rather have the company of a progressive Christian over a flippant atheist.

Fundies tend to get really mad when you point out that a bunch of poo poo they loudly believe in, like the Rapture, isn't in the Bible.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply