|
I'll have you know that egalitarianism is actually racist and so was the USSR, furthermore
|
# ? Sep 12, 2018 03:03 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 10:39 |
|
They had a department of nationalities.what the heck do you have?
|
# ? Sep 12, 2018 04:02 |
|
|
# ? Sep 12, 2018 05:57 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DgJZADHsyg
|
# ? Sep 12, 2018 09:33 |
|
dope
|
# ? Sep 12, 2018 11:25 |
|
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1039367200019230720
|
# ? Sep 12, 2018 23:25 |
|
can't believe "general storm" was a nazi
|
# ? Sep 12, 2018 23:27 |
|
Prav posted:can't believe "general storm" was a nazi
|
# ? Sep 12, 2018 23:28 |
|
https://twitter.com/kulturalmarx/status/1039986715417399296
|
# ? Sep 12, 2018 23:52 |
|
Prav posted:can't believe "general storm" was a nazi
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 02:05 |
|
soldier at :35 is trying very hard to suppress a slavic accent, listen to her 'Vs', 'Rs', and 'Ds' HorrificExistence fucked around with this message at 05:45 on Sep 13, 2018 |
# ? Sep 13, 2018 05:42 |
|
any book recs for the Mitterrand government? I was listening to Swampside Chats and they mentioned how Mitterrand went full socdem but also that it didn't work out well for them, and now my interest is piqued, especially since this is a complete historical blindspot for me
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 06:16 |
|
Miterrand was complicit or even supported the Rwandan government during the Tutsi genocide.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 06:23 |
|
https://twitter.com/ProSocialismYT/status/1040049517188603905
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 06:26 |
|
Plutonis posted:Miterrand was complicit or even supported the Rwandan government during the Tutsi genocide. *anarchistly* pfft, find me a government that hasn't supported a genocide
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 06:28 |
|
Prav posted:can't believe "general storm" was a nazi
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 08:48 |
|
a good p...post
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 09:08 |
|
gradenko_2000 posted:any book recs for the Mitterrand government? I was listening to Swampside Chats and they mentioned how Mitterrand went full socdem but also that it didn't work out well for them, and now my interest is piqued, especially since this is a complete historical blindspot for me The last biography to make a big splash was Mitterand: A Study in Ambiguity by Philip Short in 2014. I have not read the book, however I did read the reviews in both the LRB and the New York Review of Books and they make for a fascinating joint read, imo Republican King by Philippe Marlière in the LRB treats Mitterand as, essentially, a failure - the gravedigger of his own political fortune who undermined his working-class base through capitulation to neoliberal dictates; he concludes by drawing parallels with the later failings of PS under Jospin and Hollande. quote:By the time his second term started, Mitterrand had lost all interest in the possibility of social transformation. He enjoyed the company of other world leaders, such as Bush Sr, Kohl and Thatcher. His foreign policy was increasingly erratic. In 1994 the Tutsi-dominated opposition in Rwanda accused him of abetting the genocide through France’s military support for the Hutu-dominated francophone government, and of allowing Hutu militias to go on a murderous rampage, despite the presence of the French army. Mitterrand maintained that he knew nothing of the ethnic tensions that erupted after the president’s plane was shot down over Kigali, but this remains one of the darkest hours of his presidency. At home he showed little interest in the declining fortunes of his fellow citizens: ‘We have tried everything we could to fight back unemployment,’ he said. ‘There is nothing else we can do.’ Bernard Tapie, a corrupt businessman, was invited to join the government in 1992. Mitterrand manipulated and mistreated successive prime ministers: Michel Rocard, his arch-enemy, then Edith Cresson and finally Pierre Bérégovoy, who committed suicide in 1993, days after the PS had suffered another crushing defeat in the general election. By the time Mitterrand retired from politics in 1995, he had transformed the PS in the space of ten years or so from a left-wing social democratic party into a catch-all centrist party supported by a few activists and with no real purchase on French society. Historians who wish to study Third-Way ‘modernisations’ of European social democracy need not start with Blair: Mitterrand did it first. How Wily Mitterand Transformed France by Louis Begley in the New York Review of Books makes a defense of Mitterand's record from a hard liberal position quote:On balance, his presidency transformed France for the better. He improved French-German relations, took part in the creation of the euro, and counteracted the Socialist allergy to a robust defense policy. In domestic affairs he modernized the Socialist Party, showing it was possible for the left and the right to coexist peacefully. In all likelihood Mitterrand has received too much credit for diminishing the power of the Communists—the decline of Western European Communist parties in the closing decades of the twentieth century has been a generalized phenomenon—and too much blame for the rise of Jean-Marie Le Pen’s Front National. It too has been mirrored by the widespread resurgence of the European far right, and conditions unrelated to Mitterrand’s electoral maneuvers.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 12:50 |
|
I can't believe Trotsky wasn't willing to work with the DSA
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 12:58 |
|
GalacticAcid posted:The last biography to make a big splash was Mitterand: A Study in Ambiguity by Philip Short in 2014. I have not read the book, however I did read the reviews in both the LRB and the New York Review of Books and they make for a fascinating joint read, imo was about to say "didn't he do the 35-hour workweek", then googled it and realized it was jospin and chirac lol jacques chirac is further left than any US president since 1945, maybe ever edit i don't actually know how much power the french president has when the PM and cabinet is of the opposite party ediiit: looks like the french prez retreats to foreign policy when his party isn't in control of parliament i say swears online fucked around with this message at 13:45 on Sep 13, 2018 |
# ? Sep 13, 2018 13:23 |
HorrificExistence posted:soldier at :35 is trying very hard to suppress a slavic accent, listen to her 'Vs', 'Rs', and 'Ds' mm yes a free thinker
|
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 14:48 |
|
Plutonis posted:They had a department of nationalities.what the heck do you have? Representation
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 15:33 |
|
it rules that the Washington "Redskins" are somehow only the second worst brand in North American sports w.r.t. depiction of Native Americans
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 15:35 |
|
GalacticAcid posted:it rules that the Washington "Redskins" are somehow only the second worst brand in North American sports w.r.t. depiction of Native Americans Oh trust me. There are worse but they tend to be from small town highschool teams that nobody gets mad about because nobody has heard of them
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 15:37 |
|
The Indians are officially phasing out chief wahoo (because nobody actually likes the indians) next year while the Redskins are going to drag their heels forever.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 15:41 |
|
Snyder will definitely never let that name change. will have to be whoever owns the franchise next
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 15:42 |
|
The Indians should be phased out as a franchise, as should the rest of the AL Central
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 15:42 |
|
Ohio sports teams: Cleveland Browns Cincinnati Reds Cleveland Indians Thankfully the Dayton Kikes and Columbus Spooks have dissolved.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 15:44 |
|
the atlanta braves still exist, i think
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 15:46 |
|
loath as i am to defend anything related to ohio, neither the browns nor the reds are ethnic references
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 15:46 |
|
Serf posted:the atlanta braves still exist, i think they do, and they still do 'the tomahawk chop' at every game where their entire slack-jawed southron fanbase sings "oohhhhh oh oh ohhhhhh" in an "indian voice" i will still be rooting for them if they go to the NLCS against the cubs
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 15:48 |
|
ShriekingMarxist posted:Ohio sports teams: Look it's important to respect what few traditions America has
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 15:48 |
|
ShriekingMarxist posted:Ohio sports teams: The Reds used to be the red stockings, but shortened to just "Reds." The Browns are named after their first coach, Paul Brown.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 17:19 |
|
GalacticAcid posted:they do, and they still do 'the tomahawk chop' at every game where their entire slack-jawed southron fanbase sings "oohhhhh oh oh ohhhhhh" in an "indian voice" to be fair (?) to the beaneaters they stole it from Florida State U: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nlgfs7bIhys
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 17:30 |
|
https://twitter.com/windwake_/status/1039672670743347200
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 20:41 |
|
Dreddout posted:Oh trust me. There are worse but they tend to be from small town highschool teams that nobody gets mad about because nobody has heard of them I bring up the Pekin Chinks (near Peoria Illinois) all the time (they changed their name in the 80s)
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 20:43 |
|
https://twitter.com/m_l_len/status/1040059209293934593
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 22:38 |
|
mastershakeman posted:I bring up the Pekin Chinks (near Peoria Illinois) all the time (they changed their name in the 80s) Coachella Valley Arabs
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 22:45 |
|
I'm convinced the leaders of Red Guards are cointelpro
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 22:48 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 10:39 |
|
Dreddout posted:I'm convinced the leaders of Red Guards are cointelpro
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 23:28 |