Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Minenfeld!
Aug 21, 2012



Strange Poon posted:

Are you sure he didn't care before? Can you honestly say you know him well enough? Maybe he's just good at not showing how much contempt he has for minorities, women, and lgbtq people. Maybe he's never felt threatened enough to drop any slurs or openly rant about how they're upsetting him. Maybe you don't have enough skin in the game to have noticed these things.

I mean, there's a possibility he'll watch the movie and think it's all horseshit... right?

I can't be entirely certain. Part of the issue is how much he prides himself on being a troll. We're all from NYC. He grew up there poor. He still works in the city despite being exceedingly wealthy now. And he travels internationally for business every month. So he's been exposed to different people and places. He doesn't care about abortion or same sex marriage. He thinks there needs to be more gun control. He has always expressed that he wants less business regulation and lower taxes for himself. That's his prime goal for as long as I can remember. He's been personally burned by Trump before, but I worry he's going to join the cult because Obama broke his brain. Who knows. I already spent an hour berating him about the danger of Dinesh and his ilk's bullshit revisionism.

I don't know.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Taerkar
Dec 7, 2002

kind of into it, really

Keeshhound posted:

Ok, seriously, is Tucker's face just frozen like that? Does he have some rare paralytic disease that causes him to always make the same dumbfounded expression?

Does anyone have a photo of him making any other expression? Inquiring minds want to know!

It's the face of a man who's brain is at war with itself.

bird food bathtub
Aug 9, 2003

College Slice

BiggerBoat posted:

Swiping from the Trump thread to get us back on track aa bit


There may be something in the Constitution that addresses this but I haven't read it in a while.

Eh, gently caress all that. All we need is the first amendment so I can scream racist poo poo at minorities then call them oppressors when they respond, and the second amendment so I can have guns to stand my ground at any of them I want.

Crunch Buttsteak
Feb 26, 2007

You think reality is a circle of salt around my brain keeping witches out?

Taerkar posted:

It's the face of a man who's brain is at war with itself.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I've seen, Tucker Carlson appears to be caught off-guard a lot more than Hannity or O'Reilly ever were. Like, he doesn't have that Ultra-Instinct level of deflection yet, so when Hannity would instantly counter any resistance with "Yeah, well, why don't you say that to the four dead Americans at Benghazi," Tucker just sorta flounders in any situation where he's not seethingly monologuing about how bad immigration is.

It could be that he's genuinely trying (and failing) to come up with a retort in real time, or it could just be him struggling to stifle a cartoonish "a-doooy".

Slutitution
Jun 26, 2018

by Nyc_Tattoo

STAC Goat posted:

Wait... are you actually advocating for state run media?

Well, I find it amusing how the wealth gap in America is discussed more on RT America than all of the American cable media outlets combined. They also regularly have 20-30 minute interviews (oh my god, an actual analysis?!) with guests instead of the 3-5 minute segments CNN and Fox have multiple times an hour where they mostly discuss media horserace bullshit like Stormy Daniels and Trump's tweets.

So yeah, given the horrendous and horrible track record of American media corporations lying about everything from poverty to war, I'd say give state media a shot for once. Every other country has at least one state media outlet, why can't we?

LeeMajors
Jan 20, 2005

I've gotta stop fantasizing about Lee Majors...
Ah, one more!


Slutitution posted:

Well, I find it amusing how the wealth gap in America is discussed more on RT America than all of the American cable media outlets combined. They also regularly have 20-30 minute interviews (oh my god, an actual analysis?!) with guests instead of the 3-5 minute segments CNN and Fox have multiple times an hour where they mostly discuss media horserace bullshit like Stormy Daniels and Trump's tweets.

So yeah, given the horrendous and horrible track record of American media corporations lying about everything from poverty to war, I'd say give state media a shot for once. Every other country has at least one state media outlet, why can't we?

Because nearly every supposedly apolitical state bureau has become hyperpartisan and it would be subject to GOP ghoulery.

Slutitution
Jun 26, 2018

by Nyc_Tattoo

LeeMajors posted:

Because nearly every supposedly apolitical state bureau has become hyperpartisan and it would be subject to GOP ghoulery.

Counterpart: NPR

But good thing CNN, MSNBC, and FOX aren't partisan already then right

Mantis42
Jul 26, 2010

NPR is already full of conservative trash.

LeeMajors
Jan 20, 2005

I've gotta stop fantasizing about Lee Majors...
Ah, one more!


Slutitution posted:

Counterpart: NPR

But good thing CNN, MSNBC, and FOX aren't partisan already then right

NPR is known as Nice Polite Republicans for a reason. I like NPR but it’s hardly apolitical—intentions aside.

I don’t expect every news source to be 100% neutral—that’s unrealistic. I’d prefer not to put a powerful propaganda arm in the hands of a cynical terrorist organization under the guise of impartiality.

At least most reasonable people know FOX is a joke.

Corsair Pool Boy
Dec 17, 2004
College Slice

Slutitution posted:

Counterpart: NPR

NPR receives public funding but is in no way state run or part of the government.

seiferguy
Jun 9, 2005

FLAWED
INTUITION



Toilet Rascal
I hate that people think that the focus of news is to be neutral. It should be the focus to find facts, which - surprise! Probably lean left.

Phone
Jul 30, 2005

親子丼をほしい。
Oh hey, looks like Hamilton Nolan reads this thread. https://splinternews.com/the-living-standard-of-political-media-failure-1828354923

quote:

The Living Standard of Political Media Failure

Hamilton NolanToday 11:00am

Photo: AP
Among the many bitter lessons driven home by Donald Trump’s rise to power is this: the political media, for all of its hand-wringing about impartiality, is extremely susceptible to creating reality, rather than portraying it.

Donald Trump, a flaxen-haired buffoon entertainer whose primary role in American society for most of his life has been to act as human shorthand for “rich clown,” did not, prior to 2016, have a natural political constituency. He did not have any grassroots support as a political figure. He had not created, built, or even deeply engaged with any political organization. He had not risen up the ranks of a political party. He was not a leader. He did not have a base.

All he had was a megaphone. That megaphone was enthusiastically provided to him by the news media. Using only that megaphone, Donald Trump won the Republican nomination for president of the United States. He did not have the best fundraising operation. He did not have the smartest political operatives on his team. He did not have the best speechwriters, or strategists, or connections to the power structure at the local or national level. What he did have was the biggest megaphone. The biggest media platform. He was the most entertaining story. His rallies were covered live on cable news. He had limitless access to prime time TV appearances. The media handed him the keys, because he naturally provided more drama than any other candidate. His political constituency is still a work in progress. It all flowed from his media attention. Not vice versa.

All politicians try to capitalize on the media for their own ends. But never has the media played such a crucial role in creating a president from scratch. This is new. And the fact that Trump actually loving won should make everyone in the political media—in particular, those who view their role as more or less neutral arbiters of The Story—gasp in horror at their own power. The entire non-Trump-voting nation has been doing a constant series of gut checks for the past two years. The media’s gut check is one of the most meaningful of all. This is not the old debate about whether objectivity really exists, or whether the mainstream media is biased towards liberalism or conservatism. This is about the need for the media to recognize its own effect on what it purports to be covering. Genuinely or not, news outlets have always defaulted to the explanation that they cover rather than create reality. That is no longer credible. For the slice of the press that does have a genuine desire not to be wielded as a mere political tool, it’s time to get your poo poo together. The next election is fast approaching.

The most straightforward reform for political media is this: do not create candidates because you need an exciting narrative. Make coverage decisions based upon whether or not someone actually has a political base, rather than on whether you can build one for them with relentless media saturation. This is a fair and nonpartisan standard. Candidates backed by both the Tea Party and by DSA are worthy of coverage to the extent that they both represent broad political movements that have or may soon have a meaningful impact on society. Politics is not sports. Nor is it reality television, the most apt and unfortunate comparison to the 2016 campaign. Politics is the process by which ideologies compete for power. Cover it as such. Look for the ideologies and the power, and you will find the news.

You know who will not be receiving saturation media coverage under this new, healthier standard? Michael loving Avenatti. A useful yardstick for how much the media has failed to learn this vital lesson of 2016 is how much coverage Michael Avenatti is getting on cable news. Here is a man who rose to fame as a porn star’s lawyer—a man who fails the fundamental test of “having a real political base” while acing the cynical test of “being able to create ongoing drama on TV.” There is absolutely, positively no reason for credible news outlets to treat Michael Avenatti as a real presidential candidate. His entire political constituency consists of Don Lemon. He is just some guy, with a bottomless thirst for attention. And yet, here we are, watching him slowly be elevated into the ranks of presidential contenders in a way identical to that of Donald Trump. Just as Trump was before, Avenatti is a creation of the media who will use all of that (extremely valuable!) airtime as a proxy for political advertising, and vault himself into the national consciousness. It is 2018. The next presidential election is two years away. If Michael Avenatti does in fact become a viable candidate, the media has failed.

People do not “emerge” as presidential candidates. They become presidential candidates by riding a power base. In a healthy democracy, that base should be a broad coalition of concerned citizens. In America, that base is more often a mix of corporate interests and wealthy donors. It’s now abundantly clear that media is its own base, one strong enough to put one of America’s stupidest men into the White House because he got good ratings along the way. Let’s not do that again, okay?

Smilin Joe Fission
Jan 24, 2007
One party caters to their base and fires them up aggressively, while the other calls their most passionate supporters "loving morons" as Rahm Emanuel so eloquently put it. One party proudly waves the flag of conservatism, embracing that identity and working to promote and grow it. Meanwhile the party that is supposed to be representing the left is arguing that, "Hey we're not really THAT liberal!" and wholeheartedly embracing the right wing framing of the issue when they should be essentially saying, "You're goddamn right I'm a liberal! If being liberal means medicare for all... if being liberal means publicly funded college for all... if being liberal means ending the wars of occupation and conquest... if being liberal means not tearing children from their parents, forcibly drugging them, and locking them in cages... if being liberal means we don't have people working in factories 100 hours/week for starvation wages and getting ground up in the gears every so often... etc etc etc"

Goddamn do I love being on the left. It feels like you're getting one over on the bastards to some degree!

moths
Aug 25, 2004

I would also still appreciate some danger.



Corsair Pool Boy posted:

NPR receives public funding but is in no way state run or part of the government.

They're constantly trying to ditch their liberal reputation, though, since the right spent the 90s threatening to defund them.

So you get a lot of pandering pieces about how maybe this obviously idiotic thing Trump just did was OK and here's an expert we found to tell you why.

Slutitution
Jun 26, 2018

by Nyc_Tattoo
The corporate media coming out in full force today demanding to be called a "#FreePress" in their editorials is pretty cute, I'll admit.

pop fly to McGillicutty
Feb 2, 2004

A peckish little mouse!

Slutitution posted:

The corporate media coming out in full force today demanding to be called a "#FreePress" in their editorials is pretty cute, I'll admit.

Even better is the moron president saying newspapers colluded with foreign countries.

Slutitution
Jun 26, 2018

by Nyc_Tattoo

pop fly to McGillicutty posted:

Even better is the moron president saying newspapers colluded with foreign countries.

Even better is how "free" American newspapers collude with the government in order to disseminate their war propaganda and American Exceptionalism talking points.

Ytlaya
Nov 13, 2005

Slutitution posted:

Well, I find it amusing how the wealth gap in America is discussed more on RT America than all of the American cable media outlets combined. They also regularly have 20-30 minute interviews (oh my god, an actual analysis?!) with guests instead of the 3-5 minute segments CNN and Fox have multiple times an hour where they mostly discuss media horserace bullshit like Stormy Daniels and Trump's tweets.

So yeah, given the horrendous and horrible track record of American media corporations lying about everything from poverty to war, I'd say give state media a shot for once. Every other country has at least one state media outlet, why can't we?

That isn't because it's state media, but because it's state media of a state opposed to the US, and highlighting problems of the US just happens to be simultaneously a good thing and something that Russia considers to be in its interests.

Put another way, there's no reason to think that US state media would focus on the same stuff.

