|
Holy poo poo.... piss.
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 09:56 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 06:50 |
|
Maybe we could have some detailed accounts of a few nice non-submissive cocksuckings? You know, for balance and to honor the sanctity of discourse and all that.
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 09:56 |
|
Lol this isn’t getting ‘cannibalized by the left’ it is lovely language policing by the idpolitics brigade. I’m pretty sure (his avatar has changed) splitsoul is on the left. And he is right in this instance. Nothing offensive towards homosexual people was said.
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 10:06 |
|
Biomute posted:Maybe we could have some detailed accounts of a few nice non-submissive cocksuckings? You know, for balance and to honor the sanctity of discourse and all that. should've done this on page 69 imo
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 10:08 |
|
tbh i've never personally seen fellatio as a particularly homosexual act, but i might've misunderstood something on that point
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 10:14 |
|
Viking age Scandinavians seem to have held the view that male homosexuality was acceptable as long as you didn’t bottom, because that was effeminate and the greatest shame, so I can kinda see it from that angle. the source material is sketchy though.
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 10:18 |
|
Some joke about how goon fellatio is always gay because selfsuck.
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 10:27 |
|
Rust Martialis posted:Given multiple posters have concurred that his comment was clearly homophobic and/or sexist, and that he keeps playing word games to avoid taking responsibility for his own words instead of accepting it and moving on, the one trolling here isn't me, friend.
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 10:27 |
TheFluff posted:Viking age Scandinavians seem to have held the view that male homosexuality was acceptable as long as you didn’t bottom, because that was effeminate and the greatest shame, so I can kinda see it from that angle. the source material is sketchy though. Calling someone gay was one of the worst thing you could say to a viking. Like, you could be killed on the spot for saying it and it would be considered a legal action. So male homosexuality was not accepted in the viking age regardless if you were topp or bottom.
|
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 10:29 |
|
Alhazred posted:Calling someone gay was one of the worst thing you could say to a viking. Like, you could be killed on the spot for saying it and it would be considered a legal action. So male homosexuality was not accepted in the viking age regardless if you were topp or bottom. I’m not an expert on the subject, but my understanding is that when it comes to nið, the offensive part was being accused of unmanliness, or having been the submissive partner. Or at least that’s how I understand the references I’ve seen to Preben Meulengracht Sørensen‘s argumentation. There might be more recent scholarship - The unmanly man came out in 1983. TheFluff fucked around with this message at 10:42 on Aug 21, 2018 |
# ? Aug 21, 2018 10:38 |
|
GODDAMN this derail is stupid and not particularily related to Scandinavian politics. Danish and Swedish politicians love to slither around like worms at the feet of Saudi (and other) dictators because they buy so much weapons from us (Sweden, not sure what the Danes are selling) and we are morally flexible to the point of ineptitude. And now for something completely different. Potrzebie fucked around with this message at 10:43 on Aug 21, 2018 |
# ? Aug 21, 2018 10:40 |
|
evil_bunnY posted:My dude have you considered loving off Really the reaction from posters acting so hurt about being called out for casual (unthinking) sexist and/or homophobic remarks is pretty clear support for the original point that such behaviour is widely considered acceptable in Scandinavian countries, even among self-described leftists. Certainly there may be an issue with Danes understanding the possible subtler meaning of the words in English as opposed to Danish, but open minded people should be able to grow and accept that certain things have meanings they may not have intended. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 10:45 |
|
Potrzebie posted:not sure what the Danes are selling Surveillance gadgets, though I think it was primarily the recently closed danish BAE division that did so. e: Please take the dicksucking discussion to the official SA dicksucking thread the SAL scandinavian thread Lima fucked around with this message at 11:00 on Aug 21, 2018 |
# ? Aug 21, 2018 10:48 |
|
Is it possible C or L would be open to joining a S+M coalition?
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 10:48 |
|
Collateral Damage posted:Is it possible C or L would be open to joining a S+M coalition? Would M go for this in any scenario?
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 10:53 |
|
THE BAR posted:S, DF and K all seem to think, that being willing to shake hands should be mandatory when applying for citizenship. Is it about refusing to shake hands in general, or is it that you can't shake everyone's hands just fine but then refuse when it comes to a specific minority? Because the first is whatever, but the latter is kinda lovely.
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 11:20 |
|
Potrzebie posted:not sure what the Danes are selling Blowjobs, presumably.
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 11:30 |
|
Crimpolioni posted:Is it about refusing to shake hands in general, or is it that you can't shake everyone's hands just fine but then refuse when it comes to a specific minority? Because the first is whatever, but the latter is kinda lovely. It's a way to deny minorities jobs and such, by saying they're refusing to integrate or cooperate by not shaking hands. It's a minor gesture they're turning into a weapon, that's all it is.
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 11:31 |
|
Why would they refuse to shake hands
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 11:45 |
|
Zzulu posted:Why would they refuse to shake hands cos some muslims have weird ideas about gender interaction
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 11:47 |
|
of course, an approach of this kind is only going to further inflame the issue, turning that ridiculous custom into effectively a gesture of protest in the face of danish demonstrative hostility, which gives the racists additional ammunition and makes attacking them harder ('ah but we are the REAL feminists') an argh blargh
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 11:53 |
|
They dont want to shake hands with women? Why should we respect that
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 11:55 |
|
Zzulu posted:Why would they refuse to shake hands See also: people uncomfortable with hugging, kissing on the cheeks and other ways of greetings. I wonder what the difference is... it's skin colour and place of birth
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 11:56 |
|
Ya shouldn’t, in the same way you shouldn’t be sexist rear end in a top hat at the office. Only one of these has far reaching consequences tho.
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 11:57 |
|
Potrzebie posted:See also: people uncomfortable with hugging, kissing on the cheeks and other ways of greetings. I wonder what the difference is... it's skin colour and place of birth To be fair, being anti-social or even just shy can also tank a job interview for a white person, but the way in which the interviewers escalated the situation shows it was racially motivated humiliation. Edit: What is going to be really interesting is how Norway will handle our case where the genders have been reversed. I have a sneaking, and pretty much totally unfounded suspicion that part of the reason why the Muslim lady was found to have been discriminated against is that the Danes are not as uncomfortable with the idea that women should limit their physical interactions with strange men as they proclaim. Ie: 'benevolent' sexism. thotsky fucked around with this message at 12:10 on Aug 21, 2018 |
# ? Aug 21, 2018 12:02 |
|
Potrzebie posted:And now for something completely different. Indeed. The site you linked to did some simulations on the poll results with the conclusion that the ruling coalition must have support (passive or not) from two of the three major parties. Me, I am just waiting for the hilarity that ensues on the 10th. Collateral Damage posted:Is it possible C or L would be open to joining a S+M coalition? S&M is out unless we end up in a literal war. Neither s nor m is going to support this, since it would be the end of 100 years of developed antagonism.
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 12:20 |
|
https://www.thelocal.se/20180821/stockholm-police-prepare-for-neo-nazi-march-on-saturday This'll be interesting. Shame I'm heading back to the States for a vacation Friday.
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 12:34 |
|
Crimpolioni posted:Is it about refusing to shake hands in general, or is it that you can't shake everyone's hands just fine but then refuse when it comes to a specific minority? Because the first is whatever, but the latter is kinda lovely. Some Muslims greet the opposite gender with a hand over their heart instead. This kills the secular nation.
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 13:15 |
|
SplitSoul posted:Some Muslims greet the opposite gender with a hand over their heart instead. This kills the secular nation. That's low key sexism, no matter how much it's dressed up as religious tradition, and it should absolutely be called out
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 13:39 |
|
Biomute posted:It's clearly a reactionary proposal, and the people who made it would probably rather (and still might) have it be so you have to eat a piece of pork during the ceremony. Danish People's Party beat you to the punch a few years ago, they invited all new citizens to feast on a traditional pork dish. McCloud posted:That's low key sexism, no matter how much it's dressed up as religious tradition, and it should absolutely be called out It has to do with not being in close physical contact with a person you might potentially marry in the future. That's the justification. It might be somewhat odd from a western perspective where we happily slather each other's hands in germs, but I don't really see how it's "low-key sexist". It's also a tiny, tiny minority within a minority that does it, and using it as a barrier to citizenship is insanely totalitarian. SplitSoul fucked around with this message at 13:56 on Aug 21, 2018 |
# ? Aug 21, 2018 13:54 |
|
on one hand yeah it's a dumb and occasionally rude practice, on the other hand gating citizenship behind something like that is bizarre these are positions it is eminently possible to hold simultaneously
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 14:17 |
|
Get rid of all religious followers imo. Also danes? Probably Danes also
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 14:21 |
|
girls irl gave me religious cooties
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 14:25 |
|
V. Illych L. posted:on one hand yeah it's a dumb and occasionally rude practice, on the other hand gating citizenship behind something like that is bizarre This is the sane stance, imo
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 14:29 |
|
hello scandinavians please tell me which liquor from your home country i should drink while reading the reports from this thread
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 14:46 |
|
Party Plane Jones posted:hello scandinavians please tell me which liquor from your home country i should drink while reading the reports from this thread Bäska droppar. There is no other option. E: https://www.masterofmalt.com/aquavit/svenska-eldvatten/baska-droppar-aquavit/
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 14:48 |
|
Party Plane Jones posted:hello scandinavians please tell me which liquor from your home country i should drink while reading the reports from this thread I think Gammel Dansk would be in order.
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 14:50 |
|
Party Plane Jones posted:hello scandinavians please tell me which liquor from your home country i should drink while reading the reports from this thread Mose-pors snaps.
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 14:52 |
|
Aquavit is the obvious answer, but Danish schnapps is possibly the only good thing to come out of the country. Especially Dill schnapps. It is tempting to drink when one reads this thread, but if one finds one has to, then abstaining from both thread and drink is likely the right choice.
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 14:54 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 06:50 |
|
Biomute posted:Aquavit is the obvious answer, but Danish schnapps is possibly the only good thing to come out of the country. Especially Dill schnapps. Lots of good danish brewers too. On topic: get OP Anderson
|
# ? Aug 21, 2018 15:06 |