Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Flikken
Oct 23, 2009

10,363 snaps and not a playoff win to show for it
That's a simulation right?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008


Source?

Kilonum
Sep 30, 2002

You know where you are? You're in the suburbs, baby. You're gonna drive.


:allbuttons:

Serjeant Buzfuz
Dec 5, 2009

Pretty sure that's a model guys....

Right?

vessbot
Jun 17, 2005
I don't like you because you're dangerous
Yea that is fake

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008

Figuring out HOW its fake is what I'm interested in. Control inputs don't seem right for a model? I'm thinking render which means its one hell of a render.

dupersaurus
Aug 1, 2012

Futurism was an art movement where dudes were all 'CARS ARE COOL AND THE PAST IS FOR CHUMPS. LET'S DRAW SOME CARS.'

hobbesmaster posted:

Figuring out HOW its fake is what I'm interested in. Control inputs don't seem right for a model? I'm thinking render which means its one hell of a render.

:10bux: it's a render. Event with the poor quality of the vid the plane is still a little too... nice. The edge aliasing is also a little weird.

sandoz
Jan 29, 2009


my uncle works at nintendo and he says it's totally real guys

why would you even question this

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008

Continuing to watch it I think the weirdest thing is the only lights on the plane are those nose wheel ones. :wtc:

um excuse me
Jan 1, 2016

by Fluffdaddy
Looking at the airleron position gives it away as either being a simulator or rendering.

vessbot
Jun 17, 2005
I don't like you because you're dangerous
- Looks like a computer model

- Forward motion slows to almost none

- When it was upside down, it would have nosedived into the ground unless the pilot pushed a full negative 1G (astronomically unlikely)

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008

um excuse me posted:

Looking at the airleron position gives it away as either being a simulator or rendering.

Elevators don't look like they move too.

The animator did a decent job covering up many limitations on the airliner model with artifacting.

Vahakyla
May 3, 2013
That video made me say "holy loving poo poo" out loud.

Ola
Jul 19, 2004

That's an amazingly well done CGI, even if it misses some blatant stuff like control surfaces not moving. Give that person a movie to work on, it's going to look incredible.

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008

Someone made a video of something like holes being punched in the wing of a not southwest jet a few years ago that was really impressive. Not sure how I'd find it. It had the animator's website instead of "southwest.com" on the wingtips.

CarForumPoster
Jun 26, 2013

⚡POWER⚡

Cocoa Crispies posted:

Some people at SpaceX probably need a clearance for some aspects of NRO payloads, SpaceX is big enough that it makes sense for them to have the infrastructure to hold clearances, and part of that infrastructure is making sure management (including ownership) is cleared or at least clearable.

Space programmatics may be classified and things that the top brass need to know about program performance may be classified (e.g. cost, test schedule, technical issues or limitations). That said, I'm guessing Shotwell would be the person with the TS//SAP/SAR/SCI/WTF Clearance

Finger Prince
Jan 5, 2007


sandoz posted:

my uncle works at nintendo and he says it's totally real guys

why would you even question this

I know right, next thing you know, folks will be saying that AA DC10 didn't really use that guys's car as a nose wheel on the freeway! Lol that granny had such sass!

drunkill
Sep 25, 2007

me @ ur posting
Fallen Rib

Lou Takki posted:

Pretty sure that's a model guys....

Right?
Yep, computer model. No clue on the source, I'm sure it'll turn up soon.

Vahakyla posted:

That video made me say "holy loving poo poo" out loud.
My job is done.

StandardVC10
Feb 6, 2007

This avatar now 50% more dark mode compliant

BIG HEADLINE posted:

RF-4/J79 engine porn: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9khQr1iOPfs

Unmistakable low-level sonic boom at 3:06, along with some pretty reckless flying. Potato quality. Very loud (naturally).

Owns.

glynnenstein
Feb 18, 2014


KYOON GRIFFEY JR posted:

Doesn't Shotwell run the show?

Unless he's dealing with any sort of classified information, I don't see the risk. You're assuming he needs a clearance. I'm not sure that's the case.

Musk’s SpaceX provides services for the Air Force, with multiple high-value contracts. Marijuana use is prohibited for someone with a government security clearance, Fox Business reported, and is the central issue in the Air Force’s inquiry.

EvenWorseOpinions
Jun 10, 2017
Is Musk anything other than a figurehead? I'm surprise anyone cares about his opinion or what he does on a dumb talk show

um excuse me
Jan 1, 2016

by Fluffdaddy
Media decides what is important. A lot of people I know don't actually care.

Finger Prince
Jan 5, 2007


Can we please keep MuskChat confined to the EV thread? Otherwise I'll have to tweet @ him and ask whether he thinks the super Connie is a sexy aircraft or not.

Godholio
Aug 28, 2002

Does a bear split in the woods near Zheleznogorsk?
The pot thing is an absolute non-issue anyway.

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane
The fact that he smoked is not a big issue. The fact that he apparently thought it a good idea to do so in a very public way while there are already serious questions surrounding his leadership demonstrates a rather appalling lack of judgement, though, which is a much bigger issue that smoking marijuana by itself.

To bring it slightly back to topic, with marijuana legalization very close here in Canada, I've had a fair number of my students asking about what the policy on marijuana use will be, and it's starting to piss me off. Transport Canada hasn't issued any guidance beyond "flight crew must not be under the influence of drugs," and basically it's my opinion that until we have more information, pilots should simply not smoke marijuana at all. I have nothing against marijuana use personally but in the absence of clearer laws, and more data about how long it takes impairment to go away after smoking, it just seems like a bad idea.

Why the gently caress would you pick this career if you want to drink and/or use drugs regularly? When I went back to flying, I recognized that part of the tradeoff was not being able to drink as much or whenever I liked anymore.

Finger Prince
Jan 5, 2007


https://i.imgur.com/JfGpkU1.gifv

Finger Prince fucked around with this message at 14:21 on Sep 8, 2018

Lobster God
Nov 5, 2008

PT6A posted:

The fact that he smoked is not a big issue. The fact that he apparently thought it a good idea to do so in a very public way while there are already serious questions surrounding his leadership demonstrates a rather appalling lack of judgement, though, which is a much bigger issue that smoking marijuana by itself.

To bring it slightly back to topic, with marijuana legalization very close here in Canada, I've had a fair number of my students asking about what the policy on marijuana use will be, and it's starting to piss me off. Transport Canada hasn't issued any guidance beyond "flight crew must not be under the influence of drugs," and basically it's my opinion that until we have more information, pilots should simply not smoke marijuana at all. I have nothing against marijuana use personally but in the absence of clearer laws, and more data about how long it takes impairment to go away after smoking, it just seems like a bad idea.

Why the gently caress would you pick this career if you want to drink and/or use drugs regularly? When I went back to flying, I recognized that part of the tradeoff was not being able to drink as much or whenever I liked anymore.

Surely the whole point of being flight crew is to get high.

:v:

slothrop
Dec 7, 2006

Santa Alpha, Fox One... Gifts Incoming ~~~>===|>

Soiled Meat

PT6A posted:

The fact that he smoked is not a big issue. The fact that he apparently thought it a good idea to do so in a very public way while there are already serious questions surrounding his leadership demonstrates a rather appalling lack of judgement, though, which is a much bigger issue that smoking marijuana by itself.

To bring it slightly back to topic, with marijuana legalization very close here in Canada, I've had a fair number of my students asking about what the policy on marijuana use will be, and it's starting to piss me off. Transport Canada hasn't issued any guidance beyond "flight crew must not be under the influence of drugs," and basically it's my opinion that until we have more information, pilots should simply not smoke marijuana at all. I have nothing against marijuana use personally but in the absence of clearer laws, and more data about how long it takes impairment to go away after smoking, it just seems like a bad idea.

Why the gently caress would you pick this career if you want to drink and/or use drugs regularly? When I went back to flying, I recognized that part of the tradeoff was not being able to drink as much or whenever I liked anymore.

I think you make a really good poi...

Lobster God posted:

Surely the whole point of being flight crew is to get high.

:v:

:perfect:

Godholio
Aug 28, 2002

Does a bear split in the woods near Zheleznogorsk?

PT6A posted:

Why the gently caress would you pick this career if you want to drink and/or use drugs regularly? When I went back to flying, I recognized that part of the tradeoff was not being able to drink as much or whenever I liked anymore.