It's hard to really come up with a type of news media that would avoid the issues present in existing corporate or state media. I guess you could, at the very least, make news media non-profit and worker-owned (so it can't be owned and influenced by private investors), but you'd still end up with the problem of media being beholden to those who fund it, whether it's private entities or the government.

pop fly to McGillicutty
Feb 2, 2004

A peckish little mouse!

Slutitution posted:

Even better is how "free" American newspapers collude with the government in order to disseminate their war propaganda and American Exceptionalism talking points.

I agree, corporations are ruining America.

Niwrad
Jul 1, 2008


I still think he's overplaying the importance of the media here. Trump got coverage because it's what people wanted to see. And as long as the media is a business, they'll continue to operate that way. Nolan of all people should know this since he advanced his career working for a clickbait operation.

Was the media supposed to cover a Jeb Bush rally for the 4 people interested in seeing that? Back in 2008, was the media supposed to give equal coverage to Chris Dodd as they did Barack Obama? You cover what the people want and certain candidates hit a chord with the public. No one cared when Obama's every bowel movement was breaking news during the election.

Trump didn't win because someone turned on the TV and saw him on CNN and decided that's the man they needed to vote for. He won because a large segment of the population are terrible and his message of hating minorities and women was right in their wheelhouse. And instead of tip-toeing around that line, he went full steam ahead into those issues and catered directly toward his base. A bunch of white racists who are losing influence in the world were told by another white racist that he would stop that from happening.

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


a lot of people need to read manufacturing consent.

Phone
Jul 30, 2005

親子丼をほしい。

Niwrad posted:

I still think he's overplaying the importance of the media here. Trump got coverage because it's what people wanted to see. And as long as the media is a business, they'll continue to operate that way. Nolan of all people should know this since he advanced his career working for a clickbait operation.

Was the media supposed to cover a Jeb Bush rally for the 4 people interested in seeing that? Back in 2008, was the media supposed to give equal coverage to Chris Dodd as they did Barack Obama? You cover what the people want and certain candidates hit a chord with the public. No one cared when Obama's every bowel movement was breaking news during the election.

Trump didn't win because someone turned on the TV and saw him on CNN and decided that's the man they needed to vote for. He won because a large segment of the population are terrible and his message of hating minorities and women was right in their wheelhouse. And instead of tip-toeing around that line, he went full steam ahead into those issues and catered directly toward his base. A bunch of white racists who are losing influence in the world were told by another white racist that he would stop that from happening.

You're right, people really wanted to see an empty podium for 25 minutes as CNN cut from a live Bernie stump speech to an empty loving podium.

TheDeadlyShoe
Feb 14, 2014

It's not like we need to reinvent the wheel here. Professionalization of the civil service is a thing. Don't need a state media to be perfect, just good enough.

A lot of potential issues with it stem from Republicans increasing rejection of compromise and democratic principles, and there's no methodological fix for that.

p.s. RT is a horrible example though. They are uninterested in the truth.

TheDeadlyShoe fucked around with this message at 23:22 on Aug 16, 2018

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

Smilin Joe Fission posted:

One party caters to their base and fires them up aggressively, while the other calls their most passionate supporters "loving morons" as Rahm Emanuel so eloquently put it. One party proudly waves the flag of conservatism, embracing that identity and working to promote and grow it. Meanwhile the party that is supposed to be representing the left is arguing that, "Hey we're not really THAT liberal!" and wholeheartedly embracing the right wing framing of the issue when they should be essentially saying, "You're goddamn right I'm a liberal! If being liberal means medicare for all... if being liberal means publicly funded college for all... if being liberal means ending the wars of occupation and conquest... if being liberal means not tearing children from their parents, forcibly drugging them, and locking them in cages... if being liberal means we don't have people working in factories 100 hours/week for starvation wages and getting ground up in the gears every so often... etc etc etc"

Goddamn do I love being on the left. It feels like you're getting one over on the bastards to some degree!

This is all pretty true and, to me, exemplifies the success that RWM has had over the years totally framing issues and creating "bad words", often only through sheer repetition. I proudly self identify as a liberal but the propaganda has made many people wishy washy about it.

Aaaannnndddd.....FOX News put up a picture of Patti LaBelle to memorialize Aretha Franklin.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/fox-news-remembers-aretha-franklin-with-photo-of-patti-labelle_us_5b75bbcfe4b0182d49b1e165

BiggerBoat fucked around with this message at 00:20 on Aug 17, 2018

selec
Sep 6, 2003

Niwrad posted:

I still think he's overplaying the importance of the media here. Trump got coverage because it's what people wanted to see. And as long as the media is a business, they'll continue to operate that way. Nolan of all people should know this since he advanced his career working for a clickbait operation.

Was the media supposed to cover a Jeb Bush rally for the 4 people interested in seeing that? Back in 2008, was the media supposed to give equal coverage to Chris Dodd as they did Barack Obama? You cover what the people want and certain candidates hit a chord with the public. No one cared when Obama's every bowel movement was breaking news during the election.

Trump didn't win because someone turned on the TV and saw him on CNN and decided that's the man they needed to vote for. He won because a large segment of the population are terrible and his message of hating minorities and women was right in their wheelhouse. And instead of tip-toeing around that line, he went full steam ahead into those issues and catered directly toward his base. A bunch of white racists who are losing influence in the world were told by another white racist that he would stop that from happening.

If Nolan is wrong, then what’s your prescription for what the media should do differently? Or in your opinion did they do their jobs properly in ‘16?

fishmech
Jul 16, 2006

by VideoGames
Salad Prong
Cool it's the same sort of people who think George W Bush was elected in 2000 by the public instead of a shoddy Supreme Court ruling directly for him, making the same kind of misdirected blame once again.

Zipperelli.
Apr 3, 2011



Nap Ghost

pop fly to McGillicutty posted:

Even better is the moron president saying newspapers colluded with foreign countries.

Is there anything he won't project about?

Crabtree
Oct 17, 2012

ARRRGH! Get that wallet out!
Everybody: Lowtax in a Pickle!
Pickle! Pickle! Pickle! Pickle!

Dinosaur Gum

Zipperelli. posted:

Is there anything he won't project about?

Or reveal the crimes of Fox News?

Screaming Idiot
Nov 26, 2007

JUST POSTING WHILE JERKIN' MY GHERKIN SITTIN' IN A PERKINS!

BEATS SELLING MERKINS.
Donald Trump will never pay for his crimes. He will whine and moan and rake in billions for himself and his criminal rear end in a top hat friends and there is nothing that can be done about it. Peaceful revolution is laughable, violent revolution impossible -- the army has flying robots that hurl death from hundreds of miles away, callous men armed with enough weaponry to take down a small country each, and other resources procured by a runaway defense budget gleefully stolen from the poor and destitute.

And so all we can do is watch and laugh at the stupid man saying stupid things and try very, very hard not to think about how this stupid, stupid man earns more money in one hour than most of us do in a year and has with the help of oligarchs stolen the reins of a country that hates and reviles him.

drilldo squirt
Aug 18, 2006

a beautiful, soft meat sack
Clapping Larry

Screaming Idiot posted:

Donald Trump will never pay for his crimes. He will whine and moan and rake in billions for himself and his criminal rear end in a top hat friends and there is nothing that can be done about it. Peaceful revolution is laughable, violent revolution impossible -- the army has flying robots that hurl death from hundreds of miles away, callous men armed with enough weaponry to take down a small country each, and other resources procured by a runaway defense budget gleefully stolen from the poor and destitute.

And so all we can do is watch and laugh at the stupid man saying stupid things and try very, very hard not to think about how this stupid, stupid man earns more money in one hour than most of us do in a year and has with the help of oligarchs stolen the reins of a country that hates and reviles him.

I think he is going to go to jail for treason and other things.

Slutitution
Jun 26, 2018

by Nyc_Tattoo

drilldo squirt posted:

I think he is going to go to jail for treason and other things.

:lol:

Can we please contain the idiotic hot takes like this in the Ruskie thread thanks

pop fly to McGillicutty
Feb 2, 2004

A peckish little mouse!

Screaming Idiot posted:

Donald Trump will never pay for his crimes. He will whine and moan and rake in billions for himself and his criminal rear end in a top hat friends and there is nothing that can be done about it. Peaceful revolution is laughable, violent revolution impossible -- the army has flying robots that hurl death from hundreds of miles away, callous men armed with enough weaponry to take down a small country each, and other resources procured by a runaway defense budget gleefully stolen from the poor and destitute.

And so all we can do is watch and laugh at the stupid man saying stupid things and try very, very hard not to think about how this stupid, stupid man earns more money in one hour than most of us do in a year and has with the help of oligarchs stolen the reins of a country that hates and reviles him.

I agree, the death of democracy and America by the republican party is a hearty lol but I would like my child to live in a world that isn't devoid of empathy, compassion, civility, and kindness.

Slutitution
Jun 26, 2018

by Nyc_Tattoo
I guess the streets are the only platform InfoWars will soon have left lmao:

https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanetTV/status/1030480487997956097

Sephyr
Aug 28, 2012

pop fly to McGillicutty posted:

I agree, the death of democracy and America by the republican party is a hearty lol but I would like my child to live in a world that isn't devoid of empathy, compassion, civility, and kindness.

When the empathy, civility and kidness exist only in your mind, that's kind of a problem.

When your system and leaders rise because of their clear lack, and hatred of, those same qualities....

HootTheOwl
May 13, 2012

Hootin and shootin

Slutitution posted:

I guess the streets are the only platform InfoWars will soon have left lmao:

https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanetTV/status/1030480487997956097

We're so forbidden we have signs in the open to websites you can just go to!

pop fly to McGillicutty
Feb 2, 2004

A peckish little mouse!

Sephyr posted:

When the empathy, civility and kidness exist only in your mind, that's kind of a problem.

When your system and leaders rise because of their clear lack, and hatred of, those same qualities....

I'm lost, what's your message?

Bob the terrible
Aug 9, 2006

pop fly to McGillicutty posted:

I'm lost, what's your message?

It's like the political version of incels.

Slutitution
Jun 26, 2018

by Nyc_Tattoo
So now we can finally add Jake Tapper to RWM: https://www.dailywire.com/news/34683/watch-cnns-tapper-fact-checks-ocasio-cortez-ryan-saavedra

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgyK3yb5qic

Ben Shapiro, republicans, and the alt-right are celebrating Fake Tapper citing a bogus claim from corporate "fact-checking" site factcheck.org that falsely tried to say the Koch Bros did NOT accidentally say medicare for all would save Americans two trillion. It's quite obvious that CNN's big pharma and health insurance advertisers pressured Tapper to ambush Sanders and Cortez here.

So stop saying CNN is a friend of leftists and socialists; they're absolutely not. They're going to pull this bullshit tenfold in the 2020 primaries, guaranteed.

Slutitution
Jun 26, 2018

by Nyc_Tattoo
I think this qualifies as well considering Twitter refuses to get rid of alt-right figures and nutjobs like Alex Jones off their platform, but will then immediately ban any leftist for telling the truth, like this:

https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1030564199242653696

You can claim Sandy Hook was a hoax and harass the parents of the murdered children as much as you want, but telling the blatantly obvious truth about John McCain is crossing the line.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Mr Hootington
Jul 24, 2008

I'M HAVING A HOOT EATING CORNETTE THE LONG WAY

Slutitution posted:

So now we can finally add Jake Tapper to RWM: https://www.dailywire.com/news/34683/watch-cnns-tapper-fact-checks-ocasio-cortez-ryan-saavedra

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgyK3yb5qic

Ben Shapiro, republicans, and the alt-right are celebrating Fake Tapper citing a bogus claim from corporate "fact-checking" site factcheck.org that falsely tried to say the Koch Bros did NOT accidentally say medicare for all would save Americans two trillion. It's quite obvious that CNN's big pharma and health insurance advertisers pressured Tapper to ambush Sanders and Cortez here.

So stop saying CNN is a friend of leftists and socialists; they're absolutely not. They're going to pull this bullshit tenfold in the 2020 primaries, guaranteed.

https://twitter.com/BenSpielberg/status/1030483044719677440?s=19

Jake responded to this guy calling him out and it ends very nicely.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply