Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
Kurnugia
Sep 2, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

Putting myself in their shoes I wouldn't be willing to suffer traitors either, but I don't know enough to know if they're actually justified.

You seriously don't think that treating dissent as treason had anything at all to do with the collapse of the Soviet Union then?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

namesake
Jun 19, 2006

"When I was a girl, around 12 or 13, I had a fantasy that I'd grow up to marry Captain Scarlet, but he'd be busy fighting the Mysterons so I'd cuckold him with the sexiest people I could think of - Nigel Mansell, Pat Sharp and Mr. Blobby."

Mr. Lobe posted:

I think Marx said something about revolutionary struggles being ugly things in a way that is really eloquent in that way he does some times, but I can't really recall enough of it to be able to google it

Do you mean Engels?

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1872/10/authority.htm

A revolution is certainly the most authoritarian thing there is; it is the act whereby one part of the population imposes its will upon the other part by means of rifles, bayonets and cannon — authoritarian means, if such there be at all; and if the victorious party does not want to have fought in vain, it must maintain this rule by means of the terror which its arms inspire in the reactionists. Would the Paris Commune have lasted a single day if it had not made use of this authority of the armed people against the bourgeois? Should we not, on the contrary, reproach it for not having used it freely enough?

I'd like to think that never extends to war crimes directly, even if I have fall back of utilitarian concerns about hardening the resolve of the opposition though. Certainly I'd say any scorched earth strategies should be beyond the pale of any socialist revolution given any other choice.

Mr. Lobe
Feb 23, 2007

... Dry bones...


namesake posted:

Do you mean Engels?

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1872/10/authority.htm

A revolution is certainly the most authoritarian thing there is; it is the act whereby one part of the population imposes its will upon the other part by means of rifles, bayonets and cannon — authoritarian means, if such there be at all; and if the victorious party does not want to have fought in vain, it must maintain this rule by means of the terror which its arms inspire in the reactionists. Would the Paris Commune have lasted a single day if it had not made use of this authority of the armed people against the bourgeois? Should we not, on the contrary, reproach it for not having used it freely enough?

I'd like to think that never extends to war crimes directly, even if I have fall back of utilitarian concerns about hardening the resolve of the opposition though. Certainly I'd say any scorched earth strategies should be beyond the pale of any socialist revolution given any other choice.

oh that explains why I wasn't able to google it lol

smarxist
Jul 26, 2018

by Fluffdaddy
I was reading this piece about commune building in Rojava and havin' a lot of thoughts

https://www.opendemocracy.net/north-africa-west-asia/cihad-hammy/first-commune-in-kobane-construction-and-challenges

Mostly about how hopeless I feel as a first worlder who is so beholden to a ridiculous standard of living that only a massive system of exploitation and death/misery can provide it to me. I don't know what percent of the resurgent left if any are actually prepared for the diminishing material conditions that'll occur as a pretext to and then reckoning with capitalism. "Champagne socialism" is an ugly joke to me, especially when climate change is on the table as a threat to human existence.

I hate how I've been programmed to be unable to enjoy simple pleasures, quiet serene spaces, to not respect nature, be grateful for a day's bread and the people who provide it, to not understand how my means of living are provided for me, to not be able to create them myself if necessary. The parts of Marx that really speak to me are definitely the ones about the degradation and inhumanity of life under the capitalist mode of production, the way people are turned into mindless beasts who can't even enjoy easy socializing and appreciate the simple aspects of life; a meal, a cool drink of water, a day's work on a hard project with fruitful results. All of it captured and commodified by profit-driven market entities, and they won't stop until they live inside our brains.

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES
reading the tedious liberal posts in here lately and somehow coming away thinking it’s a bad thing to shoot people for their poo poo opinions

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

GalacticAcid posted:

reading the tedious liberal posts in here lately and somehow coming away thinking it’s a bad thing to shoot people for their poo poo opinions

The tedious posts convinced you its bad to kill people for having a poo poo opinion?

Kurnugia
Sep 2, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo

GalacticAcid posted:

reading the tedious liberal posts in here lately and somehow coming away thinking it’s a bad thing to shoot people for their poo poo opinions

You know, I'm bit-by-bit coming around to the same conclusion here. I am also starting to believe there are indeed people who need to be shot for their opinions, for they present a clear and lethal danger to a unified, worldwide socialist movement.

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

I could probably make a strong argument that the Leningrad affair (and earlier purges) deprived the soviet union of capable administrators and leadership down the line, but I'm on vacation so y'all will just have to imagine it.

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES

Karl Barks posted:

The tedious posts convinced you its bad to kill people for having a poo poo opinion?

It is a joke

Kurnugia
Sep 2, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo
maybe next time we should shoot the leninists before they shoot the rest of us

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

GalacticAcid posted:

It is a joke

Like I said, I'm on vacation!!

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES
Nice, enjoy

Vacation is good

Jewel Repetition
Dec 24, 2012

Ask me about Briar Rose and Chicken Chaser.
Just shoot everyone, because they may have also decided to shoot everyone

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

Kurnugia posted:

You seriously don't think that treating dissent as treason had anything at all to do with the collapse of the Soviet Union then?

You’re comparing apples to oranges here. Besides the Soviet Union which eventually collapsed encouraged dissent starting with the Destalinization campaign. Dissent wasn’t a death sentence.

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

My political philosophy is the last scene in reservoir dogs

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

Kurnugia posted:

maybe next time we should shoot the leninists before they shoot the rest of us

You wouldn’t even be threatening enough to shoot.

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES
the only guy who survives is the one who doesn’t tip, so you’re a libertarian

Kurnugia
Sep 2, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

You’re comparing apples to oranges here. Besides the Soviet Union which eventually collapsed encouraged dissent starting with the Destalinization campaign. Dissent wasn’t a death sentence.

Uhhuh. So you think it was the other way around, allowing dissent is what that led to the collapse?

e: or was it just irrelevant? Made no difference either way?

Kurnugia fucked around with this message at 21:57 on Sep 3, 2018

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

Kurnugia posted:

Uhhuh. So you think it was the other way around, allowing dissent is what that led to the collapse?

e: or was it just irrelevant? Made no difference either way?

No, you don't even understand what you're talking about. You're comparing wartime conditions to a post-revolutionary regime.

Besides, the Soviet Union fell apart because the Red Army was too weak to stop the Nagorno-Karabakh War. That made it clear to all the sister republics that they could declare independence and the Soviet Union couldn't stop them, which they did over the course of a couple years.

Larry Parrish
Jul 9, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
Idk what all this hand wringing over killing soc dems is because soc dems are liberals and half the jokes in this forum involve liberal death

Kurnugia
Sep 2, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

No, you don't even understand what you're talking about. You're comparing wartime conditions to a post-revolutionary regime.

Besides, the Soviet Union fell apart because the Red Army was too weak to stop the Nagorno-Karabakh War. That made it clear to all the sister republics that they could declare independence and the Soviet Union couldn't stop them, which they did over the course of a couple years.

If you cannot see a continuity between these things you separate in your mind into different boxes with apples and oranges, if you cannot fathom why all the 'sister republics' would ever want to secede the moment the threat of military occupation was removed, I dunno what to tell you mate. cheers and good luck, i guess

Larry Parrish
Jul 9, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
The Soviet Union collapsed due to a century of blockade, espionage, and direct military action by the United States and Europe

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

Kurnugia posted:

If you cannot see a continuity between these things you separate in your mind into different boxes with apples and oranges, if you cannot fathom why all the 'sister republics' would ever want to secede the moment the threat of military occupation was removed, I dunno what to tell you mate. cheers and good luck, i guess

Dont condescend to me, twerp. The causes of the Soviet Union's collapse are far more varied and complicated than "they shot dissenters at some point." It's insanely reductionist and ahistorical.

Kurnugia
Sep 2, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

Dont condescend to me, twerp. The causes of the Soviet Union's collapse are far more varied and complicated

uhhuh

e: dunno where you got the idea that I thought the suppression of dissent was the only cause for the collapse, but good on you for picking that up either way

Kurnugia fucked around with this message at 22:38 on Sep 3, 2018

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.
The Soviet Union collapsed because Gorbachev ate all the treats

reignonyourparade
Nov 15, 2012

Kurnugia posted:

You seriously don't think that treating dissent as treason had anything at all to do with the collapse of the Soviet Union then?

The Soviet union mostly collapsed when it stopped doing that.

A Big Fuckin Hornet
Nov 1, 2016

by Nyc_Tattoo
https://twitter.com/Ahmadinejad1956/status/1036685396837625856

Kurnugia
Sep 2, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo

reignonyourparade posted:

The Soviet union mostly collapsed when it stopped doing that.

authoritarian regimes tend to do that when their ability to project force is compromised, yes

Impermanent
Apr 1, 2010

Kurnugia posted:

authoritarian regimes

mila kunis
Jun 10, 2011
didnt they hold like a free open referendum before the ussr dissolved and the vast majority of the republics wanted to keep and stay in the union? obviously ukraine, the baltics wanted out

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

mila kunis posted:

didnt they hold like a free open referendum before the ussr dissolved and the vast majority of the republics wanted to keep and stay in the union? obviously ukraine, the baltics wanted out

Not quite, the referendum was to reform the USSR as a confederation of states. it passed in every Soviet republic, but was never implemented because the USSR dissolved instead.

GalacticAcid posted:

the only guy who survives is the one who doesn’t tip, so you’re a libertarian

GOOGLE MURRAY BOOKCHIN

Kurnugia
Sep 2, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo
well, aside from armenia, georgia, estonia, latvia, lithuania and moldova.

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

The end result would have almost certainly meant the return of private property in a lot of the ex Soviet republic anyways, so the outcomes weren't much different imo

It's like if US states no longer had to answer to DC

mila kunis
Jun 10, 2011

Kurnugia posted:

well, aside from armenia, georgia, estonia, latvia, lithuania and moldova.

drat so like 10 ssrs wanted to stay in even at the end? surprised ukraine was one of em.

Jewel Repetition
Dec 24, 2012

Ask me about Briar Rose and Chicken Chaser.
Soviet Socialist Rethuglic

Kurnugia
Sep 2, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo
I'm still a bit surprised that my argument that Stalin's purges, and the political system he built alongside it, having long-term effects that ultimately doomed the Soviet project, is so controversial among communists.

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

mila kunis posted:

drat so like 10 ssrs wanted to stay in even at the end? surprised ukraine was one of em.

Both yes and no we're votes to end the USSR, the yes vote just meant staying in a confederation. Every SSR voted in favor, but (okay I had to Google this part) the ones listed above boycotted the referendum

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

I'm putting my vote in for "the 5 year plans became more and more detached from reality, and the reforms devised in the 60s were never actually implemented, so the USSR was eventually torn apart by it's internal contradictions"

Kurnugia
Sep 2, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo

mila kunis posted:

drat so like 10 ssrs wanted to stay in even at the end? surprised ukraine was one of em.

Karl Barks posted:

Both yes and no we're votes to end the USSR, the yes vote just meant staying in a confederation. Every SSR voted in favor, but (okay I had to Google this part) the ones listed above boycotted the referendum

Yeah and it's kinda hard to say much about what that might've been or that people's opinions would have remained the same once presented with the actual form of that hypothetical confederation. Maybe it would've been great, and people probably wanted to hold on to the dream of socialism even in the face of dysfunction and disintegration, so :shrug:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Kurnugia
Sep 2, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo

Karl Barks posted:

I'm putting my vote in for "the 5 year plans became more and more detached from reality, and the reforms devised in the 60s were never actually implemented, so the USSR was eventually torn apart by it's internal contradictions"

Of course, that's contingent to my argument. But the problems preceded Khrushchev and his successors. They just didn't resolve any of them.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5