My squadron had two kegs, if that helps. The squadron I currently work with has about $300 in Jack Daniels alone under the bar that's 6 feet from the commander's office, and 10 feet from the staff.

Jonny Nox
Apr 26, 2008




How a team of amateur explorers and an underwater robot laid to rest the 'Ghost of Baker Lake'
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/baker-lake-bristol-freighter-underwater-discovery-1.4814719
Shared via the CBC News Android App

Cool poo poo

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane

Godholio posted:

My squadron had two kegs, if that helps. The squadron I currently work with has about $300 in Jack Daniels alone under the bar that's 6 feet from the commander's office, and 10 feet from the staff.

Oh yeah, I still get drunk if I'm not flying the next day, I'm 99% sure all of my co-workers drink too, and I've never had a flight test where the PE didn't mention some variation of "beer o'clock" afterward, but you have to keep the poo poo down to shoe level obviously. If you want to be a daily drinker or a regular drug user, I'm just saying it may not be the ideal profession for you -- not that you have to be teetotal or anything.

MrYenko
Jun 18, 2012

#2 isn't ALWAYS bad...

PT6A posted:

Oh yeah, I still get drunk if I'm not flying the next day, I'm 99% sure all of my co-workers drink too, and I've never had a flight test where the PE didn't mention some variation of "beer o'clock" afterward, but you have to keep the poo poo down to shoe level obviously. If you want to be a daily drinker or a regular drug user, I'm just saying it may not be the ideal profession for you -- not that you have to be teetotal or anything.

Part 121 flight crew are the sailors of the 21st century.

Thomamelas
Mar 11, 2009

PT6A posted:

The fact that he smoked is not a big issue. The fact that he apparently thought it a good idea to do so in a very public way while there are already serious questions surrounding his leadership demonstrates a rather appalling lack of judgement, though, which is a much bigger issue that smoking marijuana by itself.

To bring it slightly back to topic, with marijuana legalization very close here in Canada, I've had a fair number of my students asking about what the policy on marijuana use will be, and it's starting to piss me off. Transport Canada hasn't issued any guidance beyond "flight crew must not be under the influence of drugs," and basically it's my opinion that until we have more information, pilots should simply not smoke marijuana at all. I have nothing against marijuana use personally but in the absence of clearer laws, and more data about how long it takes impairment to go away after smoking, it just seems like a bad idea.

Why the gently caress would you pick this career if you want to drink and/or use drugs regularly? When I went back to flying, I recognized that part of the tradeoff was not being able to drink as much or whenever I liked anymore.

If it helps the Canadian military released their guidelines and flight crew aren't allowed to consume it 24 hours before a flight.

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane

Thomamelas posted:

If it helps the Canadian military released their guidelines and flight crew aren't allowed to consume it 24 hours before a flight.

That's good to know. Do you happen to know if that's the same as their policy with booze? Transport Canada's official advice for civilians is no booze 24 hours before flying, but the law only says 8 hours and you must not be under the influence at all.

I'm getting my medical this Wednesday so I'll ask the doc if he's heard anything.

I mean, ultimately I think 24 hours is probably safe but I'm going to abstain just to be on the safe side, and it would be my advice to my students to do the same. That being said, I wouldn't refuse to fly with someone who smoked more than 24 hours ago.

MrChips
Jun 10, 2005

FLIGHT SAFETY TIP: Fatties out first

If you read the second-to-most-recent Aviation Safety Letter, they said, and I quote, "aviation will continue to be incompatible with cannabis use."

Take that for what you will.

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane
Also everything I've read just now suggests it's 28 days, not 24 hours, for Canadian Forces pilots.

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/defence-watch/the-canadian-forces-releases-cannabis-policy

crazypeltast52
May 5, 2010



Most major airlines in the US are 10 hours bottle to throttle, with like one or two being eight hours.

Potato Salad
Oct 23, 2014

nobody cares



I too can momentarily disable gravitation

Previa_fun
Nov 10, 2004

I saw everyone mentioning how good and convincing it was before watching and lol what

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Fender Anarchist
May 20, 2009

Fender Anarchist

Boeing finally bringing back wing warping, I see.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply