|
Stay safe, OSHA ghost  
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 09:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 20:37 |
|
|
I honestly want Seattle to be the worlds number one destination for tiny cannon, tiny cannon balls, and tiny wooden forts or sailing ships.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 09:27
|
|
|
RandomPauI posted:I honestly want Seattle to be the worlds number one destination for tiny cannon, tiny cannon balls, and tiny wooden forts or sailing ships.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 09:35
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2Aq-gm3An0&t=23s
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 10:34
|
|
|
OooooooOoooooOOooo an operator is not required to hang a lock if they are in direct control of the isolation device, per our policy. I consider that reasonable, and it's been an element of every policy I've worked under. Any policy which permits working in live cabinets would have allowed me to energize myself, in any case. Those seven deaths were nationwide, as far as I know. Foundry work is a risky field, and presents more opportunities than usual for severe injury. My incident is absolutely due to inattention and complacency, and would have been prevented by deenergizing the panel while I worked in it. I was not injured, but any exposure to 480 is a death narrowly avoided.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 11:16
|
|
|
I'm all for reasonable tag out and individual source control because locking everything always can be enough of a burden to cause people to skirt LOTO anyway. But I can't fathom a modern safety policy where that applies for an operator sticking their mitt into an electrical cabinet.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 12:51
|
|
|
My control company had someone get killed this year so now their new policy is to never work in enclosures with live voltage above 24 or 48 or something. I don't know how that's going to work because how the hell do you troubleshoot anything if you can't even put a meter on relays, etc? Everything except their main panel has 120/208 in it here, even just basic VAVs. In practice, the techs are ignoring the rule so they can do their work and maybe just having site staff like me unhook stuff if necessary.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 12:59
|
|
|
glynnenstein posted:My control company had someone get killed this year so now their new policy is to never work in enclosures with live voltage above 24 or 48 or something. I don't know how that's going to work because how the hell do you troubleshoot anything if you can't even put a meter on relays, etc? Everything except their main panel has 120/208 in it here, even just basic VAVs. In practice, the techs are ignoring the rule so they can do their work and maybe just having site staff like me unhook stuff if necessary.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 13:31
|
|
|
Ball mill?
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 15:36
|
|
|
Groda posted:Ball mill? Balls of steel. Balls of steel. Balls balls balls balls balls balls balls balls balls
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 16:02
|
|
|
ArcMage posted:Balls of steel. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 16:18
|
|
|
Do we really transport large steel balls by *squints* wrapping them in a tarp poorly
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 16:47
|
|
|
RandomPauI posted:I honestly want Seattle to be the worlds number one destination for tiny cannon, tiny cannon balls, and tiny wooden forts or sailing ships. https://www.instructables.com/id/How-to-Build-and-Arm-a-Scale-Model-Battleship-From-1/
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 16:52
|
|
|
suuma posted:Do we really transport large steel balls by *squints* wrapping them in a tarp poorly It looks like we transport them by wrapping them well and properly securing them inside the truck, and that neither of those things was done here.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 16:57
|
|
|
This seems perfectly safe. https://i.imgur.com/WH7Yc8h.mp4
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 17:06
|
|
|
RandomPauI posted:I honestly want Seattle to be the worlds number one destination for tiny cannon, tiny cannon balls, and tiny wooden forts or sailing ships. I would say to check Archie McPhee but I don't think that's kooky enough for them.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 17:11
|
|
|
ROLL THE BALLS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUL8BwkOS0Y&t=148s
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 17:33
|
|
|
Megillah Gorilla posted:This seems perfectly safe. I do code compliance and the most egregious safety violation I’ve come across was just about like this. Two roller device pulling a sheet through, no spikes but constantly rolling and with high heat in the rollers. No safety covers. No foot actuators, no deadman. Workers had loose fitting garments. Emergency off was six feet away behind a plastic cover.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 18:37
|
|
|
It's not even doing that great of a job
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 18:39
|
|
|
Relatively speaking I mean. I had a coconut like that once and it took me a half hour with kitchen tools before I gave up and used an electric drill.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 18:40
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNGpyK9L_6I
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 18:47
|
|
|
smh if you dont eat the peel
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 18:47
|
|
|
Yeah but I didn't have access to a pointy stick All I had was all of modern technology
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 18:56
|
|
|
glynnenstein posted:My control company had someone get killed this year so now their new policy is to never work in enclosures with live voltage above 24 or 48 or something. I don't know how that's going to work because how the hell do you troubleshoot anything if you can't even put a meter on relays, etc? Everything except their main panel has 120/208 in it here, even just basic VAVs. In practice, the techs are ignoring the rule so they can do their work and maybe just having site staff like me unhook stuff if necessary. There’s ways to work in a live panel but it means getting dressed up in all sorts of poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 19:02
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sUnbpRuq4o
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 19:04
|
|
|
Ron Jeremy posted:I do code compliance and the most egregious safety violation I’ve come across was just about like this. Two roller device pulling a sheet through, no spikes but constantly rolling and with high heat in the rollers. No safety covers. No foot actuators, no deadman. Workers had loose fitting garments. Emergency off was six feet away behind a plastic cover. I got my hand caught in a machine pretty much the same as you describe. It sure is a trip having to tell a coworker how to stop the machine and get your arm out while it's slowly pulling you in. Helped improve safety standards factory wide though when the investigation was done on the plus side!
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 19:31
|
|
|
Vitamins posted:I got my hand caught in a machine pretty much the same as you describe. It sure is a trip having to tell a coworker how to stop the machine and get your arm out while it's slowly pulling you in. Helped improve safety standards factory wide though when the investigation was done on the plus side! Was the code to the machine LARA? Chrono Trigger joke
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 20:48
|
|
|
My 480 experience was this: we had a machine which had two adjacent control panels, one for motion control, one for combustion control. At times we would lock out the combustion panel while leaving the motion panel operating. This was perfectly safe in every way. The two panels were completely isolated..... until Dick (not real name, whatever) came along that is. Dick needed to replace a fuse holder in the motion panel but the new one did not fit where the old one was and there was nowhere else to put it. So Dick ran a piece of flexible conduit out the bottom of the panel, across to the other panel and mounted the fuse holder there. So I lock out the panel, sit down on a bucket and go to work, all the while not knowing that Dick's handiwork was just biding it's time waiting to bite me. And bite me it did, I just happened to contact the fuse holder with my elbow at the same time my hand was on the uninsulated shaft of my screwdriver. In hindsight I probably should have gone to get checked out but whoo but that will at the very least make you take a time out to reevaluate your life. Tldr: gently caress Dick
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 21:55
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 22:19
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 22:35
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 23:03
|
|
|
It's going to be a bridge some day anyways 
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 23:09
|
|
|
Megillah Gorilla posted:This seems perfectly safe. The watch is a good idea but the lack of long unbuttoned sleeves and gloves, is a problem. Also, I notice that the drive belt is covered. We always want to make sure that belts are exposed. How else do you take all your skin off in a hurry.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 23:50
|
|
|
What is that machine even DOING? Is it meant to be taking the skin off? He throws the skinless part away. It's mulching quite a lot the inner bit. Is it meant to be grinding the insides? It doesn't do that either as he throws the skinless part away What does this machine doooooooooo
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 00:03
|
|
|
D1Sergo posted:Was the code to the machine LARA? Oh the feels when you visit her and she gets up to walk around 
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 00:07
|
|
|
Ron Jeremy posted:I do code compliance and the most egregious safety violation I’ve come across was just about like this. Two roller device pulling a sheet through, no spikes but constantly rolling and with high heat in the rollers. No safety covers. No foot actuators, no deadman. Workers had loose fitting garments. Emergency off was six feet away behind a plastic cover. something like this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouRmXp9l_WE
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 00:07
|
|
|
Ak Gara posted:What is that machine even DOING? He's just throwing the inner shell /meats stuff to the side. that machine does exactly what it's doing, removing the bulky outer husk from the more easily transportable edible bits.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 00:11
|
|
|
Ak Gara posted:What is that machine even DOING? It's a coconut. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 00:32
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 00:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 20:37 |
|
|
https://i.imgur.com/nutswzc.mp4
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 00:47
|
|
