|
yeah, it's pretty good either way though
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 21:32 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 07:09 |
|
infernal machines posted:yeah, it's pretty good either way though but not quite perfect. it's like the count hasimir fenring of jokes
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 21:34 |
|
oh gently caress lol
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 22:05 |
|
https://twitter.com/TappyPaws/status/1037064936940351488
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 22:09 |
|
https://twitter.com/kenklippenstein/status/1037085951468728322?s=19
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 22:19 |
|
i was wondering wtf was up with my timeline recently. i thought people were 'ironically' liking certain things jfc
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 22:22 |
|
musk thread is thataway
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 22:23 |
|
Rex-Goliath posted:i was wondering wtf was up with my timeline recently. i thought people were 'ironically' liking certain things Lol, “why is my nazi-amplifier showing bad tweets,” he wondered
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 22:35 |
|
President Beep posted:but not quite perfect. it's like the count hasimir fenring of jokes
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 22:59 |
|
President Beep posted:but not quite perfect. it's like the count hasimir fenring of jokes nice analogy
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 23:03 |
|
Sagebrush posted:Why would he buy the beach in the first place if he doesn't even want it and has never been there? The town is by all accounts abandoned and he's trying to keep people out so it's not like he saw a business opportunity if someone offers you the opportunity to buy an entire beach town for 0.1% of your net worth, you take it i certainly would. even if i had no specific plan for it. that's just a cool opportunity. Sagebrush posted:Like, even if he just bought it to speculate on real estate it still doesn't really make sense that he'd keep people out. the value goes up if it becomes a desirable spot lots of people like to go when he bought it, he closed the convenience store or whatever it was in the village. which meant there was no one to collect the $2 fee for parking this of course pissed off the locals, and the state informed khosla that he would have to apply for a permit to block the beach access, or else maintain the status quo this enraged the billionaire and now he is literally going to the supreme court to defend his right to block a parking lot he doesn't care about on a beach he has never been to
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 23:09 |
|
tbf he isn't doing poo poo, his lawyers are
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 23:11 |
|
hypothetically, would it have been legal for him to do the national park thing where you just put your camping fee into an envelope and drop it in a box at the gate and some ranger collects it a few days later maybe?
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 23:15 |
|
Uptime Sinclair posted:don’t sign yore poasts!! okay, failgar Stringent posted:nice analogy
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 23:22 |
|
truly the brian herbert of analogies
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 23:23 |
|
infernal machines posted:truly the brian herbert of analogies rude
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 23:24 |
|
Sagebrush posted:hypothetically, would it have been legal for him to do the national park thing where you just put your camping fee into an envelope and drop it in a box at the gate and some ranger collects it a few days later maybe? pretty sure that would be fine since the issue is him cutting off beach access entirely. he locked the gate and hired security to keep people out. if you read the article he says he totally respects the California constitution’s right to public beaches, as long as the people on the beach don’t cross his land (the only way besides by boat) to get there lol
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 23:26 |
|
okay fine, the kevin j anderson of analogies
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 23:28 |
|
Sagebrush posted:hypothetically, would it have been legal for him to do the national park thing where you just put your camping fee into an envelope and drop it in a box at the gate and some ranger collects it a few days later maybe? why would that not be legal california law doesn't require you have any particular way to pay for parking, if anything they encourage making free spots available near beach entranceways.
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 23:28 |
|
infernal machines posted:okay fine, the kevin j anderson of analogies no!
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 23:29 |
|
infernal machines posted:okay fine, the kevin j anderson of analogies whoa, rude
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 23:32 |
|
Achmed Jones posted:whoa, rude
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 23:44 |
|
President Beep posted:but not quite perfect. it's like the count hasimir fenring of jokes ah yes, the kind that are only funny when my wife mumbles them to me
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 23:47 |
|
JawnV6 posted:ah yes, the kind that are only funny when my wife mumbles them to me heh e: and the kind that make your best friend mad at you.
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 23:47 |
|
i didn't see anyone post that amzorn is now worth one TRILLION dollars. congrats to jeff bezos on stealing a record amount of money from the public.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 00:04 |
|
the gated road to martin's beach is right off highway 1, you can just park on the side of the highway (there is a dirt area) and walk around the gate down to the beach. i've done this several times, nobody will stop you
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 00:11 |
|
all of a sudden *BOOM* loving invisible hand of the free market bounces your rear end to the curb like some kind of rational zelda wallmaster
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 00:18 |
|
actually, it's just a landmine
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 00:29 |
|
President Beep posted:rational zelda wallmaster
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 00:36 |
|
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 01:47 |
|
leftist heap posted:i didn't see anyone post that amzorn is now worth one TRILLION dollars. congrats to jeff bezos on stealing a record amount of money from the public. amazon, the company and it's assets, are not worth one trillion bux. amazon, the bubbly investor stock, is. its kind of semantic and dumb but its worth that because we're in a post-capitalism hellscape where finance is not seeking out more money via actual company investments but seeking out more money by buying stock on the premise that other financiers will want to buy it at higher price and so on and so on. stocks are just beanie babies for the rich you can also thank the feds for piss poor monetary policy that is used to ensure ultra rich never lose anything at the expense of everyone else
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 01:50 |
|
Xaris posted:its kind of semantic and dumb but its worth that because we're in a post-capitalism hellscape where finance is not seeking out more money via actual company investments but seeking out more money by buying stock on the premise that other financiers will want to buy it at higher price and so on and so on. stocks are just beanie babies for the rich this is how it's always worked
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 01:53 |
|
Xaris posted:amazon, the company and it's assets, are not worth one trillion bux. amazon, the bubbly investor stock, is. its kind of semantic and dumb but its worth that because we're in a post-capitalism hellscape where finance is not seeking out more money via actual company investments but seeking out more money by buying stock on the premise that other financiers will want to buy it at higher price and so on and so on. stocks are just beanie babies for the rich
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 02:09 |
|
posting here for the first time in months to let fishmech know that their tumblr account is posting spam
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 02:41 |
|
RISCy Business posted:posting here for the first time in months to let fishmech know that their tumblr account is posting spam lol owned
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 02:47 |
|
RISCy Business posted:posting here for the first time in months to let fishmech know that their tumblr account is posting spam how could you tell?
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 02:52 |
|
say what you will about fishmech but they reblog some choice poo poo
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 03:02 |
|
and now i slumber once more
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 03:02 |
|
RISCy Business posted:and now i slumber once more catch you on the flipside, cthulhu.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 03:03 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 07:09 |
|
Xaris posted:amazon, the company and it's assets, are not worth one trillion bux. amazon, the bubbly investor stock, is. its kind of semantic and dumb but its worth that because we're in a post-capitalism hellscape where finance is not seeking out more money via actual company investments but seeking out more money by buying stock on the premise that other financiers will want to buy it at higher price and so on and so on. stocks are just beanie babies for the rich to put it another way, if AAPL had AMZN’s P/E ratio, it would be worth $10T instead of $1.1T
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 03:06 |