Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Hodgepodge
Jan 29, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 204 days!

mandatory lesbian posted:

Jivjov I agree that the Disney star wars have been good but do you not see how disgustingly cynical this post is

When you consider that the same marketing department is backing the MCU, it becomes more like stating a factual observation.

Bonaventure posted:

Thanks for reinforcing my decision not to engage with anything in this thread.
I faltered for a moment.

Take a moment to find an online copy of A Modest Proposal and (re)read it. Satire presents itself completely straight-faced; a literal reading of the text would suggest that Swift genuinely thought that allowing the Irish to sell their infant children as a cannibalistic commodity would be a wonderful solution to poverty.

It's also still pretty relevant and funny.

Hodgepodge fucked around with this message at 21:05 on Sep 23, 2018

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Bonaventure
Jun 23, 2005

by sebmojo
The consistent misreading of that post I made would be enough to make me worried that I am bad at getting across the intended meaning of my words, but thankfully with the Birth of the Reader, I can remain confident that I am not a poor writer and instead you are all poor readers.

Waffles Inc.
Jan 20, 2005

Bonaventure posted:

The consistent misreading of that post I made would be enough to make me worried that I am bad at getting across the intended meaning of my words, but thankfully with the Birth of the Reader, I can remain confident that I am not a poor writer and instead you are all poor readers.

you went to your fainting couch when I suggested that satire comes from the reader; what did we misunderstand?

Bonaventure
Jun 23, 2005

by sebmojo

Waffles Inc. posted:

you went to your fainting couch when I suggested that satire comes from the reader; what did we misunderstand?

I asked SMG an honest question about his approach to theory out of sincere curiosity and here comes his hangers-on to fuckin' own me about being "illiterate," wowza! who could've seen it coming?
Like, look at the way people are responding to Cnut's posts, "throw your computer out in despair" and whatnot. This thread is toxic.

Since I was genuinely curious about SMG's ideas about satire I'm sticking around for his answer but don't worry I'll be gone after that and you can go back to posting "actually OP" at jivjov.

SuperMechagodzilla
Jun 9, 2007

NEWT REBORN

Bonaventure posted:

Did you mean for The Lord of The Swastika to be considered as a discrete work divorced from the satirical framing of The Iron Dream, or do you mean that The Iron Dream is itself a work that promotes fascism?

No.

RBA Starblade
Apr 28, 2008

Going Home.

Games Idiot Court Jester


I think what the author meant here is "yes".

Waffles Inc.
Jan 20, 2005

Bonaventure posted:

Since I was genuinely curious about SMG's ideas about satire I'm sticking around for his answer but don't worry I'll be gone after that and you can go back to posting "actually OP" at jivjov.

your sanctimonious martyr act is incredibly bizarre

Crespolini
Mar 9, 2014

Bonaventure posted:

Since I was genuinely curious about SMG's ideas about satire I'm sticking around for his answer but don't worry I'll be gone after that and you can go back to posting "actually OP" at jivjov.

I don't believe you.

Bongo Bill
Jan 17, 2012


No as in neither, no to the first, or no to the second?

porfiria
Dec 10, 2008

by Modern Video Games

Bongo Bill posted:

No as in neither, no to the first, or no to the second?

No.

Bongo Bill
Jan 17, 2012


Or, I guess, a fourth option would be No as in a refusal to answer.

porfiria
Dec 10, 2008

by Modern Video Games
I love people getting hot under the collar over Star Wars. It certainly beats the awful Week of Canon.

Wheat Loaf
Feb 13, 2012

by FactsAreUseless

Bongo Bill posted:

Or, I guess, a fourth option would be No as in a refusal to answer.

The story group could probably tell you which one is canon.

CelticPredator
Oct 11, 2013
🍀👽🆚🪖🏋

porfiria posted:

I love people getting hot under the collar over Star Wars. It certainly beats the awful Week of Canon.

That was fun.

This is trash and needs to die painfully.



Like Star Wars

SuperMechagodzilla
Jun 9, 2007

NEWT REBORN

Bongo Bill posted:

No as in neither, no to the first, or no to the second?

Yes.

Bongo Bill
Jan 17, 2012

Will you please help me better understand what your post about "The Lord of the Swastika" means in regard to "The Iron Dream"?

SolarFire2
Oct 16, 2001

"You're awefully cute, but unfortunately for you, you're made of meat." - Meat And Sarcasm Guy!
It boggles my mind that someone can look at the whole Casino Planet arc and say, "Yes, that was well written, well acted, and well executed."

Milkfred E. Moore
Aug 27, 2006

'It's easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism.'
I don't know if it's been mentioned in this thread, but I saw a video talking about RotS last night that pointed out that Anakin's heartbeat stops for something like twelve seconds during the suiting sequence. I never noticed that!

edit: Here. It also has an interesting take on Padme losing the will to live bit.

CelticPredator
Oct 11, 2013
🍀👽🆚🪖🏋

SolarFire2 posted:

It boggles my mind that someone can look at the whole Casino Planet arc and say, "Yes, that was well written, well acted, and well executed."

I just know it makes people like you mad, and regardless this is good.

I Before E
Jul 2, 2012

SolarFire2 posted:

It boggles my mind that someone can look at the whole Casino Planet arc and say, "Yes, that was well written, well acted, and well executed."

What do you dislike about it?

Irony Be My Shield
Jul 29, 2012

I thought it was good. It did some of the legwork explaining the cause and nature of the conflict with the First Order that TFA failed to do.

sponges
Sep 15, 2011

SolarFire2 posted:

It boggles my mind that someone can look at the whole Casino Planet arc and say, "Yes, that was well written, well acted, and well executed."

It’s wretched of course but the whole movie is like that.

SolarFire2
Oct 16, 2001

"You're awefully cute, but unfortunately for you, you're made of meat." - Meat And Sarcasm Guy!

I Before E posted:

What do you dislike about it?

They set design, the alien designs, the fact that the plot needs the characters to make foolish, illogical decisions to move the story forward.. It's just a mess.

Bleck
Jan 7, 2014

No matter how one loves, there are always different aims. Love can take a great many forms, whatever the era.

SolarFire2 posted:

the fact that the plot needs the characters to make foolish, illogical decisions to move the story forward

sounds like somebody's never watched a movie before

Mia Wasikowska
Oct 7, 2006

the casino planet could have had pod racing. what the gently caress man

Gonz
Dec 22, 2009

"Jesus, did I say that? Or just think it? Was I talking? Did they hear me?"

Zas posted:

the casino planet could have had pod racing. what the gently caress man

No way, those derpy alpacas were way better!

mandatory lesbian
Dec 18, 2012
The casino planet arc was good mostly because it was just reinforcing the point of the movie, which is that every character other then Rey is a failure

And I liked it

I Before E
Jul 2, 2012

SolarFire2 posted:

They set design, the alien designs, the fact that the plot needs the characters to make foolish, illogical decisions to move the story forward.. It's just a mess.

What did you dislike about the set and alien designs?

galagazombie
Oct 31, 2011

A silly little mouse!

I Before E posted:

What did you dislike about the set and alien designs?

I'm not him but I suspect we have similar complaint. The set is just plain uninspired, it's not a Star Wars casino, hell it's not even a space casino, it's just a casino. The complaint with the aliens is more general to the whole sequels trilogy but is still pertinent. Instead of using the scene to show creative designs or old favorites its yet more beige ballsacks.

brawleh
Feb 25, 2011

I figured out why the hippo did it.

Bonaventure posted:

The consistent misreading of that post I made would be enough to make me worried that I am bad at getting across the intended meaning of my words, but thankfully with the Birth of the Reader, I can remain confident that I am not a poor writer and instead you are all poor readers.

Cnut isn't having a problem with getting his point across. Cnut's reading is to render the plight of droids a ‘natural’ condition as part of the milue - to ‘detoxify’ slavery. Readily admitting that if he accepts the truth, that droids are people, it would rob him of the heroes emotionally triumphant arc.

Like the basic example of Obi-Wan’s “If droids could think” in light of what’s shown isn’t an inconsistency, it’s characterisation and a continuation from “why do I sense that we’ve picked up another pathetic life form.” This is where the satire from the prequels emerges, they’re critical of the old man reminiscing about a more civilised time, before the dark times, before the empire - giving this important characterisation a context.

Obi-Wan is absolutely a heroic figure from the prequels, he’s also a casually racist idiot, but the point of critique here isn’t trying to bring down Obi-Wan or whatever. It’s critical of his upbringing within the Jedi, their function within the Republic, the Republic itself and the attempts to restore it - the truth that runs through and informs all of this, giving it vital context, is the slavery of droids.

Winifred Madgers
Feb 12, 2002

I Before E posted:

What did you dislike about the set and alien designs?

I liked TLJ more or less, but the racing animals were admittedly really bad, like Barbie cartoon bad (and I have 6- and 3-year-old daughters, I've seen a lot of Barbie cartoons). A lot of the creatures in those movies have that same big-eyed, flat-snouted, overly-cute look.

SuperMechagodzilla
Jun 9, 2007

NEWT REBORN

Bongo Bill posted:

Will you please help me better understand what your post about "The Lord of the Swastika" means in regard to "The Iron Dream"?

The novel has a plurality of different meanings.

In one interpretation, we could fixate on intention. Hitler obviously has bad intentions, and Spinrad obviously has good intentions - right? So we have a safety valve: the evil author of the one text is countered by the good author, with good intentions, and we know how we are ‘supposed to’ react.

But things don’t work like that; this belief in the importance of intention already contradicts Spinrad’s stated intention: that he meant to satirize well-meaning but nonetheless thoughtlessly reactionary sci-fi authors. That’s to say Iron Dream is ‘supposed to be’ about normal people toying with “Iron Dreams”, not secret Hitlers. In that sense, the novel is already a failure.

And how exactly does Spinrad criticize fascism? Here you get to the obvious point that Alternate-Universe American Hitler doesn’t actually do anything evil, he just becomes a garden-variety nerd writer hawking merch to his fans - creating a ‘merchandising empire’ instead of trying to take over the world. There’s an obvious joke that a fan convention is a rather pathetic, impotent substitute for the Nuremberg rally. Isn’t it that, seemingly, art has given American Hitler an outlet? So then, what is actually the danger posed by Lord Of The Swastika? Do evil intentions in art cause people to do bad things - like the ‘Dominators’ do with their mind-control powers?

Note that Spinrad’s stated intention was NOT to satirize Joseph Campbell, but to satirize ‘degenerate’ versions of Campbell - writers (and fans) who lost sight of the deep “inner meaning” of Hero With A Thousand Faces. When authors aren’t Jungian enough, he asserts, “entropy and commercial pressure almost always pull the tale down.”

Here Spinrad misses the truth of Campbell, and of his own book: that the “deep inner meaning” of Campbell is this fascist kitsch - as George Lucas points out with A New Hope’s own uncomfortable Triumph Of The Will ending.

SuperMechagodzilla fucked around with this message at 17:05 on Sep 24, 2018

Bleck
Jan 7, 2014

No matter how one loves, there are always different aims. Love can take a great many forms, whatever the era.

galagazombie posted:

The set is just plain uninspired, it's not a Star Wars casino, hell it's not even a space casino, it's just a casino.

I was going to be incredulous that people were complaining that a star wars movie didn't have colourful, visually busy sets after listening to people complain about the prequels for twenty straight years but you know what that's actually just stupid enough to be real

Bongo Bill
Jan 17, 2012

SuperMechagodzilla posted:

The novel has a plurality of different meanings.

In one interpretation, we could fixate on intention. Hitler obviously has bad intentions, and Spinrad obviously has good intentions - right? So we have a safety valve: the evil author of the one text is countered by the good author, with good intentions, and we know how we are ‘supposed to’ react.

But things don’t work like that; this belief in the importance of intention already contradicts Spinrad’s stated intention: that he meant to satirize well-meaning but nonetheless thoughtlessly reactionary sci-fi authors. That’s to say Iron Dream is ‘supposed to be’ about normal people toying with “Iron Dreams”, not secret Hitlers. In that sense, the novel is already a failure.

And how exactly does Spinrad criticize fascism? Here you get to the obvious point that Alternate-Universe American Hitler doesn’t actually do anything evil, he just becomes a garden-variety nerd writer hawking merch to his fans - creating a ‘merchandising empire’ instead of trying to take over the world. There’s an obvious joke that a fan convention is a rather pathetic, impotent substitute for the Nuremberg rally. Isn’t it that, seemingly, art has given American Hitler an outlet? So then, what is actually the danger posed by Lord Of The Swastika? Do evil intentions in art cause people to do bad things - like the ‘Dominators’ do with their mind-control powers?

Note that Spinrad’s stated intention was NOT to satirize Joseph Campbell, but to satirize ‘degenerate’ versions of Campbell - writers (and fans) who lost sight of the deep “inner meaning” of Hero With A Thousand Faces. When authors aren’t Jungian enough, he asserts, “entropy and commercial pressure almost always pull the tale down.”

Here Spinrad misses the truth of Campbell, and of his own book: that the “deep inner meaning” of Campbell is this fascist kitsch - as George Lucas points out with A New Hope’s own uncomfortable Triumph Of The Will ending.

Ah, I see. Thanks.

The idea of fascism coopting whatever ideas are useful to it tracks with Spinrad's reading.

Almost Blue
Apr 18, 2018
Gary Kurtz died at age 78.

quote:

In a statement, his family said he died of cancer and would be "hugely missed".

Kurtz worked with George Lucas on American Graffiti, the original Star Wars and its first sequel, The Empire Strikes Back. His other films included The Dark Crystal and Return to Oz.

Peter Mayhew - Chewbacca in Star Wars - remembered him as "a great filmmaker" who "touched the lives of millions".

https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-45632165

Hodgepodge
Jan 29, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 204 days!

SuperMechagodzilla posted:

The novel has a plurality of different meanings.

In one interpretation, we could fixate on intention. Hitler obviously has bad intentions, and Spinrad obviously has good intentions - right? So we have a safety valve: the evil author of the one text is countered by the good author, with good intentions, and we know how we are ‘supposed to’ react.

But things don’t work like that; this belief in the importance of intention already contradicts Spinrad’s stated intention: that he meant to satirize well-meaning but nonetheless thoughtlessly reactionary sci-fi authors. That’s to say Iron Dream is ‘supposed to be’ about normal people toying with “Iron Dreams”, not secret Hitlers. In that sense, the novel is already a failure.

And how exactly does Spinrad criticize fascism? Here you get to the obvious point that Alternate-Universe American Hitler doesn’t actually do anything evil, he just becomes a garden-variety nerd writer hawking merch to his fans - creating a ‘merchandising empire’ instead of trying to take over the world. There’s an obvious joke that a fan convention is a rather pathetic, impotent substitute for the Nuremberg rally. Isn’t it that, seemingly, art has given American Hitler an outlet? So then, what is actually the danger posed by Lord Of The Swastika? Do evil intentions in art cause people to do bad things - like the ‘Dominators’ do with their mind-control powers?

Note that Spinrad’s stated intention was NOT to satirize Joseph Campbell, but to satirize ‘degenerate’ versions of Campbell - writers (and fans) who lost sight of the deep “inner meaning” of Hero With A Thousand Faces. When authors aren’t Jungian enough, he asserts, “entropy and commercial pressure almost always pull the tale down.”

Here Spinrad misses the truth of Campbell, and of his own book: that the “deep inner meaning” of Campbell is this fascist kitsch - as George Lucas points out with A New Hope’s own uncomfortable Triumph Of The Will ending.

I would go so far as to say that the only good Campbellian fiction is that which satirizes or deconstructs the hero's journey in some fashion. Frank Herbert's preface to Dune Messiah basically explains that this is necessary, with some amount of bitterness towards people who don't want to see that happen.

Ingmar terdman
Jul 24, 2006

Gary Kurtz died, seemed like a cool guy

AndyElusive
Jan 7, 2007

Zas posted:

the casino planet could have had pod racing. what the gently caress man

Another call back for fans to harp on about? Ya that would have gone over really well.

SuperMechagodzilla
Jun 9, 2007

NEWT REBORN

Bongo Bill posted:

Ah, I see. Thanks.

The idea of fascism coopting whatever ideas are useful to it tracks with Spinrad's reading.

But the rub is that the novel is not about fascism co-opting Campbell; Alt-Universe Hitler is an American writer who’s lived in the US for over three decades. This German fellow has been assimilated into American (multi-)culture, and his story of fascism is being coopted by the publishing industry and sold to presumably-centrist nerds.

Moreover, American Hitler is writing in an alternate universe where, without WWII or a Cold War, Stalinist Russia has overtaken all of Eurasia and is conducting purges of Jews and other ‘class enemies’. So, can The Lord Of The Swastika not be read as a diegetic satire of Stalinism, combined with self-criticism given the autobiographical details? Wouldn’t American Hitler, a German immigrant, see himself as part of the mutant multiculture under threat by totalitarianism?

The end of Lord Of The Swastika suspiciously parallels the end of WWII, with a bombing of the enemy’s Dresden, and the final “Dominator” leader effectively commiting suicide after being cornered in a bunker - except his dying act is to enact Magneto’s plot from X-Men 1. The meaning of the text is not unambiguous at all.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Bongo Bill
Jan 17, 2012

AndyElusive posted:

Another call back for fans to harp on about? Ya that would have gone over really well.

No movie has ever been made worse by having a chariot race in it.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply