|
Shame Boy posted:I think they're making a funy joek post about how Americans don't understand how the demographic transition works, because surely nobody's that stupid on these forums right? I remember in middle school when kids learned about overpopulation and decided we should nuke half the planet, you know, for the greater good. A tough moral decision, for sure. (For the one in the country with the nukes)
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 16:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 12, 2024 04:18 |
|
|
Bombadilillo posted:I remember in middle school when kids learned about overpopulation and decided we should nuke half the planet, you know, for the greater good. This is where I post the month old Thanos memes right?
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 16:35
|
|
|
just nuke everyone and let bacteria take over againSplitSoul posted:Given how comparatively cheap it would be to eradicate hunger, poverty and illiteracy world-wide, and how rich people generally generate and (don't) spend their wealth, they should absolutely have it expropriated for the good of mankind. expropriate their kidneys too
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 16:45
|
|
|
qkkl posted:It may be cheap now to eradicate hunger, but what about when the world population is 20 billion? 50 billion? At some point it will stop being cheap to eradicate hunger, and you'll be stuck with 25 billion hungry people instead of 3 billion. So you traded 3 billion people being hungry forever for a few generations of a hunger-free world, followed by 25 billion people being hungry forever. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 16:46
|
|
|
qkkl posted:It may be cheap now to eradicate hunger, but what about when the world population is 20 billion? 50 billion? At some point it will stop being cheap to eradicate hunger, and you'll be stuck with 25 billion hungry people instead of 3 billion. So you traded 3 billion people being hungry forever for a few generations of a hunger-free world, followed by 25 billion people being hungry forever. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsBT5EQt348
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 16:59
|
|
|
Friedrich Engels posted:The implications of this line of thought are that since it is precisely the poor who are the surplus, nothing should be done for them except to make their dying of starvation as easy as possible, and to convince them that it cannot be helped and that there is no other salvation for their whole class than keeping propagation down to the absolute minimum. Or if this proves impossible, then it is after all better to establish a state institution for the painless killing of the children of the poor, such as “Marcus” has suggested, whereby each working-class family would be allowed to have two and a half children, any excess being painlessly killed. Charity is to be considered a crime, since it supports the augmentation of the surplus population. Indeed, it will be very advantageous to declare poverty a crime and to turn poor-houses into prisons, as has already happened in England as a result of the new “liberal” Poor Law. Admittedly it is true that this theory ill conforms with the Bible’s doctrine of the perfection of God and of His creation; but “it is a poor refutation to enlist the Bible against facts.”
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 17:00
|
|
|
qkkl posted:It may be cheap now to eradicate hunger, but what about when the world population is 20 billion? 50 billion? At some point it will stop being cheap to eradicate hunger, and you'll be stuck with 25 billion hungry people instead of 3 billion. So you traded 3 billion people being hungry forever for a few generations of a hunger-free world, followed by 25 billion people being hungry forever. We have a 99% effective method of bc that requires only mineralogical copper and has been known since Egypt at the very latest so hbygfy?
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 17:55
|
|
|
Shame Boy posted:I think they're making a funy joek post about how Americans don't understand how the demographic transition works, because surely nobody's that stupid on these forums right? thats their gimmick
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 18:08
|
|
|
I like the implication that available food supply is the primary motivator for reproduction in the modern age. Just pump a bunch of food into cities and the population will be out of control in no time, just like in realistic economics simulator Sid Mier's Civilization!
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 18:15
|
|
|
https://youtu.be/lMbvtmb79N0 Seems relevant. Also the rest of his stuff is pretty explicitly anti-capitalist
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 18:26
|
|
|
qkkl posted:It may be cheap now to eradicate hunger, but what about when the world population is 20 billion? 50 billion? At some point it will stop being cheap to eradicate hunger, and you'll be stuck with 25 billion hungry people instead of 3 billion. So you traded 3 billion people being hungry forever for a few generations of a hunger-free world, followed by 25 billion people being hungry forever. You loving idiot You rear end in a top hat
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 18:32
|
|
|
We should have more sympathy for this man. Capitalist brain-worms are no laughing matter, and drive millions to commit terrible acts against themselves and others every day. We must extract these parasites from his head using the latest in medical technology.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 19:19
|
|
|
There won't be enough water for the amount of people who are on it now within a decade or two, thanks to capitalism.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 20:34
|
|
|
qkkl posted:It may be cheap now to eradicate hunger, but what about when the world population is 20 billion? 50 billion? At some point it will stop being cheap to eradicate hunger, and you'll be stuck with 25 billion hungry people instead of 3 billion. So you traded 3 billion people being hungry forever for a few generations of a hunger-free world, followed by 25 billion people being hungry forever. Please gently caress off and stop posting.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 20:39
|
|
|
qkkl posted:It may be cheap now to eradicate hunger, but what about when the world population is 20 billion? 50 billion? At some point it will stop being cheap to eradicate hunger, and you'll be stuck with 25 billion hungry people instead of 3 billion. So you traded 3 billion people being hungry forever for a few generations of a hunger-free world, followed by 25 billion people being hungry forever. the mind gem is on the forehead of vision, fyi. they have a plan to break it with the scarlet witch's powers
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 20:40
|
|
|
qkkl posted:It may be cheap now to eradicate hunger, but what about when the world population is 20 billion? 50 billion? At some point it will stop being cheap to eradicate hunger, and you'll be stuck with 25 billion hungry people instead of 3 billion. So you traded 3 billion people being hungry forever for a few generations of a hunger-free world, followed by 25 billion people being hungry forever. food goes up -> population goes up population goes up -> food goes down food goes down -> population goes down population goes down -> food goes up etc... chaos theory is fuckin sweet, also I goddamn love the logistic map but I'm also really lazy so here's someone else explaining it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETrYE4MdoLQ
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 20:43
|
|
|
"If you feed those irresponsible durka durkas they will just churn out more mouths to feed" -A very wise Capitalist
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 20:47
|
|
|
qkkl posted:It may be cheap now to eradicate hunger, but what about when the world population is 20 billion? 50 billion? At some point it will stop being cheap to eradicate hunger, and you'll be stuck with 25 billion hungry people instead of 3 billion. So you traded 3 billion people being hungry forever for a few generations of a hunger-free world, followed by 25 billion people being hungry forever. It's called the one child policy hth
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 20:48
|
|
|
qkkl posted:It may be cheap now to eradicate hunger, but what about when the world population is 20 billion? 50 billion? At some point it will stop being cheap to eradicate hunger, and you'll be stuck with 25 billion hungry people instead of 3 billion. So you traded 3 billion people being hungry forever for a few generations of a hunger-free world, followed by 25 billion people being hungry forever. Malthus is an idiot and so are you.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 20:52
|
|
|
Bodyholes posted:"If you feed those irresponsible durka durkas they will just churn out more mouths to feed" There we go
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 20:54
|
|
|
Dead Beef posted:I'm a math nerd so this makes me want to talk about population, the logistic map and chaos numeric soln to logistic map is easier than you would think
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 21:02
|
|
|
Shame Boy posted:I think they're making a funy joek post about how Americans don't understand how the demographic transition works, because surely nobody's that stupid on these forums right? PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF gently caress STOP ASSUMING EVERY IDIOT IS BEING IRONIC/FUNNY He's just a loving moron, he's been a loving moron with every post he makes, it's not irony, it's not "funny", you're defending an idiot because everyone's loving irony meter is broken
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 21:39
|
|
|
qkkl posted:It may be cheap now to eradicate hunger, but what about when the world population is 20 billion? 50 billion? At some point it will stop being cheap to eradicate hunger, and you'll be stuck with 25 billion hungry people instead of 3 billion. So you traded 3 billion people being hungry forever for a few generations of a hunger-free world, followed by 25 billion people being hungry forever. Education and some reproductive rights pretty much end any concerns for overpopulation. Like, it's not even funny, give women a choice and heaps of them won't have a huge family.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 21:56
|
|
|
qkkl posted:It may be cheap now to eradicate hunger, but what about when the world population is 20 billion? 50 billion? At some point it will stop being cheap to eradicate hunger, and you'll be stuck with 25 billion hungry people instead of 3 billion. So you traded 3 billion people being hungry forever for a few generations of a hunger-free world, followed by 25 billion people being hungry forever. Thanos is retarded fyi
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 22:00
|
|
|
Siljmonster posted:Thanos is retarded fyi And a racist, if Ryan Reynolds is to be believed
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 22:11
|
|
|
Lol we're already overpopulated, Bosch-haber process is cheathax and we need to reforest an area the size of Australia this century.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 22:27
|
|
|
Obviously reductions start from the top down though
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 22:28
|
|
|
Car Hater posted:Obviously reductions start from the top down though or maybe don't have to murder a lot of people and we adjust our lifestyles to not be the horrendous first world bourgeois ecocide E: we guillotine the wealthy for justice, not Malthus
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 22:37
|
|
|
Marxist-Jezzinist posted:or maybe don't have to murder a lot of people and we adjust our lifestyles to not be the horrendous first world bourgeois ecocide speak for your own lifestyle lmao
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 22:54
|
|
|
Marxist-Jezzinist posted:or maybe don't have to murder a lot of people and we adjust our lifestyles to not be the horrendous first world bourgeois ecocide I support UN deathsquads sweeping through the USA
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 22:55
|
|
|
Marxist-Jezzinist posted:or maybe don't have to murder a lot of people and we adjust our lifestyles to not be the horrendous first world bourgeois ecocide On the other hand, all of recorded history
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 22:56
|
|
|
Genocide the bougioise and enslave the petty bougioise imo
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 22:57
|
|
|
Yeah it's a loving bummer but the rich will never give up their poo poo voluntarily at this point
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 23:00
|
|
|
Moridin920 posted:There we go and hilary is comparing herself to Chirchill this week...
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 23:25
|
|
|
qkkl posted:It may be cheap now to eradicate hunger, but what about when the world population is 20 billion? 50 billion? At some point it will stop being cheap to eradicate hunger, and you'll be stuck with 25 billion hungry people instead of 3 billion. So you traded 3 billion people being hungry forever for a few generations of a hunger-free world, followed by 25 billion people being hungry forever. Development cures growth, not harsh conditions. Harsh conditions drive high growth. And we can develop much more cleanly today than we used to.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 23:47
|
|
|
Marxalot posted:speak for your own lifestyle lmao okay perfect guy *pats u on the head*
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2018 00:11
|
|
|
Taintrunner posted:Yeah it's a loving bummer but the rich will never give up their poo poo voluntarily at this point has anybody ever thought of that before? maybe the workers of the world should, like, become unified
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2018 00:39
|
|
|
Dead Beef posted:imagine if all the workers of the world decided to stop working until poo poo got changed Great, we just need someone to lead them. I volunteer for this difficult job. Naturally I should get paid more for the struggles I shall endure...
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2018 02:17
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HT02HeGUMKg
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2018 02:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 12, 2024 04:18 |
|
|
Jesus, the way that first machine just sprays crab guts everywhere
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2018 03:00
|
|
