Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
Mia Wasikowska
Oct 7, 2006

e: wrong thread lol

uhh let 100 flowers bloom!!!

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

THS
Sep 15, 2017

Slanderer posted:

literally every part of this is still insanely contentious and will get a one or more groups of leftists extremely upset

fake edit: except for the saudi part, that's not even a secret

yeah there are a lot of very serious issues with anti-imperialism on the left and it’s all pretty vicious. obviously i think im right though. the real ghouls all seem to be on the pro-moderate rebels side of things which just happens to be on the side of the absolute worst nations on earth including us

Impermanent
Apr 1, 2010
It's only contentious because some people just read anything the CIA drops on their desk.

coathat
May 21, 2007

Slanderer posted:

literally every part of this is still insanely contentious and will get a one or more groups of leftists extremely upset

fake edit: except for the saudi part, that's not even a secret

Who the gently caress cares about making people upset?

THS
Sep 15, 2017

Impermanent posted:

It's only contentious because some people just read anything the CIA drops on their desk.

its contentious because on some level they know they are in too deep on taking the pro-imperialist position and nothing makes someone more upset than getting called out on something they’re insecure about. its 2018 and i can see being swept up in some bad ideas early on in the syrian conflict but with everything that’s come out the weird iso / jacobin line looks Very Bad

KaptainKrunk
Feb 6, 2006


assad is bad but arming and supporting the rebels, especially post-Russian intervention, has just prolonged the carnage

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

Impermanent posted:

It's only contentious because some people just read anything the CIA drops on their desk.

actually i havent read my copy of jacobin yet


Yandat posted:

yeah there are a lot of very serious issues with anti-imperialism on the left and it’s all pretty vicious. obviously i think im right though. the real ghouls all seem to be on the pro-moderate rebels side of things which just happens to be on the side of the absolute worst nations on earth including us

everyone thinks they're right, which is why you have people tripping over each other to present conclusive proof of chemical weapons attacks and also conclusive proof that this is more NATO propaganda. supporting the rebranded al qaeda rebels is support american imperialism, and supporting assad is supporting russian imperialism.

supporting no one is the right choice. sometimes the bravest thing you can do is be a coward....

smarxist
Jul 26, 2018

by Fluffdaddy
Support the people of Syria against all the people would kill and exploit them :patriot:

"But doesn't that mean-"

*puts finger to your lips* Hush....

Slanderer
May 6, 2007
slowly driving myself further into the depths of madness trying to figure out which people of Syria i should support and love and protect from the other peoples of Syria

THS
Sep 15, 2017

i support whatever nasrallah supports

Top City Homo
Oct 15, 2014


Ramrod XTreme

Yandat posted:

i support whatever nasrallah supports

in Russian Nassrallsh means

“She spray shitted on”

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES
where’s that video of bashar al assad driving around

Bryter
Nov 6, 2011

but since we are small we may-
uh, we may be the losers

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

Just once I'd like to see a sci fi movie where the aliens really do act in our best interests, and the real antagonists are reactionary elements who can't accept positive change. Arrival was close, but it presupposes an ignorant reaction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxI7B758XBQ

Plutonis
Mar 25, 2011

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

Just once I'd like to see a sci fi movie where the aliens really do act in our best interests, and the real antagonists are reactionary elements who can't accept positive change. Arrival was close, but it presupposes an ignorant reaction.

I don't want Hollywood to ruin Childhood's End

Pablo Nergigante
Apr 16, 2002

Plutonis posted:

I don't want Hollywood to ruin Childhood's End

Too late

Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

GalacticAcid posted:

where’s that video of bashar al assad driving around

https://twitter.com/HenryKrinkIe/status/975557505051971584

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES
hell yea, lmfao

R. Guyovich
Dec 25, 1991

https://twitter.com/jonahwhatever/status/1032657174332403712

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

Bringing The Assad Must Go Curse upon yourself has never been popular.

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy
https://twitter.com/BlackSocialists/status/1032812216721043458
https://twitter.com/MattBruenig/status/1032813267255746560
https://twitter.com/MattBruenig/status/1032817247511826432

R. Guyovich
Dec 25, 1991

public wealth is not the same thing as public ownership of the means of production, especially if the mechanism for that ownership is capitalist parties!!!!! i need to just block him already. he's one of the few people who actually makes me mad.

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

The fundamental issue is that state ownership of public resources doesn't overcome the commodity form in itself. Norway isn't socialist because it's a bourgeois state primarily concerned with producing commodities for the global capitalist economy. At best you could say it's state capitalist.

I get why Matt wants to push for a nationalizing of finance capital which gives dividends to the public, but that's skirting the issue of the systemic exploitation which facilitates that kind of capital accumulation in the first place. It's literal social imperialism.

Pener Kropoopkin fucked around with this message at 03:58 on Aug 24, 2018

R. Guyovich
Dec 25, 1991

what dividends, though? there's nothing unique about the norwegian state that distinguishes it from other social democracies, other than the sovereign wealth fund. that's it. the socialization of profit doesn't happen at a firm level, and it doesn't happen at a state level to any significant degree more than, say, france, italy or denmark.

R. Guyovich
Dec 25, 1991

like the soviet union, china, dprk, cuba — all these places had and have mechanisms in place to socialize profit and keep directors accountable to their workers, both top-down in the form of state and party dictats and bottom-up in the form of trade unions and worker congresses/committees. there's nothing similar in norway. the closest you get is co-determination in germany.

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy
I really don't get why Bruenig wants to keep using """Scandinavia""" as a model of "socialism". It feels almost liberal in the way that they're running scared of bringing up actual socialist states out of fear that they'll be called Stalinists or whatever.

But that's going to happen regardless. The BBC put the Kremlin in the background of a photo of Corbyn and photoshopped his hat to look more like an ushanka.

R. Guyovich
Dec 25, 1991

his research is motivated by a need to stake out a position slightly left of the mainstream to maximize popularity. he's assuming a lot less of his audience than actual radicals. it's not very complicated.

reignonyourparade
Nov 15, 2012

BULBASAUR posted:

Can someone explain to a pleb why Trot is bad?

Trotsky was somewhat okay. Trotskyists are bad because they're all rapists.

A Gnarlacious Bro
Apr 25, 2007

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

gradenko_2000 posted:

I really don't get why Bruenig wants to keep using """Scandinavia""" as a model of "socialism". It feels almost liberal in the way that they're running scared of bringing up actual socialist states out of fear that they'll be called Stalinists or whatever.

But that's going to happen regardless. The BBC put the Kremlin in the background of a photo of Corbyn and photoshopped his hat to look more like an ushanka.

He's a Fox news personality

KaptainKrunk
Feb 6, 2006


gradenko_2000 posted:

I really don't get why Bruenig wants to keep using """Scandinavia""" as a model of "socialism". It feels almost liberal in the way that they're running scared of bringing up actual socialist states out of fear that they'll be called Stalinists or whatever.

But that's going to happen regardless. The BBC put the Kremlin in the background of a photo of Corbyn and photoshopped his hat to look more like an ushanka.

he's a lib

A Gnarlacious Bro
Apr 25, 2007

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
He's gonna debate been shapiro for likes and retweets

Mia Wasikowska
Oct 7, 2006

gently caress i keep posting in the wrong thread today

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

R. Guyovich posted:

what dividends, though? there's nothing unique about the norwegian state that distinguishes it from other social democracies, other than the sovereign wealth fund. that's it. the socialization of profit doesn't happen at a firm level, and it doesn't happen at a state level to any significant degree more than, say, france, italy or denmark.

If a sovereign wealth fund is a socialist institution then one wonders why he doesn't bring up Saudi Arabia or the UAE.

R. Guyovich
Dec 25, 1991

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

If a sovereign wealth fund is a socialist institution then one wonders why he doesn't bring up Saudi Arabia or the UAE.

that's a good point, which means he'll ignore it when it's brought up.

smarxist
Jul 26, 2018

by Fluffdaddy
also nordic style "socialism" still involves lots of international fuckery, whether it be throwing in military support for w/e brown country America is bombing at the moment, or leveraging their production/wealth disparity in developing nations to exploit their labor force via regulatory capture and other forms of imperialism

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

If a sovereign wealth fund is a socialist institution then one wonders why he doesn't bring up Saudi Arabia or the UAE.

drat it's almost like the proceeds in those nations arent distributed via socialized programs but instead are chiefly funneled towards a small class of god-kings

Slanderer fucked around with this message at 07:11 on Aug 24, 2018

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

gradenko_2000 posted:


I really don't get why Bruenig wants to keep using """Scandinavia""" as a model of "socialism". It feels almost liberal in the way that they're running scared of bringing up actual socialist states out of fear that they'll be called Stalinists or whatever.

But that's going to happen regardless. The BBC put the Kremlin in the background of a photo of Corbyn and photoshopped his hat to look more like an ushanka.

really hosed up that he doesn't use China as a model of successful socialism in our age, i agree

TenementFunster
Feb 20, 2003

The Cooler King
hell yeah getfiscal in harper's


glow up, sweet donald

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy

TenementFunster posted:

hell yeah getfiscal in harper's


glow up, sweet donald
i'm a fan

Mr. Lobe
Feb 23, 2007

... Dry bones...


hey, uh I haven't looked around CSPAM in like over a year to see this thread but wasn't this the PSL thread once or something? whatever happened to that?

also hello I am with the ISO... kind of. don't really live in the states anymore. recently moved to Germany and more just doing academic union organizing stuff while getting more of a feel for the local landscape.

I also organize with Science for the People which just had a re-foundation meeting just last February or so and is in the process of coming together into a coherent organization after being dormant for decades

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

thatfatkid
Feb 20, 2011

by Azathoth

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

Just once I'd like to see a sci fi movie where the aliens really do act in our best interests, and the real antagonists are reactionary elements who can't accept positive change. Arrival was close, but it presupposes an ignorant reaction.

The day the earth stood still? 🤔

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